Europeisk forskning fri eller politiskt styrd? SUHF 21 februari - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Europeisk forskning – fri eller politiskt styrd? SUHF 21 februari 2017 Dan Andrée VINNOVAs Brysselkontor

 Forskning på Europanivå – tillbakablick  Europeiska forskningsområdet  Horisont 2020 - Gemensamma utmaningar  Mot FP9 och hur kan man påverka.

Ministry of Education and Research Sweden

1983–2000

FP1–FP5 Project based: Transnational projects Mobility Access to infrastructures

National/regional programmes EU National/regional programmes

The Framework Programme The Changing ERA Landscape

Ministry of Education and Research Sweden

2000 ERA – European Research Area

• 5th freedom in the internal market (people,

capital, goods, services)

• freedom of knowledge

Why was ERA established?

 European researchers are increasingly unable to compete with teams from

• ther major countries such as the United States and Japan.

 Research is also good for the economy, and the products which are the end

result of research and innovation bring benefits to everyone.

 Research funding (both public and private) is lower in Europe than in

competing countries, and this gap is widening (3%-goal).

 European research activities are currently fragmented, with most research

being carried out in the framework of national and regional programmes.

 Because there is no coherent Community research policy, national research

policies often overlap, while other areas are not studied anywhere.

 Many problems (e.g. climate change) are pan-European in nature, and

require a co-ordinated approach by all the Member States.

 Increasing levels of R&D in industry creates jobs and improves

competitiveness.

 Research and technology account for a large proportion of economic growth,

and have a positive influence on the quality of life of all Europeans.

Ministry of Education and Research Sweden

ERA 2000–

FP6-FP7 Better coordination of national programmes: Integrated Projects, Networks of Excellence, ERA-NET, ERA-NET Plus, article 185, Joint Technology Initiatives (art 187)

EU programmes interact with national/regional programmes

EU National/regional programmes National/regional programmes

Ministry of Education and Research Sweden

• ESSI 1

• CRAFT
• AERO 1C

• ESSI 2

• SME

• 1. Controlled

• 2. Nuclear

• f Results

• 3. Strengthening the

• 2. Structuring the ERA
• 1. Focusing and integrating

Report of the Expert Group, FP6 evaluation, February 2009

FP3 – FP7 Thematic structure ’unchanged’ NO Political priorities

Ministry of Education and Research Sweden

FP3 – Horizon 2020 Budget increases

Programme MEUR/year FP3 1425 FP4 3304 FP5 3740 FP6 4375 FP7 7767 (2014:10 000) Horizon 2020 FP9 10 000 ?

Ministry of Education and Research Sweden

LUND Conference – July 2009 Declaration

• the need to identify and respond to the grand

challenges of our time – global warming, energy supply, water and food, ageing society, public health, pandemics and security

• calls for a new deal among European

institutions and Member States involving stakeholders

http://www.vinnova.se/In-English/eupresidency/Passed- presidency-events/New-world-New-Solutions/

Ministry of Education and Research Sweden

Joint programming Driven by Member States EU National/regional programmes National/regional programmes

EU and national programmes get more ‘integrated’ – Joint Programming – societal challenges

ERA 2009 –

Excellent science

Industrial leadership

Societal challenges

Horizon 2020 The basics - three priorities

Ministry of Education and Research Sweden

Lund Revisited

Next steps in tackling Societal Challenges Lund 2009 changed the Framework Programme Lund 2015 should change national programmes/strategies & importance of Impact

ERA Framework – 20 June 2012 ERA Road-map 29 May 2015

Increased effectiveness of national systems Increased transnational co-operation and

competition (incl. Research Infrastrucures)

An open labour market for researchers Gender equality and gender mainstreaming

in research

Optimal circulation and transfer of scientific

knowledge

International cooperation (separate

Communication)

Alignment @ IGLOO, 1-15

P2Ps - on background of 2008 Chart –2012 + 2014*

*Clarotti & Delescluse: European Commission 2014

MAPPI NG ERA - 2

• G. Clarotti - 14

FP9

2014 Juncker’s priorities

• A new boost for jobs, growth and investment
• A connected digital single market
• A resilient Energy Union with a forward-looking climate

change policy

• A deeper and fairer internal market with a strengthened

industrial base

• A deeper and fairer Economic and Monetary Union (EMU)
• A reasonable and balanced free trade agreement with the

United States

• An area of Justice and Fundamental Rights based on

mutual trust

• Towards a new policy on migration
• Europe as a stronger global actor
• A Union of democratic change.

Issue papers https://ec.europa.eu/research/evaluations/index_en.cfm?pg=hlg

Horizon 2020

Discussed areas for H2020 2018-2020 WP

• Winning the race for a low-carbon,

climate resilient Europe

• Digitisation
• Connecting economic and

environmental gains – the Circular Economy

• Supporting the Security Union

Horizon 2020

The Framework Programme is not a research programme it is a political instrument where R&I and their impact are very important

You need a strategy for participation and to give input!

Strategy for increased participation and input to the European Commission (EC)

 Articulate what you would like to achieve in relation to e.g.

national programmes/activities – EU policy

 National Networks – Public Sector  European Networks – LERU, EUA  Strategy for participation – e.g. follow, lead, new areas,

standarisation etcetera

 Give ‘useful input’ to the Commission at the right time

Sverige i Horisont 2020

• En dryg tredjedel av deltagarna

– främst företag – har inte varit med i tidigare ramprogram

• Svenska organisationer

beviljade 552 M€ i 857 projekt

• Svenska parter beviljas i snitt

500 000 € per samverkansprojekt

• Sveriges andel 3,3 %

eCORDA 1 juni 2016

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Ungern Tjeckien Polen Schweiz Portugal Irland Israel Norge Finland Grekland Danmark Österrike Sverige Belgien Nederländerna Italien Spanien Frankrike Storbritannien Tyskland Miljoner Euro (MEuro)

0,00% 1,00% 2,00% 3,00% 4,00% 5,00% 6,00% 7,00%

eCorda 1 juni 2016

Starka och svaga områden

Svenska organisationers deltagande topp 20

eCorda 1 juni 2016

Beviljade projektmedel (€) Antal projekt- deltaganden 1 LUNDS UNIVERSITET 53 263 173 77 2 KAROLINSKA INSTITUTET 43 695 185 78 3 KUNGLIGA TEKNISKA HÖGSKOLAN 42 065 029 86 4 CHALMERS TEKNISKA HÖGSKOLA AB 40 499 895 68 5 UPPSALA UNIVERSITET 34 195 950 62 6 STOCKHOLMS UNIVERSITET 16 644 441 32 7 LINKÖPINGS UNIVERSITET 15 419 561 34 8 GÖTEBORGS UNIVERSITET 13 517 266 38 9 EUROPEAN SPALLATION SOURCE ESS AB 12 159 173 5 10 SP SVERIGES TEKNISKA FORSKNINGSINSTITUT AB 10 911 871 30 11 LULEÅ TEKNISKA UNIVERSITET 10 252 861 22 12 SWEREA MEFOS AB 8 117 525 3 13 UMEÅ UNIVERSITET 6 694 645 12 14 VETENSKAPSRÅDET 6 255 098 7 15 STOCKHOLMS STAD 6 120 929 3 16 SVERIGES LANTBRUKSUNIVERSITET 6 094 132 17 17 FORMAS 5 979 762 9 18 VOLVO PERSONVAGNAR AB 5 445 877 7 19 STATENS ENERGIMYNDIGHET 5 329 467 9 20 SEKAB E-TECHNOLOGY AB 5 114 571 2

Fördelning svenska UoH

The ‘three phases’ in EU-policy

• 1. Preparation

Framework

• 2. Decision
• 3. Implementation

Biennial Work Programmes (WP) Commission Proposal Right of initiative + Consultation (Council, EP etc.) Council European Parliament Commission Lobbying Commission Programme Committees, Advisory Groups Framework H2020 2009-2011 2012 – 2013 2014 – 2020 – (2024) FP7 2003-2004 2005 – 2006 2007 – 2013 – (2017) Horizon II 2016-2018 2019 - 2020

SE MS EU EC

Topic: Enskild person, SME = Konsulter Project officers Område (’hälsa’): institut, fakultet, företag, mindre lärosäte = Plattformar: ETP, SETPLAN, PPPer etc Branchorganisa- tioner Lobbyorganista- tioner HoU, Directors Rådgivande grupper Ramprogramnivå: större lärosäten, företag,

• ffentlig sektor,

stakeholders (IVA) = Science Europe, EUA, Business Europe,LERU, EARTO, TAFTIE DG High Level Groups Regeringsnivå = EP, Council Commissioner

Påverkansnivåer

SE MS EU EC

Topic: Enskild person, SME = Konsulter Project officers Område (Hälsa) : institut, fakultet, företag, mindre lärosäte = Plattformar: ETP, SETPLAN, PPPer etc Branchorganisa- tioner Lobbyorganista- tioner HoU, Directors Rådgivande grupper Ramprogramnivå: större lärosäten, företag,

• ffentlig sektor,

stakeholders (IVA) = Science Europe, EUA, Business Europe,LERU, EARTO, TAFTIE DG High Level Groups Regeringsnivå = EC, EP, Council Commissioner

Möjliga påverkansvägar

Svårt om man inte har en strategi

SE MS EU EC

Topic: Enskild person, SME = Konsulter Project officers Område: institut, fakultet, företag, mindre lärosäte = Plattformar: ETP, SETPLAN, PPPer etc Branchorganisa- tioner Lobbyorganista- tioner HoU, Directors Rådgivande grupper Ramprogramnivå: större lärosäten, företag,

• ffentlig sektor,

stakeholders (IVA) = Science Europe, EUA, Business Europe,LERU, EARTO, TAFTIE DG High Level Groups Regeringsnivå = EC, EP, Council Commissioner

‘Rekommendation’

Svenskt FoI-kontor i Bryssel

• VINNOVA och VR –

nationella uppdrag/NCP

• Svenskt utnyttjande av

ramprogrammet och ERA

• Nätverk i Bryssel
• Pro-aktivt arbete
• Hjälper svenska aktörer

Exempel från Brysselkontoret

• Uppsala universitets ledningsråd 2015- fokus på

policy och strategiskt arbete

• KTH:s ledning 2016 – tillsammans med

Stockholms stad, SLL samt samarbetspartners från näringslivet

• Besök på KTH, SLU, Umeå, UU, SUHF - 2016
• KI, UU, LiU- seminarium om etablering i Hanoi –

2016

• Ett 70-tal EU-handläggare i nov 2016 för ett

tvådagars möte

• 12 rektorer kommer i juni 2017
• UmU ledningsgrupp i oktober 2017

Important FP9 key-words:

• Juncker’s 10 priorities
• Moedas
• Excellence, impact and openness
• Open Science - digitalisation
• Open Innovation,
• Open to the World - global research area
• European Innovation Council
• European Added value
• UN Sustainable goals
• Industrial competitiveness
• Mission oriented

Juncker priorities indicates a Competitive and Grow th Programme (cohesion, education, SME) – public sector/end users involvement very important to deliver impact

Excellence Science Challenges/missions (focus on EU-policy with impact + UN Sustainable Development) European Innovation Council

Forecast FP9 Dan Andrée Research and Innovation part of the Competitive Programme

Open to the world

Open Open

Time table – EU -level

• 2016 High Level Group (Lamy) – Jan Gulliksen (KTH)
• Open consultation on the H2020 interim evaluation

(ended 15 Jan 2017)

• 2017 – EIC High Level Group – Nicklas Bergman
• May 2016 – EC SWD on Interim evaluation
• 30 June Conference in June
• 3 July 2017 Open FP9 consultation – October
• October – EC Communication
• January 2018 – EUs budget: 2021 – 25 (27)
• Beginning – middle 2018 - FP9 – proposal

Time table – SE - Level

• Horisont 2020 interim: Formas, Forte, Vinnova, VR
• Hearing RK – 18 januari - 30 stakeholders
• Gemensam beredning inom RK
• Regeringens input före sommaren

Inspel till kommissionen från nu till tidiga hösten

Fri eller styrd forskning?

• ERC och MSCA helt fri
• Övriga delar
• När man skriver ansökan måste man vara

medveten om de politiska målen

• När projekten börjar är den ’fri’.