SLIDE 6 9/26/2011 6
From Carew (2000) Ch. 4
32
Tectal Stimulation
Electrical stimulation results: In optic tectum:
- frog orients to different
parts of visual space. (Compare with map). Stimulation in thalamus (pre- tectal area) evokes avoidance response
33
Lessons from Toad Vision
1. Toads discriminate complex visual stimuli based on size, direction of motion, shape in a large variety of visual contexts (background, color, contrasts, outline) 2. Robust adaptive behavior in laboratory: following and snapping in response to “worm”, no response or avoidance of “antiworm”. 3. No prey detectors or predator detectors in retina, instead circular center surround RFs. 4. RGC project to optic tectum (midbrain) and pretectum (thalamus). 5. OT: respond to small square, worm, but not large square, not antiworm. 6. PT: respond to large square, antiworm, not worm, not small square. 7. OT organizes strike behavior, PT organizes avoidance. 8. Does toad with PT lesion remain immobile when given a large stimulus? No, PT lesioned toads strike at any object. 9. Neurons in OT now respond to all types of stimuli, even large. 10. PT respond to large objects, initiate avoidance, and inhibit OT. 11. OT neurons respond to any object, increasing with increasing size, in addition, OT neurons stimulate approach (and snapping). 12. The net behavior is the combination of excitation and inhibition.
34
References
Ewert, J. P. (1974) The neural basis of visual guided behavior. Sci. American 230(3):34-42. Ewert, J. P. (1980) Neuroethology: An Introduction to Neurophysiological Basis of Behavior. Springer. Washington, D. C. Ewert, J.P. (1999) Neural correlates of key stimulus and releasing mechanisms: A case study and two concepts. Trends in
- Neuroscience. 20(8):332-39.
Carew, T. (2000) Behavioral Neurobiology. Sinauer Associates. Sunderland, MA.
- D. L. Wang and M. A. Arbib (1991) How does the toad's visual
system discriminate different worm-like stimuli? Biological Cybernetics, 1990, 64(3): 251-261.
35