energy efficient routing with osm
play

Energy Efficient routing with OSM - reach your destination fast AND - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Energy Efficient routing with OSM - reach your destination fast AND eco - SOTM 2018 Milan 30.7.2018 - Dr. Arndt Brenschede - B(ike?)Router ? 01 / 2013 Initial release BRouter . 01 / 2014 first, experimental car


  1. Energy Efficient routing with OSM - reach your destination fast AND eco - SOTM 2018 – Milan – 30.7.2018 - Dr. Arndt Brenschede -

  2. B(ike?)Router ? ● 01 / 2013 Initial release „BRouter“ ● …. ● 01 / 2014 first, experimental car routing ● …. ● 05 / 2016 turning instructions ● 12 / 2016 turn restrictions ● 09 / 2017 kinematic model ● 10 / 2017 Map-QA road network Usable car routing

  3. Status Quo ● Market is dominated by motorway-centric routing, optimizing travel-time only ● Example: Stuttgart → Luxemburg (Router: OSRM), Northern suburb 351 km Time: 3h 26m

  4. Status Quo ● Market is dominated by motorway-centric routing optimizing travel. ● Example: Stuttgart → Luxemburg (Router: OSRM), City center 313 km Time: 3h 25m ( -38km, same travel time)

  5. Cost-Function in Routing: Cost = Time

  6. Cost-Function in Energy Efficient Routing: Cost = Time + Energy P weight P weight = Weighting Power ( measured in kW)

  7. Specify Energy Preference: 2 Options V-max P-weight (km/h) (kW) 61 3,7 89 11 110 22 120 28,6 144 50

  8. Equivalence of P(weight) und v(max) ! P weight = 10 kW Cost = Time + Energy P weight Cost-Minimum v max

  9. Equivalence of P(weight) und v(max) ! P weight = 10 kW Cost = Time + Energy P weight Cost-Minimum v max 3 − P aux P weight = c w ∗ A ∗ρ∗ v max

  10. Equivalence of P(weight) und v(max) ! Entropy P weight = 10 kW Cost = Time + Energy P weight Cost-Minimum v max 3 − P aux P weight = c w ∗ A ∗ρ∗ v max

  11. Routing depending on Energy-Preference Aschaffenburg→Bensheim Vmax = 160 km/h ====> 52 Minutes, 23 kWh

  12. Routing depending on Energy-Preference Aschaffenburg→Bensheim Vmax = 120 km/h ====> 72 Minutes, 9 kWh

  13. Routing depending on Energy-Preference Aschaffenburg→Bensheim Vmax = 60 km/h ====> 83 Minutes, 6,5 kWh

  14. Routing depending on Energy-Preference Aschaffenburg→Bensheim Vmax = 60 km/h ====> 83 Minutes, 6,5 kWh

  15. Energy – Time Diagram 160 km/h 120 km/h 60 km/h

  16. Energy – Time Diagram 160 km/h 6 ==> 23 kWh = + 280 % 120 km/h 60 km/h

  17. Energy – Time Diagram 160 km/h 120 km/h 60 km/h

  18. Energy – Time Diagram 160 km/h 120 km/h 60 km/h

  19. Energy – Time Diagram 160 km/h 120 km/h 60 km/h

  20. Energy – Time Diagram 130 km/h 90 km/h + 44 %

  21. Energy – Time Diagram 130 km/h 90 km/h + 180 %

  22. Should I ? Really ? - travelling on minor roads needs high quality maps -

  23. Connectivity? Status Quo 09/2017 B38 B426

  24. Connectivity? Status Quo 09/2017 2 Errors in 640 sqkm ==> ca. 1000 Errors in Germany ( 357.000 qkm )

  25. QA Road-Network: Suspect Scanner / Manager

  26. QA Road-Network: Suspect Scanner / Manager

  27. QA Road-Network: Suspect Scanner / Manager

  28. Outlook / TODOs - implement road network QA world-wide - Update BRouter integration in popular MapTools: Name Turning- Time of Street- Direction- Lane- Hints Arrival names Hints mapping LocusMaps Pro o.k Almost missing n.a. n.a done OsmAnd Plus missing missing missing missing missing OruxMaps n.a. n.a n.a n.a n.a - … Integrated driving assistence for electric cars ?

  29. Thank you! SOTM 2018 – Milan – 30.7.2018 - Dr. Arndt Brenschede -

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend