Economic Feasibility Study of Seamless Multihoming WAN Solution - - PDF document

economic feasibility study of seamless multihoming wan
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Economic Feasibility Study of Seamless Multihoming WAN Solution - - PDF document

Economic Feasibility Study of Seamless Multihoming WAN Solution Antti Mkel, Henna Warma, Aurelien Decros, Kalevi Kilkki & Jukka Manner FUTURE INTERENT PROGRAMME OF FINLAND ICT SHOK June 28, 2011 NGI 2011 Outline Background and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Economic Feasibility Study of Seamless Multihoming WAN Solution

Antti Mäkelä, Henna Warma, Aurelien Decros, Kalevi Kilkki & Jukka Manner FUTURE INTERENT PROGRAMME OF FINLAND ICT SHOK

NGI 2011 June 28, 2011

Outline

  • Background and motivation
  • RAIIC concept and virtual service provider
  • Feasibility of VSP business
  • Conclusions and future work

2

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Motivation: High reliability is costly

  • Suppose organization needs intra-

site connectivity with high reliability

  • Some options:

– Dedicated connections with redundancy guarantees and Service Level Agreements

  • Expensive

– Multihoming via several providers

  • Maintaining own AS number,

routing convergence

– Multihoming over the Internet using VPNs

  • Mgmt & Configuration issues

è Usually very expensive in either monetary or workload terms

Headquarters Branch Office #2 Branch Office #1 MPLS service provider

  • r Internet

Cost analysis of SLAs

4

  • Example: Finnish medium

sized company

  • Three basic price levels seem

to emerge

– Consumer-grade – Unguaranteed business-grade – Guaranteed business-grade

  • Price gap exists between guaranteed and unguaranteed

connectivity

– Difference may be orders of magnitude – Market situation has remained stable for a considerable period – Global phenomenon

1 Gbps 1500 € à 10 Mbps 3000 €

slide-3
SLIDE 3

High reliability without high costs - is it possible?

  • Offer a virtual high-reliability bit-pipe over several

unreliable connections

– Standard consumer Internet connection works ”most of the time” – Example: three connections with 2 % downtime each

  • 0,0008 % downtime = 99,9992 % uptime
  • Redundant Array of Inexpensive Internet Connections (RAIIC)

managed by a virtual service provider

  • Proposed concept implementation is based on Mobile IP

with route optimization (Mäkelä, A., 2010)

– Could be implemented with other protocols, such as HIP – Simple and low cost infrastructure

5

Mäkelä, A. (2010). ”Concept for providing guaranteed service level

  • ver an array of unguaranteed commodity connections”, ACM SAC 2010

Mobile IP based RAIIC

6

Network A Network B

Virtual Operator Backend

Virtual Operator Cloud

Network Operator X Network Operator Y

Network operator peering point

Network Operator Z

Mobile Router A Mobile Router B

Mobile IPv 4 Home Agent AAA and

  • ther Services

Network C

Mobile Router C Node A Node B Node C

slide-4
SLIDE 4

How feasible is the concept business-wise?

7

  • A new market role

– Virtual Service Provider (VSP)

  • The role of VSP

can be taken by

– one of the existing stakeholders – a new market player

VSP business environment

  • Several providers for last mile connectivity must exist

– Variety in access technologies

  • Terms of service may disallow to provide consumer-

grade connectivity to third parties

– Usage of unguaranteed business-grade connections

  • ISP may proritize their own traffic

– Net neutrality legislation – Competition in the ISP market

  • VSP might have difficulties to become convincing

solution

– Reference customers

8

slide-5
SLIDE 5

SWOT analysis for integrators

9

SWOT analysis for hosting providers

10

slide-6
SLIDE 6

SWOT analysis for business service providers

11

Conclusions and future work

  • There is a need for mid-range priced intranet solutions

– RAIIC is a proposal to answer the demand

  • Multiple outcomes for VSP business establishment exist

– Moderately priced option for companies – Co-operation with other market stakeholders

  • Sustainability of the VSP business can be seen as a threat

– Reactions of incumbent providers – Price evolution and increasing competition

  • First effort of analyzing the economic feasibility of the concept

– More detailed analysis on potential target markets – Quantitative cost analysis

12

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Questions? Comments?

13