Effect of cation composition on the doping state optimizing critical - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Effect of cation composition on the doping state optimizing critical - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Effect of cation composition on the doping state optimizing critical current densities in Bi-2212 conductors M O Rikel, L Koliotassis, J Ehrenberg, A Hobl, J Bock, A Ballarino, L Bottura, D. Richter, E Seiler, C Scheuerlein, H Miao, Y Huang, J
Sept 2002 / 2
August 11, 2014
2
1MOr3A-02 Acknowledgements
l S Elschner (University of Applied Science, Mannheim);
J-F Fagnard and P Vanderbemden (University of Liége) for fruitful discussions
l Z Abdoullaeva, S Krämer, R Deul, W Horst (NSC);
M Matras, V Moreau, A Camus, C Sillanfest (ENSCI, Limoges); E Lugand (EPF, Paris) for assistance in experiments
l EUCARD2 and IDS-FUNMAT Projects for financial support
Sept 2002 / 3
August 11, 2014
3
1MOr3A-02 Motivation
l Origin of Strong Compositional Effects on Jc(4.2 K, sf)
in Bi2212 Wires and Dip-Coated Tapes is unclear
l It is known that significant Overdoping is necessary for
- ptimizing Ic in Bulk and Round Wire conductors
l Literature data suggest that optimum doping (highest
Tc) depends on cation composition of Bi2212
l Can the difference in the doping state explain
compositional effects on Ic in Bi2212 tapes and wires?
Sept 2002 / 4
August 11, 2014
4
1MOr3A-02 STRONG Effect of Cation Composition
- n Wire and Tape Performance
l Microstructural studies of tapes and wires did not explain a factor of
four difference in Jc of best (Sr-rich, 521) and worst (Ca-rich; 524) compositions
400 800 1200 1600 2000 882 884 886 888 890 892 894 896 898 900
T max, °C J e, A/mm
2
W521 W522 W523 W524 (b)
W521-524 2.14 : (2.86–x) : x :2.00 Sr/Ca = 2.25, 2.18, 1.75, 1.34
- H. Miao et al 2006 Adv Cryo Eng. 52B, p. 673, (2006) [Proc. ICMC 2005]
- M. Rikel et al 2006 J Phys: Conf Ser., 43 (2006) 51–54 [Proc. EUCAS 2005]
Sept 2002 / 5
August 11, 2014
5
1MOr3A-02 Microstructure of 521 vs 524. Dip coated tapes. 1
Amorphous
Grain Boundarie s
l Second phases
may explain ~10% difference in Ic (not a factor of 4 to 10)
l Amorphous
layers at GBs numerous in 524 limit current. But is this the whole story?
521 1000 A 7±3% 524 100-250 A 20±5% Property
Ic(4.2K, sf) Second Phases
Sept 2002 / 6
August 11, 2014
6
1MOr3A-02
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 30 40 50 60
Lin (Cps)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 30 40 50 60
Microstructure of 521 vs 524. Dip coated tapes. 2
l Important
microstructure characteristics are much better in 524
l Why performance
- f 524 is much
worse than that of 521 is still not clear Out-of- plane texture
521
Smaller
524
Twice Larger
Property
Grain Size Bi2201inter- growth defects 2 to 10% 0.1±0.2% 7.4(3)° 4.2(2)°
Sept 2002 / 7
August 11, 2014
7
1MOr3A-02
δ in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ
Overdoping Δδ Δδo is necessary for optimizing Ic. Tc & Ic(77 K, sf) vs δ in OST 521-like RW
δ0 = 0.213(4) δopt = 0.195(7) Δδ0 = 0.018(7)
Rikel et al ASC2012
Sept 2002 / 8
August 11, 2014
8
1MOr3A-02 OPTIMUM Doping Depends on Cation Composition
l Single Crystals grown using
Bi2+xSr2-xCa1Cu2O8+δ powder mixtures
l Annealed to vary O index l Smaller Sr/Ca requires more
- verdoping
/* real compositions unknown =>exact effect to be quantified*/
Yamashita et al Physica C 470 (2010 s170
Sept 2002 / 9
August 11, 2014
9
1MOr3A-02 Hypothesis to Check
Plan of Studies:
l Use Bi2212 bulk and vintage (521 & 524) dip coated tapes and wires
- f Bi2.00+zSr2.85-xCaxCu2.00O8+δ (x = 0.82; 0.90; 1.03; 1.22; z = 0.15,
0.08 & 0.00) compositions
l Vary O contents in the samples from δ = 0.175 to 0.252 l Justify Tc(δ) for various z & x l Study effect of δ on Jc(B) at various temperatures.
Can the difference in the doping state explain compositional effects on Ic in Bi2212 tapes and wires?
First Results
l Tc and Jc vs δ for bulk samples of Sr- and Ca-rich compositions
Sept 2002 / 10
August 11, 2014
10
1MOr3A-02 Melt Cast Processed Bulk 2212
l Melt Casting ∅5 & ∅8 mm rods
- f Bi2.00+zSr3.00-z-xCaxCu2.00O8+δ
cation compositions
. x = 0.82; 0.90; 1.03; 1.22; . z = 0.15, 0.08 & 0.00 & Bi1.95(3)Sr2.01(3)Ca0.92(3)Cu2.02(3)O8+δ + 0.1BaO +0.4SrSO4
. (NSC Bulk Standard)
l Heat Treatment to convert solidification microstructure to Bi2212
◗ far from equilibrium (Sr/Ca in Bi2212 phase from EDX larger than overall),
but
◗ well connected to show rather high self-field Jc(77 K)
Sept 2002 / 11
August 11, 2014
11
1MOr3A-02 Adjusting O Contents
The δ-pO2-T diagram of Schweizer et al (1993)
What is varied is not the O contents, but O activity. Real δ are likely dependent on the cation composition (TBD).
- 5
- 4
- 3
- 2
- 1
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Delta =0.180 Delta = 0.192 Delta = 0.198 Delta = 0.205
x = T/100, °C log(pO2 [atm])
Approach of Glowacki et al (2003) , Yamashita et al (2010) l Quench or cool down along the pO2-T cooling trajectory to suppress
O exchange
l For δ > 0.230, just annealing in air or O2 at 350 ≤ T ≤ 550°C l Anneal at high T for fast equilibration;
Sept 2002 / 12
August 11, 2014
12
1MOr3A-02 Justify Tc(δ) for various compositions
l Optimum δ and Tc depend on cation compostion
. (Sr/Ca in Bi2212 phase from EDX)
δopt = 0.177(3) δopt = 0.199(9) δopt = 0.221(5)
Sept 2002 / 13
August 11, 2014
13
1MOr3A-02 Tc and transport Jc(77 K, sf) Composition #147; Sr/Ca = 2.48(3)
δopt = 0.177(3) δo = 0.201(2) Δδ0 = 0.024(4)
Bi1.95)Sr2.01Ca0.92Cu2.02O8+δ
+ 0.1BaO +0.4SrSO4
Sept 2002 / 14
August 11, 2014
14
1MOr3A-02
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.2 0.21 0.22 0.23 0.24 0.25 0.26
Self-Field Jc(, 77 K), A/cm2 Onset Tc, K δ
Tc Jc
Tc and transport Jc(77 K) Composition #83; Sr/Ca = 2.38(5) Bi2.15Sr2.85-xCaxCu2.00O8+δ x = 0.82
δopt = 0.199(9) δo = 0.219(4) Δδ Δδ0 = 0.020(9)
Sept 2002 / 15
August 11, 2014
15
1MOr3A-02
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.2 0.21 0.22 0.23 0.24 0.25 0.26
Self-Field Jc(, 77 K), A/cm2 Onset Tc, K δ
Tc Jc
Tc and transport Jc(77 K) Composition #524; Sr/Ca = 2.00(5) Bi2.15Sr2.85-xCaxCu2.00O8+δ x = 1.22
δopt = 0.221(6) δo = 0.236(4) Δδ Δδ0 = 0.015(7)
Sept 2002 / 16
August 11, 2014
16
1MOr3A-02 NSC Bulk Standard #147; Sr/Ca = 2.48(3) Magnetization Data at 4.2 to 77 K ΔM(H, T) data for ∅5 mm rods:
l Jc
ΔM(77 K) ≈ 1000 A/cm2 ≈
Jc
transport(77 K)
l δo is strongly T dependent
ΔM(77K, 0.05 T), emu/g ΔM(40K, 0.5 T) ΔM(4.2K, 3 T)
Δδ(4.2 K) = 0.061(5) Δδ(40 K) = 0.048(7) Δδ0 = 0.024(5)
Sept 2002 / 17
August 11, 2014
17
1MOr3A-02 Ic vs δ in OST 521-like RW Overdoping at 66 K
δ0 (77K)= 0.213(4) δ0 (66 K)= 0.219(3)
δ in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Δδ0 = 0.024(7)
δopt (Tc)= 0.195(7)
Sept 2002 / 18
August 11, 2014
18
1MOr3A-02 T - δo(Jc) Map
l The difference in the doping state may explain the observed
compositional effects on Ic in Bi2212 tapes and wires
Sept 2002 / 19
August 11, 2014