EUROPEAN URBAN I NI TI ATI VE ( EUI ) EXPERT W ORKI NG GROUP - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
EUROPEAN URBAN I NI TI ATI VE ( EUI ) EXPERT W ORKI NG GROUP - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
EUROPEAN URBAN I NI TI ATI VE ( EUI ) EXPERT W ORKI NG GROUP Please take your seat in one of the seating groups m arked on the flip charts on the side of the room in view of the interactive part of the session W ELCOME AND I NTRODUCTI ON
EUROPEAN URBAN I NI TI ATI VE ( EUI ) EXPERT W ORKI NG GROUP
Please take your seat in one of the seating groups m arked on the flip charts on the side
- f the room in view of the interactive part of
the session
W ELCOME AND I NTRODUCTI ON TO THE EUROPEAN URBAN I NI TI ATI VE
PIA LAURILA & THOMAS de BÉTHUNE DG Regional and Urban Policy - European Commission
MEMBERS OF THE EUI EXPERT WORKING GROUP
URBACT Managing Authority – Ministry of Territorial Cohesion & Relations with Territories - National Agency (FR) Technical Secretariat - Ministry of Territorial Cohesion & Relations with Territories – National Agency (FR) Urban I nnovative Actions Entrusted Entity - Hauts-de-France Region (FR) Perm anent Secretariat - Hauts-de- France Region (FR) Council of European Municipalities and Regions CEMR EUROCI TI ES EC / Joint Research Centre European Com m ittee of the Regions
- Expert appointed by the EC
W HO ELSE I S I N THE ROOM?
- City
- Region
- Member State
- EU Institution
- Managing Authority
- Civil Society/ NGO
- Other
15:00 – 15:15 Welcome, introduction to the aims of the session and to the EUI Pia Laurila & Thomas de Béthune, EC/DG REGIO 15:15 – 15:30 Current state-of-play: developing the EUI Twan de Bruijn, Expert assisting the EC in the design of the EUI 15:30 – 15:50 Insight into one aspect of how the EUI might work: the experience of working together with URBACT and Urban Innovative Actions Giacomo Costantini, City of Ravenna (IT) Cleo Pouw, City of Rotterdam (NL) Inti Bertocchi, City of Bologna (IT) 15:50 – 17:10 Interactive session: discussion circles on the EUI
- Two discussion rounds
17:10 – 17:30 Q&A with audience and concluding remarks EC/DG REGIO and Twan de Bruijn, EUI Expert
COHESION POLICY AND CITIES IN 2014-2020
I nvestm ents in sustainable urban developm ent
EUR 17 billion of ERDF EUR 1,5 billion of ESF More than 960 integrated urban strategies
Capacity building - URBACT III and
the Urban Development Network
Experim entation - Urban
Innovative Actions
Know ledge/ evidence for policies - Urban Agenda for the EU
and ESPON – European Spatial Planning Observatory Network .
I nvestm ents in sustainable urban developm ent:
- Minimum 6% of ERDF
- Policy Objective Europe closer to
citizens
Minim um requirem ents for integrated territorial/ urban developm ent:
- Integrated urban strategies in place
- Local bodies involved in selection of
- perations
European Urban I nitiative – Post-2 0 2 0
COHESION POLICY AND CITIES IN 2021-2027
EUROPEAN URBAN INITIATIVE: RATIONALE
- Urban challenges will be
more pressing in the future
- Cities need to scale up
cooperation, seek for new solutions, share knowledge, deliver bottom-up evidence- based policy m aking
- Need for im proved
governance
- Support of the Urban Agenda
for the EU
- Need to tackle fragm entation
- f support offered to cities
- More cities to be involved
EUROPEAN URBAN INITIATIVE AT A GLANCE
Objectives: (1) Strengthen integrated and participatory approach to sustainable urban development (2) Provide a stronger link to EU policies, in particular to Cohesion Policy Strands of actions: (a) Capacity building: Improve capacities of cities (b) I nnovative actions: Develop transferable and scalable innovative solutions (c) Know ledge, policy & com m unication: for better policy design & implementation, urban mainstreaming, facilitate access to knowledge Creation of interaction for increasing coherence and coordination between (a) (b) and (c) Beneficiaries: all EU urban areas; upon request, support for inter-governmental cooperation on urban matters (Urban Agenda for the EU) Proposed budget: EUR 0,5 billion
CURRENT STATE-OF-PLAY: DEVELOPI NG THE EUI
TWAN DE BRUIJN (EU QUEST) Expert assisting the European Commission and providing advice on the design of the EUI
THE CURRENT SITUATION
- About EUR 1 7 billion managed directly by cities supporting
integrated strategies for sustainable urban development in Member States funded by European Regional Developm ent Fund/ Cohesion Fund
and complemented by EUR 1.5 billion from European Social Fund
- ‘Mainstream ’ Cohesion Policy investments that occur in urban
areas in Member States and implemented through Operational Programmes = EUR 115 billion
- Complemented by a plethora of program m es and initiatives:
- URBACT, Urban Innovative Actions, Urban Development Network, TAIEX-REGIO
PEER2PEER
- Knowledge initiatives: ESPON - European Territorial Observatory Network, EC/Joint
Research Centre, Horizon 2020, Joint Programming Initiative Urban Europe, national ministries, OECD, UN-Habitat, World Bank, etc.
- The EUI aims to increase the coordination and
coherence of the current urban-related programmes and initiatives of Cohesion Policy – identified strands:
- Support of capacity building
- Support of innovative actions
- Support of knowledge, policy development and communication
- The EUI aims to strengthen the link betw een
these program m es and initiatives of Cohesion Policy and wider EU policy, particularly m ainstream Cohesion Policy
FOCUS AREAS
- Beneficiaries struggle to understand who does what
- Outputs are not fully capitalised upon
- There is unexploited potential in the shared goals
- f Urban I nnovative Actions and URBACT as well
as in actions of Urban Developm ent Netw ork, in actions supported by Cohesion Policy through more than 9 5 0 integrated urban developm ent strategies implemented on ground, in actions of m ainstream Cohesion Policy investments
PROBLEM: LACK OF COORDINATION AND COHERENCE
‘Everybody is doing their bit of the puzzle, but everybody is doing it in their ow n w ay’
EUI Expert W orking Group Mem ber
- Weak link at the ‘exit-point’ of Urban Innovative
Actions and URBACT projects to mainstream Cohesion Policy programmes
- Weak link between the know ledge generated by
the urban-related programmes and initiatives of Cohesion Policy and the Managing Authorities that could use this knowledge under the mainstream Cohesion Policy programmes
PROBLEM: WEAK LINK TO WIDER POLICY
- Designing of ‘EUI support trajectories’ which ensure that
actions of different programmes and initiatives are implemented in an optimal manner and bring along coordination and coherence
- A com m on and explicit program m e fram ew ork for the EUI
- A rolling EUI w ork program m e where responsibilities for
different actions are clearly defined and scheduled
- Opportunities for staff m em bers in the different strands to
work together
- For example, creation of an internal dashboard that displays
data regarding how each strand (capacity building, innovative actions, knowledge & policy) is progressing with its work
INCREASING COORDINATION AND COHERENCE
- Use URBACT’s Transfer Netw ork methodology to
transfer a selection of innovative solutions tested by the Urban Innovative Actions
- EUI approved good practice + ‘m entoring’ city +
fellow cities – such action proposed to be supported under capacity building
- Phase 1: understanding of good practice and tailoring down the
transfer methodology
- Phase 2: begin transferal and produce transfer plans + transfer diaries
DETAILS OF ONE PROPOSED SUPPORT TRAJECTORY
- EUI National Contact Points – setting up of a
netw ork of specialists across the EU where each Member State has a knowledgeable Contact Point which informs cities of the urban-related programmes and initiatives under Cohesion Policy and liaises with the programme managers at the EU level
- Policy entrepreneurship – identification of policy
issues of interest and corresponding solutions and transferring this knowledge on well-functioning policies to policy-makers
STRENGTHENING THE LINK TO WIDER POLICY
- Purpose is to help urban areas access and use
know ledge to improve their policy development
- Policy-makers are overloaded by the quantity of
information - reduce inform ation overload by:
- Identifying policy areas of interest
- Identifying policy solutions in these areas
- Carefully screening these policy solutions
- Directly presenting these screened solutions
SUPPORTING KNOWLEDGE, POLICY DEVELOPMENT, AND COMMUNICATION
- The EUI will:
- Increase coordination and coherence between the urban-related programmes
and initiatives of Cohesion Policy
- Strengthen the link between these programmes and initiatives and mainstream
Cohesion Policy (and wider EU policy)
- Support knowledge, policy development, and communication
- It could do this by:
- Increasing accountability, predictability, and common understanding –
designing of EUI support trajectories – one example: transferring innovative solutions developed through capacity building networks
- Establishing EUI National Contact Points
- Reducing information overload by carefully screening solutions that work well
and transferring them to policy makers
SUMMARY
I NSI GHT I NTO ONE ASPECT OF HOW THE EUI MI GHT W ORK: THE EXPERI ENCE OF W ORKI NG TOGETHER W I TH URBACT AND URBAN I NNOVATI VE ACTI ONS – GOOD PRACTI CE CASE I
GIACOMO COSTANTINI, Deputy Mayor for Tourism and Smart City, City of Ravenna (IT)
RAVENNA
Ravenna is a middle-sized city by the Adriatic Sea Our assets:
- Culture & Art / UNESCO Heritage
- Sandy beaches and maritime landscape
- Commercial Port and industrial district
- Lifestyle and tourism
RAVENNA AND OUR CHALLENGE
NOW ABANDONED, NEGLECTED, STATIC AREA
- Environmental, social, economic issues
- Heritage and landscape assets
- Connection area between the ancient Art City
and Sea Side
TO ATTRACTIVE AND INNOVATIVE URBAN ECOSYSTEM
- Contemporary art and creativity
- Social innovation for inclusion
- Economic re-start in brownfield area
CITY DOCKS AND DARSENA DISTRICT, FORMER CITY PORT AND LIVELY CITY BUSINESS DISTRICT
LOCAL STRATEGY FOR THE CI TY DOCKS
PARTICIPATORY PATH The Darsena I wish 2010-15 DETAILED URBAN PLAN DARSENA (2016)
INTEGRATED PROJECT PUBLIC AND PRIVATE INVESTMENTS FOR NEW INFRASTRUCTURES AND BUSINESS «IL MARE IN PIAZZA» NATIONAL PLAN FOR SUBURBS REHABILITATION (SUBMISSION 2016 – IMPLEMENTATION 2018-21)
URBACT I I I – I MPLEMENTATI ON NETW ORK CREATI VE SPI RI TS 2016-19
URBACT I I I – CREATI VE SPI RI TS NETW ORK THE ADDED VALUE
- Know how
- Ideas
- Methodology
From/with
- Programme/project/local
experts
- Partner cities
- ULG & Local Stakeholders
- Stakeholders’
involvement
- Integrated action
plan
- Financial
innovation
- Monitoring and
evaluation DELIVERY OF DARSENA REGENERATION ACTION PLAN DESIGNED WITH CREATIVE STAKEHOLDERS DARE PROJECT IDEA AND CO-DESIGN APPLYING THE URBACT RESULTS FRAMEWORK APPROACH Submission under UIA 4° call
STAKEHOLDERS I NVOLVEMENT
2 ULG members are DARE delivery partners: CNA Ravenna (Business Association) CIFLA (local Research and Innovation Istitution) ULG is a Stekholder of DARE project
- Involvement of «unusual» stakeholders into the
regeneration process: cultural and creative industries and non profit organisations
- ULG as ongoing structured methodology
I NTEGRATED ACTI ON PLANNI NG
DARE PROJECT METHODOLOGY
- CO-DESIGN WITH
- 4 Deputy mayors
- ALL Municipality departments
- 12 partners
- Many stakeholders
- USING THE URBACT RESULTS
FRAMEWORK APPROACH URBACT ACTION PLAN Urban regeneration concept and action plan:
- Olistic approach
- Citizens’ centred
- Innovative ideas from
stakeholders (Darsena Archive, Street Art…)
- Connection with digital tools
DARE PROJECT IDEA Urban regeneration thanks to digital transition Submission under UIA 4° call
I MPROVED APPROACH TO FUNDI NG
- New tools activated
(e.g. crowdfunding based on ULG ideas / training and engagement)
- Plan and contacts with investment
funds
- New perspective on funding
complementarity ECN European crowdfunding newtwork is a partner of DARE
I MPROVED APPROACH TO FUNDI NG
New perspective
- n funding
complementarity Pilot actions Policy Action plan Citizens’ and stakeholders Engagement Olistic project development and funding strategy
@DARE Ravenna
I NSI GHT I NTO ONE ASPECT OF HOW THE EUI MI GHT W ORK: THE EXPERI ENCE OF W ORKI NG TOGETHER W I TH URBACT AND URBAN I NNOVATI VE ACTI ONS – GOOD PRACTI CE CASE I I
CLEO POUW, City of Rotterdaman (NL)
EXPERIENCE
- URBACT I (2004-2006) SecurCity – Safety policies in cities
- URBACT II (2007-2011)
- My Generation – Participation by young people in city policies
- My Generation at Work - Employability and employment of young people
- URBACT III (2013-2015) Resilient Cities - Improving city resilience
- Urban Innovative Actions (2016-2019) - BRIDGE project -
aligning young people’s educational choices with future labour market needs
CAPACITY BUILDING IN URBACT
- Coordination of 4 networks of 10-12 EU cities
- Local Groups and Local Action Plans
- Process guidance (including tools) -> step by step assisting cities
in developing an integrative and participatory approach (and make a difference!)
- Starting from problem structuring and current situation
- Strong guidance for partners on the diversity of the local
partnership -> involving all relevant stakeholders
- Strengthen the capacity of local stakeholders to develop efficient
policies.
CHALLENGES VISION Pathways EXPERIMENT Integrated Action Plan Lessons from Experiment
(results monitoring and assessing)
IMPORTANCE OF EXPERIMENTING
- In URBACT small scale at neighbourhood level
- In UIA at the level of South Rotterdam
- Trying out in practice new ways of doing, organizing and thinking
- Multi-actor action: city government is only one of the actors
- Serve as a stepping stone for learning and show commitment to
the vision
- Visible & Tangible > local, accessible, discussed, celebrated, owned
by community
- Learn from the experiment
- Make a difference, big or small!
INTERNATIONAL KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE
- From traditional ppt based meetings to interactive
workshop design
- Skilled moderators
- Creating a safe space for joint learning and inspiration
- Experts guiding the process
- Finding the ‘elements that work’ from local good practices
- Partner cities learning and experiencing new interactive
tools to use in their local process
- Building a community
URBACT -> UIA
- Chance to acquire in-depth knowledge
- Allows the exploration of a broad set of possible interventions
- It erodes the old ways of thinking, providing a careful and
structured way of learning
- Professionalism and confidence gained through URBACT helped us
dare to think, conceive and propose an innovative action
- Helped in building a strong and reliable local partnership
- Co-desiging the UIA proposal with the stakeholders
- Importance of external expertise for learning, capturing
knowledge and reflection
IMPORTANCE OF URBACT - UIA
- Offering the opportunity to experiment
- Creation of a safe innovation space for cities implementing an
integrated and participative approach
- Reducing the feelings of ‘risk’ of civil servants by working within
the URBACT / UIA framework
- Impact and scaling across the city from these experiments – for
UIA BRIDGE influencing the Work Learning Agreements in Rotterdam
- URBACT and UIA secretariat believe in the power of cities and act
accordingly!
EU PARTNERSHIP ON JOBS AND SKILLS IN THE LOCAL ECONOMY
- Rotterdam involved in the Partnership on Jobs and Skills
- Support the crucial transition phase towards the future economy.
- Important for cities to be involved in all elements currently
happening at the EU level that can benefit this transition.
- Input for the next skills discussions, regulations, financing and
knowledge exchange
- Via the Partnership we advocate for an integral approach of the
Human Capital agenda within the European Funds
I NSI GHT I NTO ONE ASPECT OF HOW THE EUI MI GHT W ORK: THE EXPERI ENCE OF W ORKI NG TOGETHER W I TH URBACT AND URBAN I NNOVATI VE ACTI ONS – GOOD PRACTI CE CASE I I I
INTI BERTOCCHI, City of Bologna (IT)
Inti.bertocchi@comune.bologna.it
URBACT PROJECTS
Focus : integration of Roma populations Main goal : to overcome negative attitudes, improve consultation and engagement with the Roma community Focus : creation of a Thematic Network across Europe to connect cultural and creative industries Main goal : to stimulate the effects of "spill over"
SALUS SPACE PROJECT (UIA)
Focus : integration of migrants and refugees Main goal : to overcome the traditional reception model by creating and innovative corespace, open to citizens, where the welcoming of refugees will match with a wider vision of multicultural welfare and social cohesion www.saluspace.eu
LESSONS LEARNT FROM URBACT
Key issues:
- Local Support Group
multilevel governance
- Bottom-up approach
participative model (target
involvement)
Needs Analysis Local Action Plan I m plem entation
- f actions/ local policies
Follow up and new projects
The process:
UIA PROJECT
Integrated services:
- Dwellings
- Hostel
- Multicultural restaurant
- Theatre
- Craftsmanship laboratories
- Gardens
- Research center – coworking
space
Local stakeholders (LSG) NGOs Public I nstitutions (LGC) University and research centers (Think Tank) Citizens (editorial staff and evaluation group) Beneficiaries (refugees, households, students, ...)
Tow ards the « Participatory Foundation »
I NTERACTI VE SESSI ON: DI SCUSSI ON CI RCLES ON THE EUI
DI SCUSSI ON ROUND 1 :
- What kind of support do urban areas need from
your organisation’s point of view? (25 min discussion)
- Harvesting (15 min)
DI SCUSSI ON ROUND 2
- How to reduce the existing gaps and
fragmentation between the different urban support tools/ programmes under Cohesion Policy as well as between these tools/ programmes and mainstream Cohesion Policy investments? (25 min discussion)
- Harvesting (15 min)
Keucheniusstraat
NEXT STEPS I N 2 0 2 0
EC, Expert and Expert Working Group continue preparatory activities of the EUI
- Design of actions that improve coordination and coherence between the urban
tools of Cohesion Policy
- Dialogue with Member States and other Urban Actors on how to support the
Urban Agenda for the EU in the frame of the EUI