Dual-Phase status: progress on 3x1x1 prototype
- L. Molina Bueno on behalf of WA105 collaboration
DUNE monthly collaboration meeting, 14th July 2017
Dual-Phase status: progress on 3x1x1 prototype L. Molina Bueno on - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Dual-Phase status: progress on 3x1x1 prototype L. Molina Bueno on behalf of WA105 collaboration DUNE monthly collaboration meeting, 14th July 2017 The WA105 collaboration demonstrate the capabilities of the dual phase technology at the kton
DUNE monthly collaboration meeting, 14th July 2017
2
The WA105 collaboration
22 institutes 138 physicists, 10 countries
demonstrate the capabilities of the dual phase technology at the kton scale
3
Goals of Dual-phase LAr TPC prototype at CERN
Demonstrate technical feasibility for O(10kton) detectors
detectors
assembly Conceptual design for DUNE dual-phase 10kton LAr TPC is described in DUNE CDR Vol. 4 arXiv:1601.02984 Operation and measured performance of the prototype at CERN informs DUNE TDR (CD2 review in 2019)
4
Two dual phase liquid argon detectors
11 m 5 m
in commissioning in construction 3x1x1 m3 protoDUNE-DP Common aspects ✓ LEMs and anode: design, purchase, cleaning and QA ✓ chimneys, FT and slow control sensors ✓ membrane tank technology ✓ Accessible cold front-end electronics and DAQ system ✓ amplification in pure Ar vapour on large areas Same technology→different sizes→different goals
5
The 3x1x1 m3 Dual phase LAr TPC
✓ First GTT constructed cryostat for LAr ✓ Fully engineered versions of many detector components with pre-production and direct implementation (installation details and ancillary services) ✓ First overview of the complete system integration: set up full chains for Quality Assessment, construction, installation and commissioning ✓ Anticipate legal and practical aspects related to procurement, costs and schedule verification ✓ short term data taking with cosmics
6
The role of CERN: Neutrino Platform
3x1x1-DP large support from CERN Neutrino platform
cryostat cryogenic installation (piping+ monitoring) infrastructure (clean room, structures,..) & safety handling, lifting operations,.. DCS
7
The role of CERN
anode+LEM: EP-DT-EF photogrammetry + survey EN-ACE-SU drift cage profile bending: EN-MME-FW main workshop polymers: TE-MSC-MDT PMT coating and qualification EP-DT-EF cold bath test, cryolab TE-CRG-CI SEM observations: EN-MME-MM LEM thickness measurements EP-UAT cabling manufacturing EN-EA-CT cabling and grounding installation EP-DT-DI SMD soldering TE-MPE-EM
in addition to the support from Neutrino Platform, important assistance from many CERN groups and labs
8
Detector installation- on schedule
9
Detector commissioning and first results
Dec Jan Feb 2017 2016
Beginning
purging of main pipes Purge in closed loop Purge in
10
Detector commissioning and first results
Dec Jan Feb 2017 2016
Beginning
purging of main pipes Purge in closed loop Purge in
RMS pedestal measured at 1.74 ADC PMTs synchronised with CRTs trigger. Data in GAr was subsequently acquired. All HV connections and sensors tested before cool down systematic check of noise Online display to constantly monitor the different sensors. A Slack account for the collaboration was created with different channels to report the daily activities. pulsing to check detector response
11
Light measurements in GAr and trigger
2 Cosmic Ray Tagger pannels with a trigger rate of 0.3 Hz
12
Detector commissioning and first results
Mar
1st cool down trial 45 temperature sensors along the insulation space
Filling process: The filling of the detector started progressively and the evolution of cold regions was monitored in the process. Cryostat works ongoing in the meantime to understand the source of cold spots.
13
Detector commissioning and first results
3rd cool down trial
Apr
Inspections inside to ensure there were no leaks. GTT started inspecting the insulation and drilling holes.
Mar
Measurement of the gradient of temperature in the gas during cool down
May
Filling process: The filling of the detector started progressively and the evolution of cold regions was monitored in the process. Cryostat works ongoing in the meantime to understand the source of cold spots
14
Detector commissioning and first results
3rd cool down trial
Apr
Inspections inside to ensure there were no leaks. GTT started inspecting the insulation and drilling holes.
Mar
Measurement of the gradient of temperature in the gas during cool down
May Jun Jul The source of cold spots was identified by CERN and GTT. Due to an anomalous convection produced in gaps between the insulation panels the heat load of the cryostat was 4.5 kW. After injecting a double component foam in several places the heat load was significantly reduced. The injection finished at the beginning of July.
15
Detector commissioning and first results
Mar May
Very high voltage tests performed in May at different LAr levels. Cathode and field cage powered up to 50 kV in stable conditions. Total resistance of the field cage:
16
Detector commissioning and first results
Mar Jun
On June 9th CRP position adjusted to its nominal level. On June 12th recirculation started. By June 15th a total
been recirculated.
17
Evidence for extraction and electroluminescence
~200 V/cm ~1ms drift ~500 V/cm ~640us drift
electroluminescence (“S2") electroluminescence (“S2") preliminary preliminary Time (200µs/div) PMT raw signal PMT raw signal prompt (“S1”) prompt (“S1”)
ktriggers per run) - data being analysed.
with scope:
kV on the grid, -20 kV on the cathode → drift, extraction, drift in gas, EL inside LEM holes
in scope trace → evidence for good liquid argon purity and long drift.
prompt (“S1”) electroluminescence (“S2")
18
Light-CRT synchronised events
preliminary
19
Detector commissioning and first results
Mar Jun
On June 9th CRP position adjusted to its nominal level. On June 12th recirculation started. On June 20th first track
One of the very first events with un-optimized field parameters: Drift field 0.32 kV/cm, extraction field 0.6 kV/cm, induction field 1 kV/cm. Amplification field in the LEM 29kV/cm (gain ~5).
Raw data- no noise filtering
By June 15th a total
been recirculated.
20
Noise and dead channels in warm and cold
accessible cold amplifiers at 150 K. Sealed in chimney separate from main argon volume uTCA crate cold ASICs ASICs insertion via 2 m blade
Test pulse at warm and at cold: 17 (1.3%) dead or problematic channels. Low noise condition at cold: 1.66 adc counts (1600 e-) RMS noise
Channel
50 100 150 200 250 300
Pedestal RMS [ADC]
1 2 3
1000 2000
Pedestal RMS [# e-]
Channel
650 700 750 800 850 900 950 1000 2000
Pedestal RMS [# e-]
Channel
350 400 450 500 550 600
Channel
50 100 150 200 250 300
Pedestal RMS [ADC]
1 2 3
(20adc=3fC)
21
Detector commissioning and first results
Mar Jun Jul
The condenser and phase separator were not well regulated We activate an interlock on the HV system to switch it off in case this happens again
We identify liquid level variations due to instabilities in the cryogenic system
Level meter measurement Time periodic variation
22
LAr level
Camera’s movies provide very useful information!
23
LAr level
monitored using 7 capacitive level meters
Since middle June, this information is also sent to the cryogenic system to constantly regulate the system to keep the level stable.
pictures continuously.
CRP level meters DC level meters RMS of the fluctuations 0.1 mm
24
Detector commissioning and first results
Mar Jun Jul
Since beginning of this week, we have implemented the possibility of sending a trigger performed by the PMTs to the charge. Beginning of HV tests and data taking.
Trigger rate of 3 Hz Raw data- no noise filtering
25
HV configuration
Anode LEM up LEM down Extraction grid Induction Field 5 kV/cm Extraction field in liquid > 2 kV/cm LEM field
Current reached values
Plot from TDR
Cathode
. . .
1 m PMTs
First Field shaper (FFS) 2 cm
0 kV Drift field 500V/cm LEM Field 30 kV/cm Current reached values
liquid: 0.9-1.5 kV
Induction Field 1-1.5 kV/cm Gain ~6 Extraction efficiency 0.4-0.8
Several HV tests and data taking campaigns performed since beginning of June at different configurations and different LAr levels. During operations we have always stayed below the nominal operating voltages as the extraction grid trips before reaching its nominal value. This limits the extraction efficiency, the induction field and the field across the LEMs.
26
Preliminary stability of data taking
Voltage stable over 5 hours
duration is 100 minutes mainly due to instabilities of the grid voltage. This was also because the purpose of some of these runs was to test a determined HV configuration and not to take data continuously.
LEM up LEM down and grid
27
Software activities - online processing and storage
Online storage and processing for protoDUNE-DP. Being tested on the 3x1x1. The online processing has been tested during the different campaigns of noise and data measurements in the 3x1x1: files transferred to a local EOS and then moved to the CERN computing center. All the necessary codes for 3x1x1 operation including online monitoring processes are functioning well and has been tested.
28
Preliminary reconstruction of 3x1x1 data
comparison - identical
Raw hit finding
Threshold for fitting: 5 ADC counts. More noise is fitted but tuning of other parameters (see previous slide) and noise filtering should get rid of this.
in LArSoft (PRELIMINARY)
works fairly well for DP and is a good starting point for further developments.
29
Time [tdc] ADC LEM down voltages
Preliminary reconstruction of 3x1x1 data
Raw data- no noise filtering 3m view
From channel 0 to160 From channel 160-320
3 m view 1 m view
Problematic channels removed from the reconstruction
30
Preliminary reconstruction of 3x1x1 data
11
Black points are registered hits in view 0 Long tracks traversing the detector are triggered by CRT Short tracks are fragments of other cosmics entering detector within +/- readout window
31
Event Gallery
Raw data- no noise filtering
32
Conclusion
Significant progress has been made:
commissioning phase and more recently due to the defect in the insulation.
commissioning.
50x50 cm2, which is the final design for DUNE, consistent with a LEM gain of 6 at 28 kV/cm.
causes which can explain this issue:
connector of the flange.
33
34
35
Event Gallery: Raw data- no noise filtering
36
Event Gallery: Raw data- no noise filtering
37
Event Gallery: Raw data-no noise filtering
38
Event Gallery: Raw data- no noise filtering
39
Event Gallery: Raw data- no noise filtering
40
Event Gallery: Raw data- no noise filtering
41
Event Gallery: Raw data- no noise filtering
42
Event Gallery: Raw data- no noise filtering
43
Event Gallery: Raw data- no noise filtering
44
Event Gallery: Raw data- no noise filtering
45
Event Gallery: Raw data- no noise filtering
46
Event Gallery: Raw data- no noise filtering
47
Event Gallery: Raw data- no noise filtering
48
Event Gallery: Raw data- no noise filtering
49
Event Gallery: Raw data- no noise filtering
50
Event Gallery: Raw data- no noise filtering
51
Event Gallery: Raw data- no noise filtering
52
Event Gallery: Raw data- no noise filtering
53
Event Gallery: Raw data- no noise filtering
54
Event Gallery: Raw data- no noise filtering
55
Event Gallery: Raw data- no noise filtering
56
Event Gallery: Raw data- no noise filtering
57
Event Gallery: Raw data- no noise filtering
58
Event Gallery: Raw data- no noise filtering