Electron Hollow Gun Collimation Performance & Simulations - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

electron hollow gun collimation performance simulations
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Electron Hollow Gun Collimation Performance & Simulations - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Electron Hollow Gun Collimation Performance & Simulations Topics: Vince Moens, 11.04.2013 Motivation Collaboration with CERN Electron Gun Charaterization Perveance Profile Measurements Field measurements Polar


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Electron Hollow Gun Collimation Performance & Simulations

Topics:

  • Motivation
  • Collaboration with CERN
  • Electron Gun Charaterization
  • Perveance
  • Profile Measurements
  • Field measurements
  • Polar Decomposition
  • Electron Beam Dynamics
  • WARP simulations

Vince Moens, 11.04.2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Who am I?

Vince Moens

Master Student @ EPFL Semester Project @ CERN: “A quantitative comparison of the transverse damping and tune resonance crossing lossmap techniques at the LHC” Master Thesis @ Fermilab/CERN via USLARP on Hollow Electron Beam Collimation

  • Leonid Rivkin (PSI/EPFL)
  • Stefano Redaelli (CERN)
  • Giulio Stancari (Fermilab)

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

CERN Strategy @ US-LARP CM20

“There are very convincing indications that the LHC could profit from the scraping functionality. The excellent Tevatron results indicate that hollow e-beams could provide this functionality “ - S. Redaelli

  • CERN supports studies on hollow e-lens and recommends to focus

available resources towards a possible production of 2 hollow e-lens for the LHC.

  • Design of a device optimized for the LHC at 7 TeV
  • Actively participate to beam tests worldwide on this topic.
  • Start building competence at CERN on the hollow e-beam hardware.
  • FNAL will work on optimum conceptual design for the LHC:
  • Integral part of Conceptual Design Report for LHC
  • Is Hollow Electron Beam Collimation effective?
  • Does Hollow Electron Beam Collimation perturb the proton core?
  • First specifications in the next 6 months, to be followed by detailed design.
  • CERN will establish links to achieve a design report by the end of 2014

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Classical Collimation System

  • Collimation?
  • Multi-stage collimation
  • LHC primary: 3.4 μrad @

7TeV (RMS value)

  • Tevatron Primary: 17 μrad @

980 GeV (RMS value)

LHC Design Report

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Hollow Electron Beam Lenses

LHC Design Report

  • Axial protons unperturbed if

perfectly symmetric

  • Off-axis protons obtain tune kick
  • Off-axis protons are sent into

secondary collimators

  • Tevatron Electron Lens: 0.2 μrad @

980 GEV (RMS value)

0.00001 0.00002 0.00003 0.00004 0.00005 0.00006 0.00007 r @mD 500000 1.0 ¥ 106 1.5 ¥ 106 2.0 ¥ 106 2.5 ¥ 106 EHrL @VêmD

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Why HEBC?

  • Tunability!!!! - “Soft Collimator“ or “Diffusion Enhancer
  • Close to beam -> 4 sigma
  • Ability to pulse the beam
  • Resonantly with betatron oscillation
  • Remove specific bunch trains
  • No nuclear break-up on ion collimation

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

HEBC @ Tevatron

  • Tested experimentally at

Tevatron

  • 0.6 inch gun in TEL2
  • 36 bunches, 3 bunch trains, 3 x

10^11 protons/bunch

  • Possibility to control just one train
  • Did not affect proton core

immensely if hole big enough

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Electron Gun Characterization

  • Perveance
  • Profile Measurements
  • Field measurements
  • Polar Decomposition

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Electron Gun Characterization

  • Test Bench & TEL2 -

Tevatron Electron Lens 2 Electron Lens Test Stand

  • Development of 1

inch gun

  • Difference between

TEL2 and Test Stand: Solenoidal bends

  • Components
  • Gun
  • Gun Solenoid
  • Drift/Bend
  • Main Solenoid
  • Drift/Bend
  • Collector
  • Collector Solenoid

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Electron Gun Characterization

  • 1 inch Hollow Electron Beam Gun -

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Electron Gun Characterization

  • Yield Measurement -
  • Yield vs. Energy?
  • Space-Charge

Limited Regime

  • Child-Langmuir

Law

  • Perv ≈ 4.2e-6 perv
  • SAM: 6e-6 perv
  • Check SAM using

WARP

2012 data by Siqi Li

I = P × V

3 2

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Electron Gun Characterization

  • Profile Measurement -
  • Deflection using Correctors / BPMs
  • Collector with 0.2 mm pinnhole
  • ACL code -> 61 x 61 grid @ 1 sec
  • R script -> Processing
  • 2D & 3D beam profiles
  • Current Densities
  • Polar Decomposition
  • Particle map

Correctors in Main Solenoid

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

CATHODE VOLTAGE [kV] MAGNETIC FIELD [T] 0.5 0.9 2.0 3.0 3.6 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35

Electron Gun Characterization

  • Measured Profiles -

From Dimensional Analysis: Thus:

 V B2

  • =

L2 ∗ e− eM

  • L ∝

√ V B

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Electron Gun Characterization

  • Current Density Profiles-
  • Radial profile of

current density

  • Dependent upon:
  • Gun Surface profile
  • Space-Charge effects
  • E x B twist
  • Magnetic

confinement

  • Tendency to be

higher on inside than outside

14

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 5 10 15 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Radial distance [mm] Current density [arb. units]

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Electron Gun Characterization

  • Particle Density Profiles-
  • Radial profile of

current density

  • Representative of

cathode shape (25.4mm/13.2mm)

  • Appears fairly

uniform & symmetric

15

10 5 5 10 10 5 5 10 X coord. [mm] Y coord. [mm]

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Electron Gun Characterization

  • Polar Decomposition -

16

−15 −10 −5 5 10 15 −15 −10 −5 5 10 15

Measurement

Xc Yc

HG1b_121219_9p25A_3−3−3kG_4kV_1100mA

−15 −10 −5 5 10 15 −15 −10 −5 5 10 15

Reconstruction

Xc Yc −15 −10 −5 5 10 15 −15 −10 −5 5 10 15

Errors

Xc Yc 5 10 15 20 25 30 5 10 15 20 25 30

Mode amplitudes

Radial mode n Azimuthal mode m

  • 5

10 15 20 25 30 0.02 0.05 0.10 0.20

Radial modes

Radial mode n Amplitude

  • ● ● ●
  • ● ● ●
  • 5

10 15 20 25 30 0.005 0.020 0.100 0.500

Azimuthal modes

Azimuthal mode m Amplitude

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Electron Gun Characterization

  • Electric Field & Potential -

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Electron Beam Evolution

  • WARP Simulations
  • Non-Linear Maps

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Electron Beam Evolution

  • Why simulate? -
  • Identify transverse fields throughout beam pipe
  • non-linear map for tracking codes (TEL2)
  • Compare Simulations to Tbench results
  • See effect of bends in TEL2

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Electron Beam Evolution

  • WARP -
  • Particle in Cell code
  • Developed at Lawrence Berkley

National Laboratory

  • Non-neutral plasma beam
  • Main components
  • Definition of Lattice
  • Definition of Source
  • Definition of Field Solver

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Electron Beam Evolution

  • Problems-
  • Package for python
  • Difficulties to install:
  • Correct versions of python
  • Compilation with same compiler
  • Super user rights
  • Solution:
  • Complete install of python & additional

packages in home directory

  • Dave Grote (LBL) -> 4 weeks
  • Packaged and available as zip file

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Electron Beam Evolution

  • Definition of Lattice -

Test Bench Tevatron Electron Lens 2 Element creation:

  • Dedicated Commands
  • Surfaces of Revolution

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Electron Beam Evolution

  • Definition of Source-
  • Gun
  • Cathode and two

Electrodes at negative potential

  • Anode at 0 potential
  • Inside of big gun

solenoid

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

What now?

  • 3 Main tasks:
  • Simulation of beam using WARP
  • Study of polar decomposition data and strong modes
  • Characterization of electric and magnetic field at center of beam
  • Remain at Fermilab for 4 more weeks and then

return to CERN

  • Work remotely
  • Submission deadline: 16 August 2013

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Acknowledgements

  • Giulio Stancari

for his role as supervisor and answering all my questions

  • Moses Chung

for aid with WARP and plasma physics

  • Alexander Valishev

for support during research and technical issues

  • David Grote (LBL)

for support with compatibility issues with WARP and TEV

  • Eric Stern

for technical support using TEV and installing WARP

  • Valentina Previtali

for technical discussions on Hollow Electron Beams

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Questions?

26