Estimation of Adaptation Cost and Risk Toshihiko Masui Izumi - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

estimation of adaptation cost and risk
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Estimation of Adaptation Cost and Risk Toshihiko Masui Izumi - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Estimation of Adaptation Cost and Risk Toshihiko Masui Izumi Kubota, Azusa Okagawa, Shinichiro Fujimori, Tomoko Hasegawa ICA-RUS/CCRP-PJ2 International Workshop 2013 Tokyo, Japan December 5, 2013 Overall of this sub-theme Collection of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Estimation of Adaptation Cost and Risk

Toshihiko Masui Izumi Kubota, Azusa Okagawa, Shinichiro Fujimori, Tomoko Hasegawa

ICA-RUS/CCRP-PJ2 International Workshop 2013

Tokyo, Japan December 5, 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Overall of this sub-theme

  • Collection of data and information on adaptation cost in

global scale, and Meta analysis

– Assessment of risk of adaptation.

  • Socio-economic scenario development –based on SSPs

– A part of Scenario Task Group, and providing scenarios to other teams.

  • Development of integrated assessment model reflecting

climate change impact & adaptation and mitigation.

– Model intercomparison among S-10-4.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Impact and Adaptation (2)

First-level category Second-level category Third-level category Adaptive measures Food sector Agriculture Grains, fruit Improvement of tolerance and avoidance of high temperatures Livestock farming Livestock, fodder Avoidance of high temperatures and migration to more suitable locations Fisheries Migratory fish, coastal fish, aquaculture Adaptation to changes in ecosystems and movement to more suitable locations Water Water supply Securing of reservoirs and groundwater use Water demand measures Improvement of efficiency Water environment management Measures against eutrophication and salt water Flood control measures Natural ecosystems (vegetation /land) Forest ecosystemsNatural forests, planted forests, community woodland Revision of sanctuaries Coastal ecosystems Oceans, freshwater, tidal flats Reduction of environmental load and riparian forest preservation

Source: Research Committee on Global Warming Effects and Adaptation (MOE, 2012)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Impact and Adaptations (1)

First-level category Second-level category Third-level category Adaptive measures Disaster prevention and coastal sector Changes in land use Changes in land use/architectural styles Development of buffer zones/dykes, changes in architectural styles Enhancement of disaster prevention systems Information provision and support Development of evacuation routes, disaster drills Monitoring Observation Health Summer heat Public health guidance Infectious diseases Vaccination, improvement of sanitation National/ urban life Safe living Houses, inhabited areas Strengthening/movement of buildings Healthy living Heat, water environment Heat stroke measures, maintenance of health Economically affluent living Heat, diet Use of weather derivatives, development of new industries Comfortable living Heat Renovation and pest extermination Culture Ecosystems Tree planting and preservation

Source: Research Committee on Global Warming Effects and Adaptation (MOE, 2012)

Update this table using IPCC AR5.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Constraints on adaptations

Constraints/obstacles

  • Physical/ecological
  • Technological
  • Economic/financial
  • Social/cultural
  • Institutional
  • Information/recognition
  • Human resource development

Source: Research Committee on Global Warming Effects and Adaptation (MOE, 2012)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Adaptation risks

Risks for human society

  • Risks associated with cost burden (adoption expenses,

development expenses)

  • Development potential as an industry
  • Risks associated with changes in land use
  • Risks associated with changes in local infrastructure
  • Risks associated with growth in energy demand

Risks for ecosystems

  • Impact on ecosystems of selective breeding and changes in

tree species, etc.

  • Risks associated with ecosystem changes

Source: Research Committee on Global Warming Effects and Adaptation (MOE, 2012)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Estimation of adaptation costs in global scale

literatur e Estimation method Results on adaptation cost notes Assumptions Adaptation fields Annual cost (bil. $) ratio to GDP World Bank (2006) Temperature change: 2-3℃ Additional investment to fields with climate risk 9-41

  • US$ at 2000price

World Bank (2010) Definition of adaptation costs additional costs Baseline defined by sector GHG scenario IPCC SRES A2 Climate scenario NCAR、CISRO Time period 2010-2050 Adaptation level recovery to the level without climate damages Discount rate Public hardware actions Infrastructure Coastal area Water supply and river flood Agriculture Fishery Human health Forestry & ecosystem Extreme events All area Rainy season (NCAR scenario) 89.5-101.8 Dry season (CISRO scenario) 76.8-88.3 Rainy season (NCAR scenario) 0.22-0.12% (2010- 49) Dry season (CISRO scenario) 0.17-0.11% (2010- 49) US$ at 2005 price UNFCCC (2007) Definition of adaptation costs additional costs Baseline defined by sector GHG scenario IPCC SRES A1B, B1,IS92a Time period 2010-2030 Infrastructure Coastal area Water supply Agriculture Forestry & Fishery Human health Natural ecosystem 8-130 1.2(A1B)、1.1(B1) 11(A1B)、9(B1) 14 4-5 12-22

  • US$ at 2005 price

Agrawala. S., et al. (OECD) (2010) Definition of adaptation cost investment to reduce damages Baseline defined by model Climate model AD-DICE, AD-RICE, AD- WITCH Time period 2005-2100 Discount rate 3% Coastal area Agriculture Human health Resident & ecosystem

  • ther vulnerable market

Non-market Extreme events Taking into account adaptation related to flow, stock & capacity

  • DICE

0.28% in 2100 WITCH 0.19% in 2100 at NPV Cost is estimated under optimal adaptation and no mitigation.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Urgent!

  • We need more information about adaptation cost!
  • If you know new data, information, report, ...,

please introduce to us!

– Global – National – Local

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Our concept of impact/adaptation modeling

CGE model <Economic activity> Agriculture (food) GHG Temperature increase Water Health Coastal area Ecosystem Damage Impact Adaptation Mitigation results from

  • ther teams

Detailed process In order to input to CGE, process/information should be simplified.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Climate change impact and adaptation assessment on food consumption utilizing a new scenario framework

Center for Social & Environmental Systems Research, National Institute for Environmental Studies

  • T. Hasegawa, S. Fujimori, S. Yonghee,
  • K. Takahashi, T. Masui and A. Tanaka

10

Hasegawa T., Fujimori S., Shin Y., Takahashi K., Masui T. and A. Tanaka, Climate change impact and adaptation assessment on food consumption utilizing a new scenario framework, Environmental Science and Technology, accepted.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Introduction

  • Climate change(CC) impacts on agriculture & food systems
  • Several approaches have been taken
  • Existing studies

– Not quantifying effects of adaptation measures – Based on SRES, not RCPs & SSPs – Based on climate data of CMIP3, not CMIP5

  • Aim

– Analyze CC impacts on food consumption and risk of hunger by using RCPs & SSPs based on multi-GCM scenarios. – Quantify effects of adaptation measures

11

Background

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Scenario settings

Optimistic SSP1 Middle SSP2 Pessimistic SSP3 NoCC Present climate condition assumed With CC RCP2.6 with/without adaptation in low or middle income countries RCP4.5 RCP6.0 RCP8.5 Climate conditions Socio-economic conditions

12

“RCP”: Representative Concentration Pathway “SSP”: Shared Socioeconomic Pathway

5000 10000 15000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Mil number

World Population

SSP1 SSP2 SSP3

50000 100000 150000 200000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 bil 2005 US$/year

World GDP

SSP1 SSP2 SSP3

World population World GDP  Adaptation measures:

  • change in crop variety & planting dates
  • industrial countries: available

社会経済 条件 気候条件

作物モデル 世界CGEモデル

エネルギー・削減費用

  • エネルギー需給
  • バイオ作物生産
  • 炭素価格
  • 所得低下

農業・食料

  • 食料需給
  • 栄養不足人口

土地利用 変化

作物収量変化 気候モデル

Method

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Socioeconomic condition (SSP1-3)

  • population
  • GDP
  • Consumer

preference Climate condition (RCP2.6/4.5/6.0/8.5 /NoCC)

Global CGE model

Modeling framework

Year: 2005-2050 World17regions Climate change impact

Climate model

Energy & mitigation cost

  • Energy supply &

demand

  • Bio-crop production
  • Carbon price
  • Income loss

Agriculture & food

  • Food supply &

demand

  • Population at risk
  • f hunger

Land use

Exogenous variables Model Endogenous variables

Crop model

Change in crop yield

Method

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • CGE model: Emission constraints
  • GAEZ crop model: climate condition

14

Representative Concentration Pathway

Method

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Temperature Precipitation Solar radiation

社会経済 条件 気候条件

作物モデル 世界CGEモデル

エネルギー・削減費用

  • エネルギー需給
  • バイオ作物生産
  • 炭素価格
  • 所得低下

農業・食料

  • 食料需給
  • 栄養不足人口

土地利用 変化

作物収量変化

気候モデル

Method

Global change in climate conditions

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • 100
  • 50

50 100 150 200 EU25 Oceania Japan Canada United States Rest of Europe Turkey China India Brazil Former Soviet Union Southeast Asia Rest of Asia Rest of South America Middle East North Africa Rest of Africa

Change in yield [%] (NoCC=100)

  • Change in crop yield due to CC is calculated M-GAEZ

16

Crop yields

Change in crop yield due to CC in 2050

(RCP8.5, HadGEM2ES)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

World food consumption & risk of hunger

17

2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000 3200 3400 3600 food consumption [kcal/cap/day]

Industrial SSP1 Industrial SSP2 Industrial SSP3 Transition SSP1 Transition SSP2 Transition SSP3 Developing SSP1 Developing SSP2 Developing SSP3

a)

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 Population at risk of hunger [109]

b)

a) Per-capita calorie intake and b) Population at risk of hunger under the three SSPs for the cases without climate change in the industrial, transition and developing countries. Hasegawa et al., accepted

Results

slide-18
SLIDE 18

rcp2.6 rcp4.5 rcp6.0 rcp8.5 rcp2.6 rcp4.5 rcp6.0 rcp8.5 rcp2.6 rcp4.5 rcp6.0 rcp8.5 SSP1 SSP2 SSP3

18

Changes in global population at risk of hunger in 2050 under the SSPs & RCPs

  • The effectiveness of adaptation measures is significant under the various

combinations on socioeconomic, climate and yield conditions and is robust regardless of the level of mitigation efforts to lower GHG emissions at least throughout 2050.

(Boxes and dotted lines show the uncertainty range across the 8 GCMs. Boxes represent the 1st-3rd quartile range and the plain line indicates the median)

Results

Percent change in population at risk of hunger [%]

Hasegawa et al., accepted

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Population of hunger in 2050: SSP3-RCP8.5

  • CC impact on risk of hunger are different across regions because levels of food

consumptions and CC impacts vary across regions.

  • Due to large CC impact, there is great land scarcity, higher crop prices and low food

consumption in India. Hasegawa et al., in review

Results

World China India SE Asia S Asia Brazil LA CIS MiddleEast Africa

Percent change in population at risk of hunger [%]

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Future works

  • taking into account other sectors’ impacts and adaptations

– human health impact through labor force and consumption pattern change.

  • taking into account various adaptation risks

– Cost burden – Land use change – Energy demand – Macro economic system? – ・・・

  • Mitigation and Adaptation

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Ten Actions for Realizing a Low Carbon Asia

Qualitative storylines are quantified.

21

S-6 Project, ERTDF, MOEJ

slide-22
SLIDE 22

GHG Emissions in Asia

22

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 GHG排出量[GtCO2eq/年] 方策1【都市内交通】による削減 方策2【地域間交通】による削減 方策3【資源利用】による削減 方策4【建築物】による削減 方策5【バイオマス】による削減 方策6【エネルギーシステム】による削減 方策7【農業・畜産】による削減 方策8【森林・土地利用】による削減 方策以外の削減 アジアの排出量(低炭素社会) 世界の排出量(低炭素社会) 世界の排出量(なりゆき社会)

GHG emissions [GtCO2eq/yr] Reduction due to Action 1 Reduction due to Action 2 Reduction due to Action 3 Reduction due to Action 4 Reduction due to Action 5 Reduction due to Action 6 Reduction due to Action 7 Reduction due to Action 8 Other reduction Emission in Asia (LCS) Global Emission (LCS) Global Emission (BaU) S-6 Project, ERTDF, MOEJ