Draft 2015 Survey Results About County Planning To inform and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

February 8, 2016

Bay Village City Council Presentation

Draft 2015 Survey Results

City of Bay Village

About County Planning

To inform and provide services in support of the short and long term comprehensive planning, quality of life, environment, and economic development of Cuyahoga County and its cities, villages and townships.

Local Expertise + Regional View

CPC Board Members by Region (8):

Westshore: Honorable Eileen Patton Mayor, City of Fairview Park Southwest: Honorable Cyril Kleem Mayor, City of Berea South Central: Honorable Michael P. Byrne Mayor, City of Parma Heights Cuyahoga: Honorable Michael Procuk Mayor, Village of Brooklyn Heights Cleveland:

• Mr. Freddie Collier

Representing Mayor Jackson Chagrin/SE: Honorable Brad Sellers Mayor, City of Warrensville Heights Hillcrest: Honorable Merle Gorden Mayor, City of Beachwood Heights: Honorable Susan K. Infeld Mayor, City of University Heights

Cuyahoga County Representatives (3):

• Mr. Nathan Kelly, Chair
• Ms. Sunny Simon, Vice Chair
• Ms. Shontel Brown

Board Structure & Representation

2015 Community Master Plans

Cleveland Heights, University Heights, Parma Heights, and Olmsted Falls

Beachwood Survey and Community Master Plan

Master plan covering land use, transportation, and economic development

Countywide Housing Study

Plan to determine housing needs, market demand, and best practices

Place-Based Economic Development Plan

Countywide economic development framework

Parma Town Center Task Force

Plan for building and branding the city center of Parma

GreenPrint

Tool for identifying, preserving, and expanding environmental features

Eastside Greenway TLCI

Multi-modal transportation plan for eastside communities

Draft 2015 Survey Results

City of Bay Village

February 8, 2016

Bay Village City Council Presentation

• Methodology + Process
• Results Report
• Detailed Findings

• Methodology + Process
• Results Report
• Detailed Findings

• Methodology + Process
• Results Report
• Detailed Findings

• Methodology + Process
• Results Report
• Detailed Findings

Methodology + Process

Formulated Questions Mailed Surveys Follow-Up Postcard Tabulated Results Produced Report

Bay Village Survey Total Households 6,043 Households

Bay Village Survey Total Households 6,043 Households Mailed Surveys 1,200 Surveys

Bay Village Survey Total Households 6,043 Households Mailed Surveys 1,200 Surveys Returned Surveys 576 Surveys Response Rate 48.0%

Bay Village Survey Total Households 6,043 Households Mailed Surveys 1,200 Surveys Returned Surveys 576 Surveys Response Rate 48.0% Confidence Level 95% Statistical Error Rate +/- 3.88

Results Report

• Executive Summary and Introduction
• Detailed Findings
• Demographics
• Appendix A: Numerical Results
• Appendix B: Comments
• Appendix C: Survey Instrument

• Executive Summary and Introduction
• Detailed Findings
• Demographics
• Appendix A: Numerical Results
• Appendix B: Comments
• Appendix C: Survey Instrument

• Executive Summary and Introduction
• Detailed Findings
• Demographics
• Appendix A: Numerical Results
• Appendix B: Comments
• Appendix C: Survey Instrument

• Executive Summary and Introduction
• Detailed Findings
• Demographics
• Appendix A: Numerical Results
• Appendix B: Comments
• Appendix C: Survey Instrument

• Executive Summary and Introduction
• Detailed Findings
• Demographics
• Appendix A: Numerical Results
• Appendix B: Comments
• Appendix C: Survey Instrument

Detailed Findings

• City Qualities
• Land Use
• Community Events
• Parks and

Recreation

• Transportation
• City Services
• Housing
• Important Issues
• Quality of Life

City Qualities

City Qualities

Reasons for Residing in Bay Village

56.0% 55.3% 50.3% 38.0% 29.1% 25.4% 25.4% 21.5% 15.8% 15.6% 13.3% 11.0% 9.1% 8.4% 4.9%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Close to Lake Erie Feel safe in my neighborhood Quality school system My property is a good… For the suburban environment Close to family/friends Well-maintained neighborhood Offers type of housing I want Easy access to Downtown… High quality municipal services Access to highways Easy access to city's parks Close to work Housing costs fit budget Close to shopping

56.0% 55.3% 50.3% 38.0% 29.1% 25.4% 25.4% 21.5% 15.8% 15.6% 13.3% 11.0% 9.1% 8.4% 4.9%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Close to Lake Erie Feel safe in my neighborhood Quality school system My property is a good… For the suburban environment Close to family/friends Well-maintained neighborhood Offers type of housing I want Easy access to Downtown… High quality municipal services Access to highways Easy access to city's parks Close to work Housing costs fit budget Close to shopping City Qualities

Reasons for Residing in Bay Village

56.0% 55.3% 50.3% 38.0% 29.1% 25.4% 25.4% 21.5% 15.8% 15.6% 13.3% 11.0% 9.1% 8.4% 4.9%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Close to Lake Erie Feel safe in my neighborhood Quality school system My property is a good… For the suburban environment Close to family/friends Well-maintained neighborhood Offers type of housing I want Easy access to Downtown… High quality municipal services Access to highways Easy access to city's parks Close to work Housing costs fit budget Close to shopping City Qualities

Reasons for Residing in Bay Village

56.0% 55.3% 50.3% 38.0% 29.1% 25.4% 25.4% 21.5% 15.8% 15.6% 13.3% 11.0% 9.1% 8.4% 4.9%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Close to Lake Erie Feel safe in my neighborhood Quality school system My property is a good… For the suburban environment Close to family/friends Well-maintained neighborhood Offers type of housing I want Easy access to Downtown… High quality municipal services Access to highways Easy access to city's parks Close to work Housing costs fit budget Close to shopping City Qualities

Reasons for Residing in Bay Village

City Qualities

Considerations for Moving from Bay Village

27.2% 49.9% 20.8% 15.1% 13.1% 12.6% 12.6% 11.2% 9.8% 8.3% 8.2% 8.2% 7.1% 6.7% 3.7% 3.4% 2.3% 1.8% 1.2% 0.9% 0.7% 0.2%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% I would not consider moving For lower taxes For a different climate For a smaller house For a retirement friendly community For attached condos/clustered homes For more home for my money For a newer house To be closer to family and/or friends For a larger house To be closer to work/job related For better community facilities For a more rural environment To be able to walk places To be closer to Downtown Cleveland For a higher quality of municipal services For a rental unit For better access to shopping For less traffic congestion For a better school district For a safer community To have better access to highways

City Qualities

Considerations for Moving from Bay Village

27.2% 49.9% 20.8% 15.1% 13.1% 12.6% 12.6% 11.2% 9.8% 8.3% 8.2% 8.2% 7.1% 6.7% 3.7% 3.4% 2.3% 1.8% 1.2% 0.9% 0.7% 0.2%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% I would not consider moving For lower taxes For a different climate For a smaller house For a retirement friendly community For attached condos/clustered homes For more home for my money For a newer house To be closer to family and/or friends For a larger house To be closer to work/job related For better community facilities For a more rural environment To be able to walk places To be closer to Downtown Cleveland For a higher quality of municipal services For a rental unit For better access to shopping For less traffic congestion For a better school district For a safer community To have better access to highways

City Qualities

Considerations for Moving from Bay Village

27.2% 49.9% 20.8% 15.1% 13.1% 12.6% 12.6% 11.2% 9.8% 8.3% 8.2% 8.2% 7.1% 6.7% 3.7% 3.4% 2.3% 1.8% 1.2% 0.9% 0.7% 0.2%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% I would not consider moving For lower taxes For a different climate For a smaller house For a retirement friendly community For attached condos/clustered homes For more home for my money For a newer house To be closer to family and/or friends For a larger house To be closer to work/job related For better community facilities For a more rural environment To be able to walk places To be closer to Downtown Cleveland For a higher quality of municipal services For a rental unit For better access to shopping For less traffic congestion For a better school district For a safer community To have better access to highways

City Qualities

Considerations for Moving from Bay Village

27.2% 49.9% 20.8% 15.1% 13.1% 12.6% 12.6% 11.2% 9.8% 8.3% 8.2% 8.2% 7.1% 6.7% 3.7% 3.4% 2.3% 1.8% 1.2% 0.9% 0.7% 0.2%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% I would not consider moving For lower taxes For a different climate For a smaller house For a retirement friendly community For attached condos/clustered homes For more home for my money For a newer house To be closer to family and/or friends For a larger house To be closer to work/job related For better community facilities For a more rural environment To be able to walk places To be closer to Downtown Cleveland For a higher quality of municipal services For a rental unit For better access to shopping For less traffic congestion For a better school district For a safer community To have better access to highways

City Qualities

Considerations for Moving from Bay Village

27.2% 49.9% 20.8% 15.1% 13.1% 12.6% 12.6% 11.2% 9.8% 8.3% 8.2% 8.2% 7.1% 6.7% 3.7% 3.4% 2.3% 1.8% 1.2% 0.9% 0.7% 0.2%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% I would not consider moving For lower taxes For a different climate For a smaller house For a retirement friendly community For attached condos/clustered homes For more home for my money For a newer house To be closer to family and/or friends For a larger house To be closer to work/job related For better community facilities For a more rural environment To be able to walk places To be closer to Downtown Cleveland For a higher quality of municipal services For a rental unit For better access to shopping For less traffic congestion For a better school district For a safer community To have better access to highways

City Qualities

Considerations for Moving from Bay Village

18 to 44 Year Olds

• For lower taxes (48.4%)
• For a larger house

(27.8%)

• For more home for my

money (27.8%)

• To be closer to

work/job related (18.3%)

• For a different climate

(18.3%)

45 to 64 Year Olds

• For lower taxes (54.3%)
• For a different climate

(26.7%)

• For a smaller house

(14.3%)

• For attached

condos/clustered homes (13.6%)

• For retirement friendly

community (13.6%)

65+ Years Old

• For lower taxes (40.4%)
• For a smaller house

(24.0%)

• For retirement friendly

community (19.1%)

• For attached

condos/clustered homes (16.9%)

• To be closer to

family/friends (12.6%)

City Qualities

Considerations for Moving from Bay Village

18 to 44 Year Olds

• For lower taxes (48.4%)
• For a larger house

(27.8%)

• For more home for my

money (27.8%)

• To be closer to

work/job related (18.3%)

• For a different climate

(18.3%)

45 to 64 Year Olds

• For lower taxes (54.3%)
• For a different climate

(26.7%)

• For a smaller house

(14.3%)

• For attached

condos/clustered homes (13.6%)

• For retirement friendly

community (13.6%)

65+ Years Old

• For lower taxes (40.4%)
• For a smaller house

(24.0%)

• For retirement friendly

community (19.1%)

• For attached

condos/clustered homes (16.9%)

• To be closer to

family/friends (12.6%)

City Qualities

Considerations for Moving from Bay Village

18 to 44 Year Olds

• For lower taxes (48.4%)
• For a larger house

(27.8%)

• For more home for my

money (27.8%)

• To be closer to

work/job related (18.3%)

• For a different climate

(18.3%)

45 to 64 Year Olds

• For lower taxes (54.3%)
• For a different climate

(26.7%)

• For a smaller house

(14.3%)

• For attached

condos/clustered homes (13.6%)

• For retirement friendly

community (13.6%)

65+ Years Old

• For lower taxes (40.4%)
• For a smaller house

(24.0%)

• For retirement friendly

community (19.1%)

• For attached

condos/clustered homes (16.9%)

• To be closer to

family/friends (12.6%)

Land Use

26.9% 25.3% 14.3% 9.0% 10.2% 10.1% 7.4% 49.9% 35.5% 37.2% 35.1% 33.2% 32.1% 30.6% 11.1% 17.8% 22.8% 24.0% 30.7% 19.7% 36.6% 31.5% 17.6% 29.3% 14.0% 18.8% 17.4% 23.2% 17.7% 22.7% 39.9% 48.6% 7.8% 13.6% 7.7% 27.6% 14.5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Environmentally friendly development is important New homes should match existing design Maintain and attract retail/service stores Focus on mixed-use development Allow more townhouses/condos Major streets should have decorative elements Promote economic development Allow more multi-family residential Grow its population Land Use

Agree Neither Disagree

Opinions on Land Use Statements

26.9% 25.3% 14.3% 9.0% 10.2% 10.1% 7.4% 49.9% 35.5% 37.2% 35.1% 33.2% 32.1% 30.6% 11.1% 17.8% 22.8% 24.0% 30.7% 19.7% 36.6% 31.5% 17.6% 29.3% 14.0% 18.8% 17.4% 23.2% 17.7% 22.7% 39.9% 48.6% 7.8% 13.6% 7.7% 27.6% 14.5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Environmentally friendly development is important New homes should match existing design Maintain and attract retail/service stores Focus on mixed-use development Allow more townhouses/condos Major streets should have decorative elements Promote economic development Allow more multi-family residential Grow its population Land Use

Agree Neither Disagree

Opinions on Land Use Statements

26.9% 25.3% 14.3% 9.0% 10.2% 10.1% 7.4% 49.9% 35.5% 37.2% 35.1% 33.2% 32.1% 30.6% 11.1% 17.8% 22.8% 24.0% 30.7% 19.7% 36.6% 31.5% 17.6% 29.3% 14.0% 18.8% 17.4% 23.2% 17.7% 22.7% 39.9% 48.6% 7.8% 13.6% 7.7% 27.6% 14.5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Environmentally friendly development is important New homes should match existing design Maintain and attract retail/service stores Focus on mixed-use development Allow more townhouses/condos Major streets should have decorative elements Promote economic development Allow more multi-family residential Grow its population Land Use

Agree Neither Disagree

Opinions on Land Use Statements

26.9% 25.3% 14.3% 9.0% 10.2% 10.1% 7.4% 49.9% 35.5% 37.2% 35.1% 33.2% 32.1% 30.6% 11.1% 17.8% 22.8% 24.0% 30.7% 19.7% 36.6% 31.5% 17.6% 29.3% 14.0% 18.8% 17.4% 23.2% 17.7% 22.7% 39.9% 48.6% 7.8% 13.6% 7.7% 27.6% 14.5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Environmentally friendly development is important New homes should match existing design Maintain and attract retail/service stores Focus on mixed-use development Allow more townhouses/condos Major streets should have decorative elements Promote economic development Allow more multi-family residential Grow its population Land Use

Agree Neither Disagree

Opinions on Land Use Statements

Land Use

18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old

Opinions on Land Use Statements by Age

46.7% 62.1% 69.3% 55.3% 46.6% 27.1% 26.2% 47.5% 50.6%

New homes should match the scale and design of existing homes Major streets should have decorative elements

(e.g., gateway signs, lamp posts)

The City should allow more townhouses or condos in appropriate locations

Land Use

18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old

Opinions on Land Use Statements by Age

46.7% 62.1% 69.3% 55.3% 46.6% 27.1% 26.2% 47.5% 50.6%

New homes should match the scale and design of existing homes Major streets should have decorative elements

(e.g., gateway signs, lamp posts)

The City should allow more townhouses or condos in appropriate locations

Community Events

Community Events

Good Average Poor

46.2% 34.8% 33.0% 38.7% 34.9% 30.4% 35.0% 25.6% 29.2% 27.0% 29.6% 49.4% 53.4% 49.5% 43.7% 46.6% 49.8% 45.1% 53.5% 48.8% 46.5% 42.7% 11.1% 13.8% 14.7% 15.8% 18.1% 16.4% 17.7% 18.5% 23.7% 23.3%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Lake Erie Nature & Science Center Night BAYarts Art Festival BAYarts Farm + Art Market BAYarts Moondance Bay Library Programs Annual May in Bay 5K Touch-a-Truck Summer Fun Night Bay Days Bay Village Community Christmas Cahoon in June

Opinions on Community Events

Community Events

Opinions on Community Events

Event Percent with “No Opinion” Touch-a-Truck 58.7% Annual May in Bay 5K 58.4% BAYarts Moondance 56.5% Bay Village Community Christmas 55.9% Summer Fun Night 53.4% Cahoon in June 53.3% BAYarts Farm + Art Market 32.0% Lake Erie Nature & Science Center Night 27.2% BAYarts Art Festival 25.5% Bay Library Programs 18.8% Bay Days 10.3%

Community Events

Opinions on Community Events

Event Percent with “No Opinion” Touch-a-Truck 58.7% Annual May in Bay 5K 58.4% BAYarts Moondance 56.5% Bay Village Community Christmas 55.9% Summer Fun Night 53.4% Cahoon in June 53.3% BAYarts Farm + Art Market 32.0% Lake Erie Nature & Science Center Night 27.2% BAYarts Art Festival 25.5% Bay Library Programs 18.8% Bay Days 10.3% Greater than 50% Less than 35%

Yes 43.2% No 11.8% Not Sure 45.0%

Community Events

Would you like to see additional events?

Community Events

Would you like to see additional events?

64.1% 57.6% 52.5% 36.8% 38.6% 16.7%

18 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+

Community Events

Would you like to see additional events?

64.1% 57.6% 52.5% 36.8% 38.6% 16.7%

18 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+

Greater than 50% Less than 40%

Parks and Recreation

Parks and Recreation

Opinions on Parks and Recreation Facilities

52.4% 39.6% 27.8% 21.8% 17.0% 20.3% 15.4% 13.7% 11.3% 8.2% 40.0% 47.0% 53.4% 57.5% 52.6% 48.6% 51.8% 49.3% 41.1% 37.0% 24.4% 9.4% 16.9% 19.0% 21.4% 22.6% 28.6% 34.1% 36.8% 42.0% 28.9% 6.9% 9.3% 12.5% 25.8% 15.3%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Huntington Reservation (Cleveland Metroparks) Bay Village Family Aquatic Center Cahoon Memorial Park Bradley Park Skate and Bike Park Biking and Hiking Trails Dwyer Memorial Senior Center Reese Park (Clague Road) Columbia Park Community House Community Gym/Fitness Room

Good Average Poor

Parks and Recreation

Opinions on Parks and Recreation Facilities

52.4% 39.6% 27.8% 21.8% 17.0% 20.3% 15.4% 13.7% 11.3% 8.2% 40.0% 47.0% 53.4% 57.5% 52.6% 48.6% 51.8% 49.3% 41.1% 37.0% 24.4% 9.4% 16.9% 19.0% 21.4% 22.6% 28.6% 34.1% 36.8% 42.0% 28.9% 6.9% 9.3% 12.5% 25.8% 15.3%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Huntington Reservation (Cleveland Metroparks) Bay Village Family Aquatic Center Cahoon Memorial Park Bradley Park Skate and Bike Park Biking and Hiking Trails Dwyer Memorial Senior Center Reese Park (Clague Road) Columbia Park Community House Community Gym/Fitness Room

Good Average Poor

Parks and Recreation

Opinions on Parks and Recreation Facilities

52.4% 39.6% 27.8% 21.8% 17.0% 20.3% 15.4% 13.7% 11.3% 8.2% 40.0% 47.0% 53.4% 57.5% 52.6% 48.6% 51.8% 49.3% 41.1% 37.0% 24.4% 9.4% 16.9% 19.0% 21.4% 22.6% 28.6% 34.1% 36.8% 42.0% 28.9% 6.9% 9.3% 12.5% 25.8% 15.3%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Huntington Reservation (Cleveland Metroparks) Bay Village Family Aquatic Center Cahoon Memorial Park Bradley Park Skate and Bike Park Biking and Hiking Trails Dwyer Memorial Senior Center Reese Park (Clague Road) Columbia Park Community House Community Gym/Fitness Room

Good Average Poor

Opinions on Parks and Recreation Facilities

Event Percent with “No Opinion” Dwyer Memorial Senior Center 49.4% Community Gym/Fitness Room 47.8% Skate and Bike Park 41.8% Community House 38.2% Columbia Park 30.0% Reese Park (Clague Road) 27.0% Bay Village Family Aquatic Center 25.7% Bradley Park 17.9% Biking and Hiking Trails 15.1% Cahoon Memorial Park 7.5% Huntington Reservation (Cleveland Metroparks) 2.8%

Parks and Recreation

Opinions on Parks and Recreation Facilities

Event Percent with “No Opinion” Dwyer Memorial Senior Center 49.4% Community Gym/Fitness Room 47.8% Skate and Bike Park 41.8% Community House 38.2% Columbia Park 30.0% Reese Park (Clague Road) 27.0% Bay Village Family Aquatic Center 25.7% Bradley Park 17.9% Biking and Hiking Trails 15.1% Cahoon Memorial Park 7.5% Huntington Reservation (Cleveland Metroparks) 2.8%

Parks and Recreation

Ease of Access to Lake Erie

Parks and Recreation

Excellent 41.8% Good 41.6% Average 10.5% Poor 5.4% Very Poor 0.7%

Yes 29.1% No 25.1% Not Sure 45.8%

Would you like to see a new green space constructed next to City Hall?

Parks and Recreation

Overall Quality of Parks and Recreation Facilities

Parks and Recreation

Excellent 27.3% Good 57.7% Average 14.3% Poor 0.5% Very Poor 0.2%

Transportation

Transportation

Opinions on Ease of Getting Around

72.3% 46.2% 42.3% 12.9% 26.5% 43.3% 44.5% 24.2% 16.5% 7.6% 6.7% 56.1% 32.9% 28.8% 17.1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Car Walking Bike Senior Transportation Public Transit

Agree Neither Disagree

Transportation

Opinions on Ease of Getting Around

72.3% 46.2% 42.3% 12.9% 26.5% 43.3% 44.5% 24.2% 16.5% 7.6% 6.7% 56.1% 32.9% 28.8% 17.1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Car Walking Bike Senior Transportation Public Transit

Agree Neither Disagree

Transportation

Priority for Improvements to Getting Around

High Average Low

20.7% 14.4% 13.5% 9.1% 9.1% 30.3% 26.1% 24.5% 18.2% 11.4% 23.7% 30.3% 32.5% 33.8% 26.6% 10.6% 11.6% 10.0% 17.2% 20.5% 14.7% 17.6% 19.5% 21.7% 32.5% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Bike Walking Senior Transportation Public Transit Car

Transportation

Priority for Improvements to Getting Around

High Average Low

20.7% 14.4% 13.5% 9.1% 9.1% 30.3% 26.1% 24.5% 18.2% 11.4% 23.7% 30.3% 32.5% 33.8% 26.6% 10.6% 11.6% 10.0% 17.2% 20.5% 14.7% 17.6% 19.5% 21.7% 32.5% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Bike Walking Senior Transportation Public Transit Car

Transportation

Priority for Improvements to Getting Around

High Average Low

20.7% 14.4% 13.5% 9.1% 9.1% 30.3% 26.1% 24.5% 18.2% 11.4% 23.7% 30.3% 32.5% 33.8% 26.6% 10.6% 11.6% 10.0% 17.2% 20.5% 14.7% 17.6% 19.5% 21.7% 32.5% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Bike Walking Senior Transportation Public Transit Car

Condition of the City’s Sidewalks

Transportation

Excellent 9.1% Good 45.0% Average 35.6% Poor 9.8% Very Poor 0.5%

City Services

City Services

Opinions on Quality of City Services

59.0% 53.2% 32.7% 36.9% 33.3% 35.1% 28.6% 20.8% 24.4% 16.7% 11.3% 11.9% 10.6% 12.6% 7.1% 8.3% 8.1% 37.8% 40.7% 56.6% 49.3% 49.5% 46.1% 48.1% 54.5% 47.8% 46.5% 42.7% 40.4% 40.0% 35.0% 37.9% 31.6% 24.0% 9.7% 11.5% 13.2% 14.2% 18.7% 21.7% 22.6% 25.4% 34.9% 37.9% 41.8% 33.2% 35.7% 38.6% 31.7% 9.6% 7.9% 6.3% 13.8% 14.0% 15.5% 20.1% 16.1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Fire protection/EMS Police protection Park maintenance Trash removal & curbside recycling Compost and brush recycling Leaf collection Traffic enforcement Recreational programs Snow removal Senior transportation services Street maintenance/repair Building department City of Bay Village website Tree lawn planting Property maintenance enforcement Sidewalk correction program Water back up/sewer inspection

Good Average Poor

City Services

Opinions on Quality of City Services

59.0% 53.2% 32.7% 36.9% 33.3% 35.1% 28.6% 20.8% 24.4% 16.7% 11.3% 11.9% 10.6% 12.6% 7.1% 8.3% 8.1% 37.8% 40.7% 56.6% 49.3% 49.5% 46.1% 48.1% 54.5% 47.8% 46.5% 42.7% 40.4% 40.0% 35.0% 37.9% 31.6% 24.0% 9.7% 11.5% 13.2% 14.2% 18.7% 21.7% 22.6% 25.4% 34.9% 37.9% 41.8% 33.2% 35.7% 38.6% 31.7% 9.6% 7.9% 6.3% 13.8% 14.0% 15.5% 20.1% 16.1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Fire protection/EMS Police protection Park maintenance Trash removal & curbside recycling Compost and brush recycling Leaf collection Traffic enforcement Recreational programs Snow removal Senior transportation services Street maintenance/repair Building department City of Bay Village website Tree lawn planting Property maintenance enforcement Sidewalk correction program Water back up/sewer inspection

Good Average Poor

City Services

Opinions on Quality of City Services

59.0% 53.2% 32.7% 36.9% 33.3% 35.1% 28.6% 20.8% 24.4% 16.7% 11.3% 11.9% 10.6% 12.6% 7.1% 8.3% 8.1% 37.8% 40.7% 56.6% 49.3% 49.5% 46.1% 48.1% 54.5% 47.8% 46.5% 42.7% 40.4% 40.0% 35.0% 37.9% 31.6% 24.0% 9.7% 11.5% 13.2% 14.2% 18.7% 21.7% 22.6% 25.4% 34.9% 37.9% 41.8% 33.2% 35.7% 38.6% 31.7% 9.6% 7.9% 6.3% 13.8% 14.0% 15.5% 20.1% 16.1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Fire protection/EMS Police protection Park maintenance Trash removal & curbside recycling Compost and brush recycling Leaf collection Traffic enforcement Recreational programs Snow removal Senior transportation services Street maintenance/repair Building department City of Bay Village website Tree lawn planting Property maintenance enforcement Sidewalk correction program Water back up/sewer inspection

Good Average Poor

City Services

Opinions on Quality of City Services

59.0% 53.2% 32.7% 36.9% 33.3% 35.1% 28.6% 20.8% 24.4% 16.7% 11.3% 11.9% 10.6% 12.6% 7.1% 8.3% 8.1% 37.8% 40.7% 56.6% 49.3% 49.5% 46.1% 48.1% 54.5% 47.8% 46.5% 42.7% 40.4% 40.0% 35.0% 37.9% 31.6% 24.0% 9.7% 11.5% 13.2% 14.2% 18.7% 21.7% 22.6% 25.4% 34.9% 37.9% 41.8% 33.2% 35.7% 38.6% 31.7% 9.6% 7.9% 6.3% 13.8% 14.0% 15.5% 20.1% 16.1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Fire protection/EMS Police protection Park maintenance Trash removal & curbside recycling Compost and brush recycling Leaf collection Traffic enforcement Recreational programs Snow removal Senior transportation services Street maintenance/repair Building department City of Bay Village website Tree lawn planting Property maintenance enforcement Sidewalk correction program Water back up/sewer inspection

Good Average Poor

City Services

Opinions on Quality of City Services

59.0% 53.2% 32.7% 36.9% 33.3% 35.1% 28.6% 20.8% 24.4% 16.7% 11.3% 11.9% 10.6% 12.6% 7.1% 8.3% 8.1% 37.8% 40.7% 56.6% 49.3% 49.5% 46.1% 48.1% 54.5% 47.8% 46.5% 42.7% 40.4% 40.0% 35.0% 37.9% 31.6% 24.0% 9.7% 11.5% 13.2% 14.2% 18.7% 21.7% 22.6% 25.4% 34.9% 37.9% 41.8% 33.2% 35.7% 38.6% 31.7% 9.6% 7.9% 6.3% 13.8% 14.0% 15.5% 20.1% 16.1%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Fire protection/EMS Police protection Park maintenance Trash removal & curbside recycling Compost and brush recycling Leaf collection Traffic enforcement Recreational programs Snow removal Senior transportation services Street maintenance/repair Building department City of Bay Village website Tree lawn planting Property maintenance enforcement Sidewalk correction program Water back up/sewer inspection

Good Average Poor

City Services

Opinions on Importance of City Services

Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important

92.0% 89.6% 64.8% 75.5% 60.6% 65.7% 52.3% 66.8% 47.5% 37.8% 27.4% 28.5% 35.2% 34.0% 26.5% 19.2% 11.6% 7.5% 9.4% 33.4% 22.6% 37.5% 31.3% 44.5% 29.9% 43.6% 50.1% 54.6% 51.9% 44.9% 44.4% 45.7% 33.3% 38.1% 8.4% 10.0% 15.7% 17.9% 17.5% 19.0% 19.5% 34.7% 36.0% 8.3% 12.8% 14.3%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Fire protection/EMS Police protection Trash removal & curbside recycling Snow removal Street maintenance/repair Leaf collection Park maintenance Water back up/sewer inspection Compost and brush recycling Recreational programs Building department Sidewalk correction program Property maintenance enforcement Traffic enforcement Senior transportation services Tree lawn planting City of Bay Village website

City Services

Opinions on Importance of City Services

Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important

92.0% 89.6% 64.8% 75.5% 60.6% 65.7% 52.3% 66.8% 47.5% 37.8% 27.4% 28.5% 35.2% 34.0% 26.5% 19.2% 11.6% 7.5% 9.4% 33.4% 22.6% 37.5% 31.3% 44.5% 29.9% 43.6% 50.1% 54.6% 51.9% 44.9% 44.4% 45.7% 33.3% 38.1% 8.4% 10.0% 15.7% 17.9% 17.5% 19.0% 19.5% 34.7% 36.0% 8.3% 12.8% 14.3%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Fire protection/EMS Police protection Trash removal & curbside recycling Snow removal Street maintenance/repair Leaf collection Park maintenance Water back up/sewer inspection Compost and brush recycling Recreational programs Building department Sidewalk correction program Property maintenance enforcement Traffic enforcement Senior transportation services Tree lawn planting City of Bay Village website

City Services

Opinions on Importance of City Services

Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important

92.0% 89.6% 64.8% 75.5% 60.6% 65.7% 52.3% 66.8% 47.5% 37.8% 27.4% 28.5% 35.2% 34.0% 26.5% 19.2% 11.6% 7.5% 9.4% 33.4% 22.6% 37.5% 31.3% 44.5% 29.9% 43.6% 50.1% 54.6% 51.9% 44.9% 44.4% 45.7% 33.3% 38.1% 8.4% 10.0% 15.7% 17.9% 17.5% 19.0% 19.5% 34.7% 36.0% 8.3% 12.8% 14.3%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Fire protection/EMS Police protection Trash removal & curbside recycling Snow removal Street maintenance/repair Leaf collection Park maintenance Water back up/sewer inspection Compost and brush recycling Recreational programs Building department Sidewalk correction program Property maintenance enforcement Traffic enforcement Senior transportation services Tree lawn planting City of Bay Village website

City Services

Matrix on Importance and Quality

City Services

Matrix on Importance and Quality

Increasing quality Increasing importance

City Services

Matrix on Importance and Quality

Average quality

City Services

Matrix on Importance and Quality

Average importance

City Services

Matrix on Importance and Quality

Above average quality, above average importance

City Services

Matrix on Importance and Quality

Below average quality, above average importance

City Services

Matrix on Importance and Quality

Below average quality, below average importance

City Services

Matrix on Importance and Quality

Above average quality, below average importance

Overall Quality of City Services

Excellent 33.3% Good 57.9% Average 7.9% Poor 0.7% Very Poor 0.2%

City Services

Change in Overall Quality of City Services

Greatly Improved 3.5% Somewhat Improved 33.0% Stayed the Same 51.8% Somewhat Declined 10.7% Greatly Declined 0.9%

City Services

Housing

Housing

Priority for Types of Housing

High Average Low

55.4% 19.9% 14.5% 9.1% 10.9% 8.7% 32.6% 28.2% 31.4% 24.4% 20.9% 21.1% 17.5% 8.8% 10.3% 35.7% 35.2% 40.5% 27.4% 41.7% 37.1% 24.5% 8.7% 12.3% 18.0% 20.1% 20.2% 20.3% 25.6% 7.6% 6.6% 8.0% 20.7% 11.2% 16.3% 36.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Maintain existing housing More options for seniors More single-family detached More walkable options More townhouses/condos More options for young people More infill development More apartments/mixed-use

55.4% 19.9% 14.5% 9.1% 10.9% 8.7% 32.6% 28.2% 31.4% 24.4% 20.9% 21.1% 17.5% 8.8% 10.3% 35.7% 35.2% 40.5% 27.4% 41.7% 37.1% 24.5% 8.7% 12.3% 18.0% 20.1% 20.2% 20.3% 25.6% 7.6% 6.6% 8.0% 20.7% 11.2% 16.3% 36.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Maintain existing housing More options for seniors More single-family detached More walkable options More townhouses/condos More options for young people More infill development More apartments/mixed-use Housing

Priority for Types of Housing

High Average Low

55.4% 19.9% 14.5% 9.1% 10.9% 8.7% 32.6% 28.2% 31.4% 24.4% 20.9% 21.1% 17.5% 8.8% 10.3% 35.7% 35.2% 40.5% 27.4% 41.7% 37.1% 24.5% 8.7% 12.3% 18.0% 20.1% 20.2% 20.3% 25.6% 7.6% 6.6% 8.0% 20.7% 11.2% 16.3% 36.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Maintain existing housing More options for seniors More single-family detached More walkable options More townhouses/condos More options for young people More infill development More apartments/mixed-use Housing

Priority for Types of Housing

High Average Low

55.4% 19.9% 14.5% 9.1% 10.9% 8.7% 32.6% 28.2% 31.4% 24.4% 20.9% 21.1% 17.5% 8.8% 10.3% 35.7% 35.2% 40.5% 27.4% 41.7% 37.1% 24.5% 8.7% 12.3% 18.0% 20.1% 20.2% 20.3% 25.6% 7.6% 6.6% 8.0% 20.7% 11.2% 16.3% 36.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Maintain existing housing More options for seniors More single-family detached More walkable options More townhouses/condos More options for young people More infill development More apartments/mixed-use Housing

Priority for Types of Housing

High Average Low

55.4% 19.9% 14.5% 9.1% 10.9% 8.7% 32.6% 28.2% 31.4% 24.4% 20.9% 21.1% 17.5% 8.8% 10.3% 35.7% 35.2% 40.5% 27.4% 41.7% 37.1% 24.5% 8.7% 12.3% 18.0% 20.1% 20.2% 20.3% 25.6% 7.6% 6.6% 8.0% 20.7% 11.2% 16.3% 36.0%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Maintain existing housing More options for seniors More single-family detached More walkable options More townhouses/condos More options for young people More infill development More apartments/mixed-use Housing

Priority for Types of Housing

High Average Low

18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old More housing options for seniors looking to remain in the City More well-designed single-family, detached homes

Housing

Priority for Types of Housing

19.5% 46.2% 70.6% 58.5% 45.2% 38.0%

18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old More housing options for seniors looking to remain in the City More well-designed single-family, detached homes

Housing

Priority for Types of Housing

19.5% 46.2% 70.6% 58.5% 45.2% 38.0%

18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old More housing options within walking distance to amenities More well-designed townhouses/condos

Housing

Priority for Types of Housing

25.6% 34.4% 37.4% 16.3% 35.3% 38.4% 6.5% 15.3% 17.3%

More well-designed apartments/mixed-use development

18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old More housing options within walking distance to amenities More well-designed townhouses/condos

Housing

Priority for Types of Housing

25.6% 34.4% 37.4% 16.3% 35.3% 38.4% 6.5% 15.3% 17.3%

More well-designed apartments/mixed-use development

Since residing in Bay Village, has your basement flooded?

Yes 46.1% No 41.2% No Basement 12.3% Not Sure 0.5%

Housing

If so, how many times has it flooded?

Housing

Once a month 2.8% Once every six (6) months 5.7% Once a year 9.5% Once every few years 36.0% Rarely 45.9%

Important Issues

82.0% 52.3% 50.2% 51.0% 33.0% 39.0% 30.1% 39.9% 27.6% 28.5% 18.0% 15.0% 12.7% 11.7% 14.1% 11.5% 16.4% 37.2% 38.1% 33.1% 50.4% 41.7% 47.1% 36.9% 44.2% 41.0% 36.4% 32.7% 31.5% 29.1% 26.5% 27.1% 9.4% 9.1% 13.1% 15.4% 16.2% 20.9% 16.3% 23.9% 26.0% 35.1% 31.6% 39.9% 38.4% 34.3% 30.3% 6.9% 10.5% 20.7% 15.9% 20.8% 25.0% 31.2%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Ensuring public safety Improving the sewer systems Preserving open space/green space Protecting the environment Improving roads Enhancing the sense of community Improving sidewalks Being able to safely bike to amenities Providing recreational programs Enforcing home maintenance ordinances Providing housing/services for seniors Attracting new retail/services Improving traffic flow Improving public transit Having a diverse community Attracting jobs to Bay Village Important Issues

Opinions on Importance of Issues

Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important

82.0% 52.3% 50.2% 51.0% 33.0% 39.0% 30.1% 39.9% 27.6% 28.5% 18.0% 15.0% 12.7% 11.7% 14.1% 11.5% 16.4% 37.2% 38.1% 33.1% 50.4% 41.7% 47.1% 36.9% 44.2% 41.0% 36.4% 32.7% 31.5% 29.1% 26.5% 27.1% 9.4% 9.1% 13.1% 15.4% 16.2% 20.9% 16.3% 23.9% 26.0% 35.1% 31.6% 39.9% 38.4% 34.3% 30.3% 6.9% 10.5% 20.7% 15.9% 20.8% 25.0% 31.2%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Ensuring public safety Improving the sewer systems Preserving open space/green space Protecting the environment Improving roads Enhancing the sense of community Improving sidewalks Being able to safely bike to amenities Providing recreational programs Enforcing home maintenance ordinances Providing housing/services for seniors Attracting new retail/services Improving traffic flow Improving public transit Having a diverse community Attracting jobs to Bay Village Important Issues

Opinions on Importance of Issues

Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important

82.0% 52.3% 50.2% 51.0% 33.0% 39.0% 30.1% 39.9% 27.6% 28.5% 18.0% 15.0% 12.7% 11.7% 14.1% 11.5% 16.4% 37.2% 38.1% 33.1% 50.4% 41.7% 47.1% 36.9% 44.2% 41.0% 36.4% 32.7% 31.5% 29.1% 26.5% 27.1% 9.4% 9.1% 13.1% 15.4% 16.2% 20.9% 16.3% 23.9% 26.0% 35.1% 31.6% 39.9% 38.4% 34.3% 30.3% 6.9% 10.5% 20.7% 15.9% 20.8% 25.0% 31.2%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Ensuring public safety Improving the sewer systems Preserving open space/green space Protecting the environment Improving roads Enhancing the sense of community Improving sidewalks Being able to safely bike to amenities Providing recreational programs Enforcing home maintenance ordinances Providing housing/services for seniors Attracting new retail/services Improving traffic flow Improving public transit Having a diverse community Attracting jobs to Bay Village Important Issues

Opinions on Importance of Issues

Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important

82.0% 52.3% 50.2% 51.0% 33.0% 39.0% 30.1% 39.9% 27.6% 28.5% 18.0% 15.0% 12.7% 11.7% 14.1% 11.5% 16.4% 37.2% 38.1% 33.1% 50.4% 41.7% 47.1% 36.9% 44.2% 41.0% 36.4% 32.7% 31.5% 29.1% 26.5% 27.1% 9.4% 9.1% 13.1% 15.4% 16.2% 20.9% 16.3% 23.9% 26.0% 35.1% 31.6% 39.9% 38.4% 34.3% 30.3% 6.9% 10.5% 20.7% 15.9% 20.8% 25.0% 31.2%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Ensuring public safety Improving the sewer systems Preserving open space/green space Protecting the environment Improving roads Enhancing the sense of community Improving sidewalks Being able to safely bike to amenities Providing recreational programs Enforcing home maintenance ordinances Providing housing/services for seniors Attracting new retail/services Improving traffic flow Improving public transit Having a diverse community Attracting jobs to Bay Village Important Issues

Opinions on Importance of Issues

Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important

82.0% 52.3% 50.2% 51.0% 33.0% 39.0% 30.1% 39.9% 27.6% 28.5% 18.0% 15.0% 12.7% 11.7% 14.1% 11.5% 16.4% 37.2% 38.1% 33.1% 50.4% 41.7% 47.1% 36.9% 44.2% 41.0% 36.4% 32.7% 31.5% 29.1% 26.5% 27.1% 9.4% 9.1% 13.1% 15.4% 16.2% 20.9% 16.3% 23.9% 26.0% 35.1% 31.6% 39.9% 38.4% 34.3% 30.3% 6.9% 10.5% 20.7% 15.9% 20.8% 25.0% 31.2%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Ensuring public safety Improving the sewer systems Preserving open space/green space Protecting the environment Improving roads Enhancing the sense of community Improving sidewalks Being able to safely bike to amenities Providing recreational programs Enforcing home maintenance ordinances Providing housing/services for seniors Attracting new retail/services Improving traffic flow Improving public transit Having a diverse community Attracting jobs to Bay Village Important Issues

Opinions on Importance of Issues

Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important

46.4% 15.4% 18.1% 19.7% 18.1% 7.2% 9.6% 6.2% 44.6% 52.3% 48.8% 45.7% 44.0% 45.0% 38.2% 34.5% 31.5% 30.5% 21.8% 18.2% 17.6% 15.4% 13.3% 10.1% 8.6% 29.4% 28.5% 30.8% 33.8% 39.8% 41.8% 46.5% 58.1% 48.3% 56.7% 56.1% 42.1% 65.6% 61.3% 65.9% 6.6% 8.4% 9.2% 13.2% 16.5% 15.2% 21.1% 14.2% 20.7% 19.6% 15.7%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Ensuring public safety Protecting the environment Preserving open space/green space Enhancing the sense of community Providing recreational programs Improving roads Being able to safely bike to amenities Improving sidewalks Improving traffic flow Enforcing home maintenance ordinances Providing housing/services for seniors Having a diverse community Improving the sewer systems Improving public transit Attracting new retail/services Attracting jobs to Bay Village Important Issues

Opinions on Current Effectiveness

Good Average Poor

46.4% 15.4% 18.1% 19.7% 18.1% 7.2% 9.6% 6.2% 44.6% 52.3% 48.8% 45.7% 44.0% 45.0% 38.2% 34.5% 31.5% 30.5% 21.8% 18.2% 17.6% 15.4% 13.3% 10.1% 8.6% 29.4% 28.5% 30.8% 33.8% 39.8% 41.8% 46.5% 58.1% 48.3% 56.7% 56.1% 42.1% 65.6% 61.3% 65.9% 6.6% 8.4% 9.2% 13.2% 16.5% 15.2% 21.1% 14.2% 20.7% 19.6% 15.7%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Ensuring public safety Protecting the environment Preserving open space/green space Enhancing the sense of community Providing recreational programs Improving roads Being able to safely bike to amenities Improving sidewalks Improving traffic flow Enforcing home maintenance ordinances Providing housing/services for seniors Having a diverse community Improving the sewer systems Improving public transit Attracting new retail/services Attracting jobs to Bay Village Important Issues

Opinions on Current Effectiveness

Good Average Poor

46.4% 15.4% 18.1% 19.7% 18.1% 7.2% 9.6% 6.2% 44.6% 52.3% 48.8% 45.7% 44.0% 45.0% 38.2% 34.5% 31.5% 30.5% 21.8% 18.2% 17.6% 15.4% 13.3% 10.1% 8.6% 29.4% 28.5% 30.8% 33.8% 39.8% 41.8% 46.5% 58.1% 48.3% 56.7% 56.1% 42.1% 65.6% 61.3% 65.9% 6.6% 8.4% 9.2% 13.2% 16.5% 15.2% 21.1% 14.2% 20.7% 19.6% 15.7%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Ensuring public safety Protecting the environment Preserving open space/green space Enhancing the sense of community Providing recreational programs Improving roads Being able to safely bike to amenities Improving sidewalks Improving traffic flow Enforcing home maintenance ordinances Providing housing/services for seniors Having a diverse community Improving the sewer systems Improving public transit Attracting new retail/services Attracting jobs to Bay Village Important Issues

Opinions on Current Effectiveness

Good Average Poor

46.4% 15.4% 18.1% 19.7% 18.1% 7.2% 9.6% 6.2% 44.6% 52.3% 48.8% 45.7% 44.0% 45.0% 38.2% 34.5% 31.5% 30.5% 21.8% 18.2% 17.6% 15.4% 13.3% 10.1% 8.6% 29.4% 28.5% 30.8% 33.8% 39.8% 41.8% 46.5% 58.1% 48.3% 56.7% 56.1% 42.1% 65.6% 61.3% 65.9% 6.6% 8.4% 9.2% 13.2% 16.5% 15.2% 21.1% 14.2% 20.7% 19.6% 15.7%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Ensuring public safety Protecting the environment Preserving open space/green space Enhancing the sense of community Providing recreational programs Improving roads Being able to safely bike to amenities Improving sidewalks Improving traffic flow Enforcing home maintenance ordinances Providing housing/services for seniors Having a diverse community Improving the sewer systems Improving public transit Attracting new retail/services Attracting jobs to Bay Village Important Issues

Opinions on Current Effectiveness

Good Average Poor

Important Issues

Matrix of Effectiveness and Importance

Average effectiveness

Important Issues

Matrix of Effectiveness and Importance

Increasing effectiveness Increasing importance Average importance

Important Issues

Matrix of Effectiveness and Importance

Above average effectiveness, above average importance

Important Issues

Matrix of Effectiveness and Importance

Below average effectiveness, above average importance

Important Issues

Matrix of Effectiveness and Importance

Below average effectiveness, below average importance

Important Issues

Matrix of Effectiveness and Importance

Above average effectiveness, below average importance

Quality of Life

Quality of Life

Overall Quality of Life

Excellent 50.8% Good 45.5% Average 3.5% Poor 0.2%

Comments

Quality of Life

Most Frequent Comments

• Parks and Recreation Facilities

– Variety of park changes – Concerns about Cahoon Park

• Flooding and Sewer System

– Roadway and basement flooding

• Animal Control

– Deer population – Animal control officer

Quality of Life

Most Frequent Comments

• Housing

– Fix housing that is deteriorating – Issues concerning infill housing

• Transportation

– New crosswalks – Safer paths to school – Removal of snow

Demographics

Demographics

Age of Respondents

7.1% 15.2% 21.5% 24.0% 19.6% 12.7%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 18 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+ years

2015 Survey 2014 American Community Survey

Demographics

Age of Respondents

7.1% 15.2% 21.5% 24.0% 19.6% 12.7% 10.4% 16.0% 24.7% 22.5% 15.3% 11.2%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 18 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+ years

2015 Survey 2014 American Community Survey

Demographics

Length of Residency

4.9% 9.5% 11.2% 20.9% 21.1% 32.3%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Under 2 years 2-5 years 6-10 years 11-20 years 21-30 years More than 30 years

Demographics

Planned Length of Residency

6.0% 11.6% 15.2% 16.3% 4.9% 1.8% 44.2%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Under 2 years 2-5 years 6-10 years 11-20 years 21-30 years More than 30 years I do not intend to move out of Bay Village

Demographics

Tenure of Respondents

Homeowner 97.4% Renter 2.6%

Demographics

Planned Tenure of Respondents

Owning 94.6% Renting 5.4%

Demographics

Ages of Respondent Household Members

2015 Survey 2014 American Community Survey

24.1% 8.3% 6.7% 9.6% 15.4% 15.9% 13.1% 6.9%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 0 to 17 18 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+ years

Demographics

Ages of Respondent Household Members

2015 Survey 2014 American Community Survey

24.1% 8.3% 6.7% 9.6% 15.4% 15.9% 13.1% 6.9% 24.4% 4.8% 8.6% 12.7% 16.5% 15.7% 9.7% 7.6%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 0 to 17 18 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+ years

Major Themes

• Proximity to Lake Erie, safety, and

schools are the top reasons people choose to live in Bay Village

• Regardless of age, the prime reason

residents would consider moving is for a community with lower taxes

• Young people are more likely to move

for a larger house, while seniors are more likely to move for a smaller house

• More than half of respondents want the

City to focus on environmentally friendly development, want new homes to match existing design, and want to maintain and attract retail and service stores

• More than half of respondents do not

want more multi-family residential

• Growing the City’s population is not

important to respondents

• Younger respondents and households

with younger respondents want more community events

• The City’s parks are rated very highly
• There is potential to improve the

Community House and Fitness Room

• Respondents would like to see

improvements to the City’s sidewalks and bikeways

• Improvements to street maintenance

and water back up/sewer inspection are key areas of importance

• Overall, respondents rate the City’s

services very highly

• Overwhelmingly, respondents want to

maintain existing housing and neighborhoods

• The City’s seniors would like more

housing options—and want a range of townhouses, mixed-use buildings, single-family homes, and walkable neighborhoods

• Improving the sewer system,

enforcing home maintenance

• rdinances, and improving sidewalks

are key areas for respondents

• Quality of life in Bay Village is rated

very highly across the board

• Methodology + Process
• Results Report
• Detailed Findings

Thank you!

Questions?