discrete symmetries of hypergraph states
play

Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states David W. Lyons Lebanon - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states David W. Lyons Lebanon Valley College Tetrahedral Geometry-Topology Seminar 1 April 2016 with support from NSF grant PHY-1211594 and Lebanon Valley College faculty research grants Lyons (LVC) Discrete


  1. Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states David W. Lyons Lebanon Valley College Tetrahedral Geometry-Topology Seminar 1 April 2016 with support from NSF grant PHY-1211594 and Lebanon Valley College faculty research grants Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 1 / 39

  2. Outline Basics 1 Graphs and Graph States 2 Hypergraphs and Hypergraph States 3 Symmetry, Geometry, and Combinatorics 4 Summary and Looking Forward 5 Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 2 / 39

  3. Outline Basics 1 Graphs and Graph States 2 Hypergraphs and Hypergraph States 3 Symmetry, Geometry, and Combinatorics 4 Summary and Looking Forward 5 Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 3 / 39

  4. The Quantum Bit Hilbert space is C 2 Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 4 / 39

  5. The Quantum Bit Hilbert space is C 2 states are points in P 1 ( C ) = P ( C 2 ) =) C 2 \ { 0 } ) / scalars ≈ S 2 Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 4 / 39

  6. The Quantum Bit Hilbert space is C 2 states are points in P 1 ( C ) = P ( C 2 ) =) C 2 \ { 0 } ) / scalars ≈ S 2 � 1 � 0 � � standard basis for C 2 is | 0 � = , | 1 � = 0 1 Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 4 / 39

  7. The Quantum Bit Hilbert space is C 2 states are points in P 1 ( C ) = P ( C 2 ) =) C 2 \ { 0 } ) / scalars ≈ S 2 � 1 � 0 � � standard basis for C 2 is | 0 � = , | 1 � = 0 1 we speak loosely and write the vector α | 0 � + β | 1 � but always mean its equivalence class in P 1 Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 4 / 39

  8. The Bloch Sphere S 2 ← → C 2 → cos θ 2 | 0 � + e i φ sin θ ( θ, φ ) ← 2 | 1 � | 0 � | ψ � θ φ | 1 � Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 5 / 39

  9. Many Quantum Bits n -qubit Hilbert space is C 2 ⊗ · · · ⊗ C 2 = ( C 2 ) ⊗ n ≈ C 2 n � �� � n factors Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 6 / 39

  10. Many Quantum Bits n -qubit Hilbert space is C 2 ⊗ · · · ⊗ C 2 = ( C 2 ) ⊗ n ≈ C 2 n � �� � n factors states are points in projective space Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 6 / 39

  11. Many Quantum Bits n -qubit Hilbert space is C 2 ⊗ · · · ⊗ C 2 = ( C 2 ) ⊗ n ≈ C 2 n � �� � n factors states are points in projective space write | 011 � for | 0 � ⊗ | 1 � ⊗ | 1 � Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 6 / 39

  12. Many Quantum Bits n -qubit Hilbert space is C 2 ⊗ · · · ⊗ C 2 = ( C 2 ) ⊗ n ≈ C 2 n � �� � n factors states are points in projective space write | 011 � for | 0 � ⊗ | 1 � ⊗ | 1 � standard (computational) basis vectors have form | I � = | i 1 i 2 . . . i n � , i k = 0 , 1 , 1 ≤ k ≤ n Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 6 / 39

  13. Entanglement Entangled States An n -qubit state is entangled if it is can not be written a product if 1-qubit states | ψ 1 � ⊗ | ψ 2 � ⊗ · · · ⊗ | ψ n � Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 7 / 39

  14. Entanglement Entangled States An n -qubit state is entangled if it is can not be written a product if 1-qubit states | ψ 1 � ⊗ | ψ 2 � ⊗ · · · ⊗ | ψ n � Example: | 00 � + | 11 � � = ( a | 0 � + b | 1 � ) ⊗ ( c | 0 � + d | 1 � ) for any a , b , c , d Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 7 / 39

  15. Entanglement Entangled States An n -qubit state is entangled if it is can not be written a product if 1-qubit states | ψ 1 � ⊗ | ψ 2 � ⊗ · · · ⊗ | ψ n � Example: | 00 � + | 11 � � = ( a | 0 � + b | 1 � ) ⊗ ( c | 0 � + d | 1 � ) for any a , b , c , d Proof: Just look at ( a | 0 � + b | 1 � ) ⊗ ( c | 0 � + d | 1 � ) = ac | 00 � + ad | 01 � + bc | 10 � + bd | 11 � . Terms don’t work out. Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 7 / 39

  16. Nonlocality Spooky action at a distance Alice has qubit 1 and Bob has qubit 2 of state | 00 � + | 11 � in labs separated far apart. Each measures 0 or 1 with probability 1 / 2, but they obtain the same outcome (both 0 or both 1) with probability 1. Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 8 / 39

  17. Nonlocality Spooky action at a distance Alice has qubit 1 and Bob has qubit 2 of state | 00 � + | 11 � in labs separated far apart. Each measures 0 or 1 with probability 1 / 2, but they obtain the same outcome (both 0 or both 1) with probability 1. Motivation to study multiqubit states Multiqubit states encode data and can be processed to perform algorithms and secure communication in ways that are (believed to be) not achievable with classical processing of classical bits. Entanglement and nonlocality play a role of essential resources for the speed up over classical algorithms. Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 8 / 39

  18. Outline Basics 1 Graphs and Graph States 2 Hypergraphs and Hypergraph States 3 Symmetry, Geometry, and Combinatorics 4 Summary and Looking Forward 5 Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 9 / 39

  19. Graph States: Ingredients Graph A graph G = ( V , E ) is a set V of vertices and a set E of (undirected, non-loop) edges. That is e ∈ E is a 2-element subset of V . Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 10 / 39

  20. Graph States: Ingredients Graph A graph G = ( V , E ) is a set V of vertices and a set E of (undirected, non-loop) edges. That is e ∈ E is a 2-element subset of V . The “plus” state | + � = | 0 � + | 1 � Observation: | + � ⊗ n = � I | I � Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 10 / 39

  21. Graph States: Ingredients Graph A graph G = ( V , E ) is a set V of vertices and a set E of (undirected, non-loop) edges. That is e ∈ E is a 2-element subset of V . The “plus” state | + � = | 0 � + | 1 � Observation: | + � ⊗ n = � I | I � The 2-qubit C operator (controlled- Z ) a | 00 � + b | 01 � + c | 10 � + d | 11 � → a | 00 � + b | 01 � + c | 10 � − d | 11 � Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 10 / 39

  22. Graph States: Construction vertex ← → qubit in | + � state edge ← → C operator on ends of the edge Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 11 / 39

  23. Graph States: Construction vertex ← → qubit in | + � state edge ← → C operator on ends of the edge Example: Graph G = K 3 State | ψ G � = | K 3 � 2 | 000 � + | 001 � + | 010 � + | 100 � 1 − ( | 011 � + | 101 � + | 110 � + | 111 � ) 3 Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 11 / 39

  24. Graph states, cont’d Formally: for edge e = { a , b } , write C e for C operator on qubits a , b Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 12 / 39

  25. Graph states, cont’d Formally: for edge e = { a , b } , write C e for C operator on qubits a , b for graph G = ( V , E ) with | V | = n , graph state is �� � | + � ⊗ n | ψ G � = C e e ∈ E Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 12 / 39

  26. Graph states, cont’d Formally: for edge e = { a , b } , write C e for C operator on qubits a , b for graph G = ( V , E ) with | V | = n , graph state is �� � | + � ⊗ n | ψ G � = C e e ∈ E Observations: Operators C e are well-defined on 2-element subsets of V and also commute. Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 12 / 39

  27. Graph states, cont’d Formally: for edge e = { a , b } , write C e for C operator on qubits a , b for graph G = ( V , E ) with | V | = n , graph state is �� � | + � ⊗ n | ψ G � = C e e ∈ E Observations: Operators C e are well-defined on 2-element subsets of V and also commute. | ψ G � has the form � I ± | I � Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 12 / 39

  28. Graph states, cont’d Formally: for edge e = { a , b } , write C e for C operator on qubits a , b for graph G = ( V , E ) with | V | = n , graph state is �� � | + � ⊗ n | ψ G � = C e e ∈ E Observations: Operators C e are well-defined on 2-element subsets of V and also commute. | ψ G � has the form � I ± | I � Facts: Graph states are the resource for a measurement-based quantum computation , capable of implementing any quantum algorithm. Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 12 / 39

  29. Graph states, cont’d Formally: for edge e = { a , b } , write C e for C operator on qubits a , b for graph G = ( V , E ) with | V | = n , graph state is �� � | + � ⊗ n | ψ G � = C e e ∈ E Observations: Operators C e are well-defined on 2-element subsets of V and also commute. | ψ G � has the form � I ± | I � Facts: Graph states are the resource for a measurement-based quantum computation , capable of implementing any quantum algorithm. Graph states play a key role in encoding and error correction theory and implementation. Lyons (LVC) Discrete symmetries of hypergraph states 2016.04.01 12 / 39

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend