Dual Language Learner Pilot Study Progress Update and New Findings - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

dual language learner pilot study
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Dual Language Learner Pilot Study Progress Update and New Findings - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Item # 6 Attachment C Dual Language Learner Pilot Study Progress Update and New Findings First 5 California Commission Meeting October 22, 2020 Heather Quick, Karen Manship The American Institutes for Research Dual Language Learner r Pi


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Item # 6 Attachment C

Dual Language Learner Pilot Study

Progress Update and New Findings

First 5 California Commission Meeting October 22, 2020 Heather Quick, Karen Manship The American Institutes for Research

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Dual Language Learner r Pi Pilot Study Ph Phases s

Landscape/Background Study: Completed In-Depth Study: In progress Expansion Study: Launching soon

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Addressing the I In-De Depth h Stud udy Q Questions s

What strategies for instruction, professional development (PD), and family engagement are used for dual language learners (DLLs)?

  • Program staff reports on classroom practices, PD, family

engagement: ‒ Site administrator survey (as planned) ‒ Educator survey (as planned) What practices support positive outcomes for DLLs and their families?

  • Child outcomes (one point in time):

‒ Preschool: Language skills, executive function, pre-academic skills ‒ Infant/toddler: Language and overall development

  • Child outcomes (two points in time as planned):

‒ All: Social-emotional development

  • Family engagement:

‒ Parent survey (two points in time as planned)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

In In-De Depth h Study: Plann nned Research Briefs s

  • Quick Facts: The Landscape of Early Learning and Care for DLLs – Just released
  • DLL Teachers’ Professional Development – Late October 2020
  • Sites’ General Approaches to Supporting DLLs – November 2020
  • Challenges in Multilingual Child Assessment – December 2020
  • What We Can Learn from Assessing Math in Two Languages – January 2021
  • 4–6 additional research briefs in 2021:

− Relationship between teacher practices (instruction, family engagement) and child and family outcomes

  • Final report
  • Final summary research brief in English, Spanish, Chinese
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Ear arly L Lear arning an g and Car are P Progr

  • gram

ams Ser erving D DLLs: P Pre-COVID a and nd No Now w

Findings just released in the study’s first Quick Facts brief

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Finding: Nearl rly Al All Centers a and M Most Family Child Care Homes in Californ rnia Serve DLLs s

Family Child Care Homes Centers

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Finding: The C Concentration of DLLs in Early Le Learning Programs Varies Widely y

The average early learning program serving DLLs enrolls 53% DLLs.

Centers

Family Child Care Homes

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Fi Finding: Multi tilingual Sites Are Common n

Number of Languages in ELC Programs

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Finding: M More T e Than an On One Q e Quart arter er o

  • f DLL-Ser

erving Progr grams U Use O Only E Engl glish f for Instructi tion

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Challenges Directors R Report rt in Serving DLLs

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Few Requirements for r DLL-Focused P PD D

  • Directors of most programs reported that their staff were not

required to participate in PD specifically focused on DLLs.

− This varied by QCC participation and program funding.

  • More details on professional development will be presented in the

next research brief (early November 2020).

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Impact of COVID ID-19 19 on D DLLs

  • Supplemental survey of a representative sample of early learning programs about COVID.
  • Programs reported facing significant financial challenges:

− 68% reported that their programs’ financial stability represented a moderate or major challenge during the pandemic. − 58% reported laying off or furloughing staff. − 36% had to reduce staff pay (64% of FCCHs, 10% of centers).

  • Program closures and new group size requirements have led to fewer children being served:

− 35% of programs reported that they were closed for in-person care, and 16% of those noted that they were not at all or only slightly likely to reopen. − 81% of California’s DLLs are no longer being served in the programs in which they were enrolled prior to COVID-19, compared with 73% of non-DLLs.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

COV OVID-19 C Challenges: T Teacher r Perspectives s

Reduced Enrollment

“One of the big issues is the loss of income [our program] endured during the last two months and the fears parents have to bring their child to [our program] again.”

Training

“I didn't receive training in virtual learning. I had to learn this technology with trial and error.”

Technology

“I myself can't participate in meetings or trainings because I have no computer. I use wi-fi and [it] is very

  • limited. I can't help my

students or parents.”

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Ad Adaptations a and I Investments in Professional Learning g

  • Teachers described training available to them (and often required) on

how to support families virtually and strategies for distance learning.

  • Many programs reported staying in close touch with families while

programs were closed.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Expansion Study dy

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Expansion Stud udy: Research Questions s

  • Implementation. What factors drive

successful local implementation of strategies to (1) build the capacity of ECE educators to support DLL children, and (2) engage and support DLL families, particularly those most in need? How can these factors inform statewide policy?

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Expansion Stud udy: Research Questions s

  • Systems Change. To what extent, and in what ways, did the DLL

expansion projects help change child-, family-, and provider-serving local systems in support of DLL children? How can these outcomes inform statewide implementation?

  • Sustainability and Scalability: What are the local lessons learned

with regard to scaling and sustaining practices for DLL children and families in the context of COVID-19 and in a post-COVID landscape? What are the implications for state policy?

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Focus o

  • f Expansion Stud

udy y

Systems Supports

  • Effective cross-
  • rganization

communication.

  • QRIS incentivizes and

tracks DLL supports.

  • Resources available to

support DLL investments (including availability

  • f PD).

Expansion Study

Program Practices

  • Teachers and

caregivers have access to and participate in PD.

  • Effective

implementation of evidence-based practices.

In-Depth Study

Child and Family Outcomes

  • Parent beliefs about

the importance of bilingualism.

  • Child home language

and English proficiency.

  • Child executive

function and pre- academic skills.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Informing Policy y

  • What approaches to instruction and

family engagement are most closely associated with positive outcomes for DLLs?

  • What kinds of supports do family child

care homes and centers most need?

  • What are the barriers to and

facilitators of successfully implementing effective practices?

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Qu Questions ns? ?

www.CaliforniaDLLStudy.org