x ray medical imaging and pixel detectors
play

X-Ray Medical Imaging and Pixel detectors PIXEL 2000 Genova, June - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

X-Ray Medical Imaging and Pixel detectors PIXEL 2000 Genova, June 5-8 th 2000 TRI ELL X J.P.Moy, , Moirans, France Pixel 2000 /JPM 8 / 6 / 2000 1 OUTLINE - X-ray medical imaging. The requirements, some


  1. X-Ray Medical Imaging and Pixel detectors PIXEL 2000 Genova, June 5-8 th 2000 TRI ELL X J.P.Moy, , Moirans, France Pixel 2000 /JPM 8 / 6 / 2000 1

  2. OUTLINE - X-ray medical imaging. The requirements, some particular features - Present detectors. - The new X-ray Flat detectors scintillator and photoconductor approach - How can pixel detectors help medical imaging? The detecting material, the readout circuit CONCLUSIONS Pixel 2000 /JPM 8 / 6 / 2000 2

  3. X-ray Imaging in Medicine : Radiography, Fluoroscopy, Computed Tomography (1) The oldest medical imaging technique : projection radiography discovered by Röntgen in 1895 : • About 200 000 systems in the world: best for bones, but also widely used for soft tissues, often with contrats agents, such as barium sulfate for gastro-intestinal imaging. • Mammography is a particular case, as it concerns soft tissues and aims at the detection of very fine calcifications. Pixel 2000 /JPM 8 / 6 / 2000 3

  4. X-ray Imaging in Medicine : Radiography, Fluoroscopy, Computed Tomography (2) • Fluoroscopy : Originally visual observation of the fluorescent screen. Now with electronic image converters : XRII Angiography is a particularly important application of fluoroscopy : imaging blood vessels after injection of an iodine compound in an artery to detect stenosis or other pathologies. • Computed tomography is a 3D imaging technique based on the reconstruction of the object from many linear projections. At present, it does not rely on imaging detectors Pixel 2000 /JPM 8 / 6 / 2000 4

  5. X-ray Imaging in Medicine : competition with Ultra-Sound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging ? • Imaging techniques without ionizing radiation will certainly develop at the expense of X-rays : - US is easy to use and cheaper than other modalities. - MRI provides invaluable information on soft tissues, and is becoming fast enough to adress cardiac imaging, but will remain expensive. • X-rays will definitely remain for many years the most practical and cost effective imaging technique for bones, joints, and mammography. Pixel 2000 /JPM 8 / 6 / 2000 5

  6. Physical limitations Poisson statistics imply a trade off between size-dose-contrast. For instance, a 100 µm detail with 10 % contrast will be detected with a 10:1 Signal to Noise ratio only if the photon flux exceeds 10 6 photons /mm² (with an ideal detector) 100 10 2 absorbed photons /mm² S/N = 3 Absorbed photon flux = 10 6 photons /mm² 10 6 absorbed photons/mm² 10 for S/N = 30 1 S/N = 10 contrast (%) S/N = 3 0,1 0,01 1 10 100 1000 10000 Object size (µm) After M.Arques, JRI 97 Pixel 2000 /JPM 8 / 6 / 2000 6

  7. X-ray image sampling The image from a digital detector is spatially sampled, and therefore must comply with the laws of sampling : 1 Neither signal nor noise spectra should exceed (Nyquist) 2 . sampling pitch Failure to comply with this law results in aliasing. A spatial response of the converter layer smaller than the pixel is deceptive : the noise spectrum extends well beyond the Nyquist limit, so that it piles up 1 in the [0- ] range. 2 . sampling pitch When the spatial response stops at the Nyquist limit, signal and quantum noise are filtered by the same MTF, and the input S/N is preserved as long as the other noises remain small. Pixel 2000 /JPM 8 / 6 / 2000 7

  8. Simulated images : photoconductor and scintillator based detectors 500 µm CsI, measured PSF Photoconductor, PSF = Pixel 5 5 x 10 x 10 120 120 6.8 6.8 6.6 100 100 6.6 6.4 6.4 80 80 intensité en e- intensité en e- 6.2 6.2 60 6 60 6 5.8 5.8 40 40 5.6 5.6 20 20 5.4 5.4 LUT LUT 20 40 60 80 100 120 20 40 60 80 100 120 Pixel 2000 /JPM 8 / 6 / 2000 8

  9. DETECTIVE QUANTUM EFFICIENCY : A measure of how well X-rays are used MTF Readout noise DQE X-ray absorption Quantum Noise X-ray Energy Dose Pixel 2000 /JPM 8 / 6 / 2000 9

  10. Compared requirements for RADIOGRAPHY and FLUOROSCOPY General Mammography Fluoroscopy radiography Size > 40 x 40 cm >18 x 24 cm >30 x 30 cm Pixel size ~ 150 µm 60-100 µm 200-400 µm Typical nb of incid.X/pel ~1000 ~5000 ~10 Corresponding dose 2.5 µGy 100µGy 25 nGy Energy range 30-120 keV ~20 keV 30-120 keV Input equiv. noise < 5 X quanta < 5 X quanta < 1 X quantum Dynamic range 12 bit 12 bit 12 bit Readout time 1-5 s 1-5 s ~30 ms (30fps) Pixel 2000 /JPM 8 / 6 / 2000 10

  11. The present detectors in Radiography (1) Film • At present, the most widely used detection scheme is the screen-film. • A light sensitive silver halide film is sandwiched between two radioluminescent screens, usually made of Gd 2 O 2 S:Tb powder in a binding agent. • The sensitivity vs resolution trade-off results from : - the thickness of the absorbing screen, - the light absorption or reflection of the backing layer, - the size of the grains in the screen. Pixel 2000 /JPM 8 / 6 / 2000 11

  12. The present detectors in Radiography (2) Screen - Optics - CCD • Based on existing elements. • Possible extension to dynamic imaging. • The basic obstacle is to get more than 1 el. /X-ray in the CCD ("Quantum sink" situation ) - According to the laws of optics the collection of light decreases as 1/demagnification². Coupling a 20 cm screen to a 2 cm CCD results in a very poor light collection - Fiber optics are the best way to couple a screen to a CCD (but the most expensive...) • Some optical gain is necessary : X-ray Image Intensifiers Pixel 2000 /JPM 8 / 6 / 2000 12

  13. The present detectors in Radiography (3) Storage Phosphors Electrons created by the absorption of X-rays are stored as a latent image in a screen. It is then read by laser scanning • Provides a digital image with a very broad dynamic range. • Handled like film : Thin, identical formats and read time, disposable if damaged. Image quality and resolution comparable to that of sreen-films. • Single reading station for several units. • Not suitable for fluoroscopy Pixel 2000 /JPM 8 / 6 / 2000 13

  14. The present detectors in fluoroscopy X-ray Image Intensifiers are widely used. They offer an unequaled range of performance : • X-ray detection efficiency close to the theoretical limits, • Excellent S/N, even for very low X-ray flux • Large size, up to Ø 400 mm • Dynamic imaging capability, • Zooming • Mature technology, affordable However, they are bulky, especially for large diameters, and suffer from strong geometrical and magnetic distortion. Pixel 2000 /JPM 8 / 6 / 2000 14

  15. Operation of an X-ray image intensifier Operation of an X-ray image intensifier Metal vacuum vacuum Metal bottle bottle G1 Output Output X-ray X-ray G2 window Lens window Lens G3 Anode Camera Camera photocathode CsI input input screen screen CsI Gain : input screen Gain : input screen = 200 el = 200 el. / X-photon . / X-photon P20 output screen screen P20 output Gain : output screen Gain : output screen = = 1000 vis. photons / el 1000 vis. photons / el. . Total gain = 200.000 Total gain = 200.000 Aluminum input input window window Aluminum vis. photons / X-photon vis. photons / X-photon Pixel 2000 /JPM 8 / 6 / 2000 15

  16. X ray Image Intensifiers from TTE Pixel 2000 /JPM 8 / 6 / 2000 16

  17. X-ray Flat Detectors, the emerging technology Two approaches : - The scintillator/visible image sensor - The photoconductor/charge sensor Both have led to commercial systems. So far, only amorphous silicon can be obtained in the required sizes. Image sensors as well as charge detection arrays can be built with a technology derived from that of LCD active matrices An assembly of standard single crystal Si circuits is also possible, but such tiling results in challenging technical obstacles. Pixel 2000 /JPM 8 / 6 / 2000 17

  18. Readout Architecture bias bias PC PD Line drivers Line drivers Charge amplifiers Multiplex, coding Photoconductor scintillator / Photodiode Pixel 2000 /JPM 8 / 6 / 2000 18

  19. The Photoconductor based pixel Se a-Si Pixel 2000 /JPM h e - gate 8 / 6 / 2000 TFT -HV bias Data column 19

  20. Cross-section of a scintillator-photodiode-TFT pixel CsI:Tl Bias column Photodiode TFT Data column a-Si gate Pixel 2000 /JPM 8 / 6 / 2000 20

  21. Photodiode quantum efficiency and CsI:Tl fluorescence spectrum Photodiode 100% quantum efficiency CsI:Tl emission (nb 80% photons) 60% 40% 20% 0% 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 wavelength (nm) Pixel 2000 /JPM 8 / 6 / 2000 21

  22. Energy absorption of different materials (standard DN spectra, escape taken into account) 100 . 90 500 µm CsI, 75 % Pack.fr. 800 µm Se 80 X-ray absorption (% energy) Lanex regular (67 mg/cm²) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DN # Pixel 2000 /JPM 8 / 6 / 2000 22

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend