elasticity of substitution
play

Elasticity of Substitution Junichiro Oda*, Takashi Homma, Keigo - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The 15th IAEE European Conference 2017 September 3-6, 2017 Hofburg Congress Center, Vienna, Austria Estimation of Japanese Steel Product Trade Elasticity of Substitution Junichiro Oda*, Takashi Homma, Keigo Akimoto Research Institute of


  1. The 15th IAEE European Conference 2017 September 3-6, 2017 Hofburg Congress Center, Vienna, Austria Estimation of Japanese Steel Product Trade Elasticity of Substitution Junichiro Oda*, Takashi Homma, Keigo Akimoto Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth (RITE) Kyoto, Japan *Contact us: jun-oda@rite.or.jp

  2. Contents 2 Heavy plate 1. Introduction 4 3 2. Analysis 1: Volume (Mt/y) 2 Price elasticity of substitution between Japan's Exports 1 Japan’s export and Japan’s import Japan's Imports 0 -1 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 Flat-rolled steel products 3. Analysis 2: 50 Japan's exports Price elasticity of substitution between China's exports Volume (Mt/y) Japan’s export and China’s export 25 4. Summary 0 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015

  3. Introduction (1/2) 3 1. Steel is a carbon intensive material.  Japanese steel industry emitted a 187 Mt of CO 2 in 2016, accounting for a 17% of Japan's energy-related CO 2 emissions.  If an unilateral carbon tax, 30 US$/tCO 2 , is adapted, steel production cost could rise by 66 US$/t of steel (+11%). 2. Steel is a tradable commodity.  Japan directly exported 41 Mt of steel products in 2016. Japanese production 100% 94 Mt Export to global 41 Mt 43% Import from global 6% 6 Mt (Mt of steel product) 0 25 50 75 100 3. The increase in production cost can lead to carbon leakage. Elasticity is one of the key parameters for the significance of carbon leakage.

  4. Introduction (2/2) 4 Japan’s steel products export to global in 2016 *1 *5 Semi-finished Other flat- (Slab, etc) 11% *2 rolled (Stainless, etc) Long (Sections, 18% etc) 7% Tubes 2% Galvanized sheet 7% *4 Others 9% 41 Mt Cold-rolled *3 wide strip 7% Flat-rolled Heavy plate 71% 7% Hot-rolled wide strip 32% *1)http://www.retainingwallsteelql  This study focuses on flat-rolled steel products as follows: d.com.au/products.php *2)https://www.thyssenkrupp- Analysis 1 Analysis 2 steel.com/en/products/heavy- plate/heavy-plate-overview.html ✓ ✓ Flat-rolled steel products *3)http://www.yogsunsteel.com/fl at_products.php ✓ Heavy plate *4)http://japanese.galvanized- steelcoils.com/sale-5372291- astm-a1008-din16723- ✓ Hot-rolled wide strip en10130-cold-rolled-steel-plate- sheet-for-oil-drum.html ・・・ ・・・ *5)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ho t-dip_galvanization

  5. Analysis 1: Elasticity of substitution between Japan’s export and Japan’s import 5 Methodology 1. Previous work for estimating trade elasticity  Armington (1969): substitution between domestic and imported goods  Hoshino (2001): semi-conductor trade elasticity in Japan 2. Based on Hoshino (2001), Analysis 1 applies the following: 𝐾𝑏𝑞𝑏𝑜 ′ 𝑡 𝑓𝑦𝑞𝑝𝑠𝑢 𝑤𝑝𝑚. [t] 𝐾𝑏𝑞𝑏𝑜 ′ 𝑡 𝑓𝑦𝑞𝑝𝑠𝑢 𝑞𝑠𝑗𝑑𝑓 [US$/t] 𝑚𝑜 𝐾𝑏𝑞𝑏𝑜 ′ 𝑡 𝑗𝑛𝑞𝑝𝑠𝑢 𝑤𝑝𝑚. [t] = 𝑑 + 𝑓𝑚𝑏𝑡𝑢𝑗𝑑𝑗𝑢𝑧 ∙ 𝑚𝑜 𝐾𝑏𝑞𝑏𝑜 ′ 𝑡 𝑗𝑛𝑞𝑝𝑠𝑢 𝑞𝑠𝑗𝑑𝑓 [US$/t] + 𝑕 ∙ 𝑧𝑓𝑏𝑠 Data Flat-rolled steel products (a) Volume (Mt/y) (b) Unit price (US$/t) 1,500 30 Unit price (US$/t) 20 1,000 Volume (Mt/y) 10 Japan's Exports 500 Japan's Imports Japan's Exports (FOB) 0 Japan's Import (CIF) 0 -10 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2017 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Ref) Ministry of Finance (2017): Trade statistics of Japan, http:// www .customs.go.jp/toukei/info/index_e.htm

  6. Analysis 1: Data (1/2) 6 Heavy plate (a) Volume (Mt/y) (b) Unit price (US$/t) 1,500 4 3 Unit price (US$/t) Volume (Mt/y) 1,000 2 Japan's Exports *2 1 Japan's Imports 500 Japan's Exports (FOB) 0 Japan's Imports (CIF) -1 0 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 Hot-rolled wide strip (a) Volume (Mt/y) (b) Unit price (US$/t) 15 1,500 10 Unit price (US$/t) Volume (Mt/y) 1,000 5 Japan's Exports *3 Japan's Imports 500 0 Japan's Exports (FOB) Japan's Imports (CIF) 0 -5 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 Ref) Ministry of Finance (2017): Trade statistics of Japan, http://www.customs.go.jp/toukei/info/index_e.htm

  7. Analysis 1: Data (2/2) 7 Cold-rolled wide strip (a) Volume (Mt/y) (b) Unit price (US$/t) 1,500 4 Unit price (US$/t) Volume (Mt/y) 1,000 2 Japan's Exports *4 Japan's Imports 500 0 Japan's Exports (FOB) Japan's Imports (CIF) -2 0 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 Galvanized sheet (a) Volume (Mt/y) (b) Unit price (US$/t) 1,500 4 Unit price (US$/t) 3 Volume (Mt/y) 1,000 2 *5 Japan's Exports 1 500 Japan's Imports Japan's Exports (FOB) 0 Japan's Imports (CIF) 0 -1 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2017 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Ref) Ministry of Finance (2017): Trade statistics of Japan, http://www.customs.go.jp/toukei/info/index_e.htm

  8. Analysis 1: Regression results 8 12 years (Jan. 2005―Jan. 2017) 4 years (Jan. 2013― Jan. 2017) [Monthly data basis] R 2 adj R 2 adj elasticity g , time trend elasticity g, time trend Flat-rolled -0.66** -1%/y 0.05 N/A steel products Heavy -1.18** -17**%/y 0.53 -1.83** -24**%/y 0.50 plate Hot-rolled -0.64** 7**%/y 0.59 N/A wide strip Cold-rolled -0.99** -1%/y 0.13 N/A wide strip Galvanized N/A -1.16** -23**%/y 0.50 sheet Note) “N/A” means that we can’t observe statistically significant results. * denotes significance level < 10%. ** denotes significance level < 5%.  Negative time trends imply that Japanese steel industry was losing market share.  Large elasticity implies that price competitiveness was very intensive.

  9. Analysis 1: Discussion 9 12 years (Jan. 2005―Jan. 2017) 4 years (Jan. 2013― Jan. 2017) [Monthly data basis] R 2 adj R 2 adj elasticity g , time trend elasticity g, time trend Hot-rolled wide strip -0.64** 7**%/y 0.59 N/A Galvanized sheet N/A -1.16** -23**%/y 0.50 15 Hot-rolled wide strip (Mt/y) Hot-rolled 10 wide strip, Volume (Mt/y) 2000’ 2010’ HRS (Mt/y) 5 Japan's Exports Japan’s steel Japan’s steel Japan's Imports 0 makers makers -5 *3 HRS 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 4 GS Thai re- Galvanized 3 rollers Sheet, GS Volume (Mt/y) 2 (Mt/y) GS Japan's Exports 1 Japan's Imports Thai car 0 Thai car companies *5 -1 companies 2017 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 e.g., Toyota Motor Thailand

  10. Analysis 2: Elasticity of substitution between Japan’s export and China’s export 10 Data Flat-rolled steel products (a) Volume (Mt/y) (b) Unit price (US$/t) 50 1,000 Japan's Exports Volume (Mt/y) Unit price (US$/t) China's Exports 25 500 Japan's Exports (FOB) China's Exports (Benchmark) 0 0 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Ref) World Steel Dynamics Inc. Steel Benchmarker (2017) Methodology  Based on Hoshino (2001), Analysis 2 applies the following: 𝐾𝑏𝑞𝑏𝑜 ′ 𝑡 𝑓𝑦𝑞𝑝𝑠𝑢 𝑤𝑝𝑚. [t] 𝐾𝑏𝑞𝑏𝑜 ′ 𝑡 𝑓𝑦𝑞𝑝𝑠𝑢 𝑞𝑠𝑗𝑑𝑓 [US$/t] 𝑚𝑜 = 𝑑 + 𝑓𝑚𝑏𝑡𝑢𝑗𝑑𝑗𝑢𝑧 ∙ 𝑚𝑜 𝐷ℎ𝑗𝑜𝑏 ′ 𝑡 𝑓𝑦𝑞𝑝𝑠𝑢 𝑞𝑠𝑗𝑑𝑓 [US$/t] + 𝑕 ∙ 𝑧𝑓𝑏𝑠 𝐷ℎ𝑗𝑜𝑏 ′ 𝑡 𝑓𝑦𝑞𝑝𝑠𝑢 𝑤𝑝𝑚. [t]

  11. Analysis 2: Regression results 11  Negative time trend implies that Japanese steel industry is losing share of global market. Large elasticity implies that price competitiveness is very intensive. 15 years (2001―2015) (Annual data basis) R 2 adj elasticity g , time trend Flat-rolled steel products -3.34** -11**%/y 0.87 Discussion  Combining the estimated elasticity (-3.34) and an unilateral carbon tax (30 US$/tCO 2 ) can lead to carbon leakage. Japan China Total (net) Flat-rolled steel production -4.2 Mt/y (-15%) 4.2 Mt/y (+9%) 0 CO 2 emission -9.3 MtCO 2 /y 10.6 MtCO 2 /y 1.3 MtCO 2 /y CO 2 intensity of BF steel mill 2.2 tCO 2 /t 2.5 tCO 2 /t - Note) Japanese steel production cost can rise by 66 US$/t of steel (+11%) based on full cost pass-through rate of carbon cost. 2015 market condition basis.

  12. Summary (1/2) 12  The results indicate large elasticity, which means that price competitiveness was very intensive.  The results also indicate negative time trends, which means that Japan’s steel industry was loosing their market share.  Analysis 1: Elasticity of substitution between Japan’s export and Japan’s import • Galvanized sheet [Jan. 2013―Jan. 2017]   Time trend: -23%/y Elasticity: -1.16 *5 • Hot- rolled wide strip [Jan. 2005―Jan. 2017]   Time trend: 7%/y Elasticity: -0.64 *3 Note) This is consistent with active overseas production of Thai re-rollers and Thai car companies (e.g., Toyota Motor Thailand).

  13. Summary (2/2) 13  Analysis 2: Elasticity of substitution between Japan’s export and China’s export • Estimated time trend: -11%/y • Estimated elasticity: -3.34 • Combining the estimated elasticity (-3.34) and an unilateral carbon tax (30 US$/tCO 2 ) can lead to carbon leakage and net increase in global CO 2 emissions (1.3 MtCO 2 /y). Future work  Comparison with the European studies done on trade impacts of EU ETS  Explicit consideration of 1. Value-added steel (stainless steel, seamless pipe, etc.) 2. Overcapacity of steel production by region, 3. Time lag and cumulative effect, and 4. Multi-regional analysis. Ref) http://sumitomothailand.co.th/

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend