Drug Use and Treatment Utilization on Both Sides of the Border - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

drug use and treatment utilization on both sides of the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Drug Use and Treatment Utilization on Both Sides of the Border - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Multiple Trends in Alcohol and Drug Use and Treatment Utilization on Both Sides of the Border Lynn Wallisch and Jane Maxwell, Center for Social Work Research, University of Texas at Austin USA-Mexico Border Volleyball Todays Topics Why


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Multiple Trends in Alcohol and Drug Use and Treatment Utilization on Both Sides of the Border

Lynn Wallisch and Jane Maxwell, Center for Social Work Research, University of Texas at Austin

slide-2
SLIDE 2

USA-Mexico Border Volleyball

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Today’s Topics

  • Why is the border of interest?
  • Risk and protective factors
  • Trends in substance use & disorders
  • Comparing border and other populations

– Off border cities, US Hispanics, colonias

  • Comparing US and Mexico borders
  • Desire for and use of treatment
  • Related factors
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Learning Objectives

  • Knowledge about prevalence of substance

use and disorders on both sides of Border and off Border.

  • Knowledge about desire for, and use of,

treatment on Border

  • Understanding of correlates of substance

disorders and desire for treatment.

slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

The Unique Border Area

  • Immigration, drug trafficking, security
  • Fast-growing & dynamic region
  • Foreign-born to 4th generation
  • Complex blend of US & MX cultures
slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • 1/2 of US Hispanics live in CA & TX
  • 8% of US Hispanics in border counties
  • 2/3 of Mexican immigrants live in the four border states
slide-9
SLIDE 9

The “Border” is not one homogeneous place!

  • California ≠Arizona ≠ New Mexico ≠

Texas

  • El Paso ≠ Laredo ≠ Rio Grande Valley
  • Urban ≠ Colonias
  • US ≠ Mexico
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Heroin 7% Heroin 2% Cocaine 11% Cocaine 30% Cocaine 42% Cocaine 10% Heroin 32% Cocaine 4% Cocaine 2% Heroin 20% Cocaine 1% Heroin 6% Meth 11% Cocaine 12% Heroin 14% Meth 11% Meth 19% Meth 27% Meth 50% Meth 41% Heroin 18% Heroin 13%

Primary Drug of Abuse at Admission to Treatment: 2012

SSA, DGE. SISVEA 2012. TEDS Cocaine 5% Cocaine 8% Meth 10% Meth 2% Heroin 0% Heroin 6% Meth 1% Meth 0.1%

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Drug Items Seized and Identified on the Texas Border: NFLIS 2013

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Risk Factors

  • Greater alcohol advertising and availability
  • Lower cost of alcohol
  • Lower & under-enforced legal drinking age
  • Easier availability of Rx pharmaceuticals
  • Young population age structure
  • Drug trafficking
  • Stresses of poverty, high unemployment,

rapid population growth, acculturation, immigration insecurity

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Protective Factors

  • Strong family & social support systems
  • Religiosity
  • Lower levels of drug use in Mexico
  • Drinking norms
  • Immigrant advantage
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Border Surveys

1996 – 1,665 residents of Brownsville, El Paso, Laredo and McAllen and 504 in colonias 2003 – 400 residents of El Paso, 400 in urban Lower Rio Grande Valley, 400 in colonias, 100 in trailer parks 2012 – 1,565 residents of US border, 771 US off-border (San Antonio)

  • 1,649 residents of MX border,

811 MX off-border (Monterrey)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Methods for In-Person Surveys

  • Random samples of adults 18+ living in

households

  • Face-to-face interviews in English or Spanish
  • Conducted by trained, bilingual, community

residents

  • Analyses used statistical procedures to adjust for

survey design (probability of selection) and to weight the sample to represent population demographics.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

2012 Respondent Characteristics

29% 61% 36% 43% 56% 31% 72% 35% 45% 45% 16% 19% 19% 31% 84%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 18-29 US Born Not HS Grad <$20,000 No Health Ins

Border Off Border State Avg

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Lifetime & Past Year Alcohol Use Across Time (Border)

80% 79% 79% 60% 54% 71%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

1996 2003 2012

LT Alcohol Use PY Alcohol Use

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Binge Drinking

  • 4+/5+ drinks on one occasion at least

monthly in past year

  • 20% of Border residents in 2012
  • Same as off-border
  • Similar in 2003
  • Of concern when leads to impaired

driving

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Impaired Driving: NHTSA

  • Mexican-Americans have high rates of

alcohol-related crashes

  • Border at high risk for DWI
  • Hispanics less likely to consider DWI to

be a safety problem and

  • Less likely to think they will be arrested
  • DPS data show Hispanics over-

represented in DWI but self-report data show underrepresentation

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Impaired Driving

2012 UMSARC

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Impaired Driving

2012 UMSARC

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Impaired Driving

2012 UMSARC

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Lifetime & Past Year Illicit Drug Use Across Time (Border)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Which Illicit Drugs? 2012 Survey

  • Marijuana: 11% past-year use

– Identical on and off border

  • Cocaine/crack: 6% past-year use
  • - Border higher than off border (2.4%)
  • Heroin, methamphetamine,

hallucinogens: 1% or less.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Abuse of Rx Drugs: 2012 Survey

  • 17% of US Border residents misused

Rx drugs in past year

  • This was twice as many as off Border
  • Pain relievers (15%)
  • Sedatives (9%) and stimulants (4%)
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Past Year Abuse/ Dependence Across Time (Border)

20% 16% 17% 5% 5% 6%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%

1996 2003 2012

PY Alc Abuse/Dep PY Drug Abuse/Dep

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Characteristics of People with SUDs (2012)

  • Male (73%)
  • 18-29 (47%) or 30-49 (45%)
  • HS graduate (72%)
  • Single (59%)
  • Both alcohol and drug users (79%)

– Illicit drugs only (37%) – Illicit + Rx (36%)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Substance Use Trends: Quick Summary

  • PY drinking has increased (71% in 2012)
  • Binge drinking stable (20%)
  • PY illicit drug use has increased (12%)
  • MJ (11%), cocaine/crack (6%)
  • Rx misuse twice as high on border (17%)
  • AUD & DUD stable since 2003
  • Border respondents more likely to have

been stopped for DWI than off border

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Comparing Border with Other Populations

US as a whole Mexican Border

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Alcohol and Drug Use: Texas Border and Texas Interior

12% 17% 20% 6% 17% 5% 13% 20% 9% 12%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%

PY Illicit Drug Use PY Rx Misuse Binge Drinking Drug Use Disorder Alcohol Use Disorder

Border Interior

2012 UMSARC

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Percent of Border and Nonborder Texas Secondary Students Who Had Ever Used Drugs: 2012

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Admissions to Texas DSHS-Funded Treatment-Border 1996-2013

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Admissions to Texas DSHS-Funded Treatment-Nonborder 1996-2013

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Past Year Alcohol and Drug Use Among Age 18-25: Border and Nationwide

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%

Drug Use Alcohol Use Binge Drinking Drug Use Disorder Alcohol Use Disorder

US Population US Hispanics Border Hispanics

*

2012 USMSARC and 2012 NSDUH

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Colonias

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Colonias

  • Unincorporated, unregulated

communities

  • Lack of basic infrastructure (paved

roads, electricity, drainage, police)

  • High poverty & unemployment
  • About 2300 individual colonias
  • 20% of Texas border population
slide-37
SLIDE 37
slide-38
SLIDE 38
slide-39
SLIDE 39
slide-40
SLIDE 40
slide-41
SLIDE 41
slide-42
SLIDE 42
slide-43
SLIDE 43

Alcohol and Drug Use: Urban Valley and Colonias

54% 22% 9% 56% 33% 11% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% PY Drinking Binge Drinking PY Ill Drug Use Valley Colonias

2003 UTSSW Border Survey

slide-44
SLIDE 44

DSM-IV Alcohol and Drug Abuse and Dependence: Urban Valley and Colonias

5% 6% 1% 3% 4% 12% 2% 3% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14%

Alcohol Abuse Alcohol Dependence Drug Abuse Drug Dependence

Valley Colonias

2003 UTSSW Border Survey

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Comparing US Border with Mexican Border

slide-46
SLIDE 46
slide-47
SLIDE 47
slide-48
SLIDE 48

Alcohol and Drug Use on Both Sides of the Border

2012 UMSARC

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Alcohol and Drug Disorders on Both Sides of the Border

2012 UMSARC

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Substance Use Comparison: Quick Summary

  • Alcohol, drug use and binge drinking are similar
  • n and off border
  • Rx drug misuse is twice as high on border than
  • ff border; AUD slightly higher on border
  • Border = lower binge drinking than US

Hispanics but higher AUD and DUD

  • Colonias showed higher binge drinking and

alcohol dependence than urban areas

  • Use and disorders are higher on US side than

MX side

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Need and Desire for Treatment

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Would Seek Professional Help for a Problem that Interfered with Day-to-Day Activities

  • Physical Problem = 81%
  • Psychological Problem = 75%
  • Drug or Alcohol Problem = 59%

2003 UTSSW Border Survey

slide-53
SLIDE 53

What would you do if you had a drinking

  • r drug problem that interfered with your

daily activities?

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

El Paso Valley Colonias

Other Nothing Religious Fam/friends Self-help Med/prof

2003 UTSSW Border Survey

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Treatment Desire and Experience

46% 27% 56% 39% 18% 58%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Needed Tx as % of Subs Users Wanted Tx as % of Needed Got Tx as % of Wanted US interior US border

2012 UMSARC

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Sources of Substance Treatment Received

  • AA/12-Step Program

58%

  • Alc/Drug Treatment Prog.

56%

  • Hospital/Doctor

35%

  • ER

34%

  • Private Therapist

23%

  • Social Service Program

18%

  • Traditional Health Worker

18%

2012 UMSARC

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Factors Associated with Desire for Treatment

  • Male
  • Over 30
  • Unemployed
  • Drug user (vs. Alcohol-only user)

2012 UMSARC

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Factors Not Associated with Desire for Treatment

  • Having health insurance
  • Income
  • Country of birth
  • Acculturation
  • Social support
  • Motives for drinking

2012 UMSARC

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Factors Related to Lower Desire for Treatment

  • High School graduate or +
  • Married
  • Living on Border (vs interior)

2012 UMSARC

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Why Lower Desire on Border?

  • Less knowledge of what treatment

entails

  • Not knowing how to get it
  • Not thinking SUD needs treatment
  • Lack of trust in formal institutions
  • Stigma
  • Concern re cost, eligibility, etc.
slide-60
SLIDE 60

0% 25% 50% 75% 100%

Healthcare Substance Tmt

Cost / No insurance Not know where Embarrassment Tmt wouldn't help Transport / Childcare No place nearby Language / Culture

Perceived Barriers as Percentage of Persons Who Wanted but Failed to Receive Care

2003 UTSSW Border Survey

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Treatment: Quick Summary

  • Fewer would seek Tx for SUD than for

medical or psychological problems

  • Most would turn to medical/professional

treatment or self-help groups.

  • Only a quarter or less who need Tx want it.
  • Of those, half have gotten Tx
  • Barriers include cost, not knowing where,

embarrassment, mistrust of Tx, and logistical issues.

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Promotoras

slide-63
SLIDE 63
  • Trusted community members who provide:

– Health education and information – Liaison to community services – Informal counseling – Social support & advocacy – Mentor, role model

  • Training and certification through DSHS
  • About 300 in the Valley & 200 in El Paso
  • Substance abuse prevention, tobacco

cessation, screening & referral, DWI education

slide-64
SLIDE 64
  • Study of adolescent “cheese” heroin

users found parents did not understand detox was not treatment.

  • Family did not want to be separated

from the child who needed to enter residential treatment.

  • Treatment staff not always bilingual and

promotoras would have been helpful in translating and explaining what was happening.

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Social and Neighborhood Factors Related to Substance Use

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Drug Availability and Visibility in Neighborhood, by Site

55% 42% 19% 60% 55% 46% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

MJ Available Oth Drugs Available Neighborhood Abuse

Valley Colonias

2003 UTSSW Border Survey

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Drug Trafficking Attitudes, by Site

77% 79% 22% 19% 84% 84% 29% 22%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Much Trafficking Corruption & Violence Econ Benefits Out of Poverty

Valley Colonias

2003 UTSSW Border Survey

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Bottom Line

  • Higher rates of substance problems
  • Focus on serving colonias
  • People would use professional Tx but

barriers remain

  • High rates of Rx misuse & DWI
  • Use Promotoras
  • Retain the best of both cultures
slide-69
SLIDE 69

Selected References

  • Wallisch, L.S. (1998). 1996 Survey of Substance Use on the Texas-Mexico Border and in Colonias (Austin,

TX: Texas Commission on Alcohol and Substance Abuse).

  • Wallisch, L. (2004). Methamphetamine use in the 2003 survey of adult substance use on theTexas-Mexico
  • border. Proceedings of the Border Epidemiology Work Group, September 2004. (Bethesda, MD: National

Institute on Drug Abuse).

  • Wallisch, L.S. and Spence, R.T. (2006). Alcohol and drug use, abuse, and dependence in urban areas and

colonias of the Texas-Mexico border. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 28: 286-307.

  • Maxwell, J.C., Cravioto, P., Galván, F., Cortés Ramírez, M., Wallisch, L.S., and Spence, R.T. (2006). Drug

use and risk of HIV/AIDS on the Mexico-USA border: a comparison of treatment admissions in both

  • countries. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 82 (Suppl. 1): S85-S93.
  • Spence, R.T. and Wallisch, L.S. (2007). Alcohol and drug use in rural colonias and adjacent urban areas of

the Texas border. The Journal of Rural Health, 23 (Supplemental Issue): 55-60.

  • Spence, R.T., Wallisch, L.S., and Smith, S. (2007). Treatment seeking in Hispanic populations in urban and

rural settings on the border. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 31:1002-1011.

  • Wallisch, L. (2007). Substance Use on the Texas-Mexico Border and in Colonias. The EpiLink, 64(2), 1-5

(epilink.org).

  • Caetano, R., Ramisetty-Mikler, S., Wallisch, L.S., McGrath, C., and Spence, R.T. (2008). Acculturation,

drinking and alcohol abuse and dependence among Hispanics in the Texas-Mexico border. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 32: 1-8.

slide-70
SLIDE 70

jcmaxwell@sbcglobal.net lynn.wallisch@austin.utexas.edu