Earthquakes in Nevada Jon Price State Geologist and Director - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

earthquakes in nevada
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Earthquakes in Nevada Jon Price State Geologist and Director - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Earthquakes in Nevada Jon Price State Geologist and Director Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology University of Nevada, Reno www nbmg unr edu www.nbmg.unr.edu There are huge risks. g We can take action to reduce the risks. H Hazard:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Earthquakes in Nevada

Jon Price State Geologist and Director Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology University of Nevada, Reno www nbmg unr edu www.nbmg.unr.edu

There are huge risks. g We can take action to reduce the risks.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

H d b biliti f th k i Hazard: probabilities of earthquakes occurring. The big concerns are largely in western states.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Probability of a Magnitude 6.5 or Greater Earthquake in the Next 50 Years FROM: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/ Denver, CO ~0.1% Phoenix and Tucson, AZ <1% Spokane, WA = 1.0 to 1.5% Ely, NV = 1.5 to 2% Flagstaff, AZ ~2% Boise ID ~2% Pioche NV = 2 to 3% Boise, ID 2% Pioche, NV 2 to 3% El Paso, TX ~2% Albuquerque, NM = 4 to 5% Eureka, NV = 4 to 6% Fresno, CA <5% Las Vegas & Pahrump, NV <5% P tl d OR 5% G ldfi ld & Wi NV 5 t 10% Portland, OR ~5% Goldfield & Winnemucca, NV = 5 to 10% Yuma, AZ = 5 to 10% Elko, NV = 6 to 8% Bozeman, MT ~10% Battle Mountain & Lovelock, NV ~10% Cedar City, UT ~9% Austin, NV = 10 to 15% y, , % Sacramento, CA ~15% Jackson, WY = 15 to 20% Fallon, NV = 20 to 25% Salt Lake City, UT = 20 to 25% Beatty, NV = 20 to 30% San Diego CA 25% San Diego, CA ~25% Seattle, WA ~30% Hawthorne, NV = 30 to 40% Monterey, CA ~40% Yerington, NV = 40 to 45% Eureka, CA ~50% South Lake Tahoe, CA + Stateline, NV ~45% Santa Barbara, CA = ~60% Reno–Carson City–Minden-VA City = 50 to 60% San Francisco Bay Area = 70 to 90% Los Angeles Metropolitan Area = 60 to >90%

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Earthquakes have occurred throughout Nevada.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

There is a good chance that you will experience a major y p j

  • earthquake. There are at least

30 faults that could cause damage in the Reno-Carson damage in the Reno-Carson City urban corridor.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The probability of at least one magnitude 6.5 or greater event g g in the next fifty years is between 50 and 60% for the Reno-Carson City-Minden Reno-Carson City-Minden urban area area. Hazards include intense Hazards include intense ground shaking, ruptures of the ground, liquefaction, landslides and ancillary landslides, and ancillary problems, such as fires and hazardous waste spills.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

We used FEMA’s loss-estimation model, HAZUS MH t ti t th ff t f HAZUS-MH, to estimate the effects of potential earthquakes near each of the county seats in Nevada.

Thi d l i d i d This model is used in emergency-response and recovery exercises and will be used to help rapidly estimate the scope of damage and losses immediately estimate the scope of damage and losses immediately after an earthquake (information that helps with a Presidential Declaration of Disaster). ) Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 06-1 www.nbmg.unr.edu

slide-8
SLIDE 8

FEMA used this model in 2000 to estimate annualized loss from earthquakes: u ed oss

  • e

qu es: $55 million per year for the State, including $28 million per year for the Las Vegas area, and $18 million per year for the Reno area. B t j th k i N d d ’t But major earthquakes in Nevada don’t occur

  • annually. They happen on any given fault every

few thousand to tens of thousands of years. If an few thousand to tens of thousands of years. If an earthquake occurs soon near an urban area, the consequences can be devastating. Because Nevada has so many active faults, the h d hi h d th i k h hazards are high, and the risks are huge.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Mount Rose Mount Rose fault zone

Genoa Genoa fault fault

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • ne of the most active

faults in Nevada

Genoa fault

well exposed in gravel quarry south of Genoa up to 5 meters of vertical displacement when it last moved, ~ 550 years ago

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • ne of the most active

faults in Nevada

Genoa fault

well exposed in gravel quarry south of Genoa up to 5 meters of vertical displacement when it last moved, ~ 550 years ago

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The risks are huge. For a magnitude 7.1 earthquake on the G f lt HAZUS ti t d f th Genoa fault, HAZUS estimated, for the Washoe-Carson-Storey-Douglas region:

up to $2.5 billion in economic loss ( $471 million in Douglas County alone) (~$471 million in Douglas County alone) major damage to approximately 3,600 buildings 600 to 3,000 displaced households 150 to 600 people needing public shelter

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The risks are huge. For a magnitude 7.1 earthquake on the G f lt HAZUS ti t d f th Genoa fault, HAZUS estimated, for the Washoe-Carson-Storey-Douglas region:

400 to 1,500 people needing medical aid 100 to 400 people needing hospital care 20 to 60 life threatening injuries 20 to 60 life-threatening injuries 30 to 120 fatalities.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

M t Mount Rose Rose fault zone

Genoa fault fault

slide-15
SLIDE 15

The risks are huge. For a magnitude 6.9 earthquake on the M t R f lt HAZUS ti t d f th Mount Rose fault, HAZUS estimated, for the Washoe-Carson-Storey-Douglas region:

up to $7.6 billion in economic loss ( 2 9 billion in Washoe County alone) (~2.9 billion in Washoe County alone) major damage to approximately 12,000 buildings 3,000 to 12,000 displaced households 800 to 3,000 people needing public shelter

slide-16
SLIDE 16

The risks are huge. For a magnitude 6.9 earthquake on the M t R f lt HAZUS ti t d f th Mount Rose fault, HAZUS estimated, for the Washoe-Carson-Storey-Douglas region:

1,300 to 5,000 people needing medical aid 400 to 1,500 people needing hospital care 60 to 120 people with life threatening injuries 60 to 120 people with life-threatening injuries 120 to 500 fatalities.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Reno Sparks

Golden Valley Sun Valley Panther Valley Wadsworth 80 395

Modified Mercalli Intensity Map from NBMG’s 1996 “Planning Scenario for a Major

Reno Sparks

Mogul Verdi Hidden Valley Spring Valley Lockwood 80

Scenario for a Major Earthquake in Western Nevada” – A magnitude 7.1 earthquake on the Mt. Rose

Valley Virginia Foothills Pleasant Valley Galena Forest Estates Virginia City Highlands 341 395

fault could cause

widespread damage in the area of

Virginia

New Washoe City Franktown Virginia City Incline Village Dayton 431 50 Mound House

Intensity IX (“General

  • panic. Cracked

ground conspicuous.

Dayton Incline Virginia City

Carson City

Pinion Hills New Empire Stewart 50 28

ground conspicuous. Damage considerable in specially designed structures great in

Dayton Carson City Incline Village

Glenbrook Indian Hills Johnson Lane area Jacks Valley Genoa Zephyr Cove 50 206

IX VIII

Modified Mercalli Intensity

structures, great in substantial masonry buildings with some

Carson City

Minden Gardnerville Centerville 207

VII VI V < V Surface faulting from scenario earthquake

collapse in large part.”)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

The earthquake hazards in Nevada are comparable to those in seismically active seismically active areas of California.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Probability of an earthquake of magnitude 6.5 or greater occurring within 50 km in 50 years (from USGS probabilistic seismic hazard analysis)

~50% chance for Reno and Carson City, magnitude 6.5 50% chance for Reno and Carson City, magnitude 6.5

Probability

slide-20
SLIDE 20

USGS maps of active faults – compiled from data of the state geological surveys geological surveys, including the Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and the California Geological Survey

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Reno Fallon Carson City Carson City Active faults on the Reno 1 x 2-degree sheet

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Probability of an earthquake of magnitude 6.5 or greater occurring within 50 km in 50 years (from USGS probabilistic seismic hazard analysis)

20-25% chance for Fallon, magnitude 6.5

Lovelock

F ll $85 illi l Fallon: $85 million loss in Churchill County from magnitude 6.5

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Active faults on the Caliente 1 x 2-degree sheet

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Probability of an earthquake of magnitude 6.5 or greater occurring within 50 km in 50 years (from USGS probabilistic seismic hazard analysis)

2-3% chance for Pioche, magnitude 6.5

Pioche: $5.6 million loss in Lincoln County from magnitude 6.5 magnitude 6.5

slide-25
SLIDE 25

There are active faults nearly everywhere in Nevada,

Red = fault ruptures during historical earthquakes (last 150 earthquakes (last 150 years) Orange = Late Pleistocene faults (<130,000 years old) Y ll th Q t

but not

Yellow = other Quaternary faults (<1.8 million years old)

but not everywhere.

slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Beatty Yucca Yucca Mtn Pahrump Faults on the Death Valley 1 x 2-degree sheet

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Pahrump Pahrump

1076 = Pahrump fault (Pahrump Valley fault zone); this is a right-lateral strike- 1076 Pahrump fault (Pahrump Valley fault zone); this is a right lateral strike slip fault, as are the San Andreas fault and the Death Valley fault system. 1073 = West Spring Mountains fault; this is a “normal” fault.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

The risks are huge. For a magnitude 7.0 earthquake on the Pahrump Valley fault zone, HAZUS Pahrump Valley fault zone, HAZUS estimated:

$200 million to $800 million in economic loss ($200 million for Nye County alone) major damage to approximately 6,000 buildings 40 to 140 people needing public shelter <20 fatalities. <20 fatalities.

* Figures could be higher; populations in Nye and Clark Counties has increased by about 30% since the 2000 census.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Probability of an earthquake of magnitude 7.0 or greater occurring within 50 km in 50 years (from USGS probabilistic seismic hazard analysis) <1% chance for Las Vegas or Pahrump, magnitude 7 Probability

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Probability of an earthquake of magnitude 6.0 or greater occurring within 50 km in 50 years (from USGS probabilistic seismic hazard analysis)

5-10% chance for Pahrump, magnitude 6 5 10% chance for Pahrump, magnitude 6

Probability

slide-32
SLIDE 32

M it Mesquite Moapa Las Pahrump Las Vegas Faults on the Las Vegas 1 x 2-degree sheet

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Quaternary fault exposed at construction site in Las Vegas Valley

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Unit 1 does not appear to be cut by the fault Unit 4

Unit 2 = wedge of sediment deposited against the fault

U it 4 Unit 5 Unit 3 Unit 4 Unit 5

Quaternary fault exposed at construction site in Las Vegas Valley

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Measured Measured earthquakes in the Las Vegas area

slide-36
SLIDE 36

The risks are huge. For a magnitude 6.6 earthquake on the F h M t i f lt HAZUS Frenchman Mountain fault, HAZUS estimated:

$4.4 to 17.7 billion in economic loss major damage to approximately 30,000 buildings 10 000 to 40 000 displaced households 10,000 to 40,000 displaced households 3,000 to 11,000 people needing public shelter

slide-37
SLIDE 37

The risks are huge. For a magnitude 6.6 earthquake on the F h M t i f lt HAZUS Frenchman Mountain fault, HAZUS estimated:

3,000 to 11,000 people needing medical aid 700 to 3,000 people needing hospitcal care 100 to 400 people with life threatening injuries 100 to 400 people with life-threatening injuries 200 to 800 fatalities.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

For a magnitude 5.9 daytime earthquake on the Frenchman M t i f lt HAZUS ti t d f ll f Cl k C t Mountain fault, HAZUS estimated, for all of Clark County: $2.2 to 8.9 billion in economic loss,

  • f which $1.2 to 4.7 billion would be in building damage,

$0.3 to 1.3 billion would be in damage to building contents, and $0.7 to 2.9 billion in business interruption losses related to the building stock;

major damage to 4,000 to 17,000 buildings

(655 completely destroyed),

3 000 to 12 000 people needing public shelter 3,000 to 12,000 people needing public shelter, 300 to 1,200 people needing hospital care (but only 768 of 2,341 beds

would be available in the county during the first day, up to 910 at Day 3 and 1 730 at Day 30); and 1,730 at Day 30); and

80 to 300 fatalities.

(Casualty numbers are expected to be less for either a night-time or commute-time earthquake.) q )

(from NBMG-NDEM-FEMA-sponsored earthquake exercise for the City of Las Vegas, 2003)

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Probability of an earthquake of magnitude 6.0 or greater occurring within 50 km in 50 years (from USGS probabilistic seismic hazard analysis)

10 20% chance for Las Vegas area magnitude 6 10-20% chance for Las Vegas area, magnitude 6

Probability

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Data from NTS shots showed that sites in Las Vegas Valley shake th it b d k (b f l il d/ more than sites on bedrock (because of loose soils and/or amplification of seismic waves due to the geometry of the basin).

slide-41
SLIDE 41

The main points:

  • 1. The earthquake risks are huge in

Nevada Nevada.

  • 2. We can do something about it.

g

  • a. Be prepared to respond.
  • b. Mitigate structural risks, largely

thro gh b ilding codes and a oiding through building codes and avoiding faults and areas of liquefaction.

  • c. Mitigate nonstructural risks.
slide-42
SLIDE 42

Nonstructural damage often can be easily prevented.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Earthquake-secure bookshelves in the office of the State Geologist

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Secured computers at the Clark County Building Department

slide-45
SLIDE 45
slide-46
SLIDE 46

Information about Nevada earthquakes and what you can do:

N d B f Mi d G l Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology www.nbmg.unr.edu Nevada Seismological Laboratory www.seismo.unr.edu University of Nevada, Las Vegas earthquakes.unlv.edu q

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Earthquakes in Nevada

Jon Price State Geologist and Director Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology University of Nevada, Reno www nbmg unr edu www.nbmg.unr.edu

There are huge risks. g We can take action to reduce the risks.