ech polymerization qualification of a solvent compatible
play

ECH polymerization Qualification of a solvent compatible with REACh - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ECH polymerization Qualification of a solvent compatible with REACh regulation G. Eck, M. Fourdinier, T . Alaime, C. Bedos, V. Chauffour 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 1 2018, Seville, Spain


  1. ECH polymerization Qualification of a solvent compatible with REACh regulation G. Eck, M. Fourdinier, T . Alaime, C. Bedos, V. Chauffour 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 1 2018, Seville, Spain

  2.  Introduction / Context  Middle term replacement of DCE  Lab scale results  Process file for scaling up to industrial scale  Conclusion 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 2 2 2018, Seville, Spain

  3. INTRODUCTION / CONTEXT ITAR AR REA REACh Ch (US/DoD or US/DoC regulations ) EUROPE has to EAR AR face to different regulations • Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and • International Traffic in Arms regulations / Restriction of Chemicals Export Administration Regulation • Adopted to improve the protection of human • Designed to help ensure that defense health and the environment from the risks that related technology does not get into the can be posed by chemicals wrong hands 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 3 3 2018, Seville, Spain

  4. INTRODUCTION / CONTEXT REACh regulation  REACH applies to all chemicals (except polymers)  Chemicals involved in industrial process  Chemicals in our day-to-day lives : cleaning products, paints, clothes, furniture, electrical appliances, …  Companies must identify and manage the risks linked to the substances they manufacture and market in the EU as manufacturers, importers or downstream users  In the long run, the most hazardous substances should be substituted with less dangerous ones 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 4 4 2018, Seville, Spain

  5. INTRODUCTION / CONTEXT REACh regulation IMPACT ON EXPLOSIVE GRANULAR COMPOSITIONS EXPLOSIVE CATALYSTS BINDER EXPLOSIVE COMPOSITION BONDING SOLVENTS AGENT PLASTICIZER 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 5 5 2018, Seville, Spain

  6. INTRODUCTION / CONTEXT REACh regulation IMPACT ON EXPLOSIVE GRANULAR COMPOSITIONS EXPLOSIVE CATALYSTS BINDER EXPLOSIVE COMPOSITION SOLVENTS BONDING DCE AGENT PLASTICIZER 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 6 6 2018, Seville, Spain

  7. INTRODUCTION / CONTEXT Impact on PECH / GAP synthesis NaN 3 CH 2 Cl H + H O CH CH 2 O H H O CH CH 2 O H O CH 2 Cl CH 2 N 3 n DCE n ECH PECH GAP  Impact of REACH regulation on DCE use as a solvent  Authorized for use up to the end of 2021  Prohibited after that 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 7 7 2018, Seville, Spain

  8. INTRODUCTION / CONTEXT Impact on PECH / GAP synthesis  Middle term replacement  Organic solvent not yet impacted by REACh  Process file ready for scale up to the industrial workshop  Long term replacement  Research studies to find new ways to polymerize ECH 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 8 8 2018, Seville, Spain

  9.  Introduction / Context  Middle term replacement of DCE  Lab scale results  Process file for scaling up to industrial scale  Conclusion 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 9 9 2018, Seville, Spain

  10. LAB SCALE RESULTS  Experiments performed on 350 g. of ECH in DCE, solvents A and B  Reaction medium T ° set between TR1 and TR2  Double jacket T ° set at T1 or T2  Addition rate of ECH regulated by the reaction medium T °  Special attention to  The initiation of the polymerization and the temperature peak that is observed when the reaction starts.  The propagation phase of the polymerization  The characterization of the polymer PECH: Mn / Mw and hydroxyl content 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 10 10 2018, Seville, Spain

  11. LAB SCALE RESULTS PECH characterizations Double Jacket T° Ref. Solvent OH content Mn Mw I (°C) (eq/kg) Average at industrial scale 1790 1890 1.05 0.80 DCE-1 DCE T 2 1670 1890 1.13 0.80 DCE-2 DCE T 1 1750 1890 1.08 0.75 A-1 A T 2 1690 1910 1.13 0.86 A-2 A T 1 1770 1910 1.08 0.84 A-3 A T 1 1820 1960 1.08 0.80 B-1 B T 1 1770 1900 1.08 0.83 B-2 B T 2 1750 1910 1.09 0.78 B-3 B T 1 1770 1910 1.08 0.81 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 11 11 2018, Seville, Spain

  12. LAB SCALE RESULTS PECH characterizations Double Jacket T° Ref. Solvent OH content Mn Mw I (°C) (eq/kg) Average at industrial scale 1790 1890 1.05 0.80 DCE-1 DCE T 2 1670 1890 1.13 0.80 DCE-2 DCE T 1 1750 1890 1.08 0.75 A-1 A T 2 1690 1910 1.13 0.86  DCE-2 seems representative of the industrial scale A-2 A T 1 1770 1910 1.08 0.84 A-3 A T 1 1820 1960 1.08 0.80 B-1 B T 1 1770 1900 1.08 0.83 B-2 B T 2 1750 1910 1.09 0.78 B-3 B T 1 1770 1910 1.08 0.81 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 12 12 2018, Seville, Spain

  13. LAB SCALE RESULTS PECH characterizations Double Jacket T° Ref. Solvent OH content Mn Mw I (°C) (eq/kg) Average at industrial scale 1790 1890 1.05 0.80 DCE-1 DCE T 2 1670 1890 1.13 0.80  Reproducible results for experiments performed in the same DCE-2 DCE T 1 1750 1890 1.08 0.75 conditions A-1 A T 2 1690 1910 1.13 0.86 A-2 A T 1 1770 1910 1.08 0.84 A-3 A T 1 1820 1960 1.08 0.80 B-1 B T 1 1770 1900 1.08 0.83 B-2 B T 2 1750 1910 1.09 0.78 B-3 B T 1 1770 1910 1.08 0.81 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 13 13 2018, Seville, Spain

  14. LAB SCALE RESULTS PECH characterizations Double Jacket T° Ref. Solvent OH content Mn Mw I (°C) (eq/kg) Average at industrial scale 1790 1890 1.05 0.80  At lab scale, no significant impact of polymerization conditions on DCE-1 DCE T 2 1670 1890 1.13 0.80 PECH characteristics DCE-2 DCE T 1 1750 1890 1.08 0.75 A-1 A T 2 1690 1910 1.13 0.86 A-2 A T 1 1770 1910 1.08 0.84 A-3 A T 1 1820 1960 1.08 0.80 B-1 B T 1 1770 1900 1.08 0.83 B-2 B T 2 1750 1910 1.09 0.78 B-3 B T 1 1770 1910 1.08 0.81 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 14 14 2018, Seville, Spain

  15. LAB SCALE RESULTS COOLING AT T 1 Solvent B  Exothermic DCE phenomenon for T° (°C) Solvent A all solvents  Peak T ° slightly TR 2 shifted in time for solvent A TR 1 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Time (min) DCE Solvent A Solvent B 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 15 15 2018, Seville, Spain

  16. LAB SCALE RESULTS COOLING AT T 2 Solvent B TR 1 DCE  Good control for TR 2 DCE and solvent B T° (°C)  More difficult to Solvent A control in solvent A 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 Time (min) DCE Solvent A Solvent B 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 16 16 2018, Seville, Spain

  17. LAB SCALE RESULTS CONCLUSION Based on lab scale experiments, PECH characterizations Double Jacket T° solvent B seems to OH content Mn Mw (°C) (eq/kg) be the best T 1 1770 1900 0.83 candidate to replace T 2 1750 1910 0.78 DCE Scale up to industrial scale to be made 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 17 17 2018, Seville, Spain

  18.  Introduction / Context  Middle term replacement of DCE  Lab scale results  Process file for scaling up to industrial scale  Conclusion 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 18 18 2018, Seville, Spain

  19. PROCESS FILE  Material balance  Heat balance  Sequence of manufacturing steps  Production time Comparison for solvent B and DCE 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 19 19 2018, Seville, Spain

  20. PROCESS FILE Material balance Vessel N°1 Vessel N°2 Recovered or engaged Raw materials Initial loading quantities ECH M1 0 kg Solvent B M2 M2 Initiator M3 0 kg Catalyst M4 Reacted PECH M1 Washing ingredients M5 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 20 20 2018, Seville, Spain

  21. PROCESS FILE Heat balance  Heat exchange capacity of reactors (kcal/h) : ϕ = K x S x ΔT  K = Heat transfer coefficient (kcal/h/m 2 .k)  S = Exchange area (m 2 )   T = Mean logarithmic temperature Cold fluid / Hot fluid  Amount of heat (J.) : Q = m x Cp x Δ T  m = Mass of components (kg)  Cp = Specific heat of the components (J/kg.K)   T = Temperature difference Initial state / Final state 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 21 21 2018, Seville, Spain

  22. PROCESS FILE Heat balance Synthesis phase Heat balance (compared to DCE in % ) Q Total (kcal) 72% Loading and heating t (min) 80%  cooling medium (kg/h) 100% Q Total (kcal) 99.8% t (min) 100% Polymerization  cooling medium (kg/h) 100% Q Total (kcal) 97.6% t (min) 96% Solvent extraction  heating medium (kg/h) 100% 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 22 22 2018, Seville, Spain

  23.  Introduction / Context  Middle term replacement of DCE  Lab scale results  Scale up  Process file for scaling up to industrial scale  Conclusion 2019 IM & EM Technology Symposium, Oct. 21-24, Abstract 22199 23 23 2018, Seville, Spain

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend