Energy Efficient and Healthy Buildings Monica Gullberg, F process - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Energy Efficient and Healthy Buildings Monica Gullberg, F process - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Energy Efficient and Healthy Buildings Monica Gullberg, F process Magnus Bengtsson, National Board of Housing, Building and Planning Nikolaj Tolstoy, National Board of Housing, Building and Planning Egil fverholm, Swedish Energy Agency
Purpose - energy
- Evaluate existing measures
- Find new efficient measures
- Survey energy demand and find efficiency potentials
- Make better forecasts for energy demand and CO2
emissions
- Develope basic data for the buildings performance
directive
- Information activities on energy efficiency in buildings
- etc…
Other appliances; 3,76kWh/m
2; 4%
Kitchen; 10,81kWh/m
2; 11%
Computerhall & server; 0,10kWh/m
2;
0% Lighting; 19,80kWh/m
2; 21%
Other building installations; 3,21kWh/m
2; 3%
Heat pumps 1,26 kWh/m
2; 1%
Electric heating; 34,76kWh/m
2; 37%
Fans; 18,04kWh/m
2;
19% Cooling machines; 0,04kWh/m
2; 0%
PC; 1,43kWh/m
2; 1%
Miscellaneous; 5,28 kWh/m
2; 5%
Electricity demand - Schools
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 [kWh/m 2, year] Miscellaneous, others Apparatus, miscellaneous Building installations, miscellaneous Refrigeration PCs Large computer/servers Fans Lighting
Electricity demand
10 20 30 40 50 60
[kWh/m 2, year] Lighting, annual specific electricity [kWh/m2], distribution and mean.
Energyefficiency possibilities
- ventilation
Energyefficiency possibilities
- ventilation
9,2 kWh/m2 Air changes 2,9 kWh/m2 SFP 8,2 kWh/m2 Operation h.
Purpose of the environment survey
– Enable follow up of the in-door environment in comparison to the building regulations – Search for a connection between energy use and in-door environment – Gain experience for similar future studies that are under way
Indoor environment in STIL-2
- Survey
- Questionnaires'
- Long-term measurements
– Radon – Temperature, indoor and out – Relativ humidity, indoor and out
– Magnetic fields – Lighting – Legionaries decease – Sound – Moisture – Air quality – Thermal environment – Cleaning efficiency
Indoor environment, eight gradings of the technical status
– Personal data – Working environment – Working conditions – illness/ailments – School environment
Questionnaires
Result indoor environment
Average grading for each school, average 3,33; weighted national average 3,88
0,00 0,50 1,00 1,50 2,00 2,50 3,00 3,50 4,00 4,50 Medelbetyg