EE Dresden University of Technology Chair of Energy Economics and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ee
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

EE Dresden University of Technology Chair of Energy Economics and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transportation and Emission Trading A CGE Analysis for the EU 15 Jan Abrell EE Dresden University of Technology Chair of Energy Economics and Public Sector Management Infraday 2007 06.10.2007, Berlin - 1 - Agenda Overview


slide-1
SLIDE 1
  • 1 -

Transportation and Emission Trading

A CGE Analysis for the EU 15

Jan Abrell

EE²

Dresden University of Technology Chair of Energy Economics and Public Sector Management

Infraday 2007 06.10.2007, Berlin

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • 2 -

Agenda

  • Overview
  • Model
  • Results
  • Conclusion

Literature

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • 3 -

Transportation and Emissions

Sources: EEA (2003); EEA (2006)

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • 4 -

Hybrid Regulation under the EU ETS

European Emission Trading System (EU ETS) regulates energy and energy intensive industries as well as refineries Transportation is subject of national environmental policies Efficient environmental regulation requires equal marginal abatement costs in each sector To efficiently regulate the transportation sector the future emission permit price must be known Thus, hybrid regulation induces economic inefficiency due to informational requirements and lobbying

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • 5 -

Transport and Emission Trading

European Commission proposed to include aviation in EU ETS from 2011

  • nwards

Aircraft operators have to hold emission permits (downstream emission trading) Road transportation can be included in either an up- or midstream manner In mid-stream emission trading, producers of cars have to hold emission permits In up-stream emission trading, the producers and importers of gasoline have to hold emission permits How to address emissions from ships?

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • 6 -

Topic Use a static multi-region CGE model of the EU 15 to answer the question: What are the welfare effects of including road, water, and air transportation in the EU ETS?

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • 7 -

Agenda

  • Overview
  • Model
  • Results
  • Conclusion

Literature

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • 8 -

Model Dimensions

Static multi-region CGE model Regions: All EU15 countries and rest of the world Sectors:

Macro good (industries and services) (MAC) Agriculture (AGR) Energy intensive industries (EINT) Refined oil products (P_C) Electricity (ELY) Fossil Fuels: Coal (COA), natural gas (GAS), crude oil (OIL) Transportation: Air (ATP), water (WTP), other (road/rail) (OTP) Motor vehicles, ships, and aircrafts (CAR)

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • 9 -

Data and Implementation

Use of GTAP 6 database (base year: 2001) International trade margins are incoporated Household’s private transportation is derived by using the Household Budget Survey of 1999 Emissions are calibrated using physical fuel energy flows Emissions from international transportation are assigned to region sectors belong to Model implementation in GAMS/MPSGE

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • 10 -

Agenda

  • Overview
  • Model
  • Results
  • Conclusion

Literature

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • 11 -

Scenarios - Hybrid Regulation

Electricity, energy intensive industries, and refineries trade allowances across Europe. Remaining sectors regionally trade allowances. ROW: regional emission trading system EU ETS DOM Electricity, energy intensive industries, and refineries trade allowances across Europe. Remaining sectors are regulated by sectoral taxes; uniform tax for road transportation. ROW: regional emission trading system EU ETS TAX All sectors in European regions trade allowances across Europe. ROW: regional emission trading system EUROPEAN All regions implement regional emission trading scheme DOMESTIC Sectoral carbon constraints: different CO2 taxes across sectors and

  • regions. Road transportation has a uniform tax rate.

ROW: regional emission trading system SECTORAL Description Name

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • 12 -

Emission Reduction Requirements

Implement in each scenario effective emission reduction requirement in 2001 under the EU Burden Sharing Agreement

5 Rest of the World 22.6 Ireland 8.5 UK 2.3 Greece

  • 9.7

Sweden 8.2 Germany 17.1 Spain 5.5 France 12.8 Portugal 10.2 Finland 15.4 Netherlands 22.9 Denmark 11.4 Luxembourg 12.0 Belgium 15.0 Italy 24.3 Austria Effective Target 2001 (%) Effective Target 2001 (%)

Source: Own calculations based on EEA (2004); only energy CO2 emissions are taken into account

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • 13 -

Results – Hybrid Regulation

SECTORAL; -0.58 DOMESTIC; -0.21 EUROPEAN; -0.16 EU_ETS_DOM; -0.29 EU_ETS_TAX; -0.57

  • 0.70
  • 0.60
  • 0.50
  • 0.40
  • 0.30
  • 0.20
  • 0.10

0.00

Hicksian Equivalent Variation of EU 15 welfare compared to bechmark of no carbon regulation (%)

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • 14 -

Scenarios – Transportation under Emission Trading

Electricity, energy intensive industries, refineries, road, air, and water transportation trade allowances across Europe. Remaining sectors regionally trade allowances. ROW: regional emission trading system EU ETS DOM RAW Electricity, energy intensive industries, refineries, road, and air transportation trade allowances across Europe. Remaining sectors regionally trade allowances. ROW: regional emission trading system EU ETS DOM RA Electricity, energy intensive industries, refineries and road transportation trade allowances across Europe. Remaining sectors regionally trade allowances. ROW: regional emission trading system EU ETS DOM R Electricity, energy intensive industries, refineries, road, air, and water transportation trade allowances across Europe. Remaining sectors are regulated by sectoral taxes; uniform tax for road transportation. ROW: regional emission trading system EU ETS TAX RAW Electricity, energy intensive industries, refineries, road, and air transportation trade allowances across Europe. Remaining sectors are regulated by sectoral taxes; uniform tax for road transportation. ROW: regional emission trading system EU ETS TAX RA Electricity, energy intensive industries, refineries, and road transportation trade allowances across Europe. Remaining sectors are regulated by sectoral taxes; uniform tax for road transportation. ROW: regional emission trading system EU ETS TAX R Description Name

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • 15 -

Results – Sectoral Carbon Taxes

EU_ETS_TAX; 0.01 EU_ETS_TAX_R; 0.41 EU_ETS_TAX_RA; 0.43 EU_ETS_TAX_RAW; 0.38

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50

Hicksian Equivalent Variation of EU 15 welfare compared to SECTORAL scenario (%)

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • 16 -

Results – Domestic Emission Trading

EU_ETS_DOM; -0.08 EU_ETS_DOM_R; 0.02 EU_ETS_DOM_RA; 0.02 EU_ETS_DOM_RAW; 0.02

  • 0.20
  • 0.10

0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50

Hicksian Equivalent Variation of EU 15 welfare compared to DOMESTIC scenario (%)

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • 17 -

Agenda

  • Overview
  • Model
  • Results
  • Conclusion

Literature

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • 18 -

Conclusion

Including road transportation in the EU ETS provides high welfare gains Including air transportation also provides welfare gains Environmental policy for maritime shipping has an great impact on international trade patterns via transportation margins Caveat: – Modeling of EU 15 trade with the rest of the world is treated very aggregated – Abatement burden not differentiated across sectors

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • 19 -

Agenda

  • Overview
  • Model
  • Results
  • Conclusion

Literature

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • 20 -

Selected References

Babiker, M., J. Reilly, and L. Viguier (2004): Is international Emission Trading always beneficial? Energy Journal 25(2), 33-56. Böhringer, C. (2001): Industry-level Emission trading between Power Producers in the EU. Applied Economics 34(4), 523-533. Böhringer, C., T. Hoffmann, and C. Manrique-de-Lara-Penate (2006): The efficiency Cost of separating Carbon Markets under the EU Emission Trading Scheme: A quantitative Assessment for Germany. Energy Economics 28, 44-61. Choumert F., S. Paltsev, and J. Reilly (2006): Improving the Refinig Sector in EPPA. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Technical Note 9. European Environment Agency (2003): Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trends and Projections in the Europe 2003. Environmental Issue Report 36/2003. Denmark. European Environment Agency (2004): Annual European Community greenhouse gas inventory 1990-2002 and inventory report 2004. Technical Report 2/2004. Denmark. EUROSTAT (1999): Household Budget Survey of 1999. Luxembourg. EUROSTAT (2001): Annual Energy Statistics. Luxembourg Paltsev, S., H. Jacoby, J. Reilly, and L. Viguier (2004): Modeling the Transport Sector: The Role of Existing Fuel Taxes in Climate Policy. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report 117. Paltsev, S., L. Viguie, J. Reilly, and K.H. Tay (2004): Disaggregating Household in the MIT EPPA Model. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Technical Report 5. Schäfer, A. , and H. Jacoby (2005): Technological Detail in a multisector CGE Model: Transport under Climate Change. Energy Economics 27, 1-24.

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • 21 -

Agenda

  • Overview
  • Model
  • Results
  • Conclusion

Literature Appendix: Model Structure

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • 22 -

Production Structure Except Transportation and Extraction

CAR COA σVAE σFF σE ELY P_C GAS LAB σVA CAP OTP ATP WTP σTRN EINT MAC AGR Domestic Imported σDM … AUT … ROW σMM CO2 GAS Domestic Output Exports 2 OIL VAE TRN VA ENE Fossil Liquid RES σLQD

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • 23 -

Production Structure Transportation Services

COA σVAE σFF σE ELY L σVA K OTP WTP EINT AGR Domestic Output Exports σOUT OIL GAS CAR ATP P_C VAE ENE VA Materials Transport Equipment σcaga

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • 24 -

Production Structure Extractive Industries (Crude Oil, Natural Gas, Coal)

Domestic Output Exports σOUT RES … … OTP Materials/ VA MAC L σVA K VA σEXT

slide-25
SLIDE 25
  • 25 -

Utility Structure

σOWN COA C σCE P_C GAS ELY σHE CAR σC P_C σHTRN MAC σOTC σHTOP OTP ATP WTP σPUR EINT MAC AGR

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • 26 -

Modeling of International Trade Margins

PT(“atp“)

1

PX(“atp”,r) PX(j,s) Import of good j from region s PT(“wtp“)

1

PX(“wtp”,r) PT(“otp“)

1

PX(“otp”,r)