Examining Functional Obsolescence & Excess Capital Costs
- Presenters:
- - Jeff Grad, CPA, CA, CBV, MRICS,
AACI
- Pat Budd, MIMA, AACI, P.App
Examining Presenters: Functional - Jeff Grad, CPA, CA, CBV, MRICS, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Examining Presenters: Functional - Jeff Grad, CPA, CA, CBV, MRICS, Obsolescence & AACI - Pat Budd, MIMA, AACI, P.App Excess Capital Costs Agenda Functional Obsolescence Excess Capital Cost Examples of dated vs current
AACI
2
Excess Capital Cost
deducting all forms of obsolescence - physical, functional (in the forms of excess operating and maintenance costs) and economic from RCN or Replacement Cost New
4
(Functional Obsolescence)
Improvements
5
6
7
8
than what it costs to build most economical improvements of equal utility
9
10
Taxpayers are confronted with what constitutes an appropriate replacement facility The choice of a replacement facility applies market realities
materials, layout and technology changes Thus, the valuer must analyze what is being built in the marketplace that accommodates similar utility.
have similar utility to the subject property
excess capital cost as it seeks to replicate the utility of the subject property while contemplating the physical composition of modern building principles.
11
Building Techniques
exterior wall - insulated precast concrete panels or insulated metal panels roof - built up or elastomeric; OWSJ or trusses height - 35’+/- structural framing – steel; bay grid - >-1,600 square feet
Building Techniques
mechanicals - suspended gas units, air conditioning and/or ventilation in areas as required; fire protection; energy efficient time & motion monitored lighting; building security
Building Techniques
‘antiquated and costly’
Building Trends over the past 100 years exterior walls pre 1950 - solid masonry - double or triple row brick; substantial fenestration post 1950 to 1980 – brick on block; introduction of transite siding leading to insulated metal panels; a movement to a mix of masonry and metal siding post 1980 to 2000 & beyond – insulated metal panels; insulated precast concrete panels
Building Trends over the past 100 years
roof - pre 1950 - wood deck on wood joists post 1950 – OWSJ or trussing; some concrete framing height - pre 1950 12 to 14’ +/- post 1950 to 1970 18’ +/- post 1970 to 1990 20’ +/- post 1990 to 2010 30’ +/- post 2010 35’ +/-
HEIGHT TREND - prehistoric days to present
post 2005 '+/-35 post 1990 pre 2005 +/- 30' post 1950 pre 1970 +/- 18' post 1950 pre 1990 +/- 22' pre 1950 +/- 14'
Building Trends over the past 100 years structural framing – steel (some concrete framing) ; bay grid pre 1950 +/- 600 square feet post 1950 to 1970 +/- 900 square feet post 1970 to 1990 +/- 1,200 square feet post 1990 to 2010 +/- 1,600 square feet post 2010 +/- 2,000 to 2,500 square feet
BAY GRID TREND - prehistoric days to present
pre 1950 +/- 600 sf post 1950 pre 1970 +/- 900 sf post 1970 pre 1990 +/-1,200 sf post 1990 pre 2005 +/- 1,600 sf post 2005 2,500 sf
Building Trends over the past 100 years
mechanicals – heating - suspended units – steam fired, eventually advancing to gas fired units; air conditioning and/or ventilation slowly introduced through time; fire protection introduced through time; lighting – incandescent, eventually fluorescent, mercury vapor, sodium vapour; (many
the plants); security systems introduced late 1990’s early 2000’s
ratio was higher in the past since administrative functions remained manual and intense compared to modern standards
200000 400000 600000 800000 1000000 1200000 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
Structure Size by Year Build
20 40 60 80 100 120 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
Structure Height by Year Build
And, this leads us to the point of identifying areas of inutility and quantifying functional obsolescence, both curable and incurable i.e.
What is prevalent, property and area-wise and with modern construction techniques?
What is prevalent, property and area-wise and with modern construction techniques?
type of building and what it could be used for (market review), consider the nature, composition/use case and location of the building
What is prevalent, property and area-wise and with modern construction techniques?
similar properties nearby
What is prevalent, property and area-wise and with modern construction techniques?
And, this leads us to the point of identifying areas of inutility and quantifying functional obsolescence, both curable and incurable i.e.
facility
understates excess construction costs; thereby, overstating value
45
46
47