Disaster Resilience Climate Resilience Webinar Series U.S. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development

Energy Investments for Disaster Resilience

Climate Resilience Webinar Series

Disclaimer

• This presentation is intended to provide communities and

states with the tools and information to help in climate resilience planning and activities.

• Information presented in this webinar is independent of

the Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for the National Disaster Resilience Competition (NDRC). While we expect that this information will be useful to interested communities and eligible applicants, it should not be construed as the definitive word on any singular approach to resilience.

• All NOFA NDRC questions should be sent to:

resilientrecovery@hud.gov

2

Presenter

• USGBC
• Jason Hartke
• Clean Energy States Alliance
• Rob Sanders

3

Agenda

• 1. Overview
• 2. Energy and Resiliency
• 3. Synergy: Integrating Resiliency
• 4. Clean Energy Group's Community

Resilient Power Work

• 5. A Baltimore Case Study
• 6. Finance Options
• 7. Resilient Power Programs and Projects

4

The Next Leadership Challenge: Advancing the Resiliency Agenda

A Preparedness Agenda “We need to be ready, not surprised” A Multi-Layered Engagement “From the White House to the State Houses, City Halls to community leaders, the private sector to the civil society

• rganizations, we need to set new standards for resilience.”

A New Agenda “The resiliency agenda will require a deep and profound reassessment of our priorities.” An Action Agenda “While the human condition can never be free of risk, if we are to have regrets, let us not regret our inaction”

5

Our Focus:  Synergy  Connectivity  Capacity

Resilient Buildings, Resilient Cities

6

How We’re Organizing to Meet the Challenge

Advocacy & Outreach → A National Campaign: RC4A → Leadership Speaker Series → Policy Platform Research & Resources → The New Orleans Principles → Sustainable Rebuilding Guidelines → Green Buildings and Climate Resilience → Climate Resiliency Screen Tool Partnerships & Initiatives → Community Resiliency Task Force → Resiliency Initiative on Global Urban Readiness (RIGUR) → ICLEI, USCM, NLC, C40, BGA, CGI

7

The Case for Strong Buildings

A First Defense in Safeguarding Our Cities →Where we live, work, learn and play →Buildings are the focus of commercial activity →As assets, they represent huge economic value →We spend 90% of our time in buildings (shelters from the storm)

8

The Art of Being Prepared

9

Vulnerable to What?

RESILIENT BUILDINGS = ULTIMATE PLACED-BASED VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT →Regional climate sensitivities (i.e., localized threats such as rising seas or floods or droughts) →Building connections (i.e., to the grid, transportation systems, water, etc.) →Building location adaptive responses

10

Vulnerable to What?

For example…

→ Analysis defies conventional wisdom → Annual electricity up 4-11% → Annual NG up 24-36% bc of colder winters → Top 3 technologies to adapt:

• Improved roof

insulation

• Upgrade water chillers
• Energy recovery

ventilation

• All scenarios indicated cooler winters.
• One scenario said warmer summers required lower

cooling loads. (because drier conditions reduced the need for dehumidification)

• Off-the-shelf technologies addressed all adaptations

required.

• The danger of averages: conditions in the study

location were significantly different than locations even 100 miles away, where a different suite of technologies would be required.

11

Connecting the Dots

ADAPTATION + MITIGATION SYNERGIES →Identify strategies →Maximize use

12

Synergy: Hitting the Ground Running

13

Integrating Resilience

→A new dimension to existing decisions. →An opportunity to prepare for future conditions. →An opportunity to enhance and sustain performance.

14

Synergy: Green and Resilient

1. Analyzed the climate change effects on the built environment. 2. Linked resilient and adaptive building strategies to green building. 3. Identified specific strategies and gaps. 4. Developed a tool to maximize resiliency best practices

15

‘No Regret’ & Resilient Strategies

No Regrets Resilient Envelope 7 17 Siting and Landscaping 12 8 Heating, Cooling, & Lighting 11 1 Water and Waste 6 3 Equipment 3 6 Process & Operations 4 3

16

CLIMATE MITIGATION & ADAPTATION CO-BENEFITS

ENERGY EFFICIENCY (EE) MITIGATION →Energy savings →Reduced Emissions ADAPTATION →Reduces a building’s dependence on centralized energy grid →Reduces risk of power disruptions

17

Building Performance

Buildings are designed based on historic conditions e.g., Typical Meteorological Year Future conditions are unlikely to match historic assumptions e.g., minimum rise of 1.5°C by 2020; potential for >5°C

18

Building Performance

Preparing for Future Conditions

Excess Energy Demand Increasing Human Health Risks Lower Passive Survivability

19

Stormwater Management

Stormwater control strategies are based on historic design storms e.g., storm intensity, frequency Trends indicate an increased frequency of high-intensity precipitation events e.g., in New England +28% in 20 years, +127% in 90 years

20

Change in Runoff

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Year 1 +20 yrs +90 years Increase in pollution (kilograms/acre/year) TSS Phosphorus Nitrogen

Source: Pyke, Warren, et al. (2011) Assessment of low impact development for managing stormwater due to climate

Performance under historic conditions Performance in 2100 Performance in 2020

21

Changes in Runoff

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Year 1 +20 yrs +90 years Axis Title Axis Title TSS Phosphorus Nitrogen

Excess Runoff Volumes Excess Nutrient Pollution Impacts on Aquatic Ecosystems Increasing Human Health Risks Increasing Risks to Property

Source: Pyke, Warren, et al. (2011) Assessment of low impact development for managing stormwater due to climate climate 22

HOW DO WE MAXIMIZE THESE CO-BENEFITS ACROSS CATEGORIES (energy, water, etc) The LEED Climate Resilience Screening Tool →Provides a practical framework to identify climate sensitivities and prioritize

• pportunities to promote resilience

through green building practice

23

How do we maximize these co-benefits

The LEED Climate Resilience Screening Tool

24

How do we maximize these co-benefits

WHAT THE TOOL TELLS US: → A significant number of commonly used green building strategies rely on assumptions about historical climatic conditions.

• Thus, future conditions will put performance at risk.

→ A large set of green building strategies help promote climate resilience.

• For example, the LEED ND rating system in temperate climate zone has

40% of its credit outcomes sensitive to changing climate conditions and 78% of its credits offer resiliency opportunities. → Variations exist in the results among different rating systems.

• The largest variations are found in tropical and coastal climate zones,

indicating a high vulnerability to storm surge/sea level rise, extreme heat & humidity.

25

What’s Next?

Insights for key stakeholders

→ Policymakers can use the tool to identify which LEED system and credits enhance resilience, providing reference for policy creation and building standards → Green building project teams can apply the framework to identify and target credits that

• ffer the best adaptation opportunities

→ Rating system developers can use the tool to evaluate LEED credit performance and help recommend new resilience credits

26

Making the Business Case

Reduced Operating Expenses Increased Productivity Government Incentives Improved Health

Investment Returns

27

Energy Investment for Disaster Resilience in Low Income Communitites

Energy Investment for Disaster Resilience in Low Income Communities

November 21, 2014

Robert Sanders, Clean Energy Group Senior Finance Director

Who We Are

resilient-power.org cleanegroup.org

29

History of CEG and Resilient Power

30

Sandy and Power

“Extensive power outages during Sandy affected millions of residents and resulted in substantial economic loss to communities. Despite the size and power of Hurricane Sandy, this was not inevitable: resilient energy solutions could have helped limit power outages.“ Hurricane Sandy Rebuilding Strategy:

Stronger Communities, A Resilient Region (Aug. 2013)

31

Extreme Weather Events & Power Outages

32

Extreme Weather Events & Power Outages

33

Extreme Weather Events & Power Outages

34

Extreme Weather and Low-Income Communities

• Extreme weather causes power
• utages and higher electricity

prices—disproportionately affecting the poor and vulnerable.

• Severe climate-related, weather

events cause disproportionate harm to low-income Americans.

• Low-income & elderly populations

are the most vulnerable to high or low temperatures during power

• utages.
• Low-income areas have more difficulty

responding & recovering from destruction.

• They lack income, savings, employment,

insurance, communication channels & information – less resilient after severe weather.

35

Need for More Power Resilient Solutions

• Critical need for reliable

distributed generation (DG) & resiliency in hospitals, affordable housing, police, fire stations, schools, hospitals, community centers, gas stations

• Protect vulnerable populations
• Distributed solar with batteries,

CHP, fuel cells can provide life- saving power

• DG a democratizing force

through community projects

• Resilient DG is both climate

mitigation and adaptation

Hospital workers evacuate a patient from NYU Langone Medical Center during Hurricane Sandy on October 29, 2012 in New York City. More than 200 patients were evacuated from the hospital after backup generators failed due to flooding. (Michael Heiman/Getty Images) 36

Resilient Power for Affordable Housing & Assisted Living Facilities

• SuperStorm Sandy: 375,000 New

Yorkers—including 45,000 public housing residents—lived in mandatory evacuation zone.

• Many low-income, elderly & disabled in

NYC public housing were stranded.

• No heat, backup generators, emergency

boilers, or working elevators.

• Many had no other affordable

place to stay, no means of leaving their neighborhoods because mass transit did not operate.

• Small battery storage systems combined

with on-site generation are needed for residents to shelter in place.

• Where possible, incorporate battery

storage in HUD Better Building Partners' solar projects.

37

CEG Resilient Power Project – Objectives

• Expand clean resilient power at state and

municipal level

• Protect low-income and vulnerable

communities

• Focus on affordable housing
• Promote new technologies/business models
• New policy and financing options
• Support local projects
• Public education, technical

assistance, information sharing

• Create national network
• Support new federal initiatives

38

CEG Resilient Power Project

• Goal: significantly increase public/ private

investment for clean, resilient power systems.

• Engage city officials to develop resilient power

policies/ programs, link to state energy policies.

• Technical assistance for resilient power projects

to help agencies/ project developers get deals done.

• http://www.cleanegroup.org

39

Community Resilient Power: Baltimore

• How can cities deploy more solar in low income

communities and be more power resilient?

• CEG report built on Baltimore’s DP3 Report that

evaluated critical facilities/ infrastructure.

• Focus on community buildings
• Bonds and credit enhancement mechanisms
• Public buildings and nonprofit-owned

facilities.

• Third-party ownership, lease-financed
• Foundation PRIs
• Public schools, libraries, police/fire stations.
• Explore legal exposure under ADA.
• The full report can be downloaded at RPP-

ResilientCommunities.

40

Innovative Financing Models

• Once decision is made to pursue resilient power project – how do you finance it?
• Municipalities, housing/ community developers have broad range of options.

41

Bond Financing

• Morris Model:
• Innovative public-private financing for

solar on public buildings

• Hybrid model: public entity issues a

government bond, transfers low cost capital to developer for lower PPA price.

• Bonds are issued for a pool of

projects

• Existing bond tools can be used to finance pooled resilient power projects
• GO bonds: NYC City Controller – multi-billion dollar “Green Bond Program”
• 501(c)(3) bonds: hospitals, universities, affordable housing, community

facilities

• School construction bonds
• Disaster recovery/ resiliency bonds: NYC Green Bond Program, Louisiana PSC

($315M of bonds by a LA bond authority for disaster recovery & reserves for future storms

42

Bond Financing

C-PACE bonds:

• Provides states & municipalities with financing for CE building projects
• Bonds are repaid by property assessments added to building owners’

property taxes.

43

Clean Energy Finance Institutions

NJ Energy Resilience Bank:

• First-in-the-nation Energy Resilience Bank (ERB).
• Designed to address a repeat of the devastating impacts of SuperStorm Sandy:

$200 million of CDBG-DR funds for municipalities to finance clean resilient power solutions.

• For critical public facilities, initially clean water/ wastewater treatment facilities
• Other critical facilities: public housing, schools used as emergency shelters,

hospitals, emergency response facilities, etc.

• Jointly managed by NJ BPU and NJ EDA
• Direct loans and grants, but can also

provide credit enhancement for bond issuances, etc. A model other states should evaluate for possible replication.

44

Credit Enhancement

• Risk reduction methods that improve credit worthiness
• f a projects/ companies, reduce cost of borrowing.
• Guarantees, pledge of additional collateral, cash

reserve accounts, subordinated debt

• SBC funds used as credit enhancement
• Hawaii Green Infrastructure Loan Program
• U.S. DOE Loan Guaranty Program
• $4 billion in loan guarantees to support innovative

CE/EE projects

• 5 eligible technology areas, the first of these grid

integration & storage (microgrid, resilient power)

• Opportunity to aggregate projects statewide and

regionally.

45

Credit Enhancement

• New framework for CE

investment being built by states providing credit enhancement

• “Reduce Risk, Increase Clean

Energy”

• States are playing an important

transitional role to a time when CE securities are a readily traded asset class

• By reducing risk for investors,

states are also reducing the cost of financing and securing long term fixed rate capital for CE

• www.cleanegroup.org

46

Public & Private Ownership Structures

• Over the past decade, companies such as SolarCity transformed

residential solar PV by providing lease financing.

• Third-party ownership is largely responsible for tremendous growth

in residential solar in recent years. – Can lease financing (3rd party ownership) accomplish for energy storage what it did for residential solar PV?

47

Third-Party Ownership

• Solar Grid Storage & other storage developers are proving the model out for

commercial, government & nonprofit entities.

• Eliminates upfront costs to host
• Transfers development & performance risk to the private developer.
• These companies’ business models have benefited greatly from new FERC

rules:

• Owners of solar + storage systems can receive additional revenue streams

from providing ancillary grid services:

– E.g., demand response, frequency regulation services – ISOs need to pay sellers for frequency regulation-related performance payments for faster, more accurate response to dispatch signals

• These new business models can make it much easier for customers to include

storage using third party leasing and PPA financing.

48

Utility-owned & financed microgrids with resilient power

 Vermont Solar + Storage Resilient Power Microgrid  One of the first US exclusively solar-powered microgrids  First to provide full back-up power to an emergency shelter on the distribution network, first solar+storage microgrid developed on a landfill/brownfield site.  Project supported with funding from federal-state-NGO partnership – remaining financing was rate-based.  Incorporates 7,722 solar panels, capable of generating 2.5 MW of electricity  Incorporates 4 MW of battery storage, both lithium ion and lead acid, to integrate the solar generation into the local grid  Will provide resilient power to a Rutland school that serves as an emergency shelter (additional critical facilities may be similarly supported by this microgrid in the future)

49

Results

• Connecticut Department of Energy and

Environmental Protection (DEEP): $48 Million Microgrid Grant and Loan Pilot Program

• New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (BPU): $200

Million Energy Resilience Bank and $10 Million Energy Storage Program

• Massachusetts Department of Energy Resources

(DOER): $40 Million Community Clean Energy Resiliency Initiative

• New York State Energy Research and Development

Authority (NYSERDA): $40 Million NY Prize microgrids competition and $66 million CHP program

• Maryland Energy Administration Microgrids RFP:

Coming This Fall

TOTAL: >$400 Million in new state funds in the Northeast alone

50

Massachusetts DOER Community Clean Energy Resiliency Initiative

• $40 million state incentive
• $ coming from ACP payments
• Focus on critical infrastructure
• Municipal-led projects
• Technology agnostic
• Includes Technical Assistance

Fund

* MassCEC pursuing additional resilient power projects See www.mass.gov

51

Massachusetts DOER Community Clean Energy Resiliency Initiative

Round 1 Results

52

Conclusion

• Financing is just one key public resource that is

needed to accelerate the deployment of resilient power for critical facilities and infrastructure.

• Technical assistance
• Targeted support for pre-development costs
• Consistent, supportive policy

53

Resources

• usgbc.org
• cleanegroup.org
• cesa.org
• cebfi.org
• resilient-power.org

54

Contact Information

• Jason Hartke
• Email: jhartke@usgbc.org
• Robert Sanders
• Email: Rsanders@cleanegroup.org

55