DO NOT COPY Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

do not copy
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

DO NOT COPY Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

DO NOT COPY Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) Emiliano Santarnecchi - Berenson-Allen Centre for Non-invasive Brain Stimulation, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA - Dept. Neuroscience, Neurophysiology section, University of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) Emiliano Santarnecchi

  • Berenson-Allen Centre for Non-invasive Brain Stimulation, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
  • Dept. Neuroscience, Neurophysiology section, University of Siena, Italy
  • Center for Complex System study, Physics Department, University of Siena, Italy

esantarn@bidmc.harvard.edu Boston, 07.01.2014

DO NOT COPY

slide-2
SLIDE 2

TMS tDCS tACS

* PubMed Search : “Transcranial magnetic Stimulation”, “Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation”, Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation”

Year

Growing interest.. “tACS is a tool to modulate brain oscillations in a frequency specific manner”

DO NOT COPY

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Oscillatory pattern and synchronicity in the brain

 tACS - Mechanism of action

  • Examples of tACS Research

 Perception  Cortical excitability  Cognition  Phase-Related activity  State and Trait – dependency  Therapeutic potential

  • Future Directions

Outline

DO NOT COPY

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Constant Fields Membrane Polarization Spike Rate Change

DC Stimulation AC Stimulation

Oscillating Fields Network Synchrony Spike Phase Change Synchrony Effect

Amplify I nput

E

Mechanism of action

DO NOT COPY

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Sleep–wake cycles are evident even if external light conditions are held constant (grey shade) Cyclic patterns in behaviour Intrinsic oscillators (circadian clocks) which cause periodicity in bodily function How do we measure rhytmicity?

  • What are oscillatory patterns and how they affect our behaviour?

Oscillatory pattern and periodicity in behaviour

Phase,angles, degrees….. Oscillators are in opposite phase (anti-phase) Frequency? Number of cycles x second (1 cycle * second=1Hz) 10Hz 2Hz

DO NOT COPY

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Tuth et al. 2012, Current Biology

  • Are these oscillatory patterns immutable?
  • Oscillatory cycle establishes a recurrent temporal reference frame that allows for the

coding of temporal relations between groups of neural elements

  • This reference frame is not fixed but is subject to dynamic changes (phase resetting).

Oscillatory pattern and periodicity in behaviour

Entrainment of endogeneous oscillatory pattern  Changes in behaviour

tACS induces entrainment of brain oscillations following the same principle (theta, alpha, beta, gamma, ..)

DO NOT COPY

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Why are oscillatory pattern so important ?

Cyclic Excitability Changes

Rhythmic fluctuations in the local field potential (LFP), synchronous transmembrane currents in populations of neurons and thus represent cyclic changes in the excitability of local neuronal populations.

Ongoing oscillatory phase significantly modulates the probability of perceiving a near-threshold visual stimulus.

  • 1. Pulse processing

2 . Hierarchical information processing Multiplexing

  • Various aspects of the stimulus are

encoded in different oscillations simultaneously, but at different frequencies.

  • Efficient coding scheme relying on

the hierarchical organization of

  • scillations.

Oscillatory pattern in the brain

DO NOT COPY

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Gamma-oscillations Theta-alpha oscillations

  • S. Sternberg, High speed scanning in human

memory, Science 153 1966. 652–654.

  • theta (6hz) = 6 cycles * second = 1 cycle  0.16 seconds
  • gamma (40HZ) = 40 cycles * second = 1 cycle  0.025 seconds
  • gamma cycles in each theta cycle = 0,16/0.025 = 6.7 (~7).

Oscillatory pattern in the brain

DO NOT COPY

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Why are oscillatory patterns so important?
  • 3. “Communication-through-coherence Theory”
  • Communication being facilitated when two
  • scillatory populations are aligned to their high

excitability phases.

  • Effective communication relies on spikes from the

sending population reaching the receiving population at a phase of high excitability.

  • Changes in synchronisation between distant brain

areas (possibly reflecting communication) are systematically related to task performance

tACS theoretically allows to modulate all these complex brain dynamics.

Oscillatory pattern and periodicity in behaviour

Canolty et al., 2007

DO NOT COPY

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Mechanism of action

DO NOT COPY

slide-11
SLIDE 11

0.8-1.7Hz

  • tACS induce AC Fields in the Brain
  • AC fields can phase-locked spiking activity

Ozen et al., 2010

Rat (in-vivo)

Mechanism of action

  • Effect of Stimulation Amplitude

Larger Amplitude Homogenous Phase More Neurons

DO NOT COPY

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Endogenous Resonance Principle

tACS induced Oscillations Synaptic mediated Oscillations

cooperate or compete

Coherent I ncoherent

tACS ~ 1.5Hz

Phase-locked (25-50% ) No Phase-locked

Exploring Sleep

Mechanism of action

Ozen et al., 2010

S=sleep R=rest E=exploration

DO NOT COPY

slide-13
SLIDE 13

tACS and Perception

DO NOT COPY

slide-14
SLIDE 14

What is frequency sensitivity of tACS evoked Visual Sensation?

Rationale Design

tACS Frequency Phosphene Threshold

Electrodes Inion (+ 4cm) - Vertex Current 0-40Hz, 0-1mA, 5s each Subjects 8 Healthy

Kanai et al., 2008

tACS and Phosphene

Eye Open/Closed Alpha (Adrian, 1934)

alpha beta gamma

DO NOT COPY

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • Occipital tACS can evoke phosphene perception
  • Efficiency of stimulation is maximal at alpha band (dark) and beta band (light)

Kanai et al., 2008

Results

tACS and Phosphene

DO NOT COPY

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Can tACS induce (cortically) tactile percept and if yes what is the

frequency sensitivity?

Question Design

tACS Frequency Strength Tactile Percept

Electrodes ~C4 (TMS hot-spot) – P3 Current 2-70Hz, 1.5mA, 5s each Subjects 14 Healthy

Feurra rra et al., 2011

Tactile Percept

DO NOT COPY

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Results

  • Parietal tACS can induce cortically tactile sensation
  • Efficiency of stimulation depends on frequency with peak at Alpha & high

Gamma Tactile Rating (0-1)

Tactile Percept

Feurra rra et al., 2011

DO NOT COPY

slide-18
SLIDE 18

tACS and Corticospinal Excitability

DO NOT COPY

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Are beta oscillations in motor cortex functional or epiphenomenon?

Question

tACS over M1 Amplitude of TMS induced MEP*

* MEP- Motor Evoked Potential ,indicating the strength of the corticospinal response

Design

Electrodes C4 (TMS hot-spot) + P4 (control) – Pz Current 5, 10, 20, 40Hz, 0.5mA* , 90s Subjects 15 Healthy

* Kept below phosphene or skin sensation threshold.

tACS

10xTMS 10xTMS 10xTMS 10xTMS 10xTMS 10xTMS 10xTMS

Mot

  • t or
  • r Mod
  • dalit y

tACS and Corticospinal Excitability

Feurra et al., 2011b

DO NOT COPY

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • Parietal tACS @ 20HZ specifically increases MEP amplitude

Results

Feurra et al., 2011b

MEP Amplitude (µV)

tACS and Corticospinal Excitability

DO NOT COPY

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Institute of Biomedical Engineering Division of neuroscience

tACS and Motor performance

DO NOT COPY

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • Are beta oscillations in motor cortex functional or epiphenomenon?

Question

Visiomotor Task + 20Hz tACS/Sham Reaction time + EEG-EMG

Electrodes C4 (TMS hot-spot) – P3 Current 20Hz, 0.6mA* , -2s to +8s Subjects 14 Healthy

* Kept below phosphene or skin sensation threshold.

Design

tACS and Motor performance

Pogosyan et al., 2009

DO NOT COPY

slide-23
SLIDE 23

active sham

EEG-EMG Coherence

Results

Pogosyan et al., 2009 I nitial Velocity

sham= active

  • Parietal 20Hz tACS slowed (small effect) initial

velocity.

  • Parietal 20Hz tACS increased somatosensory-

arm 20Hz coherence.

tACS and Motor performance

DO NOT COPY

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Institute of Biomedical Engineering Division of neuroscience

tACS and Cognition

DO NOT COPY

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Sleep Architecture

for further reading see Diekelmann, 2010 * PGO: ponto-geniculooccipital

Rationale

0.8Hz 8-14Hz (neocortex) (thalamus) (hyppocampus) 100-300Hz

*

4-8Hz (Pons-LGN) (hyppocampus)

Memory Consolidation

Declarative memory Non- Declarative memory

DO NOT COPY

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Paired Associated Learning Task Finger Sequence Tapping Task

9p

learning Recall

10:30p 7a 8:30a 11p 6:30a

c W, wake; 1–4, sleep stages 1–4 Electrodes F3-Mastoid , F4-Mastoid (diam=1cm) Current 0.75Hz, ~0.33A , 5min/1min ON/OFF Subjects 13 Healthy

mastoid

Design

46 word pairs 5-element sequences (e.g. 4-2-3-1-4) in 30s

Mars arshall all et al., 2006

Declarative memory Non-declarative memory

Memory Consolidation

DO NOT COPY

slide-27
SLIDE 27

# Correct Words

(Recall – Training)

# Correct Taps

(Recall – Training)

  • Bilateral 0.75Hz frontal- tACS during early sleep selectively enhances

hippocampus-dependent retention of declarative memory

* * P < 0.01

Results

Mars arshall all et al., 2006

Memory Consolidation

DO NOT COPY

slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • tACS entrained SWS and spindle power spectra in the prefrontal region

EEG Activity

Hz

* Bands for slow oscillations (0.5–1 Hz) ; Bands for spindle oscillations (8-12 Hz)

* *

SWS spindle

Memory Consolidation Results

Mars arshall all et al., 2006

DO NOT COPY

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Rationale

(Gianotti, 2009)

  • Theta PFC Right>Left

Risk Taking

  • But…bilateral DLPFC tDCS (regardless of polarity) facilitate risk-

adverse in Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART) ( Fecteau, 2007)

PFC: prefrontal cortex

Sela et al., 2012

Risk Taking

DO NOT COPY

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Does theta oscillation in PFC affect risky decision making?

Question

theta tACS PFC Left/Right/Sham pumps in Balloon Analog Risk Task

Electrodes F3-CP5, F4-CP6 Current 6.5Hz, 0.5mA , -5min +10mins Subjects 27 Healthy

Design

Sela et al., 2012

Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART)

Temporal

Risk T Taking

Risk Taking

DO NOT COPY

slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • Theta tACS over left and not right PFC increases risk taking

behavior

Error bars indicate SEM. * p < 0.05.

# Pumps in BART

Left PFC Sham Right PFC

higher risk

Sela et al., 2012

Risk Taking

Results

DO NOT COPY

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Fluid Intelligence

N=24; tACS 1.250mA

  • Does tACS enhance Intelligence-related processing in a frequency and trial specific

manner? Prefrontal gamma?

Logical and Relational Reasoning Stimuli

Santarnecchi et al., Curr. Bio 2013

Question Design

Stimulation sites

DO NOT COPY

slide-33
SLIDE 33
  • Decrease of Correct trials Response Time during gamma-tACS
  • Selective effect for Logic trials.
  • First evidence of a “causal” Role of gamma-oscillations in

higher-order cognition.

Results

Santarnecchi et al., Curr. Bio 2013

Fluid Intelligence

No modulation of speed-accuracy tradeoff

DO NOT COPY

slide-34
SLIDE 34

tACS and Phase-locked activity

DO NOT COPY

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Sternberg Working memory task

Fronto-parietal Phase-lag Band-pass 6 +/- 1 Hz

Polania et al., Curr. Bio 2012

tACS and Phase Coupling: Working Memory

  • Can we modulate synchronization during

working memory processing? Does it matters?

Question

DO NOT COPY

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Online tACS protocol WM performance Polania et al., Curr. Bio 2012

Design and Results

tACS and Phase Coupling: Working Memory

DO NOT COPY

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Struber et al., 2013

Rationale and Design tACS and Phase Coupling: perception of ambigous stimuli

DO NOT COPY

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Effect of tACS on motion dominance

Changes in interhemispheric coherence after tACS + Task Struber et al., 2013

Results

tACS and Phase Coupling: perception of ambigous stimuli

DO NOT COPY

slide-39
SLIDE 39

State Dependency of tACS

DO NOT COPY

slide-40
SLIDE 40

State Dependency: Motor Imagery

Feurra et al., JoN 2013

N=18, tACS= 1mA (peak-to-peak).

  • Does the effects of tACS depend on brain state?

Question

DO NOT COPY

slide-41
SLIDE 41

State Dependency

Consistent increase of MEP size during MI versus the quiescence state, regardless of the type

  • f tACS applied.

Dissociation between conditions of-tACS (5 Hz) and- tACS (20 Hz), after removing the average facilitatory main effect of MI.

Feurra et al., JoN 2013 Results

DO NOT COPY

slide-42
SLIDE 42

State Dependency

Neuling et al., 2013

  • Does the after-effects of tACS depend on the endogenous power of oscillations?
  • Exp. 1: 19 sbjs, 20’ tACS at Individual Alpha frequency*, Eyes Open
  • Exp. 2: 29 sbjs 20’ tACS at Individual Alpha frequency*, Eyes Closed

*power peak in the alpha range (8–12Hz)

DO NOT COPY

slide-43
SLIDE 43

State Dependency

tACS effect depend on brain states before the stimulation… Neuling et al., 2013 Results

DO NOT COPY

slide-44
SLIDE 44

State Dependency

…tACS effect depend on the level of intrinsic organization of brain signal and their “pliability”.

DO NOT COPY

slide-45
SLIDE 45

State Dependency

Oddball task Helfrich et al., Curr. Bio. 2014 Stimuli presented at different phase-angles

  • Phase-angle dependency of tACS effect?

14 sbjs, parieto-occipital tACS @ 10Hz

Question Design

DO NOT COPY

slide-46
SLIDE 46

State Dependency

Increase in alpha power after tACS Coherence and Target detection accuracy relative to the different phase angles Peak Peak Helfrich et al., Curr. Bio. 2014 Results

DO NOT COPY

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Institute of Biomedical Engineering Division of neuroscience

Trait-dependency of tACS..?

DO NOT COPY

slide-48
SLIDE 48

N=58 tACS=1.0 mA, tRNS=1.0 mA

Fluid Intelligence

Santarnecchi et al., submitted

Compared tACS and tRNS effect in both fluid intelligence and Working memory tasks. Confirmed previous finding

DO NOT COPY

slide-49
SLIDE 49

tACS=1.0 mA, tRNS=1.0 mA

Fluid Intelligence

  • Effect of tACS reflect individual differences which are to be considered as a stable

“Phenotype”

  • Important for the ethical evaluation of cognitive enhancement intervention.

DO NOT COPY

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Therapeutic Potential of tACS

DO NOT COPY

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Kast st en, 1998

Visual Restitution Training (VRT) Treating Optic Neuropathy?

  • Software designed for patients with visual field defects caused by optic

nerve diseases and post-chiasmal brain lesions.

  • Binocular visual stimulation within a transition zone between the intact

visual field area and the absolute field defect.

DO NOT COPY

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Electrodes Transobital (above-below eye) Current Individual alpha- flicker freq, phosphene threshold (<1mA) , 15min x 10 days Subjects 24 patients with visual field loss caused by damage to the optic nerve

  • Can tACS restore lost vision in optic neuropathy?

tACS/Sham Detection accuracy (DA) in high- resolution perimetry (HRP) + EEG

Design

Treating Optic Neuropathy?

Sabel et al., 2011 (RCT)

Question

DO NOT COPY

slide-53
SLIDE 53

HRP Visual Field

Mean DA Change

2 month

  • 1. Intact
  • 2. Relative
  • 1. Intact
  • 2. Relative defect
  • 3. Absolute defect

3 2 1

Results

3 2 1

  • 3. Absolute

Blue= increase , Red= decrease DA

Sabel et al., 2011 (RCT)

Pre Post Restored pixels

Treating Optic Neuropathy?

Improved:

  • temporal processing of visual stimuli
  • detection performance in static perimetry
  • visual acuity

DO NOT COPY

slide-54
SLIDE 54

EEG Spectrum

(Occipital)

Alpha Power Spectra

(Occipital)

I ncreased Alpha Pre Post Sham Active

Pre Post

I ncreased Alpha

  • tACS restored some lost vision in patients with optic neuropathy.
  • The effect was accompanied by an increase in occipital alpha

spectrum.

Treating Optic Neuropathy?

Results

Sabel et al., 2011 (RCT)

DO NOT COPY

slide-55
SLIDE 55
  • Can tACS reduce tremor in PD patients?

Rationale

Closed-loop tACS – tremor

phase (accelerometer) Tremor amplitude (accelerometer)

Tre rem or r suppre ressio ion?

Brittain et al., Curr. Bio 2013

accelerometer

Tremor

Tremor Suppression?

Design

DO NOT COPY

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Brittain et al., Curr. Bio 2013 Tremor Suppression?

Identification of the optimal Phase-Delay for tremor suppression Tremor Excitation Tremor Suppression Polar Map Phased-locked tACS reduced tremor by up to 50%

DO NOT COPY

slide-57
SLIDE 57
  • Patients with tinnitus-related annoyance have lower alpha activity at

the right PFC (Vanneste, 2010)

Rational

Red: high distress > low distress Blue: high distress < low distress

Right PFC

  • tDCS (left temporal or bifrontal) reduce tinnitus intensity (e.g. Song

2012)

Mean Alpha Spectrum

Measured with EEG and Low Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography (LORETA)

Treating Tinnitus?

DO NOT COPY

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Results

  • left-right DLPFC tACS at alpha band was not effective as tDCS in

reducing tinnitus intensity (and annoyance). Tinnitus I ntensity Rating tACS tDCS

Real Sham Real Sham

Pre Post

Vanneste et al., 2013 (RCT) Treating Tinnitus?

DO NOT COPY

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Principles of tACS

  • Oscillations
  • Endogenous Resonance

tACS probe oscillatory neural activities

  • Perception (vision, tactile)
  • Cortical Excitability (somatomotor, vision)
  • Cognition (Intelligence, memory & risk-taking)

Potential therapeutic tool

  • Visual restoration, dystonia

Future Directions?

E

Summary

DO NOT COPY

slide-60
SLIDE 60

fMRI-based Multifocal tACS

Ruffini et al. 2013 fMRI activation map tCS solution with 2 electrodes Multifocal tCS solution with 8 electrodes

DO NOT COPY

slide-61
SLIDE 61

fMRI-based Multifocal tACS

Meta-analysis map of fMRI activation map during Executive functions tasks Targets for Fronto-parietal desynchronization

DO NOT COPY

slide-62
SLIDE 62

esantarn@bidmc.harvard.edu

Grazie dell’attenzione!

DO NOT COPY