Evaluation Options for Oregons Primary Care Transformation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

evaluation options for oregon s primary care
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Evaluation Options for Oregons Primary Care Transformation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Evaluation Options for Oregons Primary Care Transformation Initiative Who we are and why were here John McConnell Christina Charlesworth Stephanie Renfro Center for Health Systems Effectiveness (CHSE) Our mission is to provide the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Evaluation Options for Oregon’s Primary Care Transformation Initiative

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Who we are and why we’re here

John McConnell Christina Charlesworth Stephanie Renfro Center for Health Systems Effectiveness (CHSE) Our mission is to provide the analyses, evidence, and economic expertise to build a more sustainable health care system.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Who we are and why we’re here

John McConnell Christina Charlesworth Stephanie Renfro Center for Health Systems Effectiveness (CHSE) Our mission is to provide the analyses, evidence, and economic expertise to build a more sustainable health care system. Contract with OHA to develop PCTI evaluation options

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Use value-based payment methods to: » Increase investment in primary care

  • Without increasing costs to consumers
  • Without increasing total cost of care

» Align primary care reimbursement by all purchasers of care » Continue to improve reimbursement methods, including by investing in the social determinants of health

Oregon is pursuing ambitious reform efforts under SB934

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Considerations for evaluation design

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Payment model design and recommendations

Payment reform is a tool to support broader change

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Payment model design and recommendations Adoption of recommendations

Payment reform is a tool to support broader change

“Did this actually happen?”

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Payment reform is a tool to support broader change

Payment model design and recommendations Adoption of recommendations Increased primary care investment Aligned reimbursement Improved reimbursement methods (+ SDOH)

“If this actually happened- what were the effects?”

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Particular interest in: » Integration of behavioral health » Reduced administrative burden » Comprehensive patient-centered care » Better quality and patient outcomes

Payment reform is a tool to support broader change

slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

What evidence is needed?

$

Primary care investment Cost containment VBP adoption Payment alignment Service use & quality Behavioral health integration Payment for SDOH

Did spending on primary care services increase? By how much?

slide-12
SLIDE 12

What evidence is needed?

$

Primary care investment Cost containment VBP adoption Payment alignment Service use & quality Behavioral health integration Payment for SDOH

Did the total cost of care increase? Were consumer costs affected? What was the role of prices vs utilization?

slide-13
SLIDE 13

What evidence is needed?

$

Primary care investment Cost containment VBP adoption Payment alignment Service use & quality Behavioral health integration Payment for SDOH

Did payers increase their use of Collaborative-recommended payment methods? For example, did contracts including comprehensive population- based payments (HCP-LAN category 4B) increase?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

What evidence is needed?

$

Primary care investment Cost containment VBP adoption Payment alignment Service use & quality Behavioral health integration Payment for SDOH

What progress was made towards aligning reimbursement methods across payers?

slide-15
SLIDE 15

What evidence is needed?

$

Primary care investment Cost containment VBP adoption Payment alignment Service use & quality Behavioral health integration Payment for SDOH

Did service use patterns change? For example, did avoidable ED visits decrease? Did quality of patient care change? For example, did rates of chlamydia screening, adolescent well-care visits, or follow-up after hospitalization for mental illness increase?

slide-16
SLIDE 16

What evidence is needed?

$

Primary care investment Cost containment VBP adoption Payment alignment Service use & quality Behavioral health integration Payment for SDOH

Did payment methods facilitate clinic investment in social determinants of health?

slide-17
SLIDE 17

What evidence is needed?

$

Primary care investment Cost containment VBP adoption Payment alignment Service use & quality Behavioral health integration Payment for SDOH

Did clinics integrate behavioral and primary care practice? For example, did use of Collaborative-recommended billing codes to support integrated health clinics increase? Did clinic workflows change? For example, are there more warm hand-offs between primary care and behavioral health providers?

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Evaluation options

slide-19
SLIDE 19

How we got here

Challenges » What questions do we really care about answering? » What can we measure? Limits of administrative data » Constructing a treatment variable » Implementation vs participation » Hard to get at clinic-level

slide-20
SLIDE 20

How we got here

With a little help from our friends » PCTI Evaluation Workgroup » Collaborative meetings » OHA staff, Diana Bianco » Supplementary feedback from payers, providers

slide-21
SLIDE 21

How we got here

What we bring you today » Four evaluation options » Complementary » Not mutually exclusive » Evaluation Workgroup most interested in Options 1-3 (to start!)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Option 1 Describe payment arrangements Option 2 Cross-state Commercial comparison Option 3 Cross-clinic Medicaid comparison Option 4 Qualitative clinic sample

Increased investment in primary care

X

Containment of total costs

  • f care & costs to

consumers

X

Adoption of value-based payment methods

X X X

Alignment of value-based payment methods

X X

Improvement on utilization and quality measures

X X

Adoption of payment methods to address SDOH

X

Integration of physical and behavioral health

X X X

$

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Describe payment arrangements

1

Big-picture description of payment model adoption, and alignment of contracting arrangements over time

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Describe payment arrangements

1

$

Primary care investment Cost containment VBP adoption Payment alignment Service use & quality Behavioral health integration Payment for SDOH

Big-picture description of payment model adoption, and alignment of contracting arrangements over time

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Describe payment arrangements

1

$

Primary care investment Cost containment VBP adoption Payment alignment Service use & quality Behavioral health integration Payment for SDOH

Big-picture description of payment model adoption, and alignment of contracting arrangements over time » Includes all payers » Actionable information about implementation » Updates possible annually » Important context for interpreting other results » Hinges on payer-reported data

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Cross-state commercial comparison

2

Compare commercial patient outcomes in Oregon to control states before and after the Initiative

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Cross-state commercial comparison

2

Compare commercial patient outcomes in Oregon to control states before and after the Initiative

$

Primary care investment Cost containment VBP adoption Payment alignment Service use & quality Behavioral health integration Payment for SDOH

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Cross-state commercial comparison

2

$

Primary care investment Cost containment VBP adoption Payment alignment Service use & quality Behavioral health integration Payment for SDOH

» Strong design and methods will yield high quality evidence » Disentangles role of service use and price in total costs » Can inform return on investment question » Stakeholders do not need to report any data Compare commercial patient outcomes in Oregon to control states before and after the Initiative

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Cross-clinic Medicaid comparison

3

Compare Medicaid contracting arrangements and patient

  • utcomes for Oregon PCTI vs. non-PCTI clinics
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Cross-clinic Medicaid comparison

3

Compare Medicaid contracting arrangements and patient

  • utcomes for Oregon PCTI vs. non-PCTI clinics

$

Primary care investment Cost containment VBP adoption Payment alignment Service use & quality Behavioral health integration Payment for SDOH

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Cross-clinic Medicaid comparison

3

Compare Medicaid contracting arrangements and patient

  • utcomes for Oregon PCTI vs. non-PCTI clinics

$

Primary care investment Cost containment VBP adoption Payment alignment Service use & quality Behavioral health integration Payment for SDOH

» Leverages CCO data on patient-clinic assignment & attribution » Study design weaker than Option 2 (eg, no control state) » Some implementation information, but for Medicaid only » CCOs and OHA need to report data

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Qualitative clinic sample

4

Survey a sample of clinics about microsystem changes related to VBP, behavioral health integration and SDOH

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Qualitative clinic sample

4

Survey a sample of clinics about microsystem changes related to VBP, behavioral health integration and SDOH

$

Primary care investment Cost containment VBP adoption Payment alignment Service use & quality Behavioral health integration Payment for SDOH

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Qualitative clinic sample

4

Survey a sample of clinics about microsystem changes related to VBP, behavioral health integration and SDOH

$

Primary care investment Cost containment VBP adoption Payment alignment Service use & quality Behavioral health integration Payment for SDOH

» Rich information about clinic-level changes that is not available elsewhere » Relevant to all payers » Primary data collection is resource-intensive

slide-35
SLIDE 35

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 YR 1 CPC+ Track 2 2025 2026 2027 YR 2 CPC+ Track 1, FQHCs, etc YR 3 Others

Collaborative convenes through 2027

Timeline

Implementation

slide-36
SLIDE 36

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 YR 1 CPC+ Track 2 2025 2026 2027 YR 2 CPC+ Track 1, FQHCs, etc YR 3 Others

Collaborative convenes through 2027

Pre Period Implementation Post Period

Timeline

slide-37
SLIDE 37

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 YR 1 CPC+ Track 2 2026 2027 YR 2 CPC+ Track 1, FQHCs, etc YR 3 Others

Collaborative convenes through 2027

Pre Period Implementation Post Period 2025 Get this admin data in 2025

Timeline

slide-38
SLIDE 38

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 YR 1 CPC+ Track 2 2025 2027 YR 2 CPC+ Track 1, FQHCs, etc YR 3 Others

Collaborative convenes through 2027

Pre Period Implementation Post Period 2026 Deliver final report in 2026

Timeline

slide-39
SLIDE 39

» Flexibility in details » Synergy between options » Economies of scale

Other considerations

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Option 1 Describe payment arrangements Option 2 Cross-state Commercial comparison Option 3 Cross-clinic Medicaid comparison Option 4 Qualitative clinic sample

Increased investment in primary care

X

Containment of total costs

  • f care & costs to

consumers

X

Adoption of value-based payment methods

X X X

Alignment of value-based payment methods

X X

Improvement on utilization and quality measures

X X

Adoption of payment methods to address SDOH

X

Integration of physical and behavioral health

X X X

$