empirical methods for evaluating maps illustrations and
play

Empirical Methods for Evaluating Maps: Illustrations and Results W. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Empirical Methods for Evaluating Maps: Illustrations and Results W. Jake Thompson & Brooke Nash Methods for Evaluating Map Structure External outcomes Classical item statistics Unidimensional models 2 A Framework for Map


  1. Empirical Methods for Evaluating Maps: Illustrations and Results W. Jake Thompson & Brooke Nash

  2. Methods for Evaluating Map Structure • External outcomes • Classical item statistics • Unidimensional models 2

  3. A Framework for Map Evaluation • Diagnostic Classification Models (DCMs) • Mastery profiles on the set of assessed skills • Three methods – Patterns of Mastery Profiles – Patterns of Mastery Assignment – Patterns of Attribute Difficulty 3

  4. An Illustrative Example Initial Precursor Target • 3 attribute assessment • Linear map structure 4

  5. Map Structure in a DCM Context 5

  6. 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 Patterns of Mastery Profiles hypothesized profiles 1 0 0 0 Target Precursor Initial 0 profiles checks • Estimate two models – Saturated model with all – Reduced model with only • Assess model fit – Posterior predictive model – Model comparisons 6

  7. … 0 Target Precursor Initial Student … … … … 0 1 0 5 1 0 1 4 1 1 1 1 3 0 … … … 0 0 0 5 1 1 0 4 1 1 1 3 0 0 1 2 1 0 Patterns of Attribute Mastery 2 .83 .89 .92 3 .13 .52 .86 .43 0 .85 .97 1 Target Precursor Initial Student (equivalent to LCA) 4 .88 .65 .85 1 2 0 1 1 1 Target Precursor Initial Student … … … … .33 .70 .55 5 • Estimate each attribute as a separate 1-attribute DCM • Set mastery threshold (0.8) 7

  8. classical p -values value for each attribute and group Patterns of Attribute Difficulty • Measure attribute difficulty using • Group similar respondents a priori • Calculate the weighted average p- 8

  9. Case Study: Dynamic Learning Maps levels of depth, breadth, and complexity progression during the operational assessment • Each Essential Element (EE) available at multiple – 5 levels in ELA and mathematics – 3 levels in science • Linkage levels are assumed to follow a linear • Students test on only one linkage level for each EE 9

  10. ELA missing data level reversals than lower Case Study: Dynamic Learning Maps • Patterns of Profile Mastery – Models fail to converge due to • Patterns of Attribute Mastery – The majority of flags were in – More flags for higher linkage 10

  11. Case Study: Dynamic Learning Maps • Patterns of Attribute Difficulty – Flags by subject • 28 ELA EEs • 35 mathematics EEs • 0 science EEs 11

  12. Summary framework information applied to future test and map development • Benefits and limitations of each method within the • Wide breadth of methods provides complementary • Application to DLM shows insights that can be 12

  13. Ongoing Research Mastery Profiles criteria within EEs to the more fine-grained map structure • Continue to refine methods – Alternative modeling strategies for Patterns of – Simulation studies to inform empirical flagging • Expanding beyond the progression of linkage levels 13

  14. More Information

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend