Electric and Magnetic Dipole Moments 1 Seminar Themis Bowcock - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

electric and magnetic dipole moments
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Electric and Magnetic Dipole Moments 1 Seminar Themis Bowcock - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Themis Bowcock Electric and Magnetic Dipole Moments 1 Seminar Themis Bowcock Today: Electric and Magnetic Dipoles What are they? Why are we interested in looking at them? The frozen-spin technique magic momentum for moments


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Electric and Magnetic Dipole Moments

Themis Bowcock

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Today: Electric and Magnetic Dipoles What are they? Why are we interested in looking at them? The frozen-spin technique – “magic momentum” – for moments A look at some experiments

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Fermilab g-2 (muons) Magnetic Dipole (g-2) Electric Dipole Proton Electric Dipole Experiment CERN proto-proposal

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Magnetic dipoles

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Themis Bowcock Seminar

History

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Themis Bowcock Seminar

History

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Themis Bowcock Seminar

1948: Precise Measurement and Calculation

Kusch and Foley measure ge ge = 2.00238 +/- 0.00006

History

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Themis Bowcock Seminar

1947 : QED

e e History … and Feynman and Tomonaga ….

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Themis Bowcock Seminar

from measured fine structure constant

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Was the muon g-2 = 0??? If muon had sub-structure then this simple prediction would be changed.

Discovered as a constituent of cosmic- ray particle ins 1936 by the American physicists Carl D. Anderson and Seth Neddermeyer. Thought to be the particle predicted by the Japanese physicist Yukawa Hideki in 1935 to explain the strong force that binds protons and neutrons

Muons

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Themis Bowcock Seminar

1933: g of protons and neutrons

History

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Themis Bowcock Seminar 1957 Proc. Phys. Soc. A 70 543

g=2.004  0.014 (0.6%)

Garwin, Lederman, Weinrich 2.00+/-0.10 Phys Rev 105, 1415 (Jan 57) @ Columbia

In 1959 CERN launched the g-2 experiment aimed at measuring the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon. The measures were studied using a magnet 83cm x 52cm x 10cm borrowed from the University of Liverpool. In 1962 this precision had been whittled down to just 0.4%.

156”

History Larmor Precession

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Positron “spin analyses” muon

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Evolution of precision

Lpool

Collider era

𝑏𝜈 = 𝑕 − 2 2

Measuring deviations from Pure Dirac prediction

History

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment At each stage it was meant to be obvious… Each time it has confounded expectation … theory extensions e-like tests the Standard Model But muons are heavier (original interest) More sensitive to new physics

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Themis Bowcock Seminar

𝑏𝑇𝑁 = 𝑏𝑅𝐹𝐸 + 𝑏𝑋𝑓𝑏𝑙 + 𝑏𝐼𝑏𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑗𝑑

Vacuum Polarization LO + NLO …

~ 60% total SM uncertainty

Light by Light

~ 40% total SM uncertainty

2.00231930436356 ± 0.00000000000154

Theory: 12,672 Feynman Diagrams

Physics

  • T. Aoyama, M. Hayakawa,
  • T. Kinoshita, M. Nio (PRLs, 2012)
slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Themis Bowcock Seminar

BNL E821

Technique

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Themis Bowcock Seminar

2019 a is measured to be (slightly) too big compared with theory.

Technique

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Themis Bowcock Seminar

SM: update HLMNT11  KNT17 presented @ TGM2

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Hadronic Corrections

For the BNL result to match the SM prediction then the SM hadronic estimate would need to be wrong by 6σ The beauty of the SM is that everything is related ….. “You cannot cook-up a zero g-2 SM anomaly and be consistent with the LHC Higgs mass!”

Physics

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Themis Bowcock Seminar

New Physics

New physics contributes as:

Electron g-2 is presently measured x 2,000 better than muon g-2 But is 44,000. 2nd Generation Leptons v. useful. Muon has sensitivity to new physics from < MeV to TeV.

ℓ ℓ ?

Physics

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Any new physics that contributes to the muon mass can contribute to a

a in loops m in loops

Physics

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Themis Bowcock Seminar

New Physics? just a few of many recent studies

  • 1 TeV Leptoquark Bauer + Neubert, PRL 116 (2016) 141802
  • ne new scalar could explain several anomalies seen by BaBar, Belle and LHC in the flavour

sector (e.g. violation of lepton universality in B -> Kll, enhanced B -> Dτν) and solve g-2, while satisfying all bounds from LEP and LHC

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Themis Bowcock Seminar

New Physics? just a few of many recent examples

  • light Z’ can evade many searches involving electrons by non-standard couplings preferring

heavy leptons (but see BaBar’s direct search limits in a wide mass range, PRD 94 (2016) 011102), or invoke flavour off-diagonal Z’ to evade constraints [Altmannshofer et al., PLB 762 (2016) 389]

  • axion-like particle (ALP), contributing like π0 in HLbL [Marciano et al., PRD 94 (2016)

115033]

  • `dark photon’ - like fifth force particle [Feng et al., PRL 117 (2016) 071803]

l a, s l a, s a, s l l a, s l l l l A D C B

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Muons live 2.2 s before decaying Direction of positron follows the polarization of the muon Measure Larmor Precession

Penning Trap

Since 1976 rather than stopping (or drifting) muons and applying field “trap” them

Technique

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Particle moving in a magnetic field:

  • momentum turns with cyclotron frequency wC,
  • spin turns with wS

Spin turns relative to the momentum with wa

Technique

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Themis Bowcock Seminar

With an electric quadrupole field for vertical focusing

Vertical Focussing Required (E-quads)

𝜕𝑏 = −

𝑓 𝑛𝑑 𝑏𝜈𝐶 − 𝑏𝜈 − 1 𝛿2−1

Ԧ 𝛾 × 𝐹

Simplify by choose “magic” momentum so that

𝑏𝜈 −

1 𝛿2−1 = 0

With  =29.3, p=3.09 GeV/c, dilated lifetime = 64.4 s

“CERN-III miracle”

Technique

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Themis Bowcock Seminar 21/03/2018

Technique

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Magnetic field

𝜕𝑏 = −

𝑓 𝑛𝑑 𝑏𝜈𝐶 How can it be so accurate? Make measurement with reference to proton NMR

𝑏𝜈 = 𝜕𝑏 𝜕𝑞 𝜇 − 𝜕𝑏 𝜕𝑞 𝜇 =

𝜈𝜈 𝜈𝑞 = 3.183345137(85)  27ppb

From muonium, hyperfine structure

  • W. Liu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.

82, 711 (1999).

Technique

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Themis Bowcock Seminar

  • The highest energy positrons are correlated with the muon spin.
  • As the spin rotates forward and backward the number of e+ is

modulated by wa

𝜌+ → 𝜈+ + 𝜉𝜈 𝜈+ → 𝑓+ + ҧ 𝜉𝜈 + 𝜉𝑓

Source: Polarized muons born from pion decay In ring muons decay to positrons Technique

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Inflector Kicker Modules Storage ring Central orbit Injection orbit

Pions

p=3.1GeV/c

B 

R=711.2cm d=9cm

(1.45T)

Electric Quadrupoles

xc ≈ 77 mm b ≈ 10 mrad B·dl ≈ 0.1 Tm

xc

R R

b Target narrow bunch of protons

  • Muon storage ring – weak

focusing betatron

  • Muon polarization
  • Injection & kicking
  • Focus with electric quads
  • 24 electron calorimeters

(E, t)

Schematic

Muons constrained in “cylinder” 9cm diameter 44.7m long

Technique

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Themis Bowcock Seminar

BNL 3.6 billion μ decays (2001 data) : known functions of e+ energy

BNL data

“Lighthouse on a carousel” Technique

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Themis Bowcock Seminar

g-2 Experiment at FNAL

…can we resolve the E821 anomaly?

  • I. Rabi (Schawlow)

Technique

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Themis Bowcock Seminar

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Themis Bowcock Seminar

0.54 ppm 0.14 ppm Enough to establish 5-10 σ

Technique

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Themis Bowcock Seminar

ENERGY FRONTIER Technique Team Liverpool About 15 including Academics & Senior Scientists Engineers +Workshop Technicians Graduate Students Undergraduates Interns

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

Themis Bowcock Seminar 21/03/2018

Shimming …..

Muons are distributed over storage volume B-field is not uniform over this volume Need to convolute the two.

Elements

g-2

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Themis Bowcock Seminar

New Detectors

New Calorimeter

Calorimeter (PbF2 + SiPMT)

  • more segmented.
  • x2 sampling (800M/s) vs BNL
  • quicker response (5 ns)
  • energy resolution <5% @

2GeV

  • improved gain stability
  • improved laser calibration

system

Straw Trackers (UK)

  • authenticate pileup
  • measure muon profile
  • identify lost muons
  • calibrate calorimeter
  • measure EDM

New Trackers Elements

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Traceback – 3 off

Elements

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Straw trackers

100 µm radial resolution achieved

Elements

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Technique

First Track

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

Themis Bowcock Seminar

slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

Themis Bowcock Seminar

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

Themis Bowcock Seminar

ωa systematics

Elements

slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Uncertainties and Interpretation

muonE experiment proposal (g-2 groups @ PBC – CERN) Muon on electron scattering

slide-46
SLIDE 46

46

Themis Bowcock Seminar

By 2019 (First Data 2017): 5.5σ significance from the experimental improvement becomes 9.7σ evidence of NP if central value remains the same AND theory does not move. g-2 does not probe flavour changing interactions but NP in loops . Can address models: technicolor, SUSY, 2HDM, LHT, W’, Z’ (TeV range) tanb Smuon mass (Gev) Neutralino mass = 500 GeV

If effect persists we can start to look at possible NP …

Comments

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Moments …

“If you enjoy doing difficult experiments, you can do them, but it is a waste of time and effort because the result is already known” : Pauli "No experiment is so dumb, that it should not be tried” : Gerlach

“the Muon obeys QED. g-2 is correct to 0.5%. In my opinion, it will be right to any accuracy. So it’s not worth doing the experiment” Head of CERN Theory at time of CERN EDMs “would you like to predict the result ?” : F . Farley FRS

1968 QED alone wasn’t sufficient Comments

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48

Themis Bowcock Seminar He has worked on wave energy since 1976 and has filed 14 patents in this area. He is the co-inventor of the Anaconda wave energy device.[7] He won the 1980 Hughes Medal of the Royal Society "for his ultra-precise measurements of the muon magnetic moment, a severe test of quantum electrodynamics and of the nature of the muon".[8] 1967-82 he was the academic head of the Royal Military College of Science, Shrivenham GB. He has been visiting professor at Yale, Reading University (of engineering), University of New South Wales (of theoretical physics) and currently at Southampton. Moving to France in 1986 he helped the cancer hospital Centre Antoine Lacassagne in Nice to instal a 65 MeV cyclotron for proton therapy.[9] He designed the beam transport which brings the beam to the

  • patient. Operating unmodified for 23 years the system has treated over 3000 patients for ocular

melanoma with a cure rate of 95% . His publications include the Methuen monograph "Elements of Pulse Circuits" (1955) [10] translated into French and Spanish and papers on particle physics, relativity, wave energy and cosmology.

“Catalysed Fusion is a sizzling true-to- life fantasy, woven around particle physics in Geneva, the city where nations meet and particles collide. Love and adventure, discovery and intrigue, rivalry, skill and skulduggery at the frontiers of physics. How science works, how scientists operate around those big”

slide-49
SLIDE 49

49

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Comments

slide-50
SLIDE 50

50

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Muon EDM

slide-51
SLIDE 51

51

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Purcell and Ramsey

slide-52
SLIDE 52

52

Themis Bowcock Seminar

  • Most precisely measured property of an elementary particle
  • Most precise prediction of the standard model
  • Most precise confrontation of theory and experiment
  • Greatest triumph of the standard model

Ele lectron Magnetic ic Dip ipole Moment Gabrie ielse

slide-53
SLIDE 53

53

Themis Bowcock Seminar

system under P and T is not symmetric with respect to the initial system, Having CPT symmetry, the combined symmetry CP is

violated as well.

slide-54
SLIDE 54

54

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Magnetic dipole moment Electric dipole moment

h is a dimensionless constant, analogous to g

Hamiltonian for a fermion in B and E field Transformation Properties

If CPT valid  EDM would violate CP

B E μ d C

  • P

+

  • +

+ T

  • +
  • CP
  • +
  • CPT

+ + + + Technique

slide-55
SLIDE 55

55

Themis Bowcock Seminar

10 billion matter/anti- matter pairs annihilated each other leaving behind 1 matter particle and 10 billion photons cosmic background radiation, the echo of the Big Bang we measure today.

slide-56
SLIDE 56

56

Themis Bowcock Seminar

“CP Symmetry Violation, C-Asymmetry, and Baryon Asymmetry of the Universe” e". Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics. 5: 24–

  • 27. 1967
slide-57
SLIDE 57

57

Themis Bowcock Seminar

slide-58
SLIDE 58

58

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Any non-zero EDM for a muon = New Physics Better limits from electrons but 2nd generation may be “special” (loops)

slide-59
SLIDE 59

59

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Dependence on E field cancelled out by choosing  = 29.3 Technique

slide-60
SLIDE 60

60

Themis Bowcock Seminar

EDM tilts the precession plane of the muons by an angle d

Ԧ 𝛾

EDM tilts the muon precession plane towards the centre of the g-2 storage ring Measured angle is reduced due to Lorentz contraction:

Technique

slide-61
SLIDE 61

61

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Muon : EDM

O(1M) events in trackers (few weeks)

  • -> sensitivity at 10-19

[BNL] Expect several billion events in the trackers and so reach 10-21

  • Precession plane tilts

towards center of ring

  • Causes an increase in

muon precession frequency

  • Oscillation is 90o out of

phase with the a

  • scillation

Technique

slide-62
SLIDE 62

62

Themis Bowcock Seminar

FNAL g-2 progressing well: data 2018. Results 2019.

  • Quad incident will be overcome

Theory in good shape for reducing its contribution to the systematic error

  • if we could “just” resolve the g-2 discrepancy at

FNAL, the benefits for constraining BSM scenarios would be enormous. Is there one last hurrah for this beautiful method & equipment? There IS a cross-check mu-e scatter

slide-63
SLIDE 63

63

Themis Bowcock Seminar

UPGRADE? ( & -)

slide-64
SLIDE 64

64

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Click to edit Master title style

Click to edit Master subtitle style

21/03/2018 64

Proton Electric Dipole Moment

Themis Bowcock

CERN Workshop 26th March 2018

slide-65
SLIDE 65

65

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Motivations CP sources/EDM

  • Required for Baryogenesis
  • Strong CP Problem
  • Beyond Colliders: “The PeV scale allows a

generic flavour structure and, with TeV gauginos, EDMs are one of the few

  • bservables able to probe this scale via log-

enhanced quark CEDMs”

Ritz, Lepton Moments ‘14

Pospelov,Shaposnikov, PBC 16

slide-66
SLIDE 66

66

Themis Bowcock Seminar

  • M. Pospelov, A. Ritz, Ann. Phys. 318

(2005) 119.

𝑒𝑜~ − 𝑒𝑞 Physics

slide-67
SLIDE 67

67

Themis Bowcock Seminar

electron

Timmermans, LM 14

2010 2020

muon electron proton neutron

SM value reached in

  • 2075 for neutron
  • 2115 for electron

pEDM = advancement & opportunity

J.M.Pendlebury and E.A. Hinds, NIMA 440 (2000) 471

Physics

slide-68
SLIDE 68

68

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Looking for an EDM above SM level

slide-69
SLIDE 69

69

Themis Bowcock Seminar Marciano, CM9/KAIST/Korea, Nov 2014

Physics

slide-70
SLIDE 70

70

Themis Bowcock Seminar Pospelov,PBC,16

.

slide-71
SLIDE 71

71

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Technique

slide-72
SLIDE 72

72

Themis Bowcock Seminar

𝑒Ԧ 𝑡 𝑒𝑢 = Ԧ 𝜈 × 𝐶 + Ԧ 𝑒 × 𝐹 Technique 10 More details

Bei PBC 16

slide-73
SLIDE 73

73

Themis Bowcock Seminar

𝜕𝑏 = 𝑓 𝑛 𝐻𝐶 − 𝐻 − 1 𝛿2 − 1 Ԧ 𝛾 × 𝐹 𝑑 𝜕𝑓 = 𝜃𝑓 2𝑛 𝐹 𝑑 + Ԧ 𝛾 × 𝐶 𝐶 = 0 & 𝛿 = 1 + Τ 1 𝐻 Technique 10

slide-74
SLIDE 74

74

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Counter-rotating beams

No net flow of current

Technique 11

slide-75
SLIDE 75

75

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Technique 12

slide-76
SLIDE 76

76

Themis Bowcock Seminar

p : 103 s Polarization Lifetime (Spin Coherence Time) A : 0.6 Left/right asymmetry observed by the polarimeter P : 0.8 Beam polarization Nc : 5x1010 p/cycle Total number of stored particles per cycle TTot: 107s Total running time per year f : 1% Useful event rate fraction (efficiency for EDM) ER : 8 MV/m Radial electric field strength

= 2.5×10-29 e-cm / year

Technique

slide-77
SLIDE 77

77

Themis Bowcock Seminar

What has been accomplished?

  • Polarimeter systematic errors KVI, COSY
  • Precision beam/spin dynamics tracking CAPP
  • Stable lattice, IBS lifetime: ~104s Lebedev, FNAL
  • SCT 103 s; role of sextupoles understood COSY.
  • Feasibility of required electric field strength

<8 MV/m, 3cm plate separation JLab, FNAL

  • Analytic estimation of electric fringe fields and

precision beam/spin dynamics tracking. Stable!

Elements

slide-78
SLIDE 78

78

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Feasibility all-electric ring

  • Two technical reviews have been

performed BNL: Dec 2009, March 2011

  • Fermilab review. Lebedev “concept

sound”

  • First all-electric ring: AGS-analogue

(‘53-’57)

Ring radius 4.7m Proposed-built 1953-57

  • Heidelberg Cryogenic Storage Ring:

(expertise in collab.)

  • M. Plotkin ‘91

Elements

slide-79
SLIDE 79

79

Themis Bowcock Seminar

B-field Shielding Requirements

  • No need for shielding: In principle, with

counter-rotating beams.

  • However: BPMs are located only in straight

sections  sampling finite. The B-field needs to be less than (10-100nT) everywhere to reduce its effect. We are building a prototype Selcuk Haciomeroglu, CAPP

Elements

slide-80
SLIDE 80

80

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Polarimeter analyzing power

Elements

slide-81
SLIDE 81

81

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Extraction: lowering the vertical focusing strength

R L R L

H

    U D U D

V

   

carries EDM signal increases slowly with time carries in-plane (g-2) precession signal

pEDM polarimeter

Micro-Megas detector, GEMs, MRPC

  • r Si.

Brantjes et al., NIMA 2012.

81

  • E. Stephenson

Elements

“defining aperture” polarimeter target

slide-82
SLIDE 82

82

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Comments – CPEDM @ CERN

  • Costing: Full costing for BNL proposal

Proposal here O(20MCHF) Electric has design “technically driven schedule”

  • Ideally pbars (but need plenty!)

Superb CPT check

  • Phase-II proton increasing sensitivity by
  • rder of magnitude possible

Conclusion

slide-83
SLIDE 83

83

Themis Bowcock Seminar

n,p and D

“the programme ( 3 experiments together) with EDM sensitivity of better than 10−28 e·cm can pin-point the CP-violating source should one of them discovers a non-zero value”

  • W. Marciano

Conclusion

slide-84
SLIDE 84

84

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Summary - CPEDM

  • QCD & window to

CP

  • NP into the PeV

range

  • CP-violating

sources beyond the SM, e.g. SUSY

  • pEDM >10

sensitive than the best nEDM plans

  • All electric ring design

well developed

“do the simple things…”

  • Power of the method

High intensity beams Long beam lifetime Spin Coherence Time Counter rotating beams cancel B-field effects

  • Experienced

team/collaboration based on g-2

Conclusion

slide-85
SLIDE 85

85

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Super precise measurements Using magic momenta

slide-86
SLIDE 86

86

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Note

  • Huge worldwide effort on EDMs

Electrons (new atom interferometer technique!) Neutrons

  • A fundamental way to look for NP and test the

SM

  • Many techniques of which frozen spin is only
  • ne
slide-87
SLIDE 87

87

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Measure what is measureable and make measureable what is not so.”

Galileo Galiliei 1564-1642

slide-88
SLIDE 88

88

Themis Bowcock Seminar

B-field / ωp systematics

0.17 ppm 0.07 ppm

slide-89
SLIDE 89

89

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Electron Magnetic Dipole Moment

  • Most precisely measured property of an elementary particle
  • Most precise prediction of the standard model
  • Most precise confrontation of theory and experiment
  • Greatest triumph of the standard model
slide-90
SLIDE 90

90

Themis Bowcock Seminar

  • B. Lee Roberts, TRIUMF – 7 April 2010
  • p.

90/57

e - conversion operators

have calculated the coherent -e conversion branching ratios in various nuclei for general LFV interactions to see: (1) which nucleus is the most sensitive to mu-e conversion searches, (2) whether one can distinguish various theoretical models by the Z dependence.

Relevant quark level interactions Dipole Scalar Vector R.Kitano, M.Koike and Y.Okada. 2002

MEGA Sindrum II MEG Mu2e Mu2e Project-X

κ (non-dipole term)

(fig, from Andrew Norman)

L(TeV)

slide-91
SLIDE 91

91

Themis Bowcock Seminar 21/03/2018

g-2

slide-92
SLIDE 92

92

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Technique

Lattice

Mei Bai PBC 16

14

slide-93
SLIDE 93

93

Themis Bowcock Seminar

E-field plate module

Beam position Elements We are also producing new Q1 deflectors for g-2 experiment

slide-94
SLIDE 94

94

Themis Bowcock Seminar

JLab results with TiN-coated Al

No field emission at 225 kV;gaps > 40 mm, happy at high gradient Bare Al TiN-coated Al the hard coating covers defects

15 MV/m 20 MV/m

Matt Poelker, JLab

  • Md. A. Mamun and E. Forman

Elements

slide-95
SLIDE 95

95

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Distortion of the closed orbit

Clockwise beam Counter-clockwise beam

The N=0 component is a first order effect! Elements The beam vertical position tells the average radial B-field; the main systematic error source

slide-96
SLIDE 96

96

Themis Bowcock Seminar

SQUID BPM

  • D. Kawall UMASS/Amherst

B CW CCW commercially available SQUID gradiometers at KRISS 3.3 fT /Hz @100 Hz to sense the vertical beam splitting at 1-10kHz Elements

slide-97
SLIDE 97

97

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Spin Coherence Time: need ~103 s

  • Not all particles have same deviation from

magic momentum, or same horizontal and vertical divergence (all second order effects)

  • They cause a spread in the g-2 frequencies:

2 2 2 a x y

dP d a b c P w           

Technique

slide-98
SLIDE 98

98

Themis Bowcock Seminar

Systematic errors

Conclusion

slide-99
SLIDE 99

99

Themis Bowcock Seminar

EDMs 10-26 e cm Technique Arxiv proton |dp|< 79 From 199Hg

0901.2328

proposal < 10-3 srEDM (I)

1502.04317v1

neutron |dn|< 2.9

1509.04411

deuteron < 10-3 srEDM(II)

1201.5773

ҧ 𝜄 ≤ 2 × 10−1 0

pEDM is more than an order of magnitude more sensitive than current nEDM plans

ҧ 𝜄 ≤ 3 × 10−14 Physics

slide-100
SLIDE 100

10

Themis Bowcock Seminar Altmanshoffer et. al. Pospelov PBC 16 arXiv:hep-ph/0508135

Physics

slide-101
SLIDE 101

10 1

Themis Bowcock Seminar

The ring

  • Electric field needed is moderate (<8MV/m).

New techniques with TiN coated Aluminum is a cost savings opportunity.

  • JEDI(COSY), have demonstrated Long horizontal

Spin Coherence Time (SCT) trimming with sextupoles.

Technique