dynamic structure factor and drag force in a strongly
play

Dynamic structure factor and drag force in a strongly interacting 1D - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dynamic structure factor and drag force in a strongly interacting 1D Bose gas at finite temperature Guillaume Lang , Anna Minguzzi, Frank Hekking LPMMC, Grenoble, France 1 Overview: Criteria for superfluidity, dynamic structure factor


  1. Dynamic structure factor and drag force in a strongly interacting 1D Bose gas at finite temperature ● Guillaume Lang , Anna Minguzzi, Frank Hekking LPMMC, Grenoble, France 1

  2. Overview: ● Criteria for superfluidity, dynamic structure factor and drag force ● The setup ● Infinite interactions : the Tonks-Girardeau gas ● Large interactions : the Luttinger liquid ● Luttinger liquid Vs Tonks-Girardeau in the infinite interaction regime 2

  3. Landau's criterion for superfluidity ● Superfluid = no elementary excitation if v<v c =min(ε/|p|)→look at the dispersion relation 3

  4. Landau's criterion for superfluidity ● Superfluid = no elementary excitation if v<v c =min(ε/|p|)→look at the dispersion relation ● Two candidates for superfluidity: Liquid He (b) and weakly-interacting Bose gas (a) ● Rk: interactions necessary ! 4

  5. Beyond Landau's criterion ● Problem : probabilities of excitations not taken into account ● Solution : dynamic structure factor S(q,ω) ● New criterion : drag force F such that Ė=-F·v, superfluid → F=0 5

  6. Beyond Landau's criterion ● Problem : probabilities of excitations not taken into account ● Solution : dynamic structure factor S(q,ω) ● New criterion : drag force F such that Ė=-F·v, superfluid → F=0 ● Both are measurable! Fabbri et al. PRA 91 , 043617 (2015), Meinert et al. arXiv:1505.08152v1 [cond-mat.quant-gas] 29 May 2015, Onofrio et al. PRL 85 , 2228 (2000), Desbuquois et al. Nature Physics 8 , 645-648 (2012), ... ● Link between drag force and dynamic structure factor ? 6

  7. Link between drag force and dynamic structure factor Astrakharchik and Pitaevskii, PRA 70 , 013608 (2004) ● Weak potential barrier U(r,t) stirred in the fluid + linear response theory → ● Let us put it in practice ! 7

  8. System, assumptions ● 1D, N bosons, homogeneous ● Contact 2-body (strong) interaction g ● Size L→+∞, N/L=cst ● Barrier = Gaussian laser beam, waist w>0 , low power, stirred at velocity v=cst ● Temperature T>0 ● No spin, no magnetic field... 8

  9. At equilibrium (no barrier) ● Lieb-Liniger model: contact interactions ● Dimensionless interaction strength: 9

  10. →∞ : the Tonks-Girardeau gas γ ● 1D: Lieb-Liniger model for hard-core bosons → Tonks-Girardeau gas ≈ free fermions ! ● Statistical transmutation in 1D: 10

  11. →∞ : the Tonks-Girardeau gas γ ● Dynamic structure factor at T=0: Backscattering process (umklapp point) 11 Fermi wavevector

  12. Dynamic structure factor of a Tonks- Girardeau gas at finite temperature T=0.5T F T=0.1T F T=T F T=4T F 12

  13. Drag force in the Tonks-Girardeau gas at finite temperature For a point-like ● Depend on T barrier (w=0): Integration line 13

  14. Drag force in the Tonks-Girardeau gas at finite T ● F(T) decreases ! ● Tonks- Girardeau gas not superfluid ! T=0.1T F T=0 T=4T F T=4T F 14

  15. Large but finite interactions ● Lieb-Liniger model integrable → Bethe Ansatz ● Our approach : we only need the low energy behavior → effective Luttinger liquid model ● Comparison with exact solution at γ →∞ 15

  16. The Luttinger liquid model at γ >>1 ● Hydrodynamic approximation: ● φ : phase field ● Mode ● θ : counting field expansion → ● K : linked to compressibility ● V s : sound velocity 16

  17. Luttinger liquid Vs Tonks-Girardeau ● Validity of the model ? ● At T=0, γ →∞: ● Luttinger liquid and Tonks-Girardeau gas ● Linearization ok at low energy → near q=2k F ! 17

  18. Comparison at finite T ● Need K(T), vs(T) at = +∞ γ ● Analytically : Sommerfeld expansion ● Numerically : sum rule and static structure factor. 18

  19. Luttinger liquid Vs Tonks-Girardeau at finite T ● Dynamic structure Tonks-Girardeau (exact) Luttinger liquid factor at T=0.1T F ● Luttinger liquid : excellent approximation at low energy and finite T in the backscattering region, curvature not taken into account 19

  20. Effect of T on the drag force, Luttinger liquid Vs Tonks-Girardeau L.L., T=0 L.L., T=0.1T F T.-G., T=0 T.G., T=0.1T F ● Excellent agreement at low velocity ! 20

  21. Luttinger liquid at finite interactions ● Analytical expressions for S(q,ω) and F(v) involve Luttinger parameters → ● We solve the Bethe ansatz equations (here at T=0). 21

  22. Finite barrier width in the Tonks- Girardeau gas ● The drag force fades out for a wide barrier at high velocity ! T w 22

  23. Conclusions ● Drag force and dynamic structure factor at finite temperature (and barrier width) at large interactions ● T-dependence of Luttinger parameters ● Comparison with exact solution → validity of the Luttinger liquid model : S(q,ω) near 2k F at low energy, F(v) at low v→ describes well the backscattering region, still valid at low T ! ● Learn more on Phys. Rev. A 91 063619 (2015), or arXiv 1503.08038 [cond- mat.quant-gas] 23

  24. Outlook ● Comparison with exact solution at finite γ and experiments at low energy near the backscattering region ● Drag force beyond linear response theory ? ● Renormalization of the barrier ? ● … 24

  25. | End > < End| Thanks for your attention ! 25

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend