EDUCATION 3/10/2014 Facility Committee Committee Members - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
education
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

EDUCATION 3/10/2014 Facility Committee Committee Members - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dec 16, 2022 178 likes •506 views

FACILITIES COMMITTEE PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF EDUCATION 3/10/2014 Facility Committee Committee Members Kristine Chalifoux Amy Lozar Lynn Stuckey Arlene Vespa Mark Ritz Ex Officio Avona Greene PJ Trautman

slide-1
SLIDE 1

3/10/2014

FACILITIES COMMITTEE PRESENTATION TO THE

BOARD OF EDUCATION

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Committee Members

  • Amy Lozar
  • Arlene

Vespa

  • Avona Greene
  • Bruce Knight
  • Catherine Mannen
  • Cedric Jones
  • Dan McCall
  • Daniel Bechtel
  • Elizabeth Stegmaier
  • Holly Nelson
  • Joan E. Dykstra
  • John Ayers
  • John Currey

Facility Committee

  • Kristine Chalifoux
  • Lynn Stuckey
  • Mark Ritz – Ex Officio
  • PJ Trautman
  • Mike Somers

Participants

  • Jill Trentz
  • Heather Ochs
  • Heather Owen
  • Thomas Lockman
  • William Taylor
slide-3
SLIDE 3

AGENDA

  • Where We Began
  • Charge of the

Facilities Committee

  • Process
  • Scenarios Modeled
  • Recommendations
  • Questions?
slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • DeJong Richter Study

Where We Began

DeJong Richter Study

slide-5
SLIDE 5

CHARGE

  • f the Facilities Committee

Consider options for each of the facilities included in this analysis and develop a recommended facilities plan, based on Facility Committee input and a cost/benefit analysis, to present to the Board of Education.

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Central High School
  • Centennial High School
  • Dr. Howard Elementary
  • South Side Elementary
  • Kirby Avenue Elementary
  • Edison Middle
  • Franklin Middle
  • Jefferson Middle

Facilities Included

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Presentation to the Board of Education 3/10/2014

PROCESS

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Master plan modeling and analysis

slide-9
SLIDE 9

NEEDS ASSESSMENT

Physical Needs Educational Needs

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Infrastructure / Systems
  • Interior Environmental Quality
  • Operation and Maintenance Costs
  • Energy Efficiency
  • Safety / Security
  • Technology

What is the physical condition of the building?

PHYSICAL NEEDS

slide-11
SLIDE 11

EDUCATIONAL ADEQUACY

Does the learning environment support the educational program?*

  • School Site
  • Structural and Mechanical Features
  • Plant Maintainability
  • Safety and Security
  • Educational Adequacy
  • Environment for Education

* Determined by the standards as defined in the Strategic Plan (Great Schools Together).

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Building A Building B Building C Building A Building B Building C

OPTIONS

Remodel Addition Repurpose Retire New

SCENARIO

slide-13
SLIDE 13

COST/BENEFIT comparison

Life Cycle Costs

(including first costs, energy costs, O&M costs, and renewal costs)

Educational Adequacy

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • Brainstorming
  • Revisions/Edits
  • Presented QLEO results, Revised

Scenarios

  • Administrative research on K-8

configuration

  • Cost Benefit Analysis/Develop Final

Recommendations 10/17/13 10/24/13 11/14/13 11/2013 2/20/14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Projected Enrollments

2022-2023 projected* K-5: 4780

6-8: 2244 9-12: 3207

*DeJong Richter projected enrollment data

slide-16
SLIDE 16

SCENARIOS Modeled

Presentation to the Board of Education 3/10/2014

slide-17
SLIDE 17

October 17, 2013

Scenario Name Description Scenario 1 New Dr. Howard, K-8 at Barkstall, Central as Edison & Career Prep Scenario 2 Reuse Edison by remodeling Scenario 3 Single high school, do not reuse Central Scenario 4 Reuse Edison and Dr. Howard, build 4th middle school Scenario 5 Career prep at each high school Scenario 6 Maintain current sites by remodeling and replacing Central in the same location Scenario 7 Create 2 K-8 models Scenario 8 All new work creates K-8 elementary schools Scenario 9 Reduce to 2 middle schools and create more K-8, centralize district functions at Central Scenario 10 Focus on high priority maintenance Scenario 11 Make Central a K-8 and curriculum center

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • Eliminated Scenarios: 2, 3, 4, 6, 10,11

November 14, 2013

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Added Scenarios: 12, 13, 14, 15

November 14, 2013

Scenario Name Description Scenario 12 3 middle schools, no K-8 Scenario 13 4 middle schools, no K-8 Scenario 14 4 middle schools, renovate Edison Scenario 15 4 middle schools, renovate existing, minimum work

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • District Explored K-8

Nov 2013 – Jan 2014

PROS LIMITATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS

  • Fewer transitions for students
  • Could provide a smaller school environment depending on the number of grade level strands
  • Allow current middle schools to reduce overall enrollment and provide relief from overcrowding
  • Provides an option for students and families, similar to what we do now with having balanced calendar
  • May not be able to provide as many opportunities in encore areas (e.g. instrumental music) and in extra-

curricular activities

  • Certification issues with middle level teachers
  • Bussing – will younger students be expected to be on the bus with the older students
  • Would need to have a building administrator that has experience with primary (grades K-2) and middle level
  • Professional development at the building level would need to be carefully planned to address the grade level

range and needs of teachers and staff members

  • Facility modifications may be required to address middle school level curriculum needs if an existing K-5

elementary building is converted to K-8. If a new facility is built for K-8 or an existing building is renovated in the future for this population, these needs can be included in the upfront programming of the facility.

  • As the Board considers future facilities, this grade configuration should be taken into consideration. It is not

recommended that the District go with one or the other, but provide the K-8 as an option for families, similar to how balanced calendar is currently provided.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

FINAL SCENARIOS

Presentation to the Board of Education 3/10/2014

slide-22
SLIDE 22

ADDITION RENOVATE RETIRE NEW REPURPOSE DO NO THING

SCENARIO 1

3 Middle Schools + 1 K-8

$55,400,000 1700 Students Ed Ad – 95.2 Area – 312,579 Sq Ft $90,200,000 1700 Students Ed Ad – 97..5 Area – 306,000 Sq Ft $267,313,747
slide-23
SLIDE 23

SCENARIO 5

ADDITION RENOVATE RETIRE NEW REPURPOSE DO NO THING

3 Middle Schools + 1 K-8

slide-24
SLIDE 24

SCENARIO 8

ADDITION RENOVATE RETIRE NEW REPURPOSE DO NO THING

3 Middle Schools + 1 K-8

$55,400,000 1700 Students Ed Ad – 95.2 Area – 312,579 Sq Ft $90,200,000 1700 Students Ed Ad – 97..5 Area – 306,000 Sq Ft $286,516,233
slide-25
SLIDE 25

SCENARIO 9

ADDITION RENOVATE RETIRE NEW REPURPOSE DO NO THING

2 Middle Schools + 4 K-8

$55,400,000 1700 Students Ed Ad – 95.2 Area – 312,579 Sq Ft $90,200,000 1700 Students Ed Ad – 97..5 Area – 306,000 Sq Ft $298,074,086
slide-26
SLIDE 26

SCENARIO 12

ADDITION RENOVATE RETIRE NEW REPURPOSE DO NO THING

3 Middle Schools

$55,400,000 1700 Students Ed Ad – 95.2 Area – 312,579 Sq Ft $90,200,000 1700 Students Ed Ad – 97..5 Area – 306,000 Sq Ft $257,360,739
slide-27
SLIDE 27

SCENARIO 13

ADDITION RENOVATE RETIRE NEW REPURPOSE DO NO THING

4 Middle Schools

$55,400,000 1700 Students Ed Ad – 95.2 Area – 312,579 Sq Ft $90,200,000 1700 Students Ed Ad – 97..5 Area – 306,000 Sq Ft $274,382,120
slide-28
SLIDE 28

SCENARIO 14

ADDITION RENOVATE RETIRE NEW REPURPOSE DO NO THING

4 Middle Schools

$55,400,000 1700 Students Ed Ad – 95.2 Area – 312,579 Sq Ft $90,200,000 1700 Students Ed Ad – 97..5 Area – 306,000 Sq Ft $264,926,406
slide-29
SLIDE 29

SCENARIO 15

ADDITION RENOVATE RETIRE NEW REPURPOSE DO NO THING

4 Middle Schools

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Final Scenarios

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Final Scenarios

slide-32
SLIDE 32

THANK YOU

QUESTIONS?

Presentation to the Board of Education 3/10/2014