Energy Efficient and Healthy Buildings Monica Gullberg, F process - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

energy efficient and healthy buildings
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Energy Efficient and Healthy Buildings Monica Gullberg, F process - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Energy Efficient and Healthy Buildings Monica Gullberg, F process Magnus Bengtsson, National Board of Housing, Building and Planning Nikolaj Tolstoy, National Board of Housing, Building and Planning Egil fverholm, Swedish Energy Agency


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Energy Efficient and Healthy Buildings

Monica Gullberg, ÅF process Magnus Bengtsson, National Board of Housing, Building and Planning Nikolaj Tolstoy, National Board of Housing, Building and Planning Egil Öfverholm, Swedish Energy Agency

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Purpose - energy

  • Evaluate existing measures
  • Find new efficient measures
  • Survey energy demand and find efficiency potentials
  • Make better forecasts for energy demand and CO2

emissions

  • Develope basic data for the buildings performance

directive

  • Information activities on energy efficiency in buildings
  • etc…
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Other appliances; 3,76kWh/m

2; 4%

Kitchen; 10,81kWh/m

2; 11%

Computerhall & server; 0,10kWh/m

2;

0% Lighting; 19,80kWh/m

2; 21%

Other building installations; 3,21kWh/m

2; 3%

Heat pumps 1,26 kWh/m

2; 1%

Electric heating; 34,76kWh/m

2; 37%

Fans; 18,04kWh/m

2;

19% Cooling machines; 0,04kWh/m

2; 0%

PC; 1,43kWh/m

2; 1%

Miscellaneous; 5,28 kWh/m

2; 5%

Electricity demand - Schools

slide-4
SLIDE 4

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 [kWh/m 2, year] Miscellaneous, others Apparatus, miscellaneous Building installations, miscellaneous Refrigeration PCs Large computer/servers Fans Lighting

Electricity demand

slide-5
SLIDE 5

10 20 30 40 50 60

[kWh/m 2, year] Lighting, annual specific electricity [kWh/m2], distribution and mean.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Energyefficiency possibilities

  • ventilation
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Energyefficiency possibilities

  • ventilation

9,2 kWh/m2 Air changes 2,9 kWh/m2 SFP 8,2 kWh/m2 Operation h.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Purpose of the environment survey

– Enable follow up of the in-door environment in comparison to the building regulations – Search for a connection between energy use and in-door environment – Gain experience for similar future studies that are under way

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Indoor environment in STIL-2

  • Survey
  • Questionnaires'
  • Long-term measurements

– Radon – Temperature, indoor and out – Relativ humidity, indoor and out

slide-10
SLIDE 10

– Magnetic fields – Lighting – Legionaries decease – Sound – Moisture – Air quality – Thermal environment – Cleaning efficiency

Indoor environment, eight gradings of the technical status

slide-11
SLIDE 11

– Personal data – Working environment – Working conditions – illness/ailments – School environment

Questionnaires

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Result indoor environment

Average grading for each school, average 3,33; weighted national average 3,88

0,00 0,50 1,00 1,50 2,00 2,50 3,00 3,50 4,00 4,50 Medelbetyg

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Result indoor environment

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Result questionnaire

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Pearson correlation analysis

Building, year + installation year Area/pupil Pupils/teachers Teachers/employees Pupils Total energy Average score Lighting Lighting Complaints Window area Noise Noise SFP+airflow + op. hours Air Quality Air Quality U-value, average Thermal Air Climate Thermal Climate Audit energy Audit Indoor climate User response

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Pearson correlation analysis

Building, year + installation year Area/pupil Pupils/teachers Teachers/employees Pupils Total energy Average score Lighting Lighting Complaints Window area Noise Noise SFP+airflow + op. hours Air Quality Air Quality U-value, average Thermal Air Climate Thermal Climate Audit energy Audit Indoor climate User response

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Pearson correlation analysis

Building, year + installation year Area/pupil Pupils/teachers Teachers/employees Pupils Total energy Average score Lighting Lighting Complaints Window area Noise Noise SFP+airflow + op. hours Air Quality Air Quality U-value, average Thermal Air Climate Thermal Climate Audit energy Audit Indoor climate User response

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Pearson correlation analysis

Building, year + installation year Area/pupil Pupils/teachers Teachers/employees Pupils Total energy Average score Lighting, kWh/m2 Lighting quality Complaints Window area Noise Noise SFP+airflow + op. hours Air Quality Air Quality U-value, average Thermal Air Climate Thermal Climate Audit energy Audit Indoor climate User response

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Pearson correlation analysis

Building, year + installation year Area/pupil Pupils/teachers Teachers/employees Pupils Total energy Average score Lighting, kWh/m2 Lighting quality Complaints Window area Noise Noise SFP+airflow + op. hours Air Quality Air Quality U-value, average Thermal Air Climate Thermal Climate Audit energy Audit Indoor climate User response

slide-20
SLIDE 20

No contradiction between good indoor environment and energy efficiency

slide-21
SLIDE 21

More info can be found at: www.energimyndigheten.se