expected
play

Expected outcomes of Classification retained for the initial 2. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

An agreed programme of work for 1. the initial review of ILS Expected outcomes of Classification retained for the initial 2. review the first meeting of Agenda/composition/preparation 3. the SRM & timing of the second meeting of the


  1. An agreed programme of work for 1. the initial review of ILS Expected outcomes of Classification retained for the initial 2. review the first meeting of Agenda/composition/preparation 3. the SRM & timing of the second meeting of the SRM Tripartite Working Group TWG

  2. Not a first: Previous reviews of ILS 1. The SRM The origins of the SRM 2. institutional context The specific role of the SRM 3. Tripartite Working Group

  3. 1977-1979 1995-2002 Ventejol Working Party Cartier Working Party 1997 1984-1987 Adoption of the Second Ventejol instrument of Working Party abrogation

  4. Proposals for Office to SRM within consult on SRM, framework of including Social Justice modalities Declaration November November March 2012 March 2011 2009 - 2010 June 2013 March 2015 2015 2011 Third First Tripartite Director- Establishment Adoption of Establishment Governing Governing consultations General’s of SRM TORs of SRM of the SRM by Body Body on ILO Centenary Tripartite Tripartite the Governing discussion discussion standards initiatives Working Group Working Body on the SRM on the SRM policy Group Emerging consensus on guiding Invited further principles to consultations on govern modalities of standards policy; SRM proposal for a SRM

  5. Standards Review Mechanism Process SOCIAL JUSTICE DECLARATION: institutional coherence, standards policy and the role of ILS ILC GB /LILS Standards setting • • Coordination for coherent Abrogation/withdrawal standards policy • • Oversight of SRM, including Recurrent discussions • TWG CAS (General Surveys) • Tripartite meetings of experts SRM Tripartite Requests for Art. 19 reports (General Working Group Surveys) MLC Special Tripartite Committee Office (support)

  6. Milestones 1. Defining the Agreed approach & sequence 2. programme Mapping of ILS against agreed criteria 3. of work

  7. Standards in SRM TWG initial review Up to date standards Context of initial review Interim standards Standards adopted 1919-1984 To be revised Request for information Focus of initial Outdated or shelved review Standards adopted 1985-2000 Context of initial Standards adopted 2000-2015 review

  8. June November February 2016 2016 2016 Evaluation of Report to the First meeting Social Justice Governing Body of SRM TWG Declaration March October March 2016 2016 2017 Second Report to the Review of meeting of Governing the work of the SRM Body the SRM TWG TWG

  9. Sets of instruments: organizing, sequencing and timetabling reviews

  10.  A total of 234 Instruments 124 Conventions  108 Recommendations  2 Protocols  The  Organized in 20 sets of instruments programme of work for the 4 sets under employment  7 sets under social protection  initial review 2 sets under social dialogue  3 sets under FPRW  4 sets of cross-cutting or sectoral  instruments Of those 20 sets, 6 follow up Cartier 

  11.  Review of the unfinished follow-up of Cartier WP decisions & NOT of Cartier WP decisions  Concern only instruments classified outdated (not the interim/request of Unfinished information/to be revised ---> in the review) follow-up of What does that mean? the Cartier Working Party Shelved & outdated convention: Possible  abrogation to be examined Replaced & outdated recommendation:  Possible withdrawal to be examined

  12.  Question and answer  Thank you To conclude

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend