Supernova Burst Physics At DUNE
Alex Friedland
University of Tokyo, Feb 12, 2017
DRAFT Supernova Burst Physics At DUNE Alex Friedland University - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
DRAFT Supernova Burst Physics At DUNE Alex Friedland University of Tokyo, Feb 12, 2017 Wednesday, February 8, 17 1 Outline DUNE Experiment and Collaboration Core collapse supernova: overview Things to observe: Stages of the explosion in
Supernova Burst Physics At DUNE
Alex Friedland
University of Tokyo, Feb 12, 2017
Outline
DUNE Experiment and Collaboration Core collapse supernova: overview Things to observe: Stages of the explosion in neutrinos Oscillations effects Particle and Nuclear physics effects Detection issues
2 Wednesday, February 8, 17About DUNE
Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment Neutrino beam from Fermilab to a large liquid argon detector 1,300 km away in South Dakota
3 Wednesday, February 8, 17DUNE Collaboration
As of today: 945 collaborators from 161 institutions in 30 nations
Armenia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, CERN, Chile, China, Colombia, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Greece, India, Iran, Italy, Japan, Madagascar, Mexico, Netherlands, Peru, Poland, Romania, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, USA 60 % non-US 4 Wednesday, February 8, 17DUNE Timeline
Looking ahead: Strategic Goals
Ultimate plan is for 40 kton of LAr far detector four modules of 10 kton each
5 Wednesday, February 8, 17Why SNB neutrinos at DUNE?
Unique characteristics make is a very important, complementary machine to SuperK/HyperK Sensitivity primarily to electron neutrinos Energy resolution Time snapshots of all stages of the explosion Different side of the Earth: Earth matter effect!
6 Wednesday, February 8, 17What happens when all fuel is exhausted?
The star can be supported by the electron degeneracy pressure only when electrons are non-relativistic M❊ ~ (MPl/MN)2 MPl ~ 1.4 M⊙!! Chandrasekhar mass. (We live in an amazing universe!) When the Iron core reaches this mass, gravity at last wins The Fe core collapses in free fall, at v ~c/4, until reaching (supra)nuclear densities, 1010 g/cm3 → 1014 g/cm3 7 Wednesday, February 8, 17Gravity-powered neutrino bomb
The gravitational binding energy GNM2/R ~ 3*1053 ergs (~10% of rest mass!) is initially stored mostly in the Fermi seas of electrons & electron neutrinos Photons are hopelessly stuck. Neutrinos diffuse out
n)-1 ~ a few cm
t ~ R2/cλ ~ 1012 cm2/(3 cm 3*1010cm/s) ~ 10 s For comparison, solar luminosity is 3.8*1033 ergs/s. A core- collapse supernova shines in neutrinos as bright as 1020
60-year-old problem. Why should we care?
Origin of stuff: Supernovae synthesize and disperse heavyEvolution of the explosion is reflected in neutrinos
Neutronization burst, accretion and cooling phases can all be seen in neutrinos. All stages are extremely important!! Signal depends on the progenitor star
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 8.8 solar mass Time After Bounce [s] Lν [1053 erg/s] νe anti−νe 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 10.8 solar mass Time After Bounce [s] Lν [1053 erg/s] νe anti−νe Fig from Fischer, Whitehouse, Mezzacappa, Thielemann, Liebendörfer, arXiv: 0908.1871 10 Wednesday, February 8, 17Cooling Accretion
(no2oscillations)CC NC
≈“Shock2 Revival”We may see something like this (illustration from Messer)
11 Wednesday, February 8, 17Basics of detection
Eνe > 7.48 MeVLow-energy neutrino signal in LAr
νe + 40Ar → 40K* + e- νe + 40Ar → 40Cl* + e+ν + e- → ν + e- ν + 40Ar → ν + 40Ar*
Eνe > 1.5 MeV Eν > 1.46 MeV_
_ 31 SN ν cross sections on Ar hep-ph/0307222 JCAP 10 (2003) 009 JCAP 08 (2004) 001 I.G-B & A.Rubbia 12 Wednesday, February 8, 17Predicted signal, for a reference SN model
DUNE: 40 kton LAr (SN @10 kpc)
Time-dependent signal Expected event spectrum integrated over time 13 Wednesday, February 8, 17ances$adiabaLc,$small$enough$to$ignore$mixing$$
ls$
Or maybe the signal suddenly stops, a black hole forms (O’Connor)
14 Wednesday, February 8, 17Neutronization burst
Thompson, Burrows, Pinto, astro-ph/0211194
15 Wednesday, February 8, 17Update from Oak Ridge
100 200 300 400 500 time [ms] 500 1000 1500 2000 events νe + 40Ar ➝ e2D - νe total counts vs. time
shock lift-off accretion-powered evolution rapid shock expansion - Si-Si/O C15-2D, angle-averaged, SNOwGLoBES Ar17kt, 10 kpc Messer, Devotie, et al. In prep. 16 Wednesday, February 8, 17Oscillations!
In the normal hierarchy, almost the entire neutronization burst would oscillate away! Why?
17 Wednesday, February 8, 17Sun: 2-state oscillations
In the Sun, the density scale height is Rsun/10, while losc is comparable to the width of Japan (KamLAND) -> The evolution is adiabatic (no level jumping)
P2(νe → νe) = sin2 θ sin2 θ + cos2 θ cos2 θ cos2 θ sin2 θ cos2 θvac sin2 θvac
Vacuum Core 18 Wednesday, February 8, 17SN ν oscillations: 2 MSW densities
ν-sphere “regular MSW” νe νμ ντ νe νμ ντ _ _ _ 19 Wednesday, February 8, 17SN MSW transformations, schematics
➡ Given the scale height in the progenitor, the MSW evolution is very adiabatic ➡ the adiabaticity of the atmospheric resonance is controlled by theta13 ➡ Prediction for the nue signal during the neutronization burst is critically dependentsin2 θ cos2 θ
sin2 θ13 F(νµ,τ) F(νe) F(νµ,τ)sin2 θ cos2 θ
sin2 θ13 F(νµ,τ) F(νe) F(νµ,τ)SN ν: very rich physics
ν-sphere Collective turbulence front shock “regular MSW” νe νμ ντ νe νμ ντ _ _ _ 21 Wednesday, February 8, 17WC LAr
22 Wednesday, February 8, 17Another smoking-gun feature. Tracking the shock in real time
The neutrino spectrum is modulated, but not antineutrinos (simultaneously observed by SK/HK)
multiangle collective
moving shock
Figure 7–5: Observed spectra in 34 kton of LAr for a 10 kpc core collapse, representingLBNE science document arXiv:1307 .7335v3
23 Wednesday, February 8, 17Observations
24 Wednesday, February 8, 17νeCC final states: de-excitation γs
MARLEY: Model of Argon Reaction Low-Energy Yields
Goal: determine whether “every 40K∗ e– little thing gonna be all right” for SN neutrino physics in LArTPCs
26 Wednesday, February 8, 17Gammas, neutrons, protons at high Eν
40 18Ar 0+ 1460.859 2+ 11 1460.830 E2 stable 1.12 ps 40 19K ≈ 0.048% 21.03 10.67% 11.61 4– 1.277×109 y QEC=1504.9 10.72% 40K γ 39Ar 39K Sp Sn p nNotice that theory and experiment don’ t match at all
Spectral distortion at high
e– + γs Event
Neutron ejected
In Summary
The next supernova will allow us to look inside the core collapse, observing the engine in real time Hyperk-K and DUNE are perfectly complementary. Will help unravel the explosion mechanism, while also presenting a laboratory for particle and nuclear physics unavailable on earth But we need to be prepared! Events in LAr are complicated and missing photons and gammas could be a big problem Measurements of cross sections and robust DAQ design now would pay off handsomely when SN2029a goes off 32 Wednesday, February 8, 17