[PPT] - E ARL Y L E ARNING COAL IT ION OF DUVAL He lping par e nts c PowerPoint Presentation

SLIDE 1

E ARL Y L E ARNING COAL IT ION OF DUVAL

He lping par e nts c hoose , pr e par ing c hildr e n to le ar n

QUAL IT Y CONNE CT IONS Pr e se nta tion a t the Boa r d Me e ting Aug ust 25, 2010

1

SLIDE 2

All Ja c kso nville E a rly L e a rning Pro g ra ms will pro vide hig h q ua lity c a re a nd e a rly le a rning se rvic e s tha t re sult in de mo nstra te d po sitive sc ho o l re a dine ss o utc o me s fo r a ll c hildre n.

COAL IT ION VISION ST AT E ME NT

2

SLIDE 3

QUAL IT Y CONNE CT IONS - PROGRAM OBJE CT IVE

T

e mpo we r sc ho o l re a dine ss pro vide rs to
ffe r q ua lity e a rly le a rning e xpe rie nc e s to

sc ho o l re a dine ss c hildre n a s re q uire d b y F lo rida Sta tute 411.01, b a se d o n a syste m

f e nviro nme nt a sse ssme nts, susta ine d

suppo rt, a nd pro fe ssio na l g uida nc e .

3

SLIDE 4

QUAL IT Y CONNE CT IONS - ME ASURABL E OUT COME – F Y 09- 10

Numb e r o f c la ssro o ms a sse sse d - 2 c la ssro o ms

Ove ra ll AVE

RAGE sc o re o f 3.0 (ye a r 1 o r ye a r 2 se rvic e d c e nte rs) o r a b o ve , o n I T E RS* + E CE RS*

Ove ra ll AVE

RAGE sc o re o f 3.50 o r a b o ve (c e nte rs whic h ha ve re c e ive d mo re tha n 2 ye a rs o f se rvic e ).

I

n the 7 po int sc a le , 5 is c o nside re d hig h q ua lity. Ac c o rding to Dr. Crye r (a utho r o f E RS) “A sc o re o f 5 is c o nside re d the b e nc hma rk fo r hig h q ua lity”.

____________________________________________________________________

*IT

E RS – Infant T

ddle r

E nvir

nme ntal Rating Sc ale – 0 to 30 months

*E CE RS – E ar ly Childhood E nvir

nme ntal Rating Sc ale – 31 to 60 months

4

SLIDE 5

I T E RS & E CE RS de fine e nviro nme nt in a b ro a d se nse a nd g uide the o b se rve r: to a sse ss the a rra ng e me nt o f spa c e b o th indo o rs a nd

utdo o rs

He a lth a nd sa fe ty o f the c hildre n the ma te ria ls a nd a c tivitie s o ffe re d to c hildre n the supe rvisio n a nd inte ra c tio ns tha t o c c ur in the c la ssro o m L iste ning a nd ta lking ; la ng ua g e a nd re a so ning a nd the sc he dule o f the da y, inc luding ro utine s a nd a c tivitie s. T he de finitio n is muc h b ro a de r tha n just physic a l spa c e – inc lude s pro c e ss & struc ture q ua litie s – e nc o mpa sse s a ll o f the a b o ve . DE F INIT ION OF E NVIRONME NT IN IT E RS & E CE RS

5

SLIDE 6

IT E RS- R / E CE RS- R SUBSCAL E S

IT E RS- R – Bir th to 30 months

1. Spa c e a nd F urnishing s 2. Pe rso na l Ca re Ro utine s 3. L iste ning a nd T a lking 4. Ac tivitie s 5. I nte ra c tio n 6. Pro g ra m Struc ture 7. Pa re nts a nd Sta ff I n the first 6 sub sc a le s, the re a re 32 ite ms a nd o ve r 350 indic a to rs whic h a re sc o re d.

E CE RS-R – 31 months to 5 yr s

1. Spa c e a nd F

urnishing s 2. Pe rso na l Ca re Ro utine s 3. L a ng ua g e a nd re a so ning 4. Ac tivitie s 5. I nte ra c tio n 6. Pro g ra m Struc ture 7. Pa re nts a nd Sta ff I n the first 6 sub sc a le s, the re a re 37 ite ms a nd o ve r 400 indic a to rs whic h a re sc o re d.

1-2 INADEQUATE 3-4 - MINIMAL 5-6 - GOOD 7 - EXCELLENT

6

SLIDE 7

“It is the average total score that is related to positive child development, but not any

f the single requirements

by themselves.” (All About the

ECERS-R, xii)

7

SLIDE 8

T E CHNICAL ASSIST ANCE – E NVIRONME NT SUPPORT

I

ntro duc to ry me e ting – Dire c to r & Spe c ia list

Ce nte r sta ff me e ting to disc uss e xpe c ta tio ns with the

te a c he rs

Suppo rt stric tly a nc ho re d to I

T E RS a nd E CE RS

L

e a rning ma te ria ls purc ha se d fo r the suppo rte d c la ssro o ms

Ave ra g e c a se lo a d pe r Spe c ia list – b e twe e n 14 to 17 c e nte rs
Diffe re ntia te d syste m o f suppo rt
Ave ra g e numb e r o f te c hnic a l a ssista nc e visits to e a c h

c e nte r during the pe rio d Aug ust thro ug h Ma rc h – 12 to 14

Spring (Po st) Asse ssme nts c o nduc te d in April / Ma y
Unit Co st pe r Qua lity Co nne c tio ns c e nte r - $11,000
Balanc e be twe e n te c hnic al assistanc e & pr
vide r

ac c ountability

8

SLIDE 9

2.89 1.73 3.80 2.82 3.90 3.27

2.90

3.56 2.12 5.10 4.61 4.59 4.35

3.95

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00

Space & Furn Personal Care Routines Listening & Talking Activities Interaction Program Structure OVERALL

PRE POST ITERS SCORES – FY 2009-2010

Overall ITERS-R Score

9

SLIDE 10

2.95 2.41 4.17 3.64 3.96 4.06

3.41

3.47 2.58 4.95 5.08 3.82 4.93

4.09

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00

Space & Furn Personal Care Routines Lang & Reasoning Activities Interaction Program Structure OVERALL

PRE / POST ECERS SCORES – 2009-2010

Overall ECERS-R Score

10

SLIDE 11

7% 15% 37% 17% 13% 11% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% < 3.00 3.00 to 3.49 3.50 to 3.99 4.00 to 4.49 4.50 to 4.99 5.00 to 5.49

FY 2009-2010 - ITERS SCORES DISTRIBUTION QUALITY CONNECTIONS CENTERS

11

SLIDE 12

2% 14% 32% 30% 13% 9% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% <3.00 3.00 to 3.49 3.50 to 3.99 4.00 to 4.49 4.50 to 4.99 > 5.00

FY 2009-2010 - ECERS SCORES DISTRIBUTION QUALITY CONNECTIONS CENTERS

12

SLIDE 13

4.64 4.14 4.02

1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010

AVERAGE ENVIRONMENT RATING SCORE - 2007-2008, 2008-2009 & 2009-2010 Scores show the shifting balance between Support and Accountability

QUAL IT Y CONNE CT IONS 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 E RS Be nc hma rk Re q uire me nt 3.0 3.0 3.5 # o f Ce nte rs suppo rte d (a ppro x.) 100 100 100 # o f Cla ssro o ms 200 251 303 # o f F ull T ime Sta ff 6 5.5 5.5

Ave r age E RS Sc or e - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

4.64 4.14 4.02

13

SUMMARY OF 3 YEARS OF ENVIRONMENT RATING SCALES SCORES – QUALITY CONNECTIONS

SLIDE 14

Pr

gr

am Ye ar 2007- 2008 – no ne o f the c e nte rs

misse d the b e nc hma rk o f 3.0

Pr

gr

am Ye ar 2008- 2009 – 8 c e nte rs we nt thro ug h

the 30-da y c o rre c tive a c tio n pla n pro c e ss a nd 7 c e nte rs ma de the b e nc hma rk; o ne c e nte r’ s sc ho o l re a dine ss a g re e me nt wa s te rmina te d

Pr

gr

am Ye ar 2009- 2010 – 5 Qua lity Co nne c tio ns

c e nte rs a nd 3 Guiding Sta rs suppo rte d c e nte rs we nt thro ug h the c o rre c tive a c tio n pla n pro c e ss; o ne c e nte r’ s sc ho o l re a dine ss a g re e me nt wa s te rmina te d

CE NT E RS WHICH MISSE D T HE QUAL IT Y BE NCHMARK

14

SLIDE 15

Qua lity Co nne c tio ns – initia tive - a ppro ve d b y the b o a rd me mb e rs a t the April 25th, 2007 b o a rd me e ting , a nd wa s la unc he d during fisc a l ye a r 2007-2008 Ob je c tive wa s to e sta b lish a me a sure o f q ua lity using a na tio na lly a nd inte rna tio na lly use d to o l whic h ha d b e e n te ste d to re lia b ility a nd va lidity I T E RS a nd E CE RS – we re use d a s the to o ls to me a sure the le ve l o f q ua lity o f e a rly le a rning e xpe rie nc e s o f the c hildre n Suppo rt b a se d o n I T E RS a nd E CE RS ha s b e e n pro vide d to a ppro x 100 c hild c a re c e nte rs e a c h fisc a l ye a r fo r the pa st 3 ye a rs – 07- 08, 08- 09 a nd 09- 10

A L

OOK BACK AT 3 YE ARS OF QUAL IT Y CONNE CT IONS

15

SLIDE 16

SUPPORT T O E MPOWE RME NT & ACCOUNT ABIL IT Y - 3-YE AR PROCE SS

F Y 2007- 2008:

Gra dua l intro duc tio n o f the sc a le s to pro vide rs; Antic ipa tio n o f sig nific a nt impro ve me nts b e twe e n pre & po st a sse ssme nts

16

F Y 2008- 2009:

T he o b je c tive wa s to shift the b a la nc e b e twe e n suppo rt a nd pro vide r a c c o unta b ility, a nd to e mpo we r the dire c to rs to ta ke o wne rship o f the suppo rt o f the 2 ma inte na nc e c la ssro o ms.

F Y 2009- 2010:

T he o b je c tive wa s to pe rsua de the dire c to rs to ta ke g re a te r

wne rship o f ma inte na nc e o f q ua lity e ve ryda y, sinc e mo st o f

the m ha d g o ne thro ug h 2 ye a rs o f suppo rt, while still re c e iving g uida nc e a nd suppo rt fo r the ne w c la ssro o ms.

SLIDE 17

T RANSIT IONING T O… .. RE SUL T S BASE D ACCOUNT ABIL IT Y (RBA)

F unda me nta lly, the pro c e ss re vo lve s a ro und a nswe ring thre e q ue stio ns a b o ut the pro g ra m o r se rvic e s b e ing pro vide d:

1. Ho w muc h did we do ? (the q ua ntity o f se rvic e )
2. Ho w we ll did we do it? (the q ua lity o f the se rvic e )
3. I

s a nyo ne b e tte r o ff? (the q ua ntity a nd q ua lity o f the se rvic e o utc o me )

17

SLIDE 18

F OUR QUADRANT S OF RBA

18

SLIDE 19

T URN T HE CURVE – QUAL IT Y CONNE CT IONS

AVE RAGE E RS SCORE – 2007- 2008, 2008- 2009, 2009- 2010**

** RBA TEMPLATE – QUALITY CONNECTIONS – SEPARATE HANDOUT

2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 Average ERS Score 4.64 4.14 4.02

4.64 4.14 4.02

3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00

QUALITY CONNECTIONS - AVERAGE ERS SCORE - 5 = HIGH QUALITY Trend Line Turn the Curve 19

SLIDE 20

NE XT ST E PS - Are the c hildre n a nd fa milie s b e tte r o ff?

Co ntinuo us q ua lity impro ve me nt

Co mpa riso n o f E

CE RS sc o re s to VPK Re a dine ss Ra te s?

Da ta sha ring a g re e me nt with Duva l Co unty Pub lic Sc ho o ls?

Da ta De ve lo pme nt Ag e nda

Pe rc e nta g e o f c e nte rs whic h will ha ve a n a ve ra g e sc o re a b o ve 4.00
Pe rc e nta g e c ha ng e in the o ve ra ll sc o re – to turn the c urve in a n upwa rds

tra je c to ry

Se le c t me a sure s to turn the c urve

Re vie w c urre nt pro c e sse s to de te rmine wha t wo rks & wha t do e s no t wo rk?
Ho ld pro vide r fo c us g ro ups to unde rsta nd the ir c ha lle ng e s – turno ve r, dro p

in e nro llme nt

I nfo rma tio n & Re se a rc h Ag e nda

Ma inta in ste a dy c o mmunic a tio n with o ur pa rtne rs to e nsure tha t the fo c us

re ma ins o n c hild o utc o me s

Are c hildre n a nd fa milie s b e tte r o ff?

E ng a g e a ll o ur pa rtne rs – JCC, E CS, DCF , F SCJ

20

SLIDE 21

I f yo u ha ve a lo t o f thing s to do , g e t the na p o ut o f the wa y first.

An 8-ye ar o ld

T HANK YOU to a ll the c o a c he s, Spe c ia lists, te a m le a de rs, pa rtne rs, Bo a rd me mb e rs, pro vide rs a nd fa milie s !

21