disclosures
play

Disclosures Clinical trials research funding support from: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2/15/2019 Disclosures Clinical trials research funding support from: Bristol-Meyer Squibb Recent Advances in Agios Neurology Abbvie Neuro-Oncology Case Presentation NEUROLOGY AND NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY Jennie W Taylor, MD, MPH


  1. 2/15/2019 Disclosures Clinical trials research funding support from: • Bristol-Meyer Squibb Recent Advances in • Agios Neurology • Abbvie Neuro-Oncology Case Presentation NEUROLOGY AND NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY Jennie W Taylor, MD, MPH Assistant Professor Division of Neuro-oncology February 15, 2019 Case 1: 34 year old woman with panic Q1 – next steps for work-up? attacks 48% In 07/2015 patient presented to academic medical center with A. EEG for evaluation of seizures 9 years of escalating spells described as a "weird smell" followed B. Biopsy/resection for possible low grade by "fuzzing out", nausea and a panicky sense with deja vu 23% glioma 18% 11% C. Biopsy/resection for possible high grade glioma D. Lumbar puncture and empiric acyclovir for . . . . . . . s . s . . . i . s s m e o o s e presumed HSV p p f d o r r n o o n f f a o n n e t i o o r a u u t i t i c c c t l e e a n v s s u e e e p r r r / / r o y y a s s f p p b G m o o E i i u E B B L Underwent biopsy with pathology revealing diffuse astrocytoma, grade 2, IDH1 R132H mutant, 1p19q intact by FISH 3 4 1

  2. 2/15/2019 Risk stratification of grade 2 gliomas Q2 – next steps in treatment? Construction set • EORTC 22844 and 22845 Overall survival • Prognostic index for low- A. Chemotherapy alone Low risk grade glioma: B. Chemotherapy with radiation – Age ≥ 40 High risk C. Radiation alone – Tumor diameter ≥ 6 cm D. Observation – Tumor crossing midline Validation set 46% – Astrocytic histology Overall survival – Pre-operative deficit Low risk 22% 22% • Low risk = < 2 factors High risk 10% – mOS ~ 7 years • High risk = ≥ 3 factors e . e n n . n o o d . o t i – mOS ~ 3 years a l a a l a r v y h n r p t o e a i i s r w t b e a Pignatti et al, J Clin Oncol 2002 y i O h d t p a o a m r R e e h h t C o m e h C 5 Radiation alone does not improve survival Radiation and chemotherapy improve in low-grade gliomas outcomes in low-grade glioma • EORTC 22845 Progression Free Survival • RTOG 9802 Progression Free Early radiation Upfront radiation versus – Upfront radiation versus Survival radiation at progression in radiation + low-grade gliomas Radiation at progression chemotherapy (PCV) in newly diagnosed high • Improvement in risk patients progression free survival (5.3 v 3.4 years; HR 0.59) • Improvement in Early radiation progression free survival • No improvement in overall Overall Survival Overall Survival (10.4 v 4.0 years; HR 0.50) survival (7.4 v 7.2 years; Radiation at progression HR 0.97) • Improvement in overall survival (13.3 v 7.8 years; • Improves seizure control HR 0.59) at one year (41% v 25%) Buckner NEJM 2016 van den Bent et al, Lancet, 2005 2

  3. 2/15/2019 06/2018 – Progressive Q2 – next steps in treatment? disease A. Chemotherapy alone • MRI revealed increased mass-like FLAIR and new B. Chemotherapy with enhancement with necrosis radiation • Clinically with increased C. Radiation alone fatigue, headaches, D. Observation inattention, and word finding difficulties • Recommended to undergo resection • Subtotal resection with pathology revealing glioblastoma, IDH mutated Temozolomide for 23 months (08/2017) 9 10 Q3 – next steps in treatment? UCSF500: Targeted sequencing • Pathology consistent A. Chemotherapy alone with anaplastic 80% oligodendroglioma B. Chemotherapy with radiation • > 50 non- C. Radiation alone synonymous somatic mutations D. Immunotherapy with either radiation and/or chemotherapy • Virtually all mutations are C>T/G>A 15% • No germ line 3% 2% alternations • These findings are indicative of Chemotherapy alone Radiation alone Chemotherapy with radi... Immunotherapy with eit... hypermutated phenotype from temozolomide 11 12 3

  4. 2/15/2019 Temozolomide-induced hypermutation Q3.5 – next steps in treatment? 100% • Defined as C>T/G>A A. Chemotherapy alone transitions predominantly B. Chemotherapy with radiation occurring at CpC and CpT C. Radiation alone dinucleotides, which is a D. Immunotherapy with either radiation distinct signature of TMZ- and/or chemotherapy induced mutagenesis not seen in other tumors 0% 0% 0% tumors e e n . . n o . o . . i . • Implicated is some cases l d l t a a a i e y r n p o h h a t i t r i t w i e w a i of malignant h d y y t p a p o R a m a r r e e e h h h t C t o transformation o m n u e m h m C I Immunotherapy with either radiation or chemotherapy • True incidence is not Johnson B, Science, 2014 known 13 14 Just a word on neurologic complications High mutational burden is predictive of response to immunotherapy checkpoint inhibition of checkpoint inhibitors... Cuzzubbo S, Eur J Cancer, 2017 Outcome of neurological adverse events correlated with a partial or complete neurological recovery in 73% of cases (20/27), with a median delay of 4 weeks. Yarchoan M, NEJM, 2017 15 16 4

  5. 2/15/2019 11/2018 – post-radiation Case 2: 57 year old woman with acute and immunotherapy onset of slurred speech • MRI revealed • MRI revealed enhancing mass with favorable response significant surrounding edema to treatment • Past medical history notable for • Expected post lupus, eczema, and thyroid disease surgical changes • Exam notable for dysarthria and • Decreased mass- right arm weakness like FLAIR • Clinically stable with improved seizure control 17 18 Case 2: 57 year old woman with acute Q1 – Next steps? onset of slurred speech • She underwent biopsy of left frontal A. Consider surgery for high suspicion of recurrent mass. Pathology: glioblastoma, IDH disease wildtype, MGMT unmethylated B. Continue adjuvant temozolomide 53% • Completed standard of care with C. Repeat radiation fractionated radiation and D. Start bevacizumab 37% temozolomide • 4 cycles of adjuvant temozolomide • MRI with increased enhancement 7% 3% and neurologic worsening expressive aphasia and right sided weakness Start bevacizumab Repeat radiation Consider surgery for high... Continue adjuvant temo... 19 20 5

  6. 2/15/2019 Underwent extensive resection Extent of resection (EOR) improves with sequencing 05/2015 outcomes for newly diagnosed GBM (9 months from diagnosis) • Retrospective review of Pathology revealed 10% recurrent 500 patients with newly glioblastoma and 90% treatment effect diagnosed GBM Genomic Alteration Drug MGMT unmethylated • EOR evaluated by 48 hour EGFR (V292L) Afatinib post-op MRI Erlotinib Ibrutinib • EOR was an independent Lapatinib Propranolol predictor of outcome Vandetanib when adjusting for age NF1 (T956fs) Trametinib and KPS PALB2 (S700fs) Carboplatin Cisplatin • Improvement in OS was Mitomycin Olaparib seen with incremental Oxaliplatin increase in EOR, starting TLK1 (K433N) Perphenazine Thioridazine at 78% Trifluoperazine Sanai, J Neurosurg, 2011 Treatment recommendation by Treatment recommendation by molecular tumor board molecular tumor board • Continued on trametinib monotherapy from 03/2016 • PALB2 mutation – 06/2017 (34 months from diagnosis) – Carboplatin : alkylating agent impairs DNA synthesis • Developed new seizures and increased mass-like FLAIR concerning for progressive disease – Olaparib : PARP inhibitor further damages DNA in platinum sensitive 03/2016 06/2017 tumors • NF1 mutation – Trametinib : MEK inhibitor blocks MAPK/ERK pathway of dysregulated cell growth • Stable disease after 10 months of carboplatin/trametinib from 06/2015 - 03/2016 (19 months from diagnosis) 23 24 6

  7. 2/15/2019 Q2 – Next steps? Re-irradiation to 35 Gy in 10 fractions A. Consider surgery for high suspicion of recurrent disease B. Restart temozolomide 52% C. Repeat radiation D. Start bevacizumab 37% 11% 0% e n b . d o a . . m i i m h t g a u o i i d z h o l i a c r z r a o o t v f m a e y e e b r p e t t g e r t R a r r u a t s t S s r e e R d i s n o C 25 26 Q3 - What are radiologic changes most Subacute radiation consistent with? • CNS complications of radiation occur in 3 clinical phases 90% – Acute (during treatment) A. Tumor progression – Subacute (within 6 months of treatment) B. Pseudoprogression – Delayed (within years of treatment) • Subacute effects (i.e. pseudoprogression) felt to be exaggerated response to radiation • Radiographically appears similar to tumor progression with increased enhancement at the site of maximum 10% radiation, increased edema, and mass effect. Often without significant diffusion restriction • Treatment includes steroids though anti-angiogenic Pseudoprogression Tumor progression therapy (i.e. bevacizumab) may be needed 27 28 7

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend