12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 1
E-Pass Redesign Overview Presentation for E-Pass Implementation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
E-Pass Redesign Overview Presentation for E-Pass Implementation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
E-Pass Redesign Overview Presentation for E-Pass Implementation Team February 12, 2003 12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 1 Agenda Why re-design? Key improvements Project timeline Feature walkthrough
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 2
Agenda
- Why re-design?
- Key improvements
- Project timeline
- Feature walkthrough
- Usability test results
- Help Needed – Testing, Rollout
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 3
Why re-design?
- Reduce training and operating costs
– Make application easier to use and understand – Make processing of requests and token processing more efficient – Reduce helpdesk calls
- Address problems with current application
- Improve overall application reliability,
maintainability and flexibility for change
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 4
Reduce training and operating costs
- Baseline for customer satisfaction established with September
2002 customer satisfaction survey
- Improved ease-of-use - confirmed with usability testing
- Request processing more efficient with tasks and alerts,
intelligent sponsor identification, pre-defined mailing addresses, ability to transfer approvals, direct access via e-mail and more…
- Added self-service operations to reduce reliance on customer
support and sponsor
- Added capability to identify and track key operational metrics
- Guided troubleshooting of key problems
- Online context-sensitive page and field help
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 5
Address current problems
- Multiple menus
- Confusion about when to replace a token
- Most frequent operations not close-to-hand
- Difficult to select individuals in sponsor’s branch of
tree
- Bad e-mail addresses
- Poor security question compliance
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 6
Improve reliability, maintainability, flexibility
- Detailed design documentation
- Use of general-purpose models for roles and rights
- Software architecture utilizing modern 3-tier, object-
- riented model (J2EE)
- Hardware architecture provides load balancing and
fail-over of key components for reliability
- Web Services interface for connecting to any future
identity management initiatives
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 7
Key improvements
- Orientation change – focus on user vs. function
System gives ready access to functions that are applicable at any given stage to the user selected
- Personalized start page – view tasks and alerts specific to you
and sponsored users
- Customer self-service functions - reduce helpdesk and sponsor
calls
- Security question changes - improve compliance/security
- E-mail address verification
- Direct access to waiting tasks from e-mail
- Improved search capability
- Comprehensive and flexible security model
- Ability to issue limited-term E-Passes
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 8
Project timeline
Implementation planning from now through early July launch…
Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Oct 01 Aug 03 Business Requirements Key Use Cases & Business Processes Stakeholder Workshops High-Level Design Completed RFP Implementation Vendor Selected Iteration 1 User Acceptance Iteration 2 Launch Detailed Design Prototype & Usability Testing
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 9
Home page
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 10
Alerts & waiting tasks
- Alert sponsor of all activity related to directly sponsored users:
– Lost, stolen, broken tokens; temporary passwords set
- Waiting tasks include:
– For self:
- Updating profile
- Renewing an expiring token
- Updating security questions
– Sponsor approvals for:
- New E-Pass (permanent or limited-term)
- Replacement tokens
- User transfers
- Revalidating user
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 11
Start page
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 12
User- vs. function-centric
- Existing system
– Select function, then user, then determine if function is still valid for user
Select Function Identify User Function valid/ not valid? Identify User Select Valid Function
- New system
– Select user, system displays functions available for that user based on privileges, then select function desired
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 13
Select user
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 14
Manage user
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 15
Customer self-service
- Requires a minimum of two security questions to be
answered
- Allow end-user to self-report or handle common
token problems
– Report lost or stolen token
- Allows user to automatically place request for replacement
token with sponsor
– Resync Token – Reset PIN – Receive and Activate Token
- Sponsor and user notified by e-mail; self-service not
available if e-mail addresses haven’t been verified
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 16
Customer self-service
- User identity is validated with correct answers to two security
questions
- Security questions are pre-defined; user can select up to 6 out
- f 20 or more possible and supplies answers
- Three self-service operations available:
– Report Lost or Stolen Token – Reset PIN – Resync Token
- Operations cause sponsor and user to be notified by e-mail
- Self-service is not available if user is sponsor-dependent
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 17
Security questions
- Questions no longer open-ended (industry-standard)
- Questions selectable from a list of 20 or more
- At least 6 questions are available to be used at any
given time
- “Used” questions cannot be re-used in any 30 day
period
- User has 30 days grace period to select and answer
at least two security questions after E-Pass issued
- E-Pass disabled if security questions not answered
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 18
Token self-activation
- Applies to new or replacement tokens
- User receives e-mail notification, clicks on included
URL
- Browser launches special activation page - user is
prompted for the token serial number of the token now in their possession
- If the supplied token serial number matches the token
sent, the token is automatically activated
- If the token received was a replacement token, the
- ld token is deactivated
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 19
E-Mail verification
- Significant problem with invalid e-mail addresses in
current system
- Re-design requires e-mail addresses to be “verified”
for new users and any time e-mail address is changed in a profile
- User will receive e-mail with a unique URL/code.
Clicking on URL within e-mail will automatically “verify” e-mail address
- Sponsors will receive e-mail in cases where user has
no e-mail account
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 20
E-mail address verification
Profile
- E-Mail: pahazen@phena.com
User Registers: Enters Basic Profile Information System Creates Unique Code & Sends E-Mail to Registered E-Mail Address
Profile
- E-Mail: pahazen@phena.com
- Unique Code: xj47syw8fas
- E-Mail Unverified
1 2
User Clicks on URL In E-Mail Containing Unique Code System Matches Code to Profile & Marks E-Mail Verified
Profile
- E-Mail: pahazen@phena.com
- Unique Code: xj47syw8fas
- E-Mail Verified
3
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 21
Direct access to waiting tasks from e-mail
- Notification e-mails that include a waiting task
will include a URL for direct processing of the task
- User clicks on e-mail URL
- After authentication, user can immediately
approve/reject request!
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 22
Three elements
- Delegated authority model
- Privileges – roles and rights
- Company trust relationships
Eliminates hard-coded business rules!
- Alliance vs. non-alliance dependencies
- Level 0, 1, 2, 3, 3, 3, …, 4
New security model
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 23
Profiles, tokens, activity log
Name Company SBU Site Site Location Street Address City State Country E-Mail Phone
up4353 up4353
User Profile Primary Token Additional Token
st0193
Optional Tokens
- 1. User Registered
- 2. Temp Pswd Set
- 3. User & Token Activated
- 4. Token Expiry Notice Sent
- 5. New Token Received
- 6. Transfer Initiated
- 7. Transfer Accepted
User Activity Log
In the redesign, the E-Pass user profile and tokens are separate. This allows E-Pass usernames to be assigned without tokens or for multiple tokens to be assigned to an individual when special circumstances warrant it (e.g. extra token needed for system testing)
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 24
Sponsor dependence
When:
- Sponsor explicitly wants to manage the user, or
- User has a limited-term E-Pass, or
- User has a blank or invalid e-mail address, or
- User has been assigned an E-Pass but no token
Effects are:
- User is not permitted to edit his/her security questions
- User is not eligible for self-service or customer support
- All e-mail alerts are re-directed to the sponsor
User is dependent on sponsor!
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 25
Limited-term E-Passes
- Ability to issue a limited term E-Pass/token to
a non-DuPont visitor or contractor
- E-Pass is valid and token can be used for 30-
180 days
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 26
Limited-term E-Passes
- Only designated sponsors are permitted to issue LTEs, those with the
Visitor Administrator privilege assigned
- A limited-term E-Pass is issued using the standard E-Pass request
process (extra checkbox specifies LTE vs. permanent E-Pass)
- Sponsors can assign a reclaimed token from a previous LTE or have a
new token sent by Token Administration
- LTEs are valid for 30 days at a time, renewable up to 180 days (6
months). Sponsors are notified 5 days prior to expiration to renew.
- Token operations (reset PIN, resync token, etc.) for LTEs can be
performed by sponsors only.
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 27
Usability testing
- Prototype developed, Nov-Dec 2002
- Prime audience was sponsors, 2000 invited.
- 180 tests completed over an 8-day period
(Dec 10-18)
- Gathered feedback on key tasks/areas:
– Home page, login, start page, reports, re-assign E-Pass approval, expired token, request new E- Pass, select & manage user, revalidate user
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 28
Usability results
- 78% North America, 11% Europe, 7% A/P, 4% South America
- 73% of sponsors sponsor fewer than 30 users
- 75% of users use their sponsor as the primary means of support
- 70% use E-Pass at least monthly, 30% rarely
- 80+% use network connection to access the application
- 84% agreed that new application is easier-to-use than current
application
- Several areas for improvement identified and added to design:
– labeling, login, differentiating approval/rejection options, finding users, key reports
- Many asked for additional opportunities to see the new design
and review training materials
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 29
Your help needed
- Testing
- Rollout
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 30
Key areas of change
- Users
– Activation alternative (self-service) – New security questions and answers – Update profile after revalidation – Self-service capabilities
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 31
Key areas of change
- Sponsors
– Sponsor dependence – Waiting tasks – Transferring more than one user at a time – Refer E-Pass approval to another sponsor – Manage user (selecting user then operation) – Using the tree selector and search tool – Tracking requests – Reporting lost, stolen, broken tokens; use of return token
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 32
Help needed: Testing
- Need volunteers from the end-user
community (all roles) to:
– Help develop test cases – Test the developing system – Report success/failure
How do we identify these individuals?
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 33
Help needed: rollout preparation
- Awareness: Communications, online demonstrations
- Education: tutorial/guide, help topics, reference cards
- One-on-one training for small role groups: Customer
Support, TA/TO, Company Administrators
- Testing – participation needed from all role types
What are your expectations and ideas?
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 34
Additional background
The remaining slides in this presentation provide additional detail on the new security model incorporated into the redesigned E-Pass application
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 35
Delegated authority model
- Model doesn’t change in the re-design
- Determines scope of changes that can be
made by sponsors
- Delegated authority model does not
constrain:
– Company administrators – Token admins or token operators – Customer support representatives – System administrator
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 36
Privileges
- 2 types of rights
– Assigned right - determines what role(s) the user can play – Delegation right - controls whether or not the user can delegate a right to another user
- Roles:
– Sponsor – Visitor Administrator – Company Administrator – Customer Support – Token Administrator – Token Operator – System Administrator
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 37
Roles
All companies Company Administrator
Manages Role
Self User Users in entire delegated authority model Customer Support Representative Token Administrator Token Operator System Administrator Limited-term E-Passes and tokens assigned to distribution point Visitor Administrator Sponsored Users:
- Lower down in branch
- Must be In same company unless affiliated
company has ExtSponsor right Sponsor CESSO
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 38
Company trust relationships
- Constrains actions of a user belonging to a specific company
- Allows/restricts what changes can be made within the company
and between users of different companies
– The CESSO exists within ONLY DuPont – Can the company have:
- Sponsors
- Visitor administrators
- Company administrators - DuPont Only
- System administrators
- Token administrators
- Token operators
- Customer support representatives?
– Only DuPont is allowed to sponsor other companies. – Only someone in DuPont is allowed to change the privileges of someone in another company.
12-Feb-2003 (c) 2003, Phena Partners LLC & DuPont 39
Example: Security model
CESSO Robert Lee SP CA
Eric Bongard
SP CA SP CA TA
Ed Miller (CSC)
SP CA TA
Sponsor A
SP
User B
SP
User C
SP
Brian Hayden (CSC)
SP TA
Sue Koffler (CSC)
SP TA
Token Admin A
SP TA
DuPont has External Sponsor and External Assignment company trust
- rights. This allows DuPont to
sponsor someone in CSC and to assign the TA delegation right to
- CSC. They can also sponsor User
C, who is belongs to Phena. CSC has the Token Administrator company trust right allowing Token Administrators to be defined within the company. DuPont Phena CSC DuPont has CA company trust rights. This allows the CESSO to appoint Robert Lee and Eric Bongard as CAs. SP Sponsor CA Company Administrator TA Token Administrator
Assigned Right Delegation Right
CS VA SA TO TO TO TO
Token Operator A
SP TO