Economic Freedom and Public Policy: Economics as a Moral Discipline - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Economic Freedom and Public Policy: Economics as a Moral Discipline - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Lionel Robbins Memorial Lectures Economic Freedom and Public Policy: Economics as a Moral Discipline Lord Turner Chairman of the Financial Services Authority, the Climate Change Committee and the Overseas Development Institute Howard Davies
1
Lecture III Economic Freedom, Public Policy and the Discipline
- f Economics
London School of Economics 13 October 2010
Adair Turner Lionel Robbins Memorial Lectures Economics after the crisis: Objectives and means
2
Starting Point: The Instrumental Conventional Wisdom
Free markets Allocative efficiency Growth Human happiness Inequality: Justified because it helps deliver growth Free markets
3
Happiness and income per capita in the USA
Source: Bruno Frey & Alois Stutzer, Happiness and Economics, Princeton University Press, 2002
4
Income and Human Contentment: Possible stylised pattern over time
Income / Contentment Pre-industrial societies The Great Transformation Economic and technological progress Income Human wellbeing contentment / happiness
China Africa Developed economies
5
- 3. Congestion externalities
Three distinct reasons why relative income matters
- 1. Rising
expenditure on fashion and branded goods Concern for relative status in itself Relative income influences absolute living standard Rising average incomes degrade quality of some forms of consumption
Higher relative income increases happiness Happiness a function
- f others’
income as well as
- wn
- 2. Increased competition
for inherently limited supply positional goods
6
“Distributive” versus “creative” activities
“Creative” “Distributive” Winning increasing income at expense of
- thers
Increasing the net real income available for consumption
Source: See Roger Bootle, The Trouble with Markets, chapters 4 and 5
7
Health and social problems
Income Inequality
Source: Wilkinson & Pickett, The Spirit Level , Penguin 2009
8
USA debt as a % of GDP by borrower type
Source: Oliver Wyman
Household Corporate Financial
1929 1935 1941 1947 1953 1959 1971 1977 1983 1990 1996 2002 2007
- 1929
1935 1941 1947 1953 1959 1965 1971 1977 1983 1990 1996 2002 2007
9
Global issuance of Collateralised Debt Obligations: Cash and synthetic
Source: IMF Global Financial Stability Report, 2006
50 100 150 200 250 300 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Synthetic Cash $bn
10
Complete markets as a route to…
Credit derivatives “enhance the transparency of the markets’ collective view of credit risks.. [and thus]… provide valuable information about broad credit conditions and increasingly set the marginal rice of credit. Therefore, such activity improves market discipline” “There is a growing recognition that the dispersion of credit risk by banks to a broader and more diverse group of investors has helped make the banking and
- verall financial system more
resilient … The improved resilience may be seen in fewer bank failures and more consistent credit provision”.
… efficiency … and stability
IMF, Global Financial Stability Review, April 2006
11
Share of the financial industry in US GDP
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 50 70 90 10 30 50 70 90
1850 1910
Source: Philippon, T (2008), The Evolution of the US Financial Industry from 1860 to 2007: Theory and Evidence. (As referenced by Andrew Haldane in The Future of Finance, LSE Report, 2010)
%
1850 1910
12
Historical 'excess' wage in the US financial sector
0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 25 26 27 28 30 31 32 33 35 36 37 38 40 41 42 43 45 46 47 48 50 51 52 53 55 56 57 58 60 61 62 63 65 66 67 68 70 71 72 73 75 76 77 78 80 81 82 83 85 86 87 88 90 91 92 93 95 96 97 98 00 01 02 03 05
- +
1910 2000
1910 2000 'Excess' wage
Source: Philippon, T and Reshef A (2009). Wages and Humal Capital in the US Financial Industry: 1909-2006, NBER Working Paper No 14644.A. Resh (As referenced by Andrew Haldane in The Future of Finance, LSE Report, 2010)
13
Growth not the objective but by-product of other desirable objectives Policy implications Implications for the discipline of economics
14
The case for growth
Growth in low and middle income countries The poor in rich countries Economic regression in absence of markets The journey, not the destination Economic freedom as an end per se Avoidance of involuntary unemployment
+
15
The internally contradicted argument
Economic growth in rich countries still matters because it matters to poorer citizens Economic growth is maximised by significant inequalities / incentives Therefore don’t worry if economic growth is combined with increasing inequality
16
The case for growth
Growth in low and middle income countries The poor in rich countries Economic regression in absence of markets The journey, not the destination Economic freedom as an end per se and avoidance of involuntary unemployment
17
Keynes, The General Theory
“There is social and psychological justification for significant inequalities of incomes and wealth… … dangerous human proclivities can be canalised into comparatively harmless channels by the existence of
- pportunities for money-making and private wealth
which, if they cannot be satisfied in this way, may find their outlet in cruelty, the reckless pursuit of personal power and authority, and other forms of self-
- aggrandisement. It is better that a man should tyrannise
- ver his bank balance than over his fellow citizens.”
(Chapter 24)
18
The case for growth
Growth in low and middle income countries The poor in rich countries Economic regression in absence of markets The journey, not the destination Economic freedom as an end per se and avoidance of involuntary unemployment
19
Happiness, income and changing aspirations
Income Happiness
Aspiration 1 Aspiration 2 Aspiration 3
Flat line of long-term happiness
1 2 3
20
The case for growth
Growth in low and middle income countries The poor in rich countries Economic regression in absence of markets The journey, not the destination Economic freedom as an end per se and avoidance of involuntary unemployment
21
Amartya Sen, “Development as Freedom”
“… the freedom of people to act as they choose in deciding where to work, what to produce, what to consume…” “The merit of the market system does not lie only in its capacity to generate more efficient culmination
- utcomes but also in the processes by which those
- utcomes are achieved”
(Chapter 1, The Perspective of Freedom)
22
Growth not the objective but by-product of other desirable objectives Policy implications Implications for the discipline of economics
23
Four clear policy implications
Maximise stability and minimise downsides
- Financial regulation and macro-economic management
- Climate change mitigation
Maximise public choice: especially at local level Minimise positional goods competition
- Welcome population stabilisation
24
Happiness, already achieved income, and changing aspirations
Happiness Income
Plus: Happiness as function of relative as well as absolute income 1 2 3 4
25
Do we “need to grow” to afford public expenditure?
Health Education Debt servicing In general no, if main cost is salaries which rise proportionally with average GDP per capita Yes, if macro-instability or fiscal profligacy generate high stock of debt relative to GDP
26
Costs and benefits of higher capital and liquidity standards
- Standard evaluation techniques
- Compare costs & benefits using a discount rate which accords
equal weight (in any given year) to costs and benefits
- Consequence: will undervalue stability and over-value minor
increments to growth, if people highly value already achieved wealth/income and avoided unemployment, and deeply dislike setbacks Possible costs to GDP growth
- Long-term?
- Transitional
Benefits of reduced probability
- f negative setbacks
Vs
27
Estimating GDP
Long-term trends and cross-country comparisons between rich countries have uncertain meaning Annual or quarterly changes are crucial guide to inflation targeting and economic stabilisation
Lionel Robbins: “both the concept of world money income and of national money income have strict significance
- nly for monetary
theory”
Measured value of financial services? Distributive rent extracting versus “creative” activities Increasing % of income devoted to housing house prices increase: inflation or real income?
28
Four clear policy implications
Maximise stability and minimise downsides
- Financial regulation and macro-economic management
- Climate change mitigation
Maximise public choice: especially at local level Minimise positional goods competition
- Welcome population stabilisation
29
Growth in UK living standards: with 80% emissions cut
GDP per capita 2006=100
75 150 225 300 2006 2020 2030 2040 2050
338 100
1.0 – 2.0% lower
Business as usual 80% emissions cut
30
Costs of climate change
Conceptually clear – but difficult to quantify, e.g. changes in agricultural yields Inherently uncertain
- Contingent social and political responses
Small probability catastrophic losses
31
The impact of discount rates
Discounted
- at 4% real
£3.67 today 6% of GDP today
- at 2% real
£59 today 100% of GDP today
Assuming 2% per annum growth: 100 %
- f GDP in 2150 is worth
£1000 in 2150 is worth
32
Discount rate and declining marginal utility
r = η (g) + δ
g = growth rate δ = the rate of pure time
preference
η = the elasticity of the marginal
utility of consumption
Stern’s base case η = 1 g = 1.9 δ = 0.1 r = 2.0%
Utility Consumption
The flatter the curve becomes, the higher η, and the higher the discount rate
33
Happiness already Achieved Income and Changing Aspirations
Happiness Income
Plus: Happiness as function of relative as well as absolute income 1 2 3 4
34
Three problems with the standard discount rate approach
- Losers in future may be
poorer than rich big emitters today
- Small probability of
catastrophic losses
- Losses of
environmental goods – species, beauty, diversity – valued in themselves Discount rate should be negative Discount rate applied to those losses should be negative Gains of economic income cannot offset environmental losses
35
Four clear policy implications
Maximise stability and minimise downsides
- Financial regulation and macro-economic management
- Climate change mitigation
Maximise public choice: especially at local level Minimise positional goods competition
- Welcome population stabilisation
36
Four clear policy implications
Maximise stability and minimise downsides
- Financial regulation and macro-economic management
- Climate change mitigation
Maximise public choice: especially at local level Minimise positional goods competition
- Welcome population stabilisation
37
Population growth and stabilisation: UN medium projections
5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5
2005 6.5 7.7 8.3 8.8 9.2 2020 2030 2040 2050
- 100
200 300 400 500 600 2005 2020 2030 2040 2050
2005 2020 2030 2040 2050
World population (bn) EU 27 and UK population (m)
Source: UN Medium Projections
60 65 68 70 72 495 513 519 520 515
38
Four clear policy implications
Maximise stability and minimise downsides
- Financial regulation and macro-economic management
- Climate change mitigation
Maximise public choice: especially at local level Minimise positional goods competition
- Welcome population stabilisation
Overall Objective: Creating a stable environment in which freedom to choose can be allowed expression while minimising downside consequences and setbacks
39
Two unclear issues
- 1. Are some goods / services more important to human
wellbeing / happiness than others – even when counted equally in GDP?
- 2. How much inequality is fair / optimal / unavoidable?
40
Different marginal utility of different “goods”
Utility / Happiness Utility / Happiness Utility / Happiness Income Income Income
Good health? Branded fashion goods? Congestion and environmental damage?
41
42
Sub-optimal consumption choices
Goods consumed as a result of public choice Social mores, herd-like fashion, and advertising Congestion and environmental externalities
43
Two unclear issues
- 1. Are some goods / services more important to human
wellbeing / happiness than others – even when counted equally in GDP?
- 2. How much inequality is fair / optimal / unavoidable?
44
How much inequality?
Inequality is justified because and to the extent that it delivers growth which delivers wellbeing; low taxation rates incentivise effort and entrepreneurship Relative income matters Standard responses inadequate
– Growth – Skills – Opportunity
Relative status competition invalidates standard incentive theory Economic freedom, and even perceived fairness, imply significant inequality The instrumental justification The reality
45
Growth not the objective but by-product of other desirable objectives Policy implications Implications for the discipline of economics
46
Economics in the dock
Assumption of rationality Mathematicisation: “physics envy” Focus on market completion and equilibrium Lack of enquiry about end
- bjectives
Prosecution
Always recognised imperfections Never monolithic
- Mirrlees, Stiglitz, Akerlof
- Kahneman
- Sen
Never said growth (rather than welfare) was objective
Defence
Prosecutors: Robert Skidelsky, Keynes: “The Return of the Master” John Cassidy: “How Markets Fail”
47
From Arrow-Debreu to the Washington Consensus: Three simplifications
Downplay of severity of market imperfections From Pareto equilibrium to good outcome – even without redistribution From equilibrium to growth as the objective
48
Economics for the real world, not for ease of modelling
- Is happiness the objective? Or welfare? Or freedom?
- How are they related to each other, and to income?
- Can we measure happiness or welfare?
- Inherent failures of complex markets
- Consequences of human mental processes – part
rational, part instinctive
- Inherent irreducible uncertainty, not mathematically
modellable probability distributions
Objectives Means
49
Keynes on economics
“economics is a moral and not a natural science” “no part of man’s nature or his institutions must be entirely outside [the economist’s] regard” The economist should be “mathematician, historian, statesman and philosopher in some degree”
* * * * * *
50
“Economics deals with ascertainable facts: ethics with valuations and obligations. The two field of enquiring are not on the same plane of discourse”
(Lionel Robbins, On the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, 1932, P.132)
“As against Robbins, Economics is essentially a moral science. That is to say, it employs introspection and judgement of value”
(John Maynard Keynes, Letter to Roy Harrod)
51
Lionel Robbins: Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science
“Both the concept of world money income and of national income money have strict significance only for monetary theory” “There is no penumbra of approbation around the theory of
- equilibrium. Equilibrium is just equilibrium”