errors in pixel offset analysis
play

Errors in Pixel Offset Analysis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Errors in Pixel Offset Analysis Satoshi Okuyama (AIST) 1/20 Pixel Offset Analysis Pixel Offset Analysis (Offset Tracking, Image Matching, etc.) Coregistrate two


  1. ピクセルオフセット解析における誤差 Errors in Pixel Offset Analysis 奥山 哲 (産総研) Satoshi Okuyama (AIST) 1/20

  2. Pixel Offset Analysis Pixel Offset Analysis (Offset Tracking, Image Matching, etc.) Coregistrate two Images at densely distributed tie-points and estimate the surface displacement as misfit of the global coregistration function. Each offset is calculated as image shift which maximizes the image correlation of small image patches Compared to InSAR, Pixel Offset Analysis can ○ detect large displacement InSAR: ~2m / POA: ~(window size)/2 ○ detect azimuth component of the dis- placement, as well as range but × is less sensitive to the displacement InSAR:2~3cm / POA:40cm × has lower spatial resolution InSAR:18m / POA : ~1km 2/20

  3. Strategy Target: Iwate-Miyagi Nairiku (Inland) Earthquake (M7.2, 2008) Data: 6 PALSAR amplitude image pairs Method: Calculate EW, NS and UD components of the surface displacement by applying weighted least-square adjustment to estimated range and azimuth offsets ID Master Obs. Date [Mode] Slave Obs. Date [Mode] Path No. [Off-Nadir] Bperp 1 2006/06/19 [FBD] 2008/06/24 [FBS] 053 [41.5] 301m 2 2006/07/06 [FBD] 2008/07/11 [FBS] 054 [41.5] 291m 3 2007/08/29 [FBS] 2008/07/16 [FBS] 057 [34.3] -788m 4 2006/08/02 [FBS] 2008/06/22 [FBS] 061 [21.5] 389m 5 2007/06/21 [FBS] 2008/06/23 [FBS] 402 [34.3] -335m 6 2007/02/03 [FBS] 2009/02/08 [FBS] 402 [34.3] -1083m ・ FBD images are oversampled in range direction befor offset estimation for FBD-FBS pairs ・ Correlation window size: 256x256[pixel] ・ Stereoscopic effect is corrected using SRTM DEM 3/20

  4. Error Evaluation Evaluate the error by calculating Std. Dev. of the offsets ID Mode Std. Dev. Az 65cm 1 FBD-FBS Ra 40cm Az 39cm 2 FBD-FBS Ra 37cm Az 22cm 3 FBS-FBS Ra 20cm Az 69cm 4 FBS-FBS Ra 64cm Az 68cm 5 FBS-FBS Ra 46cm Az 72cm ID3(Ra): D34.3 [FBS-FBS] 6 FBS-FBS Ra 32cm -3m +3m 4/20

  5. Calculation of the three-dimensional displacement Assumptions ・ All the pairs observe same deformation ・ Range/Azimuth offset errors follow a normal distribution ・ The error is constant over the scene 1 σ 2 Apply least-square adjustment using as weight / 5/20

  6. Three-Dimensional coseismic displacement map Horizontal Displacement Vector (arrows) + Vertical Displacement (color) Epicenter Mt. Kurikoma 6/20

  7. Error Evaluation ID Mode Std. Dev. Az 65cm 1 FBD-FBS Ra 40cm Az 39cm 2 FBD-FBS Ra 37cm Az 22cm 3 FBS-FBS Ra 20cm Az 69cm 4 FBS-FBS Ra 64cm Az 68cm 5 FBS-FBS Ra 46cm Az 72cm ID1(Az): D41.5 [FBD-FBS] 6 FBS-FBS Ra 32cm -3m +3m 7/20

  8. Error Evaluation ID Mode Std. Dev. Az 65cm 1 FBD-FBS Ra 40cm High Az 39cm Low 2 FBD-FBS Ra 37cm There is spatial variation in error Az 22cm (Mountainous = High Error?) 3 FBS-FBS Ra 20cm Az 69cm 4 FBS-FBS Ra 64cm Az 68cm Low 5 FBS-FBS Ra 46cm Az 72cm ID1(Az): D41.5 [FBD-FBS] 6 FBS-FBS Ra 32cm -3m +3m 8/20

  9. New Strategy 0. Offset estimation program implemented by GAMMA provides SNR (some kind of quality measure) for each offset estimate 1. Sort offset estimates by SNR 2. Distribute offset estimates into bins so that each bin contains 100 offset estimates 3. Calculate Std. Dev. for each bins assuming that offset estimates of same SNR are under same condition 4. Check if any relation is seen between SNR and Std. Dev. of each bins 9/20

  10. Result y = bx ae Exponential Function ( ) should explain the data well 10/20

  11. Result − σ = × 0 . 077 ( SNR ) (Range) 1 . 16 e offset σ = × − 0 . 079 ( SNR ) 2 . 42 e (Azimuth) offset 11/20

  12. Result − σ = × 0 . 076 ( SNR ) (Range) 1 . 11 e offset σ = × − 0 . 070 ( SNR ) 2 . 24 e (Azimuth) offset 12/20

  13. Result − σ = × 0 . 032 ( SNR ) (Range) 0 . 78 e offset σ = × − 0 . 047 ( SNR ) 1 . 69 e (Azimuth) offset 13/20

  14. Result − σ = × 0 . 008 ( SNR ) (Range) 0 . 42 e offset σ = × − 0 . 020 ( SNR ) 0 . 63 e (Azimuth) offset 14/20

  15. Result − σ = × 0 . 077 ( SNR ) (Range) 0 . 17 e offset σ = × − 0 . 011 ( SNR ) 0 . 30 e (Azimuth) offset 15/20

  16. Result − σ = × 0 . 021 ( SNR ) (Range) 0 . 40 e offset σ = × 0 . 002 ( SNR ) 0 . 62 e (Azimuth) offset 16/20

  17. Path 402, Azimuth Offset ID Mode Std. Dev. Az 65cm 1 FBD-FBS Ra 40cm Az 39cm 2 FBD-FBS Ra 37cm Az 22cm 3 FBS-FBS Ra 20cm Az 69cm 4 FBS-FBS Ra 64cm Az 68cm 5 FBS-FBS Ra 46cm Az 72cm ID5(Az): A34.3 [FBS-FBS] 6 FBS-FBS Ra 32cm -3m +3m 17/20

  18. 18/20 ) ) 10 10 > < topo topo σ σ ( ( topo σ random / b Effect of Topography + a = = SNR SNR (

  19. 19/20 Error (Std. Dev.) 2m 0 Offset +3m -3m Offset and Error Map

  20. Summary The relation between the SNR and offset error is investigated in empirical manner σ ・ can be well explained as an exponential function of SNR offset σ σ ・ SNR is inverse proportional to when is greater than 10m topo topo 20/20

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend