Exploiting Global R&D Collaboration toward the Advanced Internet - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1

SAINT2005

Exploiting Global R&D Collaboration toward the Advanced Internet Applications

February 2nd, 2005

Tomonori Aoyama The University of Tokyo

2

CONTENTS

• Overview of expanding broadband services in Japan
• Requirements for advanced network testbeds
• Applications of large volume of contents
• Research on ubiquitous networking and photonic

networking

• Example of R&D collaboration using advanced

network testbeds

3

Broadband service users in Japan

• World largest FTTH Infrastructure -

2001 Users (thousand) ADSL FTTH 100 10,000 CATV 1,000 10 2M today 12.3M 2.7M 2002 2003 2004 2005 ADSL FTTH CATV User increment / month (Fiscal year) FTTH: 7.7M ADSL: 7.0M CATV: 4.3M Estimated by e-Japan Strategy Committee

• f MIC in 2001

4

Evolution of Cellular Phone in Japan

Excerpt from report from Study Group on Next Generation IP-based Info-communications Infrastructure set up by MPHPT

Transition from 2G to 3G has been smoothly performed

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 (million shipment) 3G Camera phone Browser phone 31.5 41.5 51.1 60.9 69.1 75.7 81.5 34.6 51.9 62.5 69.7 3.1 22.1 47.9 7.2 16.7

5

New feature of mobile phone

“Mobile Wallet” Fingerprint Sensor Pedometer Various function have been implemented in mobile phones

User Automatic report

• f measurement

Family

6

Ubiquitous Network (u-Japan)

• Connection - Communication - Creation

MIC Communication News http://www.soumu.go.jp/joho_tsusin/eng/Releases/NewsLetter/Vol14/Vol14_23/Vol14_23.html

7

Integration of the real and virtual world

Real world Virtual world

Data Service Service Data

Sensor network RFID Context-aware service

• A ubiquitous information society is a new environment that

integrates the real world with a virtual world

8

Security

IT Evolution

Ubiq Ubiquito tous Expansion of Varie Expansion of Variety Bro Broadband dband Expansion of BW Expansion of BW IPv6 Expansion of Address

Digital Camera Keitai with Camera Digital TV Digital Cinema RFI D Tag Sensor Robot Consumer Electronics

9

Importance of global R&D collaboration over connected network test beds in the world

・ Difficulty to obtain required R&D recourses by one organization and even

• ne country
• EX. ＳＣ

ＳＣ, Mass Storage, Microscope, Telescope, etc. ・ Success in the industry relies strongly on how to utilize available resources distributed globally. ・ High-tech R&D tools have been driving the technological innovation which will spread out among general users later on.

• Ex. Internet, WWW, etc.

It is more and more important to facilitate advanced network and computer test beds to transport huge capacity of data and contents

• n a global basis.

10

Technologies for C drive the innovations

DSL GigE LAN

C A B A -> Need full Internet routing B -> Need VPN services on/and full Internet routing C -> Need very fat pipes, limited multiple Virtual Organizations Source: Cees de Laat, UvA

Number of users Bandwidth consumed

11

Requirements for Advanced Network Testbeds for R&D Collaboration

• Handling capability of huge volume of contents
• Customer controlled capability
• Capability to test ubiquitous computing and

networking environments

• Photonic network infrastructures to provide

lambda handling capability

12

Rich Contents over Networks

K M G

Access [page/day]

K M G T P

Yahoo 300Mpage/ day I nternetTV 11Mpage/ day

Web base

Capacity

SDTV

DVD = 5GB Web = 10kB/ pag e MP3= 10MB/ 曲 Digital Cinema = 300GB

Contents Rich contents distribution

HDTV Cinema

B2C B2B

[bit]

Sensor Network S2M P2P Targe Target

13

Rich Contents Application - 1 Scientific Visualization

14

Ultra-Resolution Displays Utilize Photonic Multicasting --Scaling to 100 Million Pixels Glimmerglass Switch Used to Multicast and Direct TeraVision Stream from One Tile to Another on the Geowall-2 Driven by Linux Graphic s Clusters

Source: Tom DeFanti

15

OptIPuter 100 MegaPixel Displays

55-Panel Display 100 Megapixels 30 x 10GE interfaces 1/3 Tera bit/sec Driven by 30 unit Cluster of 64 bit Dual Opterons 60 TB Disk Linked to OptIPuter Working with NASA ARC Hyperwall Team to Unify Software Source: Jason Leigh, Tom DeFanti, EVL@UIC

16

Extend Current Collaboration Between UCSD and Osaka Univ. Using Real-Time Instrument Steering and HDTV Monitoring

Southern California OptIPuter

Most Powerful Electron Microscope in the World -- Osaka, Japan Source: Mark Ellisman, UCSD

17

Major Collaboration Opportunity Emerging Between U.S. and Japan www.eri.u-tokyo.ac.jp/KOHO/Yoran2003/sec6-6-eng.htm

• Japan Has Historically Been a

Pioneer in Cabled Ocean Observatories

• New Challenge:

– How to Link to Cyber- infrastructure? – Ocean-Side Control

• Instrument
• Infrastructure

– Shore-Side

• Data Management
• Simulation
• Visualization

18

Rich Contents Application - 2 Show Biz Contents Cinema Musical Opera Concert Sports

19

３５ｍｍ ３５ｍｍ Film

Cinema（４Ｐ） （４Ｐ） Photograph（８Ｐ） （８Ｐ）

Digital Cinema Standard must be established.

20

Picture size of digital cinema

SD = 30~40Mpixels/frame 2K: HD=SD x 5 ～ 6 200Mpixels/frame 4K: SHD=HD x 4 800Mpixels/frame

DDCJ has been proposing 4K

21

Viewing Distances in a Theatre

HDTV HDTV SDTV SDTV 4k 4k Source: Chris Cookson Warner Brothers

Conventional Cinema Theatre

22

Viewing Distances in a Theatre

HDTV HDTV SDTV SDTV 4k 4k Source: Chris Cookson Warner Brothers

Current Cinema Theatre

23

World First 4K Digital Cinema Prototype System

Vertical scan lines 2000 Lines Horizontal pixels 4000 Pixels（４ （４K) Source: ＮＴＴ ＮＴＴ Labs. D-ILA 4K Projector JPEG2000 Real Time Decoder

24

Digital Cinema Distribution Trial

SHD Decoder 8M pixel SHD LCD Projector 35mm Film Scanner SHD Video Server JPEG/JPEG2000 Compression IP on GbE Raw Image GbE-Router GbE-Router Compressed Video(15:1) IP Network Distribution 3840x 2048 pixel 96 Hz Refresh 24 fps (200M pixel/sec) Realtime Decompression Video Stream 300~400Mbps Total 500GB 15 min. Movie 4.5 Gbps Digitral Video Theater 1 h 41 min = 180 GB

25

Comparison among three display devices Comparison among three display devices Comparison among three display devices Comparison among three display devices

Front Pr

• nt Proje
• jector

tor Front Pr

• nt Proje
• jector

tor Rea Rear Pr Projector

• jector

Rea Rear Pr Projector

• jector

ＤＬＰ ＤＬＰ

（Refl flect ectio ion n ）

ＤＬＰ ＤＬＰ

（Refl flect ectio ion n ）

D-ILA Dev D-ILA Device ce

（Refl flect ectio ion）

D-ILA Dev D-ILA Device ce

（Refl flect ectio ion）

ＴＦ ＴＦＴ Dev Device ce

（Pa Pass throug ss through）

ＴＦ ＴＦＴ Dev Device ce

（Pa Pass throug ss through）

LSI LSI LSI LSI

Gla Glass

LC LCD LC LCD

What is What is Ｄ-ＩＬＡ ＩＬＡ ?

( ( Direc rect-drive

• drive I

Image age Ligh Light t Amp Amplifier ifier ) ) ( ( Direc rect-drive

• drive I

Image age Ligh Light t Amp Amplifier ifier ) )

We suppor We support We suppor We support Technolog echnology Technolog echnology

Application

26

SIGGRAPH2001 Demonstration SIGGRAPH2001 Demonstration August 2001 , Los Angeles August 2001 , Los Angeles First demonstration of 4k D-Cinema in US First demonstration of 4k D-Cinema in US

27

Example Example of the

• f the eva

evalua uation test in Paramou tion test in Paramount t Studio Studio 600 inc 00 inch (16m (16m wide) sc wide) scree reen – Side Side by side com by side comparison arison be between tween film ilm proje projector an tor and digita d digital proj l projector ector – High gh qua qualit lity film vs y film vs dig digita tal cin l cinema ma

World first demonstration and evaluation test

• f 4K digital cinema prototype system in

Hollywood (Paramount Studio)

Film Projector ４Ｋ ４Ｋ Digital Projector Analog digital

28

NTT Server

USC Zemeckis Center

• ne wilshire

Chicago Chicago

Indianapolis Indianapolis Kansas City Kansas City

UIC / EVL

Sunnyvale Sunnyvale Los Angeles Los Angeles

300 Mb/s 300 Mb/s tr transmiss ansmission over 3000 km IP networ

• n over 3000 km IP network from Chica

k from Chicago to Los

• to Los

Angeles (RTT=59msec Angeles (RTT=59msec、mult lti TCP stream i TCP stream trans transfer)

IP Stream Transfer Experiment IP Stream Transfer Experiment

• ver Internet 2 Testbed
• ver Internet 2 Testbed from Chicago to LA

rom Chicago to LA

29

Demonstration for in Europe Demonstration for in Europe June and July, 2003 June and July, 2003

CineCitta in Rome National Film Theater In London

30

First in the world ！

Two 4K digital cinema projectors made by SONY and JVC projected 4K digital cinema side by side.

ＳＯＮＹ ＳＯＮＹ ＪＶＣ ＪＶＣ

Tokyo International Cinema Festival in 2004

31

Image of 4K digital cinema distribution

• ject

Ci City hall, hospit ty hall, hospital, al,・・・ ・・・

Cinem Cinema Theater Theater Cinema Data Center Cinema Data Center

School, hom School, home

Live of Live of Mus Musica cal Live of Live of sports sports Utilization of City hall (18,000) & Public hall (1,500) in Japan

Broadband Network

32

CineGrid Project

• Japan and USA-
• CineGrid is a new application of the OptIPuter to

develop a seamless Grid optimized for secure use of 4K digital images and/or stereo at HD or higher quality (files and streams)

– Networks – Computing – Storage – Visualization – Collaboration – Application tools and middleware

• Working with Hollywood directors, movie studios,

software and hardware companies

33

A Structure of Ubiquitous Networks A Structure of Ubiquitous Networks

移動体網 無線LAN 固定網

Ne Network twork Platform Platform

センシング センシング デバイス デバイス

Applia Appliances nces

ITS NW GW

IP a and d Ph Phot

• ton
• nic Ne

Netw twor

• rk

IP a and d Ph Phot

• ton
• nic Ne

Netw twor

• rk

チップNW チップNW 超小型チップ 超小型 超小型チップネット ットワーク

組織・団体 個人 企業

Use Users

コンテンツ市場 ンツ市場 電子商取引 電子商取引 コミ コミュニティ ティ ERP CRM

Applications Applications

アク アクチュ チュエータ

Netw Networ

• rk of Se
• f Sensor
• rs a

and RF d RF ID IDs Cont ntrol a l and Ma d Mana nagement Pla ment Platfor form

Certification an Certification and Agent Platform d Agent Platform

34

Demonstration Video

35

AML STONE Room

A test-bed for ubiquitous networking

36

• The proliferation of mobile computing devices allows

any user to fetch content and access services

• everywhere. On the other hand, the objective of

context-aware computing aims at personalized services based on the user’s situation, preference, etc.

• In our project, we seek a new content delivery

paradigm for mobile devices based on users’ preference, environmental and physiological states.

• We monitor users’ context with a set of off-the-shelf

worn sensors. The monitored context includes user’s location, environmental situation and physiological

• states. This information is then used to trigger a

notification to the user’s content as well as the content selection.

A Context Aw are Content Delivery System

Sensor Network Context Contents

37

COCO

• Utilization of Context Information -
• Inference of environment from multi-sensors
• Inference of user status from acceleration sensors

Bright Temp UV Humid

X: Y:

Environment User status Humidity Humidity Motion Alcohol Brightness UV Acceleration sensor GPS Sensor array

Physical interaction

38

Evolution scenario of photonic networks

p-to-p WDM transmission OADM ring NW

OADM : Otical Add/Drop Multiplexer OXC : Optical Cross-connect

Photonic packet switching NW OXC

Dynamic control

• f wavelength

Hour 〜 Day 〜 Year msec 〜 sec Packet / Burst Distributed control with Photonic MPLS NW (Stream data→Burst data) Centralized control With full-mesh NW using OXC

2001 2005 2010〜 Year

～数100Gb/s

1T～10Tb/s > 10Tb/s

/ Stream Min.

I P packets are mapped within wavelength labeled bit stream

Static wavelength

• peration

Bandwidth control using photonic labels Source: Photonic I nternet Forum

39

What is OBS ?

• Intermediate transmission granularity

– Low requirements for switch, high bandwidth efficiency

• Separation of transmission and control

– Offset time between control packet and data burst

• Out-of-band signaling

– Easy to process and realize

• One-way reservation protocol

– Reduce end-to-end latency

• Burst can cut-through switches instead of store and

forward

– Buffer is not necessary

40

OBS Switching time design target & application area

Data Volume Transmitted By 10-Gbit/s signal

10s 1s 100ms 10ms 1ms 100μs

1000s 1s 1ms

Photonic MPLS Router at Present

Signal length, τb Switching Time τsw (L=0, h=1) Next Generation DVD 30 GB DVD 5 GB CD 650 MB Super High Definition Still Image 12 MB

100µs

10km 100km 1ms 10ms 1000km 100ms 10,000km

Round trip delay Transmission Distance (L)

LAN Metro Nation wide/Global 1TB 1GB 1MB

η = 0.9

η = τ η = τb / (τ / (τb + τ + τsw )

η = 0.5 η = 0.99

200msec at present Target

Source: NTT Network Innovation Labs.

41

Fujitsu MEMS-SW Fujitsu MEMS-SW GSMP-IF NEL DC-SW Control Box NTT DC-SW NTT DC-SW NTT DC-SW Control Box

Experiment of OBS in the JGN II Test Bed

In the JGN II Open Laboratory in Keihanna, Japan ２５６ ＭＥＭＳ Ｓｗｉｔｃｈ （Fujitsu) Source: NTT and Fujitsu

42

Experiment of 3 nodes of OBS designed by AML (Aoyama- Morikawa Lab.)

Bursts on 4 wavelengths

43

Application-centered Reservation

• f Photonic Networks

Visualization EVL (Chicago)

Cluster

OC-192

PIN

Cluster

Calient Photonic Switch

Cluster Cluster

Calient Photonic Switch Glimmerglass Photonic Switch

Correlation / Filtering StarLight (Chicago) Data Access UvA (Amsterdam) Muxed & DeMuxed DWDM

PIN PIN PDC PPBAC PDC

Joe Mambretti (NU), Eric He, Oliver Yu (UIC), Cees de Laat (UvA)

44

Examples of Network Testbeds

45

What Has Changed Since Ten Years Ago?

• The Grid emerged for distributed computing

applications

• Lambdas available at reduced prices
• 1GE and 10GE switching/routing possible
• StarLight built for electronic and optical peering of

international networks

• Low cost alternatives to big routers installed
• StarLight partners formed GLIF
• GLIF building the LambdaGrid – lambda networks

becoming a Grid resource, just like computers, data stores and instruments

Source: Tom DeFnti

46

From iGrid 2000 at INET 2000…

July 18-21, 2000, Yokohama, Japan

• 14 regions: Canada, CERN, Germany, Greece, Japan, Korea, Mexico,

Netherlands, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, United Kingdom, USA

• 24 demonstrations: featuring technical innovations in tele-immersion, large

datasets, distributed computing, remote instrumentation, collaboration, streaming media, human/computer interfaces, digital video and high-definition television, and grid architecture development, and application advancements in science, engineering, cultural heritage, distance education, media communications, and art and architecture

• 100Mb transpacific bandwidth carefully managed

www.startap.net/igrid2000

47

Ten Years Later: 10Gb Connectivity

48

Kanazawa Sendai Sapporo Nagano Kochi Nagoya Fukuoka Naha Okayama

20Gbps 10Gbps 1Gbps Optical testbeds Core network nodes (Available as access points) Access points

Osaka Tokyo

USA

[Legends ]

*IX:Internet eXchange

Outline of JGN ⅡNetwork Outline of JGN ⅡNetwork

49 Structure of JGN II

NW-A : OAM NW NW-B : Tera b/s core networking GMPLS Control 10G (1G×8) 10G Kitakyushu Kanazawa 10G 10G 10G×2 10G Tsukuba Otemachi CRL Keihanna CRLKoganei 10G 10G CRLKashima 10G Sendai Sapporo 1G 1G Nagano Kochi Nagoya 1G 1G 1G Fukuoka Dojima 10G (1G×8) 10G (1G×8) 1G Okinawa 10G 10G (1G×8) Okayama CRLKobe 1G Kanazawa Kanazawa Fukuoka Fukuoka Dojima Dojima Okayama Otemachi Kitakyushu CRLKeihanna Tsukuba CRLKashima Tsukuba Otemachi Dojima CRL Keihannna Dark Fiber NW : Photonic Networking

US

50

(1) 10Gbps (OC-192 SONET) 1 line (2) JAPAN (Tokyo) - USA (Chicago) (3) To succeed TRANSPAC (4) Management under (or as ) JGN2 project (Link-owner NICT) (5) Method of Use (The detail will be decided and announced before launching.) (6) Transit connection via JGN2 is not allowed, in principle. Characteristics of JGN2 / Japan-US line Characteristics of JGN2 / Japan-US line Domestic Research Organizations Overseas Research Organizations A Joint Research Contract between users and NICT (same as JGN) MoU (Memory of Understanding) based on the comprehensive joint research contract

51

ＪＧＮ ＪＧＮII Sympojium -- Uncompressed HDTV at 1.5 Gpbs Live From Seattle to Osaka

Osaka Seattle Chicago

Japan: NiCT, JGN II, WIDE Circuits: JGN II, WIDE, KDDI, NTT, IEEAF, NLR (National Lambda Rail) USA: University of California San Diego/Calit2, University of Washington/Pacific Northwest GigaPoP, Pacific Interface, Inc., StarLight (Argonne National Laboratory, Northwestern University, University of Illinois at Chicago), Indiana University

52

Real-Time HDTV Broadcast from USA to Japan Enabled by Advanced Networks Japan’s JGN2 Symposium 2005 features keynote speaker Larry Smarr broadcasted live from Seattle over advanced optical networks

January 18, 2005 – Seattle, Washington, USA and Osaka, Japan. Dignitaries and researchers attending the JGN2 Symposium 2005 in Osaka, Japan this week listened as Larry Smarr gave the keynote presentation on the large screen above the podium. Unlike traditional keynote talks, however, Smarr was 5000 miles away, in Seattle, Washington. Advances in transmitting live, uncompressed high-definition television (HDTV) over optical networks are enabling true telepresence, in which participants feel they are together in the same room.

53

Global Lambda Integrated Facility GLIF World Map – 2005

Predicted international Research & Education Network bandwidth, to be made available for scheduled application and middleware research experiments by 2005 www.glif.is

Visualization by Bob Patterson, NCSA.

54

GLIF Members

• Argonne National

Laboratory

• Cal-(IT)2
• Caltech
• CANAIRE
• CERN
• CESNET/ CzechLight
• DataTAG
• IEEAF
• Indiana University
• Internet2
• JISC (UK)
• MIT
• NSF (USA)
• National LambdaRail
• NetherLight
• NORDUnet/

NorthernLight

• Northwestern

University

• Pacific Northwest

GigaPoP

• Pacific Wave
• StarLight
• SURFnet
• TeraGrid
• TERENA
• TransLight
• UKERNA/JANET and

UKLight

• University of

Amsterdam

• University College

London

• University of Illinois at

Chicago

• University of Maryland
• University of

Washington

• USAwaves
• WIDE Project
• JGN II

55

What are GLIF Exchanges?

• GLIF exchanges are open bandwidth concentrators

and exchanges (StarLight, NetherLight, UKLight, NorthernLight, Pacific Wave, CAVEwave, MANLAN, HKLight, T-LEX, JGN II, …)

• GLIF exchanges deliver Grid cyberinfrastructure

services, such as computing, storage and visualization support

• GLIF exchanges deal with big data streams and map

them economically to the least expensive services they need

• GLIF exchanges have co-location space for

experimental equipment

56

University of California, San Diego California Institute for Telecommunications and Information Technology [Cal-(IT)2]

iGrid 2oo5

The Global Integrated Facility http://www.startap.net/igrid2005

57

ＧＬＩＦ２００６ ＧＬＩＦ２００６ will be held in Japan ！

58

Thank you for your Attention !

• Univ. of Tokyo

Campus

Thank you for your attention ！ http:/ / www.mlab.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp

The University

• f Tokyo

Campus