DJ Basin Crude Oil Flammability Analysis Background Alignment of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

dj basin crude oil flammability analysis background
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

DJ Basin Crude Oil Flammability Analysis Background Alignment of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

DJ Basin Crude Oil Flammability Analysis Background Alignment of the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (HCS) with the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS). Required evaluation of chemical


slide-1
SLIDE 1

DJ Basin Crude Oil Flammability Analysis

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background

  • Alignment of the OSHA Hazard

Communication Standard (HCS) with the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS).

  • Required evaluation of chemical hazards
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Background

  • North Dakota Industrial Commission crude
  • il stabilization requirements
  • Prior to shipment by rail, crude oil must be

stabilized (volatile components removed) to a Total Vapor Pressure less than 13.7 psia

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Background

  • EPA/CDPHE Fugitive Emission Regulations
  • Elimination of fugitive emissions from tanks

caused an increase in flammable/toxic vapors present in tanks – resulting in worker exposure and increased vapor fires (OSHA Hazard Alert)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Crude Flammability Study

  • 3 producers
  • BBC
  • Great Western Oil & Gas
  • PDC Energy
  • 16 crude oil samples from 12 production

facilities

  • 4 corresponding tank headspace and crude
  • il true vapor pressure (TVP) sample

locations

  • Study area 78 miles x 84 miles
  • 1S to 12N and 61W to 68W
  • Mid-2011 to mid-2014 first production
  • Niobrara and Codell horizontals

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Approximate Sample Locations

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Crude Flammability Study

  • Boiling point by ASTM D2887
  • Flammability (flash point) by ASTM D93
  • Headspace volatile organic compounds

(VOCs) by EPA TO-15

  • TVP by ASTM D6377

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

FP and BP Sample Results

  • 15 samples had flash point below 50 deg F
  • 1 sample had flash point below 70 deg F
  • Wide variability in boiling points – 20% BP

151-295ºF

  • No correlations based on geography,

formation, or age of well

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

TVP Sample Results

  • All four samples had TVP below 13.7 psia

threshold recently established by NDIC for Bakken crude

  • Samples ranged from 6.04 to 11.05 psia
  • No correlation to 20% BP, however a

correlation between age of well and TVP was

  • bserved
  • Older wells had lower true vapor pressures

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

VOC Sample Results

  • VOC concentrations in tanks exceeded

OSHA PELs but did not exceed IDLH concentrations

  • Wide variability head space vapor

composition

  • No apparent correlations to boiling point, age
  • f well, or geographic location

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Crude Classification

  • Results indicate crude is:
  • Class IB flammable liquid (NFPA 30)*
  • Class 3 flammable liquid (DOT - 49 CFR 173.120)
  • Flammable liquid (OSHA - 29 CFR 1910.106(a)(19))
  • Crude oil tanks should be labeled with NFPA

704 label (aka NFPA diamond) flammability rating of “3”

  • Crude oil meets requirements of NDIC Order
  • No. 25417 - oil conditioning order

* Per Section 4.2.1.2 of NFPA 30 the 20% boiling point of the

distillation analysis is used for characterization

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Data Analysis

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Data Analysis

  • Bill Barrett Corporation, Great Western Oil

and Gas and PDC each contributed samples to the study

  • Identifying data masked to provide

confidentiality

  • Well name not provided
  • Location limited to Township and Range
  • Spud date limited to quarter and year

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Results Summary – Boiling Point

14

Sample ID Flash Point Initial Boiling Point 5% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 95% Full Boiling Point

1 <50 56.5 110.9 183.4 267.0 337.0 427.3 512.7 591.9 671.4 766.1 858.1 903.5 962.9 2 <50 52.2 85.2 152.2 233.1 307.5 389.1 477.5 560.5 645.2 740.1 840.4 892.8 961.8 3 <50 62.5 186.1 235.8 295.5 368.7 441.3 512.2 587.8 666.9 758.5 861.7 914.4 984.2 4 <70 62.4 177.8 205.1 282.4 347.7 426.7 499.6 572.9 659.9 749.0 852.6 910.2 982.7 5 <50 51.8 61.9 84.6 165.9 204.6 266.5 315.6 388.5 481.9 575.2 715.2 823.0 923.1 6 <50 51.9 84.7 139.2 204.8 266.6 322.5 395.5 481.9 569.8 666.4 795.3 875.0 953.9 7 <50 51.9 84.8 139.2 229.0 290.5 352.4 437.4 511.8 592.8 689.0 799.8 873.6 952.9 8 <50 51.9 84.8 139.2 221.4 282.3 336.2 420.7 499.5 579.0 670.6 781.5 852.3 934.6 9 <50 61.8 138.7 190.1 250.6 313.8 381.7 465.2 539.3 630.5 728.8 839.3 902.2 982.5 10 <50 51.8 62.0 84.7 177.4 204.7 266.5 313.9 376.7 450.3 539.4 647.7 727.4 852.1 11 <50 51.7 84.5 128.5 197.5 261.2 322.3 403.5 481.7 569.4 666.1 781.2 852.0 934.4 12 <50 51.8 66.9 109.9 177.4 204.6 250.8 295.5 359.0 450.3 539.3 670.3 758.0 888.9 13 <50 55.9 84.8 151.3 228.9 285.0 352.2 438.8 511.6 597.6 688.8 799.6 862.8 937.9 14 <50 51.8 84.7 139.1 204.7 270.6 330.2 414.4 496.9 581.8 674.1 787.2 860.7 937.8 15 <50 51.8 61.9 84.5 151.1 197.3 241.5 282.1 330.6 403.7 481.5 592.5 674.1 883.4 16 <50 51.9 67.0 110.0 190.3 237.6 292.5 356.1 437.1 511.6 603.1 712.5 787.3 883.4 NOTES: All temperatures are in degrees Fahrenheit < - less than

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Boiling Point Analysis

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Results Summary - TVP

16

Sample ID TVP (psia @ 100ºF) 20% BP (ºF) Spud Date 1 6.04 267.00 Q4 2011 2 7.07 233.10 Q3 2013 3&4 11.05 288.90 Q1 2014 5&6 10.90 185.35 Q1 2014

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Results Summary - VOCs

17

Compound Unit Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 & 4 Site 5 & 6 IDLH 10% LEL Methylene Chloride ppm 25 30

  • 5,000 13,000

Hexane ppm

  • 730

2,100 740 5,000 1,100 Benzene ppm 610 140 380 73 3,000 1,200 Cyclohexane ppm 910 170 520 150 10,000 1,300 Heptane ppm 1,000 170 440 140 5,000 1,050 Toluene ppm 360 76 140 32 2,000 1,100 Chlorobenzene ppm 14

  • 2,400

1,300 Ethyl benzene ppm 34 4.3 9.3 1.9 2,000 800 m,p-Xylene ppm 35 5.9 13 5.2 1,000 900

  • -Xylene

ppm 15 2.7 5.4

  • 1,000

900 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ppm 2.5

  • NL

NL Propane ppm 570 780 540 510 20,000 2,100 Isobutane ppm 390 560 400 650 NL NL Cyclopropane ppm

  • 600
  • NL

NL Butane ppm 630 890

  • 880

19,000 1,900 Butane, 2-methyl- ppm 450 480 430 570 NL NL Pentane ppm 450 520 440 560 15,000 1,500 Pentane, 2-methyl- ppm 200 160 200 180 NL NL Pentane, 3-methyl- ppm

  • 84

110 83 NL NL Cyclobutane, methyl- ppm

  • 110

79 NL NL Cyclopentane, methyl- ppm 170 130 140 87 NL NL Cyclopentane, 1,2,3-trimethyl- ppm 210

  • NL

NL Hexane, 2-methyl- ppm

  • 53

NL NL Hexane, 3-methyl- ppm

  • 66
  • 71

NL NL Hexane 2,5-dimethyl- ppm

  • 68
  • NL

NL Heptane, 2-methyl- ppm 410

  • 140
  • NL

NL Heptane, 3-methyl- ppm 150

  • NL

NL Cyclohexane, methyl- ppm 170 110 140 100 10,000 1,200 Cyclohexane, 1,2-dimethyl- ppm 230

  • NL

NL Cylcohexane, 1,3-dimethyl-, trans- ppm

  • 110
  • NL

NL Octane ppm 290

  • 100
  • 5,000

1,000 NOTES: ppm = parts per million

  • - = not detected

IDLH = immediately dangerous to life and health LEL = lower explosive limit NL = not listed

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Results Summary - LEL

  • Mixture LEL ranges from 11500 ppm to

15360 ppm

  • Average LEL = 12250 ppm
  • Methane LEL = 10000 ppm
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Boiling Point Analysis

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Boiling Point Analysis

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Boiling Point Analysis

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Head Space Composition

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 Concentration (ppm)

Tank Head Space VOC Composition

Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 & 4 Site 5 & 6