Healthcare without boundaries
EMIS Group plc H1 2013 Results Presentation
Chris Spencer – CEO Peter Southby – CFO
EMIS Group plc H1 2013 Results Presentation Chris Spencer CEO - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Healthcare without boundaries EMIS Group plc H1 2013 Results Presentation Chris Spencer CEO September 2013 Peter Southby CFO Introduction Chris Spencer CEO Agenda Introduction Chris Spencer Financial Review Peter Southby
Healthcare without boundaries
Chris Spencer – CEO Peter Southby – CFO
Introduction
Agenda
Chris Spencer
Peter Southby
Chris Spencer
Chris Spencer
3
Financial review
Financial highlights
£21.7m)
(1)
Excludes capitalisation and amortisation of development costs and amortisation of acquired intangibles. For EPS also adjusts for related tax impact.
(2)
Stated after deduction of development costs capitalised of £2.7m (2012 H1: £2.2m).
5
£m H1 2012 H2 2012 H1 2013
% Change
% Change
Revenue 42.3 44.0 47.1
11% 7%
Adjusted operating profit 11.5 11.3 11.6
Capitalised development costs 2.2 3.1 2.7 Amortisation (1.7) (1.9) (2.2) Exceptionals/other 0.1 (0.5) (0.1) Profit before tax 12.1 12.0 12.0 Tax (2.3) (2.3) (2.7) MI/other (0.3) (0.3) (0.2) Earnings 9.5 9.4 9.1 Adjusted EPS 15.6p 15.2p 14.9p
Reported EPS 16.3p 16.2p 15.6p
Income statement
6
Segmental analysis
£m (rounded) EMIS RX Total
% Change
„12 % Change
„12
H1 „12 H2 „12 H1 „13 H1 „12 H2 „12 H1 „13 H1 „12 H2 „12 H1 „13
Revenue
34.2 35.6 38.7 8.1 8.4 8.4 42.3 44.0 47.1
11% 7%
Recurring revenue
28.2 28.5 29.0 6.2 6.5 7.0 34.4 35.0 36.0
5% 3%
Segmental
11.0 11.5 10.9 1.3 1.7 1.6 12.3 13.2 12.5
Capitalised development costs
(2.2) (3.1) (2.7)
(3.1) (2.7)
Amortisation
1.2 1.5 1.7 0.4 0.4 0.5 1.6 1.9 2.2
Adjusted segmental profit
10.0 9.9 9.9 1.7 2.1 2.1 11.7 12.0 12.0
Group costs
(0.2) (0.7) (0.4)
Adjusted operating profit
11.5 11.3 11.6
7
Core business analysis
£m H1 2012 % of sales H2 2012 % of sales H1 2013 % of sales
% Change
2012 % Change
2012
Licenses & software support 17.8
42%
18.6
42%
19.1
40% 7% 3%
Other support services 9.9
23%
12.2
28%
11.6
25% 17%
Hosting 3.9
9%
5.1
12%
6.3
13% 62% 24%
Hardware and training 7.0
17%
6.1
14%
7.9
17% 13% 30%
Other 3.7
9%
2.0
4%
2.2
5%
10%
Total 42.3
100%
44.0
100%
47.1
100% 11% 7%
Recurring 34.4
81%
35.0
80%
36.0
76% 5% 3%
Non-recurring 7.9
19%
9.0
20%
11.1
24% 41% 23%
Total 42.3
100%
44.0
100%
47.1
100% 11% 7%
8
Cash flow
£m H1 2012 H2 2012 H1 2013 Operating profit 12.1 12.1 12.1 Depreciation and amortisation 4.0 4.5 5.1 Working capital 7.8 (7.8) 4.5 Cash flow from operating activities 23.9 8.8 21.7 Development costs capitalised (2.2) (3.1) (2.7) Cash from operations 21.7 5.7 19.0 Business combinations (0.8)
Net capex (5.9) (6.9) (5.2) Transactions in own shares 0.2 (2.0) 0.2 Tax paid (1.9) (2.7) (2.1) Dividends (3.6) (4.1) (4.1) Change in net cash 9.7 (10.0) 7.1 9
reorganisation resolved post period
acquisition (Digital Healthcare £3.1m post period)
Balance sheet
£m H1 2012 H2 2012 H1 2013 Goodwill 22.0 22.0 22.6 Other intangible assets 29.1 30.8 31.6 Property, plant & equipment 18.4 22.1 24.1 Associate and other current assets 17.0 19.2 23.8 Deferred income (22.0) (15.9) (24.6) Other current liabilities (16.6) (14.3) (15.1) Deferred tax (7.5) (7.5) (7.6) Net cash 17.7 7.7 14.8 Net assets 58.1 64.1 69.6 10
cash/£3.0m debt
reversed
good revenue visibility
reflect future corporation rate change to 20%
Financial Guidance and Trends
review of senior incentivisation
cash flow despite usual seasonality
11
Operational Review
Operational Highlights
34.8% (4,595 pharmacies))
signed
13
Operational review – EMIS GP systems
14
EMIS Web GP
2,564)
likely average of 150 maintained
15
Rx Systems
34.9% (4,727 pharmacies (2012 H2: 34.8% (4,595 pharmacies))
doubled its revenues, profits, customer base and market share
Multepos in January 2013
EMIS Web GP
16
EMIS Web CCMH & Integrated Care
fenced development and sales resource further strengthened
well but commercial return remains slower than expected
healthcare services using EMIS Web for the delivery of integrated care
agreement with TPP
17
Digital Healthcare
and Community Pharmacy core
18
healthcare strategy
Retinopathy screening service
NHS Mandate – EMIS Group at the fore
Foreword: “Never in its history has the NHS had to face such a profound shift in our needs and expectations. “An ageing population, rising costs of treatments, and a huge increase in the number of us with long-term, often multiple conditions are rewriting our relationship with health and care, all at a time of acute pressure on public finances.” Enhancing quality of life for people with long-term conditions “By 2018 nearly three million people, mainly older people, will have three or more conditions all at once. “By March 2015, we expect the Board to have made particular progress in four key areas: (i) involving people in their own care; (ii) the use of technology; (iii) better integration of services; and (iv) the diagnosis, treatment and care of those with dementia.”
19
EMIS Group Integrated Products and Markets Strategy
20
patient health by providing cross-
and “Supportive” products
despite political/structural change
Enduring products
integrated care opportunities in primary, community and other adjacent markets, whether by acquisition, partnering or strategic investment
Summary
maintained
planned
fruit
TPP
21
Outlook
since the period end
wider NHS
systems
22
EMIS Group is making significant progress towards delivery of its strategic vision of cross-organisational healthcare systems
EMIS GP market share by country
25 Country EMIS estate
%
InPS estate
%
TPP estate
%
iSoft estate
%
Other
%
Total England 4,331
53.8
1,319
16.4
2,090
26.0
150
1.9
154
1.9
8,044 Scotland 512
51.4
484
48.6
Wales 150
31.9
253
53.8
13.4
4
0.9
470 Northern Ireland 177
50.9
113
32.5
9.2
26
7.4
348 UK Total 5,170
52.4
2,169
22.0
2,090
21.2
245
2.5
184
1.9
9,858
(EMIS and competitor data estimated based on company records showing customers installed as at 30 June 2013)
EMIS Web GP – Post Migration Survey
26
How would you compare EMIS Web to your previous system?
50 100 150 200 250 Better Too early to tell Worse (blank) Grand Total
Survey source: EMIS internal post migration survey of all EMIS Web Sites going live in July 2013.
50 100 150 200 250 No Not yet Yes (blank) Grand Total
Would you recommend EMIS Web to another practice?
27
EMIS Web GP – KLAS report Findings
KLAS interviewed providers from 102 GP practices to offer greater transparency into supplier system performance.
customers are satisfied with the platform overall. “
long time, and they are pretty solid....It can‟t get any better than
including functionality for community health services. Also, it gives users the ability to write very powerful searches and reports. And I like the ability we have to provide a patient interface.‟
part to their long term plans”
Source: UK GP System Performance 2013. Making an Informed Decision. www.KLAS research.com
Safer patient care
“With the help of EMIS Web we are able to target specific groups of patients that we see regularly and proactively manage their care” Tony Oram, practice manager, Nottingham.
Improved clinical efficiency
“We‟re saving at least 10 minutes of nurse time per annual review” Pamela Taylor, practice nurse, Leeds.
Seamless migration
The simple move to EMIS Web saved Mike Tasker, informatics manager, Grimbsy, approximately two weeks: “I exported all our documents and templates into EMIS Web with just a couple of clicks.”
Access anywhere, at anytime
With EMIS Mobile you can view core elements of the system whatever the care setting. Nearly eight minutes per patient could be saved by using EMIS Mobile - that‟s 5.6 working days saved every year.
Reducing emergency admissions
NHS Oldham has built a risk-profiling database to help GPs identify and manage patients at risk of emergency admission, using data extracted from 47 practices.
Reducing health inequalities
Automated data extracts have helped public health nurses target children missing MMR vaccinations, seeing a rise in vaccination rates from 80 to over 95% - making East London and the City one of the highest performing boroughs in London.
Improving management of long-term conditions
GP practices across East London and the City have improved diabetic control, with a 6- 7% improvement in the recording of blood tests across the borough since implementing a call and recall programme.
Improved efficiency
Quarterly reporting and data collection for NHS Health Checks take 90% less time for NHS Stoke on Trent.
Optimised medications
Deliver more responsive, cost-effective care by using data extracts to identify and reduce prescribing waste spent on high-cost drugs and target high-cost patients.
Measuring performance against targets
In real-time, CCGs in London have built searches to see the immediate impact of specific initiatives like call and recall rates, rather than using out-of-date QOF data.
PATIENTS BENEFITING:
IN BRISTOL IN NORTH MERSEY IN THE NORTH EAST & LONDON