Diversity and Abundance of Invertebrates in Teatown's Managed and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

diversity and abundance of invertebrates in teatown s
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Diversity and Abundance of Invertebrates in Teatown's Managed and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Diversity and Abundance of Invertebrates in Teatown's Managed and Unmanaged Meadows By Lucia Rhode White Plains High School Introduction Teatown meadow restoration project Goal: help increase the bird, insect and small mammal


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Diversity and Abundance of Invertebrates in Teatown's Managed and Unmanaged Meadows

By Lucia Rhode White Plains High School

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

  • Teatown meadow restoration project
  • Goal: help increase the bird, insect

and small mammal diversity by providing unique habitat space

  • Maintenance:
  • Removing shrubs and trees
  • Regularly mowing
  • Managing invasive species
  • Invertebrate may be useful Indicators of

condition of Meadows (Hollier et al., 2005; Korosi et al., 2011)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Hypothesis

  • Invertebrate population of the managed meadow is more diverse and

abundant than in the unmanaged meadow

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Methodology

Pitfall traps

  • Cup in ground
  • Soapy water
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Methodology

Unmanaged Meadow Managed Meadow

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Methodology

  • Collected twice
  • Pitfall traps collected
  • ver 3 nights
slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Invertebrate Count

  • Majority of invertebrates are

unknown insect

  • Managed has double the amount
  • f unknown
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Invertebrate Count w/o Unknown Insects

  • Managed Meadow:
  • Mites
  • Ants
  • Spiders
  • Unmanaged Meadow:
  • Ants
  • Orthoptera
  • Spiders
  • Isopods
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Results

  • Shannon-Weaver Diversity Index
  • Managed = 1.65+/-.11
  • Unmanaged = 1.38+/-.14
  • Managed Meadow had a

slightly higher diversity index

  • Jaccard's Similarity Index
  • About 70% similar
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Discussion

  • Slight increase in diversity in managed meadow
  • Ongoing restoration of meadow
  • Continued long term observation of invertebrate population
  • Response of insect community to restoration process is usually slow (Karg et

al., 2015)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Acknowledgment

Thank you to Amy Karpati, Eva Thaddeus, Charlie Luisi and Erin Baker & Teatown

References

Hollier, J. A., Maczey, N., Masters, G. J., & Mortimer, S. R. (2005). Grassland Leafhoppers (Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha) as Indicators of Habitat Condition – A Comparison of between-site and between-year differences in Assemblage Composition. Journal of Insect Conservation, 9(4), 299-307. doi:10.1007/s10841-005-8821-z Karg, J., Kujawa, K., Manhart, C., Marschalek, H., Neugebauer, K. R., & Sachteleben, J. (2015). Restoration of Subalpine Species-Rich Grasslands: Short-TermvsLong-Term Changes in the Density and Diversity of above- Ground Insects. Polish Journal of Ecology, 63(1), 142-158. doi:10.3161/15052249pje2015.63.1.013 Kovács-Hostyánszki, A., Kőrösi, Á, Orci, K. M., Batáry, P., & Báldi, A. (2011). Set-aside promotes insect and plant diversity in a Central European

  • country. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment,141(3-4), 296-301.

doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.03.004

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Diversity and Abundance of Invertebrates in Teatown's Managed and Unmanaged Meadows

By Lucia Rhode White Plains High School