draft
play

DRAFT Presented to the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Agenda Item #8 DRAFT Presented to the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization Board March 19, 2015 Dale M. Stith, AICP, GISP Principal Transportation Planner Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization DRAFT The LRTP is


  1. Agenda Item #8 DRAFT Presented to the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization Board March 19, 2015 Dale M. Stith, AICP, GISP Principal Transportation Planner Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization DRAFT

  2.  The LRTP is the blueprint for the Update the LRTP to Reflect region’s transportation future Changing Conditions and identifies all regionally significant transportation Regional Priorities projects in the metropolitan Populations and Employment area Projections  The LRTP has a planning horizon Economic Change of 20 years and is updated every 4 years Anticipated Travel Demand  Current 2034 LRTP adopted January 2012  New LRTP horizon year: 2040 2 DRAFT

  3. Per Federal Regulations: • Any transportation project that receives federal funds or is categorized as “regionally significant” must be included in the LRTP • “Regionally significant” projects must be included in the LRTP and Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) before FHWA/FTA issues a Record of Decision (ROD) 3 DRAFT

  4. 2040 LRTP YEAR 4: 2015 YEAR 3: Adopt Fiscally- 2014 Draft Fiscally- Constrained YEAR 2: Constrained List LRTP 2013 for Public YEAR 1: Environmental Review and 2012 Coordination Comment Develop Vision Conduct Air and Goals Prioritization Quality Establish Plan Evaluation Conformity Develop Horizon (if necessary)* Socioeconomic Environmental Forecast Justice Analysis Identify EJ Draft LRTP Communities Document for Collect and Outreach Develop Pubic Review Candidate Strategies Financial Plan and Comment Projects *EPA’s final rulemaking for the implementation of 2008 ozone standards revokes the 1997 ozone standard in its entirety, which includes the revocation of transportation conformity requirements for Hampton Roads. The rulemaking will be effective April 6, 2015. 4 http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-03-06/pdf/2015-04012.pdf DRAFT

  5. 5 DRAFT

  6.  A single score based on three components: ₋ Project Utility: ability to solve a transportation 2040 LRTP issue Project ₋ Economic Vitality: ability to support economic Categories growth ₋ Project Viability: readiness of a project to be Highway constructed  Evaluation of projects required extensive data: Bridge/Tunnel ₋ Traffic/Congestion Intermodal ₋ Safety ₋ Funding Transit ₋ Project Readiness ₋ Accessibility Active Transportation  Approximately 190 projects evaluated ₋ Committed Projects not evaluated ₋ HRTAC Projects not evaluated 6

  7. November • DRAFT Economic Vitality Scores presented to LRTP Subcommittee December • DRAFT Project Utility Scores presented to LRTP Subcommittee • DRAFT Project Viability Scores presented to LRTP Subcommittee • Present DRAFT scores to FTAC for review and comment January • DRAFT Scores presented to Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TTAC) for review and comment • DRAFT Scores presented to CTAC and Pedestrian and Bicycle Advisory Committee (PABAC) for review and comment March • Present DRAFT Scores to HRTPO Board April • HRTPO Board to approve FINAL Scores January – April • Public Information Campaign – opportunities for citizens to review and comment on Prioritization Scores 7 DRAFT

  8.  Review of Draft Scores  Prioritization Information Campaign • Kick-off: March • Social Media • Website • Regional Libraries • Community Centers • Civic Organizations 8 DRAFT

  9. Project Economic Project Grand Project Category Utility Vitality Viability Total Score Highway, Interchange/Intersection, 100 Points 100 Points 100 Points 300 Points Bridge/Tunnel, Intermodal, Transit Active Transportation 100 Points N/A 100 Points 200 Points 9 DRAFT

  10. 11 Projects evaluated: • Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel • Deep Creek AIW Bridge Replacement • 22nd Street Bridge • Triple Decker Bridge • Jamestown Rd (Rte 31) over Powhatan Creek • Rte 601 over Diascund Creek • Humelsine Pkwy at Colonial Pkwy • Ft Eustis Blvd • Mills Godwin Bridge • Kings Hwy Bridge • Paradise Creek Bridge 10 DRAFT

  11. Draft PROJECT UTILITY ECONOMIC VITALITY PROJECT VIABILITY GRAND TOTAL SCORE Project Name TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL (MAX 300 POINTS) (MAX 100 POINTS) (MAX 100 POINTS) (MAX 100 POINTS) INTERSTATE Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel (8-Lanes) [MULTI] 74 95 18 187 PRIMARY Deep Crk AIW Bridge Replacement and G.W. Hwy (US 17) / Moses Grandy 87 48 42 177 Trail Intersection Improvements [CH] Triple Decker Bridge (Interchange of US 13, US 460, and Norfolk Southern 83 37 8 128 Rail Line) [CH] Mills Godwin Bridge [SUF] 65 35 15 115 Jamestown Rd (Rte 31) Over Powhatan Creek [JCC] 43 10 13 66 Humelsine Pkwy (Rte 199) at Colonial Pkwy [JCC] 32 5 5 42 SECONDARY Rte 601 Over Diascund Creek [JCC] 39 10 16 65 URBAN Kings Hwy Bridge [SUF] 66 32 5 103 22nd St Bridge [CH] 73 10 13 96 Fort Eustis Blvd Bridge Replacement [NN] 61 14 10 85 Paradise Creek Bridge (Rte 239) [POR] 53 19 8 80 11 DRAFT

  12. 109 Highway Projects Evaluated • See Draft 2040 LRTP Prioritization of Transportation Projects report for full list 12 DRAFT

  13. Draft Note: Top scoring projects by system are shown; there were over 100 Highway projects evaluated PROJECT UTILITY TOTAL ECONOMIC VITALITY TOTAL PROJECT VIABILITY TOTAL GRAND TOTAL SCORE Project Name (MAX 100 POINTS) (MAX 100 POINTS) (MAX 100 POINTS) (MAX 300 POINTS) INTERSTATE I-64 Peninsula (8-Lane Option) [MULTI] 86 85 33 204 PRIMARY Southeastern Pkwy and Greenbelt [MULTI] 73 87 18 178 Dominion Blvd Phase II [CH] 71 25 81 177 G.W. Mem Hwy (US 17) (Dare to Denbigh) [YK] 84 46 15 145 G.W. Mem Hwy (US 17) [GLO] 72 63 5 140 G.W. Hwy (US 17) (NN CL to Lakeside Dr) [YK] 78 54 5 137 SECONDARY Longhill Rd (Phase 1) [JCC] 72 28 25 125 Longhill Rd (Phases 1-3) [JCC] 74 28 15 117 Croaker Rd [JCC] 66 17 20 103 Longhill Rd (Phase 2) [JCC] 59 17 15 91 Coventry Blvd Extension [YK] 56 24 5 85 URBAN Brambleton Ave [NO] 89 69 5 163 Shore Dr - Phase III [VB] 56 27 70 153 Kenyon Rd Connector [SUF] 64 20 68 152 J. Clyde Morris Blvd [NN] 81 67 0 148 Woodlake Dr [CH] 33 29 85 147 Indian River Rd [VB] 77 55 15 147 General Booth Blvd [VB] 70 60 15 145 Princess Anne Rd - Phase VII [VB] 50 20 74 144 13 DRAFT

  14. 22 Interchange/Intersection Projects Evaluated • I-64 at Denbigh Blvd (Rte 173) • I-64 at N. King St • I-264 at Independence Blvd • Air Terminal Interchange • I-64 at Lasalle Ave • I-64 at Settlers Landing Rd • Military Hwy at I-64 -- New EB On-Ramp • I-264 at Ballentine Blvd Diverging Diamond Interchange • I-64 at Northampton Blvd Interchange Improvement • I-264 at Rosemont Rd • Mt Pleasant Rd/Great Bridge Bypass • First Colonial Rd at Virginia Beach Blvd • Rosemont Rd at Holland Rd • Bypass Rd at Page St at Capitol Landing Rd • Monticello Ave at Ironbound Rd (Rte 615) • Terminal Blvd at Diven St • Elm Ave at Navy Gates 29 and 36 • Great Bridge Blvd • Richmond Rd (US 60) at Humelsine Pkwy (Rte 199) West Ramp • Laydon Way at Poquoson Ave at Little Florida Rd • Humelsine Pkwy (Rte 199) at Brookwood Dr 14 • Centerville Rd at News Rd DRAFT

  15. Draft PROJECT UTILITY ECONOMIC VITALITY PROJECT VIABILITY GRAND TOTAL SCORE Project Name TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL (MAX 300 POINTS) (MAX 100 POINTS) (MAX 100 POINTS) (MAX 100 POINTS) INTERSTATE Air Terminal Interchange [NOR] 80 95 23 198 I-64 at Denbigh Blvd (Rte 173) [NN] 81 95 0 176 169 I-264 at Independence Blvd [VB] 79 85 5 I-64 at Northampton Blvd [NOR/VB] 82 76 5 163 I-64 at Lasalle Ave [HAM] 67 82 10 159 I-64 at N. King St [HAM] 64 87 0 151 I-264 at Ballentine Blvd Diverging Diamond Interchange [NOR] 72 72 5 149 I-64 at Settlers Landing Rd [HAM] 65 84 0 149 Military Hwy at I-64 -New EB On-Ramp [NOR] 60 79 5 144 I-264 at Rosemont Rd [VB] 69 63 5 137 PRIMARY First Colonial Rd at Virginia Beach Blvd [VB] 66 49 62 177 163 Monticello Ave at Ironbound Rd (Rte 615) [JCC] 44 32 87 122 Mt Pleasant Rd/Great Bridge Bypass [CH] 63 54 5 97 Rosemont Rd at Holland Rd [VB] 50 39 8 94 Bypass Rd at Page St at Capitol Landing Rd [WMB] 61 33 0 85 Great Bridge Blvd [CH] 58 22 5 78 Laydon Way at Poquoson Ave at Little Florida Rd [PQ] 51 20 7 Richmond Rd (US 60) at Humelsine Pkwy (Rte 199) West Ramp [JCC] 39 22 5 66 Humelsine Pkwy (Rte 199) at Brookwood Dr [JCC] 24 12 5 41 SECONDARY Centerville Rd at News Rd [JCC] 37 5 5 47 URBAN Elm Ave at Navy Gates 29 and 36 [POR] 74 38 0 112 Terminal Blvd at Diven St [NOR] 47 25 5 77 15 DRAFT

  16. 5 Projects evaluated: • Hampton Blvd at Terminal Blvd • Finney Ave Flyover • Freeman Ave • Portlock Rd • North Suffolk Connector Rd 16 DRAFT

  17. Draft PROJECT UTILITY ECONOMIC VITALITY PROJECT VIABILITY GRAND TOTAL SCORE Project Name TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL (MAX 300 POINTS) (MAX 100 POINTS) (MAX 100 POINTS) (MAX 100 POINTS) URBAN Hampton Blvd at Terminal Blvd [NOR] 60 85 24 169 Portlock Rd [CH] 81 50 5 136 Freeman Ave [CH] 60 60 14 134 Finney Ave Flyover [SUF] 59 50 15 124 105 North Suffolk Connector Rd [SUF] 70 30 5 17 DRAFT

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend