disclosures
play

Disclosures Spontaneous Coronary Artery I have nothing to disclose - PDF document

12/18/16 Disclosures Spontaneous Coronary Artery I have nothing to disclose Dissection Jeffrey Zimmet, MD, PhD Associate Professor of Medicine, UCSF Director, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, SFVAMC SCAD: Major points SCAD: Major


  1. ◆ 12/18/16 Disclosures Spontaneous Coronary Artery I have nothing to disclose Dissection Jeffrey Zimmet, MD, PhD Associate Professor of Medicine, UCSF Director, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, SFVAMC SCAD: Major points SCAD: Major Points ■ It’s not just related to pregnancy ■ Invasive coronary angiography is still the ■ It is an under-recognized cause of mainstay of diagnosis acute coronary syndrome ■ Intravascular imaging with ■ If you don’t suspect it, you can IVUS or OCT is an important easily miss it adjunct in equivocal cases ■ The “classic” angiographic ■ CT can be helpful but often appearance represents only a misses the diagnosis, fraction of cases – need to know especially in smaller vessels the alternative types ◆ 1

  2. ◆ 12/18/16 SCAD: Major points SCAD – What is it? ■ Many cardiologists won’t recognize ■ The non-traumatic and non-iatrogenic separation of the coronary arterial walls, the non-pathognomonic forms on creating a false lumen coronary angio ■ It is an under-recognized and often- ■ The principles of management are missed cause of acute coronary primarily a product of expert syndrome opinion ■ It is uncommon, but not as rare as once thought. Intimal tear vs Medial How does it occur? hemorrhage Two primary theories: ■ Intimal tear ◆ The primary event is a tear or rupture of the intima, allowing pressurized blood to enter the subintimal space ■ Medial hemorrhage ◆ The primary event is the rupture of vasa vasorum ◆ Leads to “classic” appearance ◆ 2

  3. ◆ 12/18/16 SCAD: Epidemiology Predisposing factors Female preponderance: recent series estimate 92- Strong association with fibromuscular dysplasia ■ ■ 95% of cases when atherosclerotic causes were (FMD) – present in >70% of SCAD patients who excluded are screened Association with pregnancy and the peripartum ■ period Recent series estimate that SCAD accounts for ■ between 1 and 4% of acute coronary syndromes Should be strongly considered in younger women ■ without CAD RFs presenting with ACS However, older women not excluded. In recent ■ case series, over half of patients were > 50 years old and 62% were post-menopausal SCAD - Precipitating Predisposing factors factors Intense emotional stress Pregnancy (once thought to comprise a large ■ ■ Weight lifting and isometric exercises proportion of cases; now ~5%) ■ Valsalva-like activities: childbirth, coughing, ■ vomiting, bowel movement Sympathomimetic drugs, including cocaine and Hormonal therapy ■ ■ methamphetamines Connective tissue disorders: ■ Note that the same stresses can precipitate classic ■ o Marfan syndrome atherosclerotic MI/plaque rupture o Loeys-Dietz syndrome o Ehler-Danlos syndrome o cystic medial necrosis o alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency o polycystic kidney disease ◆ 3

  4. ◆ 12/18/16 Clinical Presentation Most present with chest pain and positive cardiac ■ enzymes (96% of the largest published series of 196 pts) Long period from symptom-onset to presentation is ■ the norm -- average of 1.1 days in the same series 1/3 of patients had unstable symptoms (ongoing ■ pain or stuttering/recurrent pain) prior to cardiac cath A significant proportion present as STEMI ■ A small proportion present with ventricular ■ arrhythmia, cardiogenic shock, or SCD Diagnosis by angiography Diagnosis by angiography ■ Type I: classic angiographic appearance (pathognomonic) of multiple lumens ■ Classification proposed by J Saw in Catheter Cardiovasc Interv in 2014 ◆ Type I: classic angiographic appearance (pathognomonic) of multiple lumens ◆ Type II: diffuse narrowing in the absence of atherosclerosis. Often long and smooth, affecting mid to distal segments of arteries ◆ Type III: mimicks atherosclerotic disease ◆ 4

  5. ◆ 12/18/16 ■ Type II: diffuse narrowing in the absence of ■ Type I: classic angiographic appearance atherosclerosis. Often long and smooth, (pathognomonic) of multiple lumens affecting mid to distal segments of arteries ◆ Saw J, et al J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jul 19;68(3):297-312 ■ Type III: mimicks atherosclerotic disease Diagnosis by angiography Screening for renal and iliac FMD at the time of ■ coronary angiography may be useful, due to strong association of FMD with SCAD Acute plaque rupture (in arteriosclerotic coronary ■ disease) may appear angiographically identical ◆ 5

  6. ◆ 12/18/16 Diagnosis by OCT and IVUS Diagnosis by OCT and IVUS Definitive diagnosis of SCAD ■ Risks of placing wire in false lumen, or propagating ■ ◆ normal the dissection. ◆ dissection Diagnosis by OCT Diagnosis by OCT ◆ Antoniucci D, et al, Eur Heart 11(12):1130-1134. ◆ 6

  7. ◆ 12/18/16 Increased suspicion for SCAD Management SCAD in: Myocardial infarction in young women (especially ■ age ≤ 50) ■ All based on expert opinion from Absence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors case series ■ Little or no evidence of typical atherosclerotic ■ ■ No randomized trials lesions in coronary arteries Peripartum state ■ History of fibromuscular dysplasia ■ History of relevant connective tissue disorder or ■ systemic inflammatory condition (e.g. Marfan’s, SLE, cystic medial necrosis, etc, etc). Recent intensive exercise or emotional stress ■ SCAD Management – SCAD Management Antiplatelet therapy Beta blockers Reduction of false lumen thrombus burden ◆ Probably beneficial ■ Treatment of prothrombotic environment when ◆ Almost universally recommended ■ intimal tear is present (not all SCAD) ◆ Reduce shear stress ◆ Beneficial in tolerating ischemia Aspirin : generally considered important in both ◆ Reduce ventricular arrhythmia ■ short- and long-term treatment Clopidogrel : Controversial ■ ◆ Often given in combination with ASA for 1-12 months after presentation ◆ 7

  8. ◆ 12/18/16 SCAD – gpIIb/llla inhibitors Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (abciximab, ■ eptifibatide, tirofiban) ◆ generally not recommended . Greater propensity for bleeding, and potential to extend the dissection SCAD - Thrombolytics SCAD - Anticoagulants Generally considered to be contraindicated ■ Heparin/LMWH is generally given up to the ■ point of angiography for ACS management Multiple reports of clinical worsening, extension of ■ intramural hematoma and dissection ■ Risk of extending the dissection In one retrospective series of 87 patients with ■ Risk is balanced by potential benefit of ■ SCAD who received thrombolytics, 52 had clinical improving flow in the true lumen, and worsening improving compression by false lumen Multiple individual case reports of benefit of thrombus ■ thrombolytics, due to lysis of false lumen thrombi ■ Most recommend discontinuation of heparin and improvement in true lumen compression once the diagnosis is made; however, there is Balance of evidence suggests they should be ■ not general agreement on this point avoided ■ Contrast with carotid dissection ◆ 8

  9. ◆ 12/18/16 SCAD – adjunctive SCAD – adjunctive pharmacology pharmacology ■ Statins ■ ACE inhibitors ◆ No good data ◆ No data ◆ tend to be given post MI, regardless of etiology ◆ Generally given when there are other ◆ one small retrospective study suggested high rate of recurrence of SCAD with statin use indications, such as LV dysfunction or ◆ another study reported high statin use with low hypertension recurrence rate ◆ bottom line: give them to patients with hyperlipidemia. Use in others is just a guess SCAD – Conservative SCAD - Revascularization therapy Conservative therapy is generally recommended In published case series, patients who were initially ■ treated conservatively had a small likelihood of if possible progression requiring revascularization: 3.5% in Conservatively-treated patients often heal the Vancouver series, and 10% in the Mayo clinic ■ Multiple prospective series with planned repeat series. ■ angiography Most recurrence occurs in the first several days. ■ have demonstrated that spontaneous dissections most Patients treated conservatively should be ■ often heal with conservative management: 73% (43 of 59 monitored for 3-5 days in the hospital. cases); 90% (79 of 88); and 97% (29 of 30) almost all repeat imaging performed more than 1 month ■ after presentation shows healing, although multiple individual cases show residual dissection on repeat late angio ◆ 9

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend