do not copy
play

DO NOT COPY Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

DO NOT COPY Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) Emiliano Santarnecchi - Berenson-Allen Centre for Non-invasive Brain Stimulation, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA - Dept. Neuroscience, Neurophysiology section, University of


  1. DO NOT COPY Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) Emiliano Santarnecchi - Berenson-Allen Centre for Non-invasive Brain Stimulation, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA - Dept. Neuroscience, Neurophysiology section, University of Siena, Italy - Center for Complex System study, Physics Department, University of Siena, Italy esantarn@bidmc.harvard.edu Boston, 07.01.2014

  2. Growing interest.. DO NOT COPY “tACS is a tool to modulate brain oscillations in a frequency specific manner” TMS tDCS tACS Year * PubMed Search : “Transcranial magnetic Stimulation”, “Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation”, Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation”

  3. Outline DO NOT COPY • Oscillatory pattern and synchronicity in the brain  tACS - Mechanism of action Examples of tACS Research •  Perception  Cortical excitability  Cognition  Phase-Related activity  State and Trait – dependency  Therapeutic potential • Future Directions

  4. Mechanism of action DO NOT COPY DC Stimulation AC Stimulation Constant Oscillating Fields Fields Synchrony Effect E Membrane Network Polarization Synchrony Spike Rate Spike Phase Amplify Change Change I nput

  5. Oscillatory pattern and periodicity in behaviour DO NOT COPY • What are oscillatory patterns and how they affect our behaviour? Cyclic patterns in behaviour How do we measure rhytmicity? Sleep–wake cycles are evident even if external light conditions are held constant (grey shade) Phase,angles, degrees….. Intrinsic oscillators (circadian clocks) which cause Oscillators are in opposite periodicity in bodily function phase (anti-phase) Frequency? Number of cycles x second (1 cycle * second=1Hz) 2Hz 10Hz

  6. Oscillatory pattern and periodicity in behaviour DO NOT COPY Tuth et al. 2012, Current Biology • Are these oscillatory patterns immutable? Entrainment of endogeneous oscillatory pattern  Changes in behaviour • Oscillatory cycle establishes a recurrent temporal reference frame that allows for the coding of temporal relations between groups of neural elements • This reference frame is not fixed but is subject to dynamic changes (phase resetting). tACS induces entrainment of brain oscillations following the same principle (theta, alpha, beta, gamma, ..)

  7. Oscillatory pattern in the brain DO NOT COPY • Why are oscillatory pattern so important ? 2 . Hierarchical information processing 1. Pulse processing Cyclic Excitability Changes Rhythmic fluctuations in the local field potential (LFP), synchronous transmembrane currents in populations of neurons and thus represent cyclic Multiplexing changes in the excitability of local neuronal • Various aspects of the stimulus are populations . encoded in different oscillations simultaneously , but at different frequencies. Ongoing oscillatory phase significantly modulates the • Efficient coding scheme relying on probability of perceiving a near-threshold visual the hierarchical organization of stimulus. oscillations.

  8. Oscillatory pattern in the brain DO NOT COPY S. Sternberg , High speed scanning in human memory, Science 153 1966. 652–654. Theta-alpha oscillations Gamma-oscillations • theta (6hz) = 6 cycles * second = 1 cycle  0.16 seconds • gamma (40HZ) = 40 cycles * second = 1 cycle  0.025 seconds • gamma cycles in each theta cycle = 0,16/0.025 = 6.7 (~7).

  9. Oscillatory pattern and periodicity in behaviour DO NOT COPY • Why are oscillatory patterns so important? 3. “Communication-through-coherence Theory” • Communication being facilitated when two oscillatory populations are aligned to their high excitability phases. • Effective communication relies on spikes from the sending population reaching the receiving population at a phase of high excitability. • Changes in synchronisation between distant brain areas (possibly reflecting communication) are systematically related to task performance tACS theoretically allows to modulate all these complex brain dynamics. Canolty et al., 2007

  10. Mechanism of action DO NOT COPY

  11. Mechanism of action DO NOT COPY Ozen et al., 2010 • tACS induce AC Fields in the Brain Rat (in-vivo) 0.8-1.7Hz • Effect of Stimulation Amplitude • AC fields can phase-locked spiking activity Homogenous Phase Larger Amplitude More Neurons

  12. Mechanism of action DO NOT COPY Ozen et al., 2010 • Endogenous Resonance Principle tACS induced Synaptic mediated Oscillations Oscillations Coherent I ncoherent cooperate or compete Exploring S =sleep Sleep R =rest tACS ~ 1.5Hz E =exploration Phase-locked (25-50% ) No Phase-locked

  13. DO NOT COPY tACS and Perception

  14. tACS and Phosphene DO NOT COPY Kanai et al., 2008 Rationale alpha beta gamma Eye Open/Closed Alpha (Adrian, 1934) What is frequency sensitivity of tACS evoked Visual Sensation? tACS Frequency Phosphene Threshold Design Electrodes Inion (+ 4cm) - Vertex Current 0-40Hz, 0-1mA, 5s each Subjects 8 Healthy

  15. tACS and Phosphene DO NOT COPY Kanai et al., 2008 Results • Occipital tACS can evoke phosphene perception • Efficiency of stimulation is maximal at alpha band (dark) and beta band (light)

  16. Tactile Percept DO NOT COPY Feurra rra et al., 2011 Question • Can tACS induce (cortically) tactile percept and if yes what is the frequency sensitivity? tACS Frequency Strength Tactile Percept Design Electrodes ~C4 (TMS hot-spot) – P3 Current 2-70Hz, 1.5mA, 5s each Subjects 14 Healthy

  17. Tactile Percept DO NOT COPY Feurra rra et al., 2011 Results Tactile Rating (0-1) • Parietal tACS can induce cortically tactile sensation • Efficiency of stimulation depends on frequency with peak at Alpha & high Gamma

  18. DO NOT COPY tACS and Corticospinal Excitability

  19. tACS and Corticospinal Excitability Mot ot or or Mod odalit y Feurra et al., 2011b DO NOT COPY Question • Are beta oscillations in motor cortex functional or epiphenomenon? Amplitude of TMS induced MEP* tACS over M1 Design 10xTMS 10xTMS 10xTMS 10xTMS 10xTMS 10xTMS 10xTMS tACS Electrodes C4 (TMS hot-spot) + P4 (control) – Pz Current 5, 10, 20, 40Hz, 0.5mA* , 90s Subjects 15 Healthy * Kept below phosphene or skin sensation threshold. * MEP- Motor Evoked Potential ,indicating the strength of the corticospinal response

  20. tACS and Corticospinal Excitability DO NOT COPY Feurra et al., 2011b Results MEP Amplitude (µV) • Parietal tACS @ 20HZ specifically increases MEP amplitude

  21. DO NOT COPY tACS and Motor performance Institute of Biomedical Engineering Division of neuroscience

  22. tACS and Motor performance Pogosyan et al., 2009 DO NOT COPY Question • Are beta oscillations in motor cortex functional or epiphenomenon? Visiomotor Task + 20Hz tACS/Sham Reaction time + EEG-EMG Design Electrodes C4 (TMS hot-spot) – P3 Current 20Hz, 0.6mA* , -2s to +8s Subjects 14 Healthy * Kept below phosphene or skin sensation threshold.

  23. tACS and Motor performance Pogosyan et al., 2009 DO NOT COPY Results EEG-EMG Coherence I nitial Velocity sham= active active sham • Parietal 20Hz tACS slowed (small effect) initial velocity. • Parietal 20Hz tACS increased somatosensory- arm 20Hz coherence.

  24. DO NOT COPY tACS and Cognition Institute of Biomedical Engineering Division of neuroscience

  25. Memory Consolidation DO NOT COPY Rationale Sleep Architecture * (neocortex) (Pons-LGN) (hyppocampus) (hyppocampus) (thalamus) 0.8Hz 8-14Hz 100-300Hz 4-8Hz Non- Declarative memory Declarative memory for further reading see Diekelmann, 2010 * PGO: ponto-geniculooccipital

  26. Memory Consolidation all et al., 2006 Mars arshall DO NOT COPY Finger Sequence Paired Associated Design Tapping Task Learning Task Non-declarative Declarative memory memory 5-element sequences 46 word pairs (e.g. 4-2-3-1-4) in 30s Recall learning 9p 10:30p 11p 6:30a 7a 8:30a c W, wake; 1–4, sleep stages 1–4 Electrodes F3-Mastoid , F4-Mastoid (diam=1cm) Current 0.75Hz, ~0.33A , 5min/1min ON/OFF mastoid Subjects 13 Healthy

  27. Memory Consolidation all et al., 2006 Mars arshall DO NOT COPY Results # Correct Words # Correct Taps (Recall – Training) (Recall – Training) • Bilateral 0.75Hz frontal- tACS during early sleep selectively enhances hippocampus-dependent retention of declarative memory * * P < 0.01

  28. Memory Consolidation all et al., 2006 Mars arshall DO NOT COPY Results EEG Activity SWS * spindle * Hz tACS entrained SWS and spindle power spectra in the prefrontal region • * Bands for slow oscillations (0.5–1 Hz) ; Bands for spindle oscillations (8-12 Hz)

  29. Risk Taking Sela et al., 2012 DO NOT COPY Rationale • Theta PFC Right>Left Risk Taking (Gianotti, 2009) But… bilateral DLPFC tDCS (regardless of polarity) facilitate risk- • adverse in Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART) ( Fecteau, 2007) PFC: prefrontal cortex

  30. Risk Taking Risk T Taking Sela et al., 2012 DO NOT COPY Question Does theta oscillation in PFC affect risky decision making? pumps in Balloon Analog Risk Task theta tACS PFC Left/Right/Sham Design Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART) Electrodes F3-CP5, F4-CP6 Temporal Current 6.5Hz, 0.5mA , -5min +10mins Subjects 27 Healthy

  31. Risk Taking Sela et al., 2012 DO NOT COPY Results # Pumps in BART higher risk Left PFC Sham Right PFC • Theta tACS over left and not right PFC increases risk taking behavior Error bars indicate SEM. * p < 0.05.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend