Explaining the Unexplained: A CL CLass-Enhanced Attentive Response - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

explaining the unexplained a cl class enhanced
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Explaining the Unexplained: A CL CLass-Enhanced Attentive Response - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Explaining the Unexplained: A CL CLass-Enhanced Attentive Response (CLEAR) Approach to Understanding Deep Neural Networks Devinder Kumar* , Alexander Wong & Graham W. Taylor Current Approaches Heatmap/Attention based! Deconvolution:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Explaining the Unexplained: A CL CLass-Enhanced Attentive Response (CLEAR) Approach to Understanding Deep Neural Networks

Devinder Kumar*, Alexander Wong & Graham W. Taylor

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Current Approaches – Heatmap/Attention based!

Saliency: Simonyan et.al. CVPR 2013 Guided backpropagation: ICLR 2015 Deconvolution: Zeiler et.al. ECCV 14 Deep Taylor Decomp. Montavon et. al. PR journal 2017 Prediction Difference: Zintgraf et. al. ICLR 2017

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Input Output

3

Heatmap

DNN

2 3

Focuses on right areas: Looks correct!

Focuses on wrong part, curve might be two; but why not 3 or 5 or 6? Probably focuses

  • n correct part,

but why 3?

Interpretation

DNN DNN

Interpretations

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Binary Heatmap CLEAR Map

Class Enhanced Attentive Response (CLEAR) Map

slide-5
SLIDE 5

given Output response at layer l Output response of layer l Dominant Class Response Dominant Response

Class Enhanced Attentive Response (CLEAR)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Class Enhanced Attentive Response (CLEAR) Map

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Input Output

3

Heatmap

DNN

2 3

Focuses on right areas: Looks correct! Focuses on wrong part, curve might be two; but why not 3 or 5 or 6? Probably focuses

  • n correct part,

but why 3?

CLEAR map

Major part of the positive focus is of 3 Major part of the positive focus represents 2 Major part of negative focus is 3; higher activation than any other class

Interpretation Interpretation

CLEAR color map

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

DNN DNN

slide-8
SLIDE 8

MNIST RESULTS

Correctly Classified Wrongly Classified

slide-9
SLIDE 9

SVHN RESULTS

Correctly Classified Wrongly Classified

slide-10
SLIDE 10

MNIST & SVHN RESULTS

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Stanford Dog Dataset Results

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Stanford Dog Dataset Results

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Stanford Dog Dataset Results

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Conclusion

  • Sparsity in the individual response maps from the last layer kernels :

same pattern for all datasets considered.

  • Evidence for classes tend to come from very specific localized regions.
  • CLEAR maps enable the visualization of not only the areas of interest

that predominantly influence the decision-making process, but also the degree of influence as well as the dominant class of influence in these areas.

  • Showed efficacy of CLEAR maps both quantitatively and qualitatively.
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Thank You!

devinder.kumar@uwaterloo.ca http://devinderkumar.com