Drizly - Comparison Feature
General Assembly Design Team
Drizly - Comparison Feature General Assembly Design Team What is - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Drizly - Comparison Feature General Assembly Design Team What is Drizly? Alcohol marketplace operating in over 100 markets across the United States & Canada w e i v r e v O Brief Research Overview User Interviews
General Assembly Design Team
○ User Interviews ○ Quantitative Data ○ Competitive/Comparative Analysis ○ Problem + Solution Statements
3
4
We were given the task to build a feature for the mobile and desktop website where users could compare items to help them make a decision.
5
“I like to see reviews, if they like the flavor or not” “The price, I don’t want to spend a lot
“Compares presentation
label, color of glass, artwork on glass)” “When I am browsing I usually buy products through suggested products or trendy products” “I look at descriptions to compare wines” “I look for accurate description of the flavor profile and suggested food pairings”
6
7
bhphotovideo.com
totalwine.com
peapod.com
instacart.com
Only)
google.com
amazon.com
Type of Business Products Sold Comparison Feature Type of Business Products Sold Comparison Feature Type of Business Products Sold Comparison Feature Type of Business Products Sold Comparison Feature Type of Business Products Sold Comparison Feature Type of Business Products Sold Comparison Feature Alcohol Products Alcohol Products Alcohol Products Alcohol Products Alcohol Products Alcohol Products
8
The consumer needs a way to compare products by price, reviews, label information, and flavor profile because that will help them to make a better informed purchase.
9
We will know this to be true when users spend time on the website using this feature, making better informed decisions, and discovering new items.
1
*This user flow is structured under the assumption that the user is signed in and the delivery address has been entered.
1 1
1 2
1 3
V1: 6 usability tests V2: 5 usability tests V3: 5 usability tests Final Version: 16 usability tests
1 4
The copywriting caused confusion The button lacked consistency and wasn’t prominent enough The copywriting was confusing to users. Also, some users missed it there. The color draw too much attention in the category page. The copywriting received great feedback. The button lacked consistency and did not meet users’ expectations.
V1 V2
1 5
V3
This button did not meet users’ expectations, so we iterated it with an icon.
1 6
1 7
Quick Compare feature on the PDP