Evaluation Robert W. Lindeman Worcester Polytechnic Institute - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

evaluation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Evaluation Robert W. Lindeman Worcester Polytechnic Institute - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CS-525V: Building Effective Virtual Worlds Evaluation Robert W. Lindeman Worcester Polytechnic Institute Department of Computer Science gogo@wpi.edu Measuring Effectiveness How do we know if our world/technique/ application/etc. is


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Robert W. Lindeman

Worcester Polytechnic Institute Department of Computer Science

gogo@wpi.edu

CS-525V: Building Effective Virtual Worlds

Evaluation

slide-2
SLIDE 2

R.W. Lindeman - WPI Dept. of Computer Science 2

Measuring Effectiveness

How do we know if our world/technique/

application/etc. is effective?

Is this a binary thing? Why measure this? How can we measure?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

R.W. Lindeman - WPI Dept. of Computer Science 3

Qualitative vs. Quantitative

Qualitative

 Look at the data, and draw conclusions

Quantitative

 Form a hypothesis, and try to prove it

Both are effective, Quantitative is less

time consuming to do

slide-4
SLIDE 4

R.W. Lindeman - WPI Dept. of Computer Science 4

Objective vs. Subjective Measures

Objective

 Measure using performance metrics  Speed, accuracy, etc.

Subjective

 Measure using questionnaires, interviews,

etc.

These can either be gathered using

quantitative or qualitative means

slide-5
SLIDE 5

R.W. Lindeman - WPI Dept. of Computer Science 5

Descriptive Methods

Frequency distributions

 How many people were similar in the sense

that according to the dependent variable, they ended up in the same bin

 Table  histogram (vs. bar graph)  Frequency polygon  Pie chart

slide-6
SLIDE 6

R.W. Lindeman - WPI Dept. of Computer Science 6

Descriptive Methods (cont.)

Distributional shape

 Normal distribution (bell curve)  Skewed distribution

 Positively skewed (pointing high)  Negatively skewed (pointing low)

 Multimodal (bimodal)  Rectangular  Kurtosis

 High peak/thin tails (leptokurtic)  Low peak/thick tails (platykurtic)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

R.W. Lindeman - WPI Dept. of Computer Science 7

Descriptive Methods (cont.)

Central tendency

 Mode

 Most frequent score

 Median

 Divides the scores into two, equally sized parts

 Mean

 Sum of the scores divided by the number of

scores  Normal distribution: mode ≈ median ≈ mean  Positive skew: mode < median < mean  Negative skew: mean < median < mode

slide-8
SLIDE 8

R.W. Lindeman - WPI Dept. of Computer Science 8

Descriptive Methods (cont.)

Measures of variability

 Dispersion (level of sameness)  Range

 max - min of all the scores

 Interquartile range

 max - min of the middle 50% of scores

 Box-and-whisker plot  Standard deviation (SD, s, σ, or sigma)

 Good estimate of range: 4 * SD

 Variance (s2 or σ2)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

R.W. Lindeman - WPI Dept. of Computer Science 9

Descriptive Methods (cont.)

Standard scores

 How many SDs a score is from the mean  z-score: mean = 0, each SD = +/-1

 z-score of +2.0 means the score is 2 SDs above

the mean  T-score: mean = 50, each SD = +/-10

 T-score of 70 means the score is 2 SDs above

the mean

slide-10
SLIDE 10

R.W. Lindeman - WPI Dept. of Computer Science 10

Bivariate Correlation

Discover whether a relationship exists Determine the strength of the

relationship

Types of relationship

 High-high, low-low  High-low, low-high  Little systematic tendency

slide-11
SLIDE 11

R.W. Lindeman - WPI Dept. of Computer Science 11

Bivariate Correlation (cont.)

Scatter plot Correlation coefficient: r

  • 1.00

+1.00 0.00

  • Positively correlated
  • Direct relationship
  • High-high, low-low
  • Negatively correlated
  • Inverse relationship
  • High-low, low-high

Strong Strong Weak High Low High

slide-12
SLIDE 12

R.W. Lindeman - WPI Dept. of Computer Science 12

Bivariate Correlation (cont.)

 Quantitative variables

 Measurable aspects that vary in terms of intensity

 Rank; Ordinal scale: Each subject can be put into

a single bin among a set of ordered bins

 Raw score: Actual value for a given subject. Could

be a composite score from several measured variables

 Qualitative variables

 Which categorical group does one belong to?

 E.g., I prefer the Grand Canyon over Mount

Rushmore

 Nominal: Unordered bins  Dichotomy: Two groups (e.g., infielders vs.

  • utfielders)
slide-13
SLIDE 13

R.W. Lindeman - WPI Dept. of Computer Science 13

Reliability and Validity

Reliability

 To what extent can we say that the data are

consistent?

Validity

 A measuring instrument is valid to the extent

that it measures what it purports to measure.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

R.W. Lindeman - WPI Dept. of Computer Science 14

Inferential Statistics

Definition: To make statements beyond

description

 Generalize

A sample is extracted from a

population

Measurement is done on this sample Analysis is done An educated guess is made about how

the results apply to the population as a whole

slide-15
SLIDE 15

R.W. Lindeman - WPI Dept. of Computer Science 15

Motivation

Actual testing of the whole population is

too costly (time/money)

 "Tangible population"

Population extends into the future

 "Abstract population"

Four questions

 What is/are the relevant populations?  How will the sample be extracted?  What characteristic of those sampled will

serve as the measurement target?

 What will be the study's statistical focus?

slide-16
SLIDE 16

R.W. Lindeman - WPI Dept. of Computer Science 16

Statistical Focus

What statistical tools should be used?

 Even if we want the "average," which

measure of average should we use?

slide-17
SLIDE 17

R.W. Lindeman - WPI Dept. of Computer Science 17

Estimation

 Sampling error

 The amount a sample value differs from the

population value

 This does not mean there was an error in the

method of sampling, but is rather part of the natural behavior of samples

 They seldom turn out to exactly mirror the

population

 Sampling distribution

 The distribution of results of several samplings of

the population

 Standard error

 SD of the sampling distribution

slide-18
SLIDE 18

R.W. Lindeman - WPI Dept. of Computer Science 18

Analyses of Variance (ANOVAs)

Determine whether the means of two (or

more) samples are different

 If we've been careful, we can say that the

treatment is the source of the differences

 Need to make sure we have controlled

everything else!

 Treatment order  Sample creation  Normal distribution of the sample  Equal variance of the groups

slide-19
SLIDE 19

R.W. Lindeman - WPI Dept. of Computer Science 19

Types of ANOVAs

Simple (one-way) ANOVA

 One independent variable  One dependent variable  Between-subjects design

Two-way ANOVA

 Two independent variables, and/or  Two dependent variables  Between-subjects design

slide-20
SLIDE 20

R.W. Lindeman - WPI Dept. of Computer Science 20

Types of ANOVAs (cont.)

One-way repeated-measures ANOVA

 One independent variable  One dependent variable  Within-subjects design

Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA

 Two independent variables, and/or  Two dependent variables  Within-subjects design

slide-21
SLIDE 21

R.W. Lindeman - WPI Dept. of Computer Science 21

Types of ANOVAs (cont.)

Main effects vs. interaction effect

 Main effects present in conjunction with

  • ther effects

Post-hoc tests

 Tukey's HSD test

 Equal sample sizes

 Scheffé test

 Unequal sample sizes

slide-22
SLIDE 22

R.W. Lindeman - WPI Dept. of Computer Science 22

Types of ANOVAs (cont.)

Mixed ANOVA 2 x 3

 Time of day  Real Walking / Walking in-place / Joystick

slide-23
SLIDE 23

R.W. Lindeman - WPI Dept. of Computer Science 23

References

Schuyler W. Huck Reading Statistics and

Research, Fourth Edition, Pearson Education Inc., 2004.