Enhancing Student Learning through Holistic Mentoring Program - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

enhancing student learning through holistic mentoring
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Enhancing Student Learning through Holistic Mentoring Program - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Enhancing Student Learning through Holistic Mentoring Program Holistic Mentoring Program Karen KW Mak 1 and Peter FM Lau 2 1 D 1 Department of Chemistry t t f Ch i t 2 Centre for Holistic Teaching and Learning H Hong Kong Baptist University K


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Enhancing Student Learning through Holistic Mentoring Program Holistic Mentoring Program

Karen KW Mak1 and Peter FM Lau2

1D

t t f Ch i t

1Department of Chemistry 2Centre for Holistic Teaching and Learning

H K B ti t U i it Hong Kong Baptist University

slide-2
SLIDE 2

HKBU HKBU

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Communities of Practice

This project calls for the perfection of the existing mentoring system and with the intent to make it into a full‐fledged academic advising system. Through the implementation of a variety of activities the life experience and caring attitude of the implementation of a variety of activities, the life experience and caring attitude of the mentor can be used to inspire our mentees in fully developing their potential as independent learners and responsible citizens via the four year of university education at HKBU. Under the advice of the mentor, the in‐depth subject knowledge, generic skills and teamwork spirit of our students can be fostered through their participation in skills and teamwork spirit of our students can be fostered through their participation in the Video Production Competition. The quality YouTube as the deliverables of this competition after uploading in public domain will serve as a tool to promote public sciences to our community. To offer students more opportunity in polishing their English oral presentation skills st dent are enco raged to participate the FameLab an English oral presentation skills, student are encouraged to participate the FameLab, an annual 3‐min presentation competition on science topic organized by the British

  • Council. In the pilot run of this initiative, selected colleagues from the Faculty of Science

are also involved.

HKBU G d t Graduate Attributes

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Findings

  • ETS Proficiency Profile

(ETS)

  • Relatively Strong in

M h i

(ETS)

– From the US T d ’ hi

Mathematics

– Test students’ achievement in Reading, Writing, Critical Thinking and Mathematics Thinking and Mathematics

  • Academic Proficiency

Test (APT)

  • Relatively Weak in

Test (APT)

– Local instrument Test on three areas Use of

Relatively Weak in Communication skill – particularly in English

– Test on three areas, Use of English, Chinese and Aptitude

particularly in English

p

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

FameLab FameLab

One of the greatest initiatives in science communication

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Science Video Production Competition Science Video Production Competition

Judging criteria:

  • 1. Scientific accuracy
  • 1. Scientific accuracy
  • 2. Presentation clarity
  • 3. Creativity

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Need for science communication Need for science communication

  • How can we understand science if we are not

speaking about science? p g

  • Most scientists do not receive formal training

in science communication to the public in science communication to the public

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Need for science communication 2 Need for science communication 2

  • Underestimate the difficulties
  • Current outreaching activities are relatively

Current outreaching activities are relatively informal, infrequent, under‐recommended by mentors mentors

  • Possibility of infuse formal science

communication training into the curriculum in higher education higher education

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Civic Scientists

“Science is not finished until it is communicated.” communicated.

Mark Walport

Sick Science! screencap

G l h t th

  • Prof. Xiangyi LI

UNESCO Kalinga Prize for the P l i ti f S i 2013

Goal: shorten the gap between modernization and bli i tifi lit

Popularization of Science 2013

10

public scientific literacy

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Feedback from Students – FameLab Competition (Individual Task)

Percentage of respondents who agreed their achievement(s) in HKBU GAs

100.0%

90 0% 100.0%

g f p g ( )

75.0% 75.0%

70.0% 80.0% 90.0%

25.0% 25.0%

40.0% 50.0% 60.0% %

0 0% 25.0% 25.0% 0 0%

10.0% 20.0% 30.0%

0.0% 0.0%

0.0%

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Students’ Evaluation – FameLab Competition Students Evaluation – FameLab Competition

S d A (C i i )

  • Student A (Communication)

“I was shortlisted as a finalist and had a chance to participate to a workshop on presentation skills facilitated by a science communicator… p p f y I learnt some effective way to explain science topic, by simplifying the concepts or theories for the public audiences.“

  • Student B (Creativity and Communication)
  • Student B (Creativity, and Communication)

“Although I didn’t learn new science knowledge from this activity, I knew some creative and simple ways to explain science, such as to made use f d il lif l ”

  • f daily life examples.”
  • Student C (Communication)

“Some of the events were open to public It provided me an opportunity Some of the events were open to public. It provided me an opportunity to communicate science subject to audiences with different backgrounds.”

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Video Competition Results

Group 1 2 3 4 5 6 Group 1 2 3 4 5 6 Scientific accuracy (40%) 25 30 28 22 not rated not rated (40%) Presentation clarity (30%) 23 22 17 20 Creativity (30%) 23 13 15 18 Total 71 65 60 60 Total 71 65 60 60

Mentors’ observation

  • Learning science ‐ improve motivation =)

C ti it ! ))

  • Creativity! =))
  • Communication =|
  • Knowledge =)

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Feedback from Students – Video Competition (Group Task)

Percentage of respondents who agreed their achievement(s) in HKBU GAs

90 0% 100.0%

g f p g ( )

57 1% 71.4% 71.4%

70.0% 80.0% 90.0%

57.1% 35.7% 35.7%

40.0% 50.0% 60.0% %

14.3% 14.3%

10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 0.0%

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Students’ Evaluation – Video Competition Students Evaluation – Video Competition

St d t D (C ti it )

  • Student D (Creativity)

“One of the objective of this activity was to raise the awareness of science from public audience. Thus, we should not just to demonstrate an experiment We finally created a story with a mysterious opening to experiment… We finally created a story with a mysterious opening to attract the audiences and then explained the concept in a logic and scientific way.”

  • Student E (Teamwork)
  • Student E (Teamwork)

“The task was far from individual effort. It required science‐based knowledge, IT skills, script writing, giving a speech, etc… Everyone in my group were so engaged Some focused on topic research others did the group were so engaged. Some focused on topic research, others did the speech and post editing… no one get a free ride.”

  • Student F (Knowledge)

“During the video production we found an interesting topic about ‘plant “During the video production, we found an interesting topic about ‘plant blood’ … I further searched on this topic afterwards and started to think about proposing that as my final year project. As I hope to identify if there was any relationship between plant blood and human blood.” y p p

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Issues Identified

Suggestions

Issues Identified

h f “

Suggestions

h

  • The concept of “Science

Communication” is new to our students.

  • Relate the Science

Communication with Career Opportunities.

  • Science‐knowledge‐based

pp

  • Provide extra training

workshops to students ti l l i ti activities (such as, FramLab and Video Competition) helped raise student awareness on Science particularly on communicating science to public audience.

  • Implement these activities to

Communication.

  • Compare to group task,

i di id l t k id d p some curricular subjects.

  • Encourage student to have a

b l d ti i ti t b th individual task provided more

  • pportunities for student to

develop Science balanced participation to both individual and group tasks throughout the mentoring Communication. programme.

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17