Expected outcomes of Classification retained for the initial 2. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

expected
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Expected outcomes of Classification retained for the initial 2. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

An agreed programme of work for 1. the initial review of ILS Expected outcomes of Classification retained for the initial 2. review the first meeting of Agenda/composition/preparation 3. the SRM & timing of the second meeting of the


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Expected

  • utcomes of

the first meeting of the SRM TWG

1.

An agreed programme of work for the initial review of ILS

2.

Classification retained for the initial review

3.

Agenda/composition/preparation & timing of the second meeting of the SRM Tripartite Working Group

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The SRM institutional context

1.

Not a first: Previous reviews of ILS

2.

The origins of the SRM

3.

The specific role of the SRM Tripartite Working Group

slide-4
SLIDE 4

1977-1979

Ventejol Working Party

1984-1987

Second Ventejol Working Party

1995-2002

Cartier Working Party

1997

Adoption of the instrument of abrogation

slide-5
SLIDE 5

2009 - 2010 Tripartite consultations

  • n ILO

standards policy March 2011 First Governing Body discussion

  • n the SRM

November 2011 Establishment

  • f the SRM by

the Governing Body March 2012 Third Governing Body discussion

  • n the SRM

June 2013 Director- General’s Centenary initiatives March 2015 Establishment

  • f SRM

Tripartite Working Group

Emerging consensus on guiding principles to govern standards policy; proposal for a SRM Proposals for SRM within framework of Social Justice Declaration Invited further consultations on modalities of SRM Office to consult on SRM, including modalities

November 2015 Adoption of TORs of SRM Tripartite Working Group

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Standards Review Mechanism Process

ILC

  • Standards setting
  • Abrogation/withdrawal
  • Recurrent discussions
  • CAS (General Surveys)

GB /LILS

  • Coordination for coherent

standards policy

  • Oversight of SRM, including

TWG

SOCIAL JUSTICE DECLARATION: institutional coherence, standards policy and the role of ILS

MLC Special Tripartite Committee

SRM Tripartite Working Group

Office (support)

Tripartite meetings

  • f experts

Requests for Art. 19 reports (General Surveys)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Defining the programme

  • f work

1.

Milestones

2.

Agreed approach & sequence

3.

Mapping of ILS against agreed criteria

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Standards adopted 2000-2015 Standards adopted 1985-2000 Standards adopted 1919-1984

Up to date standards Interim standards To be revised Outdated or shelved Request for information

Focus of initial review Context of initial review Context of initial review

Standards in SRM TWG initial review

slide-9
SLIDE 9

February 2016 First meeting

  • f SRM TWG

March 2016 Report to the Governing Body June 2016 Evaluation of Social Justice Declaration October 2016 Second meeting of the SRM TWG November 2016 Report to the Governing Body March 2017 Review of the work of the SRM TWG

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Sets of instruments: organizing, sequencing and timetabling reviews

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The programme of work for the initial review

 A total of 234 Instruments

124 Conventions

108 Recommendations

2 Protocols

 Organized in 20 sets of instruments

4 sets under employment

7 sets under social protection

2 sets under social dialogue

3 sets under FPRW

4 sets of cross-cutting or sectoral instruments

  • Of those 20 sets, 6 follow up Cartier
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Unfinished follow-up of the Cartier Working Party

 Review of the unfinished follow-up of

Cartier WP decisions & NOT of Cartier WP decisions

 Concern only instruments classified

  • utdated (not the interim/request of

information/to be revised ---> in the review) What does that mean?

  • Shelved & outdated convention: Possible

abrogation to be examined

  • Replaced & outdated recommendation:

Possible withdrawal to be examined

slide-13
SLIDE 13

To conclude

 Question and answer  Thank you