19 September 2003
- D. Roland-Holst
East Asian Regionalism: Prospects to 2020
David Roland-Holst UC Berkeley and Mills College presented by Hiro Lee ICSEAD, Japan
Asia Pacific Economic Forum Keio University, Tokyo
East Asian Regionalism: Prospects to 2020 David Roland-Holst UC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
East Asian Regionalism: Prospects to 2020 David Roland-Holst UC Berkeley and Mills College presented by Hiro Lee ICSEAD, Japan Asia Pacific Economic Forum D. Roland-Holst 19 September 2003 Keio University, Tokyo Contents I. Chinas
19 September 2003
David Roland-Holst UC Berkeley and Mills College presented by Hiro Lee ICSEAD, Japan
Asia Pacific Economic Forum Keio University, Tokyo
19 September 2003
19 September 2003
China’s accession to the WTO is a watershed
Initial reactions of regional partners, who perceive
Our research reveals a more complex picture of
19 September 2003
Because of its size and stage of development,
19 September 2003
19 September 2003
(Normalized to 100 in 2000)
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 2005 2010 2015 2020 China Japan NIE ASEAN
19 September 2003
(billions of 1997 USD)
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 2005 2010 2015 2020 China Japan NIE ASEAN
19 September 2003
(billions of 1997 USD)
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 2005 2010 2015 2020 China Japan NIE ASEAN
19 September 2003
(billions of 1997 USD)
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 2005 2010 2015 2020 China Japan NIE ASEAN
19 September 2003
19 September 2003
19 September 2003
19 September 2003
(1997 billions of USD)
Importer Exporter China Japan NIE ASEAN USA EU ROW Total China
166 66 71 122 Japan 5 39 20 23
21 NIE 135
19
40 ASEAN 41
18 8 12 41 USA
32
48
EU
15 32
34
ROW
50 12
40
Total
168 41 16
19 September 2003
How can regional economies best respond to China’s global initiative? A variety of alternative regional arrangements were examined empirically. All include the first scenario.
1.
CNWTO: China joins WTO, status quo elsewhere
2.
AFTA: ASEAN Free Trade Area
3.
AFTAPC: AFTA plus China
4.
NEAFTA: Northeast Asian Free Trade Area
5.
ASEAN+3: ASEAN, China, Japan, and Korea
6.
PAC3: Pacific Trilateralism - China, Japan, USA
7.
GTL: Global Trade Liberalization
19 September 2003
(percentage change from Baseline in 2020)
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
CNWTO AFTA AFTAPC NEAFTA ASEAN+ 3 PAC3 GTL
China Japan NI E ASEAN USA EU ROW
19 September 2003
(percentage changes in 2020, relative to Baseline)
Im p
E xp
hin a Ja pan N IE A S E A N U S A E U R O W To ta l C h in a 37 43 36 31 35 32 34 J ap an 3 8
3 N IE 3 2
3 A S E A N 2 8
1 u sa 2 4
1
1 E U 2 2
1
R O W 1 3
2 2
G ra nd To t 2 6 5 6 2 2 1 3
19 September 2003
(percentage changes in 2020, relative to Baseline)
Im porter Exporter C hina Japan N IE A SEA N U SA EU R O W Total C hina 66 91 73 21 23 21 38 Japan 41 33 32
13 N IE 37 35 22 27
14 A SEA N 33 44 33 23
1
15 usa 30
1
EU 26
R O W 19
Total 31 17 17 15 1
6
Bandwagon
19 September 2003
China is in a relatively unique position. This country
Carrots: Access to domestic market and the
“bandwagon” effect, selling into China’s export growth.
Stick: Denial of access.
However, this strategic leverage appears to be
Chinese imports are essential to its export capacity WTO standards will not sustain exclusion
19 September 2003
19 September 2003
China will be the region’s largest exporter by about 2010, but it’s largest importer by 2005. The latter situation presents an unprecedented opportunity for neighboring economies.
19 September 2003
Provided East Asian economies do not isolate themselves from the process of Chinese trade liberalization, the net effect of China’s growth will be hugely positive, as Chinese absorption emerges to dominate regional demand.
19 September 2003
In terms of both exports and imports, China will become Japan’s largest bilateral partner. Japan will also be China’s largest individual source of imports.
19 September 2003
In other words, most of China’s trade surplus will ultimately accrue to its regional neighbors. This has profound implications for patterns of both North-South and regional capital accumulation.
19 September 2003
In this sense, East Asia can capture most of the benefits of full globalization by just forming ASEAN+3. The other EA countries should negotiate collectively with China, with an eye toward broader
Our results indicate that, in the wake of China’s WTO accession, the best strategy for East Asia is to pursue globalism through more comprehensive regionalism.
19 September 2003
By conforming to its existing WTO commitments, China will realize most of the gains it would enjoy in a world of free trade. Thus its unilateral initiative makes it less reliant on regional and bilateral commitments.
19 September 2003
sustainable under its WTO commitments. The carrots are real, but their strategic value is limited.
export capacity. The stick is not credible against most EA partners.