Distribution service classification: processes and principles - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

distribution service classification processes and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Distribution service classification: processes and principles - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Distribution service classification: processes and principles Public Forum on Contestability of Energy Services: 25 January 2017 MEHNAZ YOOSUF ADVISER AUSTRALIAN ENERGY MARKET COMMISSION AEMC PAGE 1 Focus AEC focus COAG focus Regulation


slide-1
SLIDE 1

AEMC PAGE 1

Distribution service classification: processes and principles

MEHNAZ YOOSUF

ADVISER AUSTRALIAN ENERGY MARKET COMMISSION

Public Forum on Contestability of Energy Services: 25 January 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Classification

  • f services

Regulation of economically regulated services Process RIT-D Definitions Planning framework Principles Capex vs opex Incentive mechanisms Expenditure forecasts Total expenditure Arrangements across service classifications Shared assets mechanism Cost allocation Ring-fencing Solutions COAG focus AEC focus Transparency Service delivery discretion Procurement

  • nly

approach Issues Binding RIT-D

Focus

slide-3
SLIDE 3

AEMC PAGE 3 AEMC PAGE 3

Distribution service classification - process

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Distribution service classification: current process

  • AER undertakes distribution service classification during the

framework and approach (F & A) stage of each DNSP’s regulatory determination.

  • AER typically publishes a draft framework and approach paper for

consultation and then issues a final framework and approach paper.

  • AER may alter its service classification from the F&A in the draft

revenue determination if it considers unforeseen circumstances arise.

  • Distribution determinations and framework approach processes
  • ccur on different timelines in different jurisdictions in the NEM.

AEMC PAGE 4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

COAG issues and solutions: guidelines and re- classification

  • COAG considers that the existing arrangements:

– attract little engagement from stakeholders – create a lag in the ability of the AER to reclassify services

  • COAG considers that the Commission should consider changing the

NER to: – require AER to publish a distribution service classification guideline; and – allow the AER to re-classify services within regulatory control periods.

AEMC PAGE 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

AEMC PAGE 6 AEMC PAGE 6

Distribution service classification: definitions and principles

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Distribution service classification: stages

AEMC PAGE 7

Direct control services Negotiated distribution services Standard control service Alternative control service Distribution services Unclassified distribution services Non-distribution services Level 1 Level 2 Level 3

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Level one: definition of ‘distribution service’

  • COAG and the AEC consider the definition of ‘distribution service’

(and its associated definitions) is unclear.

  • NER definition: ‘A service provided by means of, or in connection

with, a distribution system’. A ‘distribution system’ is defined as a ‘distribution network, together with the connection assets associated with the distribution network, which is connected to another transmission or distribution system’.

  • A key question in the Alternatives to Grid Supply rule change

submitted by Western Power is whether ‘in connection with’ means there must be a physical connection with the distribution system in

  • rder for a service to be classified as a ‘distribution service’?

AEMC PAGE 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Level one reforms: definition of ‘distribution service’

  • Commission’s power to make changes to this definition may be

limited because of the extent and nature of related definitions under the NEL (such as 'electricity network service').

  • We will be considering these matters in the context of these rule

change requests and the Western Power rule change request.

AEMC PAGE 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Level two: current principles

  • Clause 6.2.1(c) of the NER: Factors the AER needs to have regard

to in classifying distribution services: – the form of regulation factors; – the form of regulation (if any) previously applicable to the relevant service or services and, in particular, any previous classification under the present system of classification or under the previous regulatory system; – the desirability of consistency in the form of regulation for similar services; and – any other relevant factor.

  • Section 2F of NEL: Contains form of regulation factors. Includes

consideration of extent and presence of barriers to entry, network externalities, availability of substitutes.

AEMC PAGE 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Level two: current principles

  • Clause 6.2.1(d) of the NER: In classifying distribution services

previously subject to regulation, unless a different classification is clearly more appropriate: − there should be no departure from a previous classification (if service previously classified); and − the classification should be consistent with previously applicable regulatory approach (if no previous classification).

AEMC PAGE 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Level three: current principles

  • Clause 6.2.2(c) of the NER: Factors the AER must have regard to

when classifying a ‘direct control service’ as a ‘standard control service’ or ‘alternative control service’.

  • Include the potential for development of competition in the market,

the extent to which the costs of providing the service are directly attributable to the person to whom the service is provided.

  • Clause 6.2.2(d) of the NER: In classifying distribution services

previously subject to regulation, unless a different classification is clearly more appropriate: – there should be no departure from a previous classification (if the service previously classified); and – the classification should be consistent with the previously applicable regulatory approach (if no previous classification).

AEMC PAGE 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Questions for stakeholders to consider

Process

  • Is there a problem with the current process for distribution service

classification?

  • Would a distribution service classification guideline increase clarity

regarding distribution service classification?

  • To what extent does service classification being locked in over the

regulatory control period create a lag in appropriate reclassification

  • f services?
  • What would be the costs and benefits of allowing reclassification of

services within a regulatory control period?

AEMC PAGE 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Questions for stakeholders to consider

Level one

  • Does the definition of ‘distribution services’ provide clear guidance

regarding which services are ‘distribution services’ and which are not?

  • What would be the pros and cons of changing the definition of

‘distribution services’?

AEMC PAGE 14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Questions for stakeholders to consider

Levels two and three

  • Do the form of regulation factors provide clear guidance to the AER

in determining whether ‘distribution services’ should be classified as ‘direct control services’, ‘negotiated distribution services’ or ‘unclassified distribution services’?

  • Do the NER provide effective guidance to the AER in classifying

‘direct control services’ into ‘standard control services’ and ‘alternative control services’?

  • Should the requirement to not change service classification unless a

new classification is clearly more appropriate be removed?

AEMC PAGE 15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

AEMC PAGE 16