Emerging Technologies and the Changing Nature of Electrical Power - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

emerging technologies and the changing nature of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Emerging Technologies and the Changing Nature of Electrical Power - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Emerging Technologies and the Changing Nature of Electrical Power Generation Jim Black Aerothermodynamics and Heat Transfer Lead Thermal Sciences Division MHD Power Generation Workshop November 1, 2014 National Energy Technology Laboratory


slide-1
SLIDE 1

National Energy Technology Laboratory

Jim Black Aerothermodynamics and Heat Transfer Lead Thermal Sciences Division

MHD Power Generation Workshop November 1, 2014

Emerging Technologies and the Changing Nature of Electrical Power Generation

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Lowering emissions limits for SO2, NOX, particulates, Hg,
  • etc. requires new and upgraded emissions controls to

existing coal plants … or plant retirement.

  • Recent New Source Standards for CO2 emissions

– Coal plant – 1,100 lbCO2/MWhgross (requires CO2 capture of ~30%) – NGCC – 1,000 lbCO2/MWhgross (no controls required because of lower carbon density of natural gas)

Regulations Related to Fossil Fueled Power Plants

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Source:

3

Proposed Existing Source CO2 Standard

Four step approach to determine the CO2 emissions limits

  • n a state by state basis

1. 6% heat rate improvement for existing coal units 2. Displace existing coal generation with existing gas, up to 70% NGCC annual capacity factor 3. Increased renewable capacity/avoiding at-risk nuclear retirements 4. Increasing state demand-side efficiency programs

Source: Grol and Kern, “Discussion of Proposed Existing Source Performance Standard for CO2 Emissions,” to be presented at 2014 Pittsburgh Coal Conference

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

http://science.house.gov/sites/republicans.science.house.gov/files/documents/ESPS%20Hearing%20Charter.pdf

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Issues for evaluation

– ‘Base loaded’ plants are forced to load follow - load following has historically had negative impacts on maintenance cost and emissions as the plants are cycled increasing thermal stress and emissions control system performance suffers under transient conditions – With a change in the power generation profile required by the proposed CO2 emissions regulations, is power available where needed for the existing demand and grid system? – Reduction in spinning reserve with addition of renewables can lead to grid stability issues.*

* Power Engineering youtube video - “Grid Stability and the Changing Landscape of Power Generation” - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODFoHHbhiOM grid instability issue

Changing Landscape of Power Generation

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Clean Coal Research Program Goals

Driving Down the Cost of Coal Power with CCS

Goals shown are for greenfield plants. Costs are nth-of-a-kind and include compression to 2215 psia but exclude CO2 transport and storage costs.

0% Reduction 20% Reduction >20% Reduction

40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110

IGCC or Supercritical PC 2nd-Generation Technology Transformational Technology

COE Relative to Today's Coal with Capture, %

State-of-the Art 2025 Demo Beyond 2025

Cost of Electricity Reduction Targets

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Advanced ultra-supercritical steam rankine cycles (NETL

program goal 1,400 °F and 5,000 psi)

  • Advanced gas turbine combined cycle (goal is 3100 °F

turbine inlet temperature – targeting 63-65% CC efficiency w/o capture)

  • Advances in IGCC with capture

– Oxygen production – Warm gas cleanup for particulate, sulfur, mercury removal – CO2 separation technologies, e.g. hydrogen membranes – Advanced hydrogen turbines

Emerging Power Generation Technologies

Advances to Existing Technologies

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

IGCC Pathway

  • 2nd Generation

– Advanced H2 turbine (2650F turbine inlet temp) – Advanced oxygen membrane – Warm gas cleanup (desulfurization)

  • Transformational

– H2 Turbine – Advanced gasification

  • Chemical looping gasification
  • Compact gasifier

– Advanced H2 / CO2 separation – Direct SCO2 power cycle

70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 Baseline

  • Adv. Hydrogen Turbine

ITM Warm Gas Cleanup Hydrogen Membrane 85% Availability Conventional Financing

COE (2011$/MWh)

CO2 transport and storage cost

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Supercritical CO2

– Indirect – Direct

  • Chemical Looping (Combustion and Gasification)
  • Pressurized Oxycombustion
  • Fuel Cell System
  • Pressure Gain Combustion (applicable to gas turbines)
  • Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) or Direct Power

Extraction (DPE)

Emerging Power Generation Technologies

New Power Technologies

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

SCO2 Power Cycle

Indirect Heating

Advantages:

  • Suitable for wide spectrum of heat sources
  • Compact turbomachinery
  • Single-phase working fluid

10

Challenges:

  • Operate near critical point

required for optimum efficiency complicates operating controls

  • Recuperated heat transfer is

several times greater than the power output.

  • Development of turbomachinery

Two-stage Recuperated (recompression) Brayton cycle

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

SCO2 Power Cycle

Direct Heating

11

Advantages:

  • Flue gas from the pressurized oxycombustor is sent directly to

the turbine eliminating the temperature limit imposed by heat exchange through an exchanger

  • Flue gas stream exiting the turbine is at elevated pressure

reducing or eliminating the need for CO2 compressing

  • Compact turbomachinery
  • Heat sources are fossil fuel based

Challenges:

  • Oxycombustion at up to 4,500 psi

requires development

  • Recuperated heat transfer is

significant and critical to the cycle efficiency

  • Development of turbomachinery
slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Chemical Looping Combustion

Source: NETL

Recovered fuel to oxidizer

Advantages:

  • Elimination of ASU and

associated high capital cost and auxiliary power requirement.

  • Technology is applicable to

combustion and gasification. Challenges:

  • Relatively low carrier

capacities necessitates large solid circulation rates.

  • Solid-solid separation is

critical to achieve high carbon capture efficiency and efficient carrier utilization.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Pressurized Oxy-combustion

Oxy- Combustion Boiler Coal Prep / Feed Air Separation HRSG / Gas Cleaning CO2 Purification / Compression

CO2

(Limestone)

(CO2)

Steam Cycle Advantages:

  • Operation at elevated pressure minimizes

CO2 compression requirements

  • Operation at elevated pressure enables

recovery of latent heat in flue gas

  • Elevated pressure boiler allows for physically

smaller boiler design Challenges:

  • CO2 purification
  • Achieving acceptably high efficiency

and low capital cost

  • Dry coal feed
slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

IGFC Systems

Process Diagram - Atmospheric

Source: NETL

Cathode Blower SOFC Stack Air Cathode

Electrolyte

Anode AC Exhaust Gas Cathode HTX Recycle Blower Recycle Blower SOFC Module Anode HTX Enclosure Anode Off-Gas Anode Recycle Gas Clean Syngas Inverter Combustor Heat Recovery Steam Generator Steam Turbine Generator AC To Stack Syngas Expander Oxidant to Combustor E-Gas TM Gasifier Coal Treatment Air Separation Unit Heat Recovery Dry Gas Cleaning Air Water Coal Steam Oxidant Vent Slag Coal Slurry Recycle Syngas HP Steam Steam NG Injection CO2 Drying, Compression & Purification Unit CO2 Stream for Sequestration Water Vent

Advantages:

  • High efficiency

potential Challenges:

  • Fuel cell degradation
  • Cost
  • Inverter efficiency
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Advantages:

  • Utilizes explosive combustion to produce pressure gain simultaneously with heat

generation

  • Use in the combustor of a gas turbine would enable elimination of last compressor stages

and associated power consumption. Challenges:

  • Demonstrating the concept in continuous operation
  • Combustor wall cooling
  • Intake valves with no moving parts and minimal pressure drop

Pressure Gain Combustion

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • NETL ORD and Analysis Staff – federal and contractor

Acknowledgements

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Jim Black James.Black@netl.doe.gov 412-386-5458

Questions

17