Environmental Claims Presentation Rheged 27 th October 2010 David - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

environmental claims presentation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Environmental Claims Presentation Rheged 27 th October 2010 David - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Environmental Claims Presentation Rheged 27 th October 2010 David Waller, LLB (Hons) ACII, ACILA, Director, Environmental Claims Division, QuestGates, Chartered Loss Adjusters & Claims Specialists. 1 What is an Environmental Claim?


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Environmental Claims Presentation

Rheged 27th October 2010

David Waller, LLB (Hons) ACII, ACILA, Director, Environmental Claims Division, QuestGates, Chartered Loss Adjusters & Claims Specialists.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

What is an Environmental Claim?

“An environmental claim in its widest context can emanate from any incident resulting in pollution or contamination to human health, buildings or other structures, land, the atmosphere or any water course or body of water”

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Where are the Gaps in Insurance Cover?

  • Sudden identifiable incident
  • Own land contamination – Yorkshire Water v.

Sun Alliance

  • Statutory charges – Bartoline v. RSA
  • Preventative work – duty to mitigate
  • Overlapping policy cover
  • Diminution of market value

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

4

Operative Clause would read:-

  • In the event of accidental personal injury or loss of or damage to

property or obstruction trespass nuisance or interference with any right

  • f way, air, light or water or other easement which arises in connection

with the business and which occurs during the period of insurance and within the territorial limits.

  • Insurers will indemnify the policy holder against (1) legal liability for

compensation up to the limit of indemnity and (2) costs and expenses.

  • Usual exceptions will seek to exclude own land/property and

pollution/contamination other than caused by a sudden identifiable unintended and unexpected incident which occurs in its entirety at a specific time and place during the period of insurance.

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Typical Occupiers Liability Extension To Household Policy

  • Accidental bodily injury or illness; or
  • Accidental loss of or damage to property
  • Happening during the period of insurance and arising:
  • As occupier (not as owner) of the home and its land;

Your legal liability to pay damages and claimant’s costs and expenses for: Usual exclusions include damage to own land/property Loss damage or liability arising from pollution or contamination unless caused by: a) A sudden and unexpected accident which can be identified; or b) Oil leaking from a domestic oil installation at the home.

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Legislation

  • Brief history and

development of environmental legislation in the UK

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

  • Land – Environmental Protection Act 1990 Part IIA
  • Contaminated Land Regime
  • Land is defined as contaminated if “significant harm is being

caused or there is a significant possibility of such harm to be caused, or pollution of controlled waters is likely to be caused”. A significant pollution linkage (SPL) must be identified

  • The regime identifies two type of people which may be liable

under the principle “the polluter pays”.

  • Class A - Those who have caused or knowingly permitted

the presence of contaminants

  • Class B - The owner or the occupier of the land

Legislation (continued)

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

  • Controlled Water
  • Water Resource Act (1991) Part III Chapter 1
  • Section 85 – “A person who causes or knowingly permits

any poisonous or polluting matter or any solid waste to enter any controlled waters”.

  • Section 161 – Authority shall be entitled to carry out anti-

pollution work and operations if:

  • Pollution is likely to enter controlled waters
  • If contamination has entered controlled waters to

restore as reasonably practicable the flora and fauna dependent on the aquatic environment prior to the pollution incident.

Legislation (continued)

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

  • Water Environment & Water Services (Scotland) Act 2003
  • Provides statutory framework for protection, improvement

and sustainable use of surface waters, transitional waters, coastal waters and groundwater

  • Requires any activity that is liable to cause water pollution

to be authorised.

  • Water Environment (Controlled Activities) (Scotland)

Regulations 2005

  • Creates offence of discharging polluting matters without

authorisation.

Legislation (continued)

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

The Environmental Damage (Prevention and Remediation) Regulations

  • This is the transposition of the Environmental

Liability Directive (ELD) into UK law (1st March 2009)

  • Liable persons
  • Operator of occupational activity carried out

under EC legislation listed in Directive is strictly liable for preventive or remedial measures due to imminent threat of , or actual, environmental damage to natural resources, that is:

  • Water
  • Land
  • Protected species and natural habitats

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

The Environmental Damage (Prevention and Remediation) Regulations

(continued)

  • Liable Persons
  • Operator of occupational activity not carried out

under listed EC legislation is liable for preventive

  • r remedial measures due to imminent threat of
  • r damage to:
  • Protected species and natural habitats
  • Provided that operator is negligent or
  • therwise at fault

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

The Environmental Damage (Prevention and Remediation) Regulations

(continued)

  • Environmental damage threshold
  • Land: significant risk of adverse effect on human

health

  • Water: significant adverse effect on ecological

chemical or quantitative status and ecological potential of waters

  • Protected species and natural habitats:

significant adverse effect on attainment or maintenance of conservation status

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

The Environmental Damage (Prevention and Remediation) Regulations

(continued)

  • Remediation
  • Land
  • Removal of significant risk
  • f adverse effect on human

health

  • Water and protected species

and natural habitats:

  • Primary remediation
  • Complementary remediation
  • Compensatory remediation

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

The Environmental Damage (Prevention and Remediation) Regulations

(continued)

  • Exceptions (armed conflict, natural phenomenon, activities

serving national defence or international security, protection from national disasters)

  • Mandatory defences (caused by third party despite

appropriate safety measures, result of compliance with governmental authority’s unrelated compulsory order or instruction

  • Optional defences (emission or event in compliance with

permit issued under domestic law which has transposed EC legislation or activity or emission not likely to cause damage according to current scientific and technical knowledge.

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

The Environmental Damage (Prevention and Remediation) Regulations

(continued) Type of damage Liability for operators

  • f Annex iii
  • ccupational activities

Liability of operators of

  • ther occupational

activities Standard of remediation Type of remediation applicable To protected species and natural habitats Strict Fault based Return the environment as a whole back to baseline condition, and remove any significant risk of an adverse effect on human health Primary Complementary Compensatory To water Strict None Return the environment as a whole back to baseline condition, and remove any significant risk of an adverse effect on human health Primary Complementary Compensatory To land Strict None The removal of any significant risk of an adverse effect on human health Remove significant risk of adverse effects on Human health, taking account

  • f actual or planned future use

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

The Environmental Damage (Prevention and Remediation) Regulations

(continued)

  • Suggested could have only modest impact in reality
  • Baseline levels/target values - potential difficulty to

determine baseline condition pre incident

  • Preventative action i.e. regulator can impose

corrective action for potential damage - quantification therefore difficult

  • Improvement works regulators may insist upon this,

query policy coverage

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

The Environmental Damage (Prevention and Remediation) Regulations 2009

(continued)

  • Remediation, primary, complimentary and

compensatory

  • Reserving issues
  • Potential choice of legislation available to regulators
  • Possible bean feast for the consultants!

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

EDR in Action

  • Mid Devon District Council case
  • Modest spill of kerosene at residential location from road tanker
  • Health threat to household
  • EDR more practicable tool to enforce clean up than Part IIA

EPA 1990 or WRA 1991

  • Spill resulted from economic activity, dangerous substance

entered ground, health risk, none of exemptions applied. Why EDR?

  • “adverse effects on human health” easier to satisfy than

“significant risk of significant hard”.

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Hungarian Sludge & ELD

  • Alumina plant reservoir – dam

failure at Ajka, Hungary,

  • Highly alkaline sludge, pH9-12
  • 6 villages destroyed, 5 dead,

controlled water including the Danube under threat.

  • Natural attenuation – chemical

neutralisation/buffering in soils and surface water and dilution.

  • Response includes adding clay

and acids to rivers to neutralise.

  • Human health – mainly

ingestion risk and dust inhalation.

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Hungarian Sludge - Remediation

  • Source removal – as practicable
  • Treatment of oils and water with

neutralising agents

  • Soil washing and recovery

(acids etc; metals recovery.

  • Natural attenuation – chemical

neutralisation/buffering in soils and surface water and dilution.

  • Response includes adding clay

and acids to rivers to neutralise.

  • Human health – mainly

ingestion risk and dust inhalation.

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Hungarian Sludge - ELD

  • More pressure on EU Governments to force

industries to insure or make financial provision against such serious enviro incident.

  • Hungary had intended to enforce compulsory

financial provision.

  • Current position – MAL Magyor Aluminium has
  • ffered to pay villages €360 per family, up to max of

€110,000

  • Company’s 3 private owners have individual

fortunes of between €60,000,000 and €85,000,000!

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Insurance Solutions?

  • Environmental Impairment Liability insurance.
  • Increasingly available, at more competitive rates e.g.

specialist cover offered by endorsement to NFU Mutual policyholders.

  • Cover not subject to “sudden identifiable”

restrictions, covers own land clean up and statutory as well as civil liabilities.

  • Regulator Enforced remediation – including habitat

damage (primary, complementary and compensatory).

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Case Study 1

  • Location – Domestic

property Nr Winchester.

  • Pollutant – Approximately

5000 litres of kerosene

  • Groundwater vulnerability –

Total catchment area. Very close to a grade A river and SSSI.

  • Geology – Topsoil overlying

approximately 1.5 m of gravel followed by chalk at depth.

  • Hydrogeology – presence of

shallow (<1m) groundwater.

23

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Site Location

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Contamination Assessment

  • Kerosene mostly contained as free

product on top of shallow groundwater. Lateral movement of free and dissolved phase.

  • Constraints: –
  • Kerosene impacted nearby listed

(grade II) building with no foundations.

  • High soil permeability requires

extremely high pumping rates in

  • rder to achieve hydrogeological

containment.

  • No discharge possible except to

surface water.

  • Necessity to minimise on site

disruption.

  • Remediation – system of trenches
  • excavated. In situ treatment of

groundwater over 18 months, then 6 months monitoring.

25

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Traditional Approach

Excavation of approximately 5000 m3 of material Contaminated soil disposal approx. £300K Backfill operations approx £100K Garden reinstatement approx £35K Total - £435K

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Innovative Treatment Solution

Installation of an innovative in situ recovery system System cost including installation £190K Operating cost £40K Post monitoring cost £15K Total £245K

27