Economic Impact Analysis Prepared for: Long Island Regional Planning - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

economic impact analysis
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Economic Impact Analysis Prepared for: Long Island Regional Planning - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Village of Patchogue Revitalization, Economic Impact Analysis Prepared for: Long Island Regional Planning Council E CONOMIC AND R EAL E STATE A NALYSIS FOR S USTAINABLE L AND U SE O UTCOMES E CONOMIC AND R EAL E STATE A NALYSIS FOR S


slide-1
SLIDE 1

ECONOMIC AND REAL ESTATE ANALYSIS FOR SUSTAINABLE LAND USE OUTCOMES™ ECONOMIC AND REAL ESTATE ANALYSIS FOR SUSTAINABLE LAND USE OUTCOMES™

Village of Patchogue Revitalization, Economic Impact Analysis

Prepared for: Long Island Regional Planning Council

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The Long Island Regional Planning Council acknowledges and appreciates the support of the Suffolk County Economic Development Corporation in producing this study.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Interviews

  • Village of Patchogue public officials
  • Patchogue-Medford School District superintendent
  • Town of Brookhaven officials
  • Local real estate professionals
  • Local business owners

Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis: Methods Employed

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Economic Impact Analysis

  • Public Subsidies
  • Private Development Investment
  • Spending from New Non-Local Households
  • New Businesses Operations
  • Prospective residential and commercial development

Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis: Methods Employed

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Fiscal Impact Analysis

  • New residents and public school-age children.
  • Net fiscal impacts to the school district
  • Prospective residential and commercial development

Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis: Methods Employed

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Comparative Analysis

  • Real Property Values
  • Number of Business Establishments
  • Value of Sales, Receipts or Revenues
  • Annual Payroll
  • Number of Employees

Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis: Methods Employed

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Historical Overview

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The economic foundation of Patchogue was developed around heavy industry, which led to the establishment of retail, hospitality and entertainment businesses.

slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Patchogue’s commercial district was a regional destination for many decades and a good deal of the building architecture remains – lending to Patchogue’s current visitor appeal.

slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12

2% to 5% Vacancy Rate Pre 1960s

The Central Business District (CBD) Remains Healthy

slide-13
SLIDE 13

10% to 20% Vacancy Rate 1960s to 1970s

The CBD Begins to Experience Increased Vacancies

slide-14
SLIDE 14

40% to 50% Vacancy Rate 1980s to 1990s

The CBD Experiences Full Blown Distress

slide-15
SLIDE 15

What happened next?

slide-16
SLIDE 16

What were the catalysts underpinning Patchogue’s revitalization?

Vision sion and Volunt lunteerism erism: the “can do” attitude of the village’s civic, business, and elected leaders Infrastr frastruc ucture ture Impr mproveme ements: nts: including expansion of the village’s wastewater treatment facility Par Partne nersh ships ps with h Developers: elopers: allowing developers to “bring their best” ideas and encouraging them to invest in the community Vigor

  • rous
  • us Pur

ursui uit t of Grant nt Fun undi ding: ng: municipal projects, arts organizations, and business groups all benefitted

slide-17
SLIDE 17

What were the catalysts underpinning Patchogue’s revitalization?

Creat ating ing an En Enter erta tainm nment nt and Dining ng Destinat stination: ion: creating more and better

  • ptions to encourage visitor spending

Attracti cting ng Visitor

  • rs

s with th Comm mmuni nity ty Ev Events ts: including the annual Alive at Five event welcoming thousands to the village Bui uilding ding a N New w Ar Arts s and Cul ultura ural l Scene ene: including renovation of the Patchogue theater and artist housing

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Every successful revitalization effort has a champion at its beginning.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Economic Impact Analysis

slide-20
SLIDE 20

$0 $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $6,000,000 $8,000,000 $10,000,000 $12,000,000 $14,000,000 $16,000,000 $18,000,000

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Patchogue Chamber of Commerce Village of Patchogue Copper Beech Artspace The Gateway Patchogue Arts Council Patchogue Village Center for the Performing Arts Patchogue Community Development Agency Worldwide Voices Patchogue Theatre for the Performing Arts

Economic Impact Analysis: Pub ubli lic Sub ubsidies sidies

From 2001 to 2017, Patchogue secured $60.3 million in public subsidies (grants, loans, tax incentives). $37 million in grants alone

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Patchogue’s ability to secure and/or provide grants, loans and tax incentives was critical to the scale of private investment made over the past 17 years

$60.3MM $246MM

Grants, Loans & Tax Incentives Total Private Residential Development Costs

slide-22
SLIDE 22

$246 Million lion in n Constru struction ction Investments estments For every y $1. 1.00 directly ectly invest ested d in const struct ruction n activ ivity ity, , $0.70 in indirect irect and induced ed activit vity y resu sult lted ed throug

  • ughout
  • ut the

Suf uffolk

  • lk County

unty econom nomy.

$79.4M 9.4MM M in indi direct rect econom

  • nomic

c out utput ut + $93.4 3.4MM M in induc duced ed econ

  • nomic

c out utput put + $246. 46.0MM 0MM in direct ect econ

  • nomic

c out utput put =

$418. 18.8MM MM in tota tal l economic

  • mic output

put

1, 1,435 435 direc rect t tempora porary y jobs s + 582 indire rect ct temporar porary y jobs + 651 induc duced ed temporar porary y jobs s =

2,668 total tal tempor

  • rar

ary jobs For every y 100 direct ect constr truction ction relat ated ed jobs s creat ated ed, , 86 indirect irect and induced ed jobs s were creat ated ed within hin the Suffolk lk County unty econo nomy.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Economic Impact Analysis: Direct & Indirect Employment Impacts

  • 54 new businesses

inesses estab tabli lishe shed d in downtown wn Pa Patc tchogu

  • gue

e bet betwee een n 2000 and nd 2017.

  • 42 of these

se businesses inesses are considered idered stable ble (operat erating ing for at least st one full year). r).

  • An esti

timat ated ed 408 direct ect new jobs s in the downtown n are attri tribu buted ed to these se new businesses. inesses.

  • An addit

itional ional 128 indire irect ct and induced uced jobs s were e creat ated ed in Suffolk

  • lk County

nty as a resu sult. lt.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

2001 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2022

Food services Retail trade Real estate and rental and leasing Professional, scientific, and technical services Other services (except public administration) Finance and insurance Arts, entertainment, and recreation

Economic Impact Analysis: New Businesses Stabilized by Type

42 new businesses stabilized by 2017

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Economic Impact Analysis: 2000 to 2017 Total Economic Impacts Cumu mulativ lative e numbe ber r of jobs: s: 5,918 18 Total al Direct ect Economic

  • mic Output:

put: $408,476,6 ,636 Total al Indirec irect t Economic nomic Outp tput: ut: $124,349,6 ,678 Total al Induced ed Economic

  • mic Output:

put: $160,483,6 ,644 Total al Economic nomic Out utput: put: $693,309,9 ,958 58

The e above e value ues s pertain tain to const struc ructi tion,

  • n, new

w house useho holds lds spendin nding g and new w bus usines iness operati eration

  • ns

s over r the e 17-year r period iod.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Fiscal Impact Analysis

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Fiscal Impact Analysis Findings: Public School Children Impacts

Copper Beech Condos

  • n Waverly

Riverview Condos Bay Village Condos Artspace Lofts New Village Riverwalk Condos

714 total dwelling units 1,465 total residents 142 total public school-age children

The above population figures are likely overstated, based on local interviews and secondary research

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Fiscal Impact Analysis Findings: Public School Children Impacts Over the 12-year period examined, the PMSD realized a decrease ease of ne nearly rly 1,100 students udents, despite an overall increase in the Village population during the same timespan.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Fiscal Impact Analysis Findings: Public School Children Impacts The likely average per pupil cost for new students in the district is assumed to be $4,000 (approximately

  • ne sixth of the current average cost).

Residential Project Years Open Total PSAC Lower Limit Average Cost ($4,000/Pupil) Total Annual Average Cost Total Educational Service Cost Since Project Opening Copper Beech 10 8 $32,000 $320,000 Condos on Waverly 11 4 $16,000 $176,000 Riverview Condos 9 6 $24,000 $216,000 Bay Village Condos 10 6 $24,000 $240,000 Artspace Lofts 5 18 $72,000 $360,000 New Village Apartments 5 81 $324,000 $1,620,000 Riverwalk Condos 7 19 $76,000 $532,000 Totals 142 $568,000 $3,464,000

An estimated $3.5 million in total educational service costs since 2006.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Residential Project Years Open Total PMSD Taxes Copper Beech 10 $1,869,561 Condos on Waverly 11 $1,215,206 Riverview Condos 9 $668,679 Bay Village Condos 10 $1,753,566 Artspace Lofts 5 $59,910 New Village Apartments 5 *** Riverwalk Condos 7 $1,047,347 Totals $6,614,297

Fiscal Impact Analysis Findings: Public School Children Impacts Based on tax assessor data, the seven multi- family projects examined have a cumulative tax levy total of $6,614,297 since 2006.

An estimated $6.6 million in total tax levies 2006.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Fiscal Impact Analysis Findings: Public School Children Impacts

$6,614,29 4,297 7 in estimated tax levies over ten years minus… $3,46 464,000 4,000 in estimated educational costs over the same ten years = $3,150,29 50,297 7 es esti timat mated ed net surplus revenues to the School District

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Fiscal Impact Analysis Findings: Prospective Development

What fiscal impact would occur if a new 100-room hotel were developed? Or a new 60-unit apartment building?

slide-33
SLIDE 33

$472, 72,234 234 $130, 130,202 02 $342, 42,032 032 $736, 36,732 732 $236, 36,54 544 4 $500, 00,188 88

$0 $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000

Total Local Net Fiscal Impacts Net Impact to Village Net Impact to Public Schools 100 room Hotel Multi-family Residential

Net Fiscal Impact Findings: Prospective Large Scale Development Projects

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Comparative Analysis

slide-35
SLIDE 35

4% 24% 31% 34% 35% 43%

Sayville Patchogue (Non-Village) Patchogue Village Bellport Blue Point Brookhaven Real Estate Market Value Percentage Change: 2004 -2018

Real Estate Market Value Trends: Real Estate Market Value

Source: Town of Brookhaven, Department of Assessment, 2018

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Comparative Business Employment & Investment Trends

Source: Census Bureau, ACS, 2018

  • 20%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Retail Trade Professional, Scientific & Technical Svcs. Health Care & Social Assistance Arts, Entertainment & Recreation Accommodation & Food Services

Businesses Established: Percentage Change Since 2002-2012

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Comparative Business Employment & Investment Trends

  • 100%

0% 100% 200% 300% 400% 500% Retail Trade Professional, Scientific & Technical Svcs. Health Care & Social Assistance Arts, Entertainment & Recreation Accommodation & Food Services

Value of Sales, Receipts, Revenue Percentage Change, 2002-2012

Source: Census Bureau, ACS, 2018

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Comparative Business Employment & Investment Trends

  • 40%
  • 20%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140% 160% Retail Trade Professional, Scientific & Technical Svcs. Health Care & Social Assistance Arts, Entertainment & Recreation Accommodation & Food Services

Annual Payroll Percentage Change, 2002-2012

Source: Census Bureau, ACS, 2018

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Comparative Business Employment & Investment Trends

  • 60%
  • 40%
  • 20%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% Retail Trade Professional, Scientific & Technical Svcs. Health Care & Social Assistance Arts, Entertainment & Recreation Accommodation & Food Services

Number of Employees Percentage Change, 2002-2012

Source: Census Bureau, ACS, 2018

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Study Takeaways

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis: Study Takeaways

  • Upf

Upfront

  • nt pu

public ic in inves estmen ent t can lever erage ge many tim imes es it its val alue ue in in pr privat ivate e in inves estmen ment. t.

  • Coope

pera rati tion

  • n among

g vario ious us pu public ic and d pr privat ivate e sec ector

  • r ac

actors s is is c crit itic ical! al!

  • Wi

Without ut one or e or more e stea eadfast dfast champi pions

  • ns,

, suc ucce cess ss is is no not lik ikel ely y to be e rea ealiz ized ed.

  • Res

esid iden entia ial l de devel elopmen pment t – pa partic icula ularly rly multi ti- fam amil ily y dw dwel ellin ing g un unit its – can annot not be e au automati matica call lly y assume med d to be a e a fis iscal al burde den to a c commun mmunit ity.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Questions?

www.4wardPlanning.com www.LandUseImpacts.com