different cuts to present
play

Different cuts to present Josh Albert Notable Points about 07a MC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Different cuts to present Josh Albert Notable Points about 07a MC The cut on outer detector hits has been changed from nhitac<10 to nhitac<16, this is to bring it in line with SK-III standards. Changing the nhitac cut has


  1. Different cuts to present Josh Albert

  2. Notable Points about 07a MC • The cut on outer detector hits has been changed from nhitac<10 to nhitac<16, this is to bring it in line with SK-III standards. • Changing the nhitac cut has virtually no effect on sensitivity • Mine-san made a new version of POLfit to reduce backgrounds with minimal loss of signal. • All sensitivity plots are for 90% one sided confidence level, ν e from solar oscillation is counted as background

  3. Old POLfit exposure plots !"#$%&$'()*+$,-+.$+-.(/-0 !"#$%&$'()*+$,-+.$+-.(/-0 !"#$%&$'()*$+,-./$/01,203 !"#$%&$'()*$+,-./$/01,203 90% CL 750 kW beam vs. time 90% CL 10 7 s beam vs. power 9 @ ?:',-.*,=@$1++(+$A+*@,=(< "B$':'$9 ! '=0-0 $'-<'=,=/=,: $+05+()(2()A 9#B$':'$9 ! '=0-0 ! 9 9# 7#B$':'$9 ! '=0-0 ! @ @" 9> @B ! ! CA+)01.)(4$D//,/$E/.4)(,5 $7$ $<$ 7 < '=< +(5 ! 7 9# 5,$+A+$@ ! +(303 B"#$+A+$@ ! +(303 >"#$+A+$@ ! +(303 ! > ! < 9# @" ! 9 < 9# @" 9 @ @" 7 123('4+-56778"%,$2$9:-*+; 8,'0/$9:;6$'()*$9<<=>:)$?$@" $+04,53+6 10% systematic 5 yr limit: sin 2 2 θ 13 =0.0067 30% systematic 100kW limit: sin 2 2 θ 13 =0.063

  4. Old POLfit sensitivity plots ,-.!/0! ,-.!/0! !"#$%&'&(&') !"#$%&'&(&') ,-.!/0! ,-.!/0! !"#$%&'&(&') !"#$%&'&(&') ! ! ! ! 90% CL 750 kW 5 years beam 90% CL 750 kW 5 years beam ! * *- *+ *+ *+ *+ 6 ")%'#57'&8!9::;:!<:78'&;$ ")%'#78'&2!9::;:!<:82'&;$ 5 =.!%)%!* ! %&>#> 5.!%)%!* ! %&=#= *-.!%)%!* ! %&>#> *-.!%)%!* ! %&=#= ! 1 *- 4 1-.!%)%!* ! %&>#> 1-.!%)%!* ! %&=#= 2 1 !3#4 23 *+ " + 1 !5 " ! + *- 1 * ! 6 - *- ! + ! + ! 1 ! * ! 1 ! * *- *- *- *- *- *- * * 1 1 %&$ !1! !%#$%&'&(&') %&$ !1! !%#$%&'&(&') ! ! *+ *+ 10% systematic 5 yr limit: sin 2 2 θ 13 =0.0067

  5. New POLfit exposure plots !"#$%&$'()*+$,-+.$+-.(/-0 !"#$%&$'()*+$,-+.$+-.(/-0 !"#$%&$'()*$+,-./$/01,203 !"#$%&$'()*$+,-./$/01,203 90% CL 750 kW beam vs. time 90% CL 10 7 s beam vs. power 9 @ ?:',-.*,=@$1++(+$A+*@,=(< "B$':'$9 ! '=0-0 $'-<'=,=/=,: $+05+()(2()A 9#B$':'$9 ! '=0-0 ! 9 9# 7#B$':'$9 ! '=0-0 ! @ @" 9> @B ! ! CA+)01.)(4$D//,/$E/.4)(,5 $7$ $<$ 7 < '=< +(5 ! 7 9# 5,$+A+$@ ! +(303 B"#$+A+$@ ! +(303 >"#$+A+$@ ! +(303 ! > ! < 9# @" ! 9 < 9# @" 9 @ @" 7 123('4+-56778"%,$2$9:-*+; 8,'0/$9:;6$'()*$9<<=>:)$?$@" $+04,53+6 10% systematic 5 yr limit: sin 2 2 θ 13 =0.0062 30% systematic 100kW limit: sin 2 2 θ 13 =0.062

  6. New POLfit sensitivity plots ,-.!/0! ,-.!/0! !"#$%&'&(&') !"#$%&'&(&') ,-.!/0! ,-.!/0! !"#$%&'&(&') !"#$%&'&(&') ! ! ! ! 90% CL 750 kW 5 years beam 90% CL 750 kW 5 years beam ! * *- *+ *+ *+ *+ 6 ")%'#57'&8!9::;:!<:78'&;$ ")%'#78'&2!9::;:!<:82'&;$ 5 =.!%)%!* ! %&>#> 5.!%)%!* ! %&=#= *-.!%)%!* ! %&>#> *-.!%)%!* ! %&=#= ! 1 *- 4 1-.!%)%!* ! %&>#> 1-.!%)%!* ! %&=#= 2 1 !3#4 23 *+ " + 1 !5 " ! + *- 1 * ! 6 - *- ! + ! + ! 1 ! * ! 1 ! * *- *- *- *- *- *- * * 1 1 %&$ !1! !%#$%&'&(&') %&$ !1! !%#$%&'&(&') ! ! *+ *+ 10% systematic 5 yr limit: sin 2 2 θ 13 =0.0062

  7. Table of cuts with new POLfit New POLfit ν µ + ν µ Background ν e Signal total 11074.53 172% 349.6 161% 489.5 153% truefid 7182.3 111% 226.7 104% 316.2 99% recfid 6456.0 100% 217.8 100.0% 319.8 100% nhitac 5679.0 213.0 314.5 88.0% 97.8% 98.3% evis 3398.5 185.2 304.9 52.6% 85.0% 95.3% onering 1582.6 24.5% 102.4 47.0% 266.4 83.3% elike 212.4 3.29% 99.42 45.65% 262.0 81.93% nomuedcy 161.4 2.50% 84.10 38.62% 242.6 75.86% cosine 98.93 42.95 212.9 1.53% 19.72% 66.55% pi0mass 28.24 32.43 199.4 0.44% 14.89% 62.34% pi0like 21.70 0.34% 30.79 14.14% 194.0 60.64% recnuE 10.14 0.16% 15.63 7.18% 149.1 46.61% *Histograms showing each cut can be found in the backup slides

  8. K2K-style cuts. • remove cosine cut • remove pi0 likelihood cut • make pi0mass cut p dependant: • pi0mass increases linearly from 50 to 100 for momentum between 0 and 300 MeV. • For p>300 MeV, the cut is simply pi0mass<100.

  9. K2K-style cut on signal POLfit π 0 mass vs. momentum 0 0 mass vs p mass vs p ! ! 300 mass (MeV) 10 10 250 Cut 0 ! 200 1 1 150 100 Keep 10 10 50 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 p (MeV)

  10. K2K-style cut on background POLfit π 0 mass vs. momentum 0 0 mass vs p mass vs p ! ! 300 mass (MeV) 2 2 10 10 250 Cut 0 ! 200 10 10 150 100 1 1 Keep 50 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 p (MeV)

  11. K2K style exposure plots !"#$%&$'()*+$,-+.$+-.(/-0 !"#$%&$'()*+$,-+.$+-.(/-0 !"#$%&$'()*$+,-./$/01,203 !"#$%&$'()*$+,-./$/01,203 90% CL 750 kW beam vs. time 90% CL 10 7 s beam vs. power 9 @ ?:',-.*,=@$1++(+$A+*@,=(< "B$':'$9 ! '=0-0 $'-<'=,=/=,: $+05+()(2()A 9#B$':'$9 ! '=0-0 ! 9 9# 7#B$':'$9 ! '=0-0 ! @ @" 9> @B ! ! CA+)01.)(4$D//,/$E/.4)(,5 $7$ $<$ 7 < '=< +(5 ! 7 9# 5,$+A+$@ ! +(303 B"#$+A+$@ ! +(303 >"#$+A+$@ ! +(303 ! > ! < 9# @" ! 9 < 9# @" 9 @ @" 7 123('4+-56778"%,$2$9:-*+; 8,'0/$9:;6$'()*$9<<=>:)$?$@" $+04,53+6 10% systematic 5 yr limit: sin 2 2 θ 13 =0.0061 30% systematic 100kW limit: sin 2 2 θ 13 =0.058

  12. K2K style sensitivity plots ,-.!/0! ,-.!/0! !"#$%&'&(&') !"#$%&'&(&') ,-.!/0! ,-.!/0! !"#$%&'&(&') !"#$%&'&(&') ! ! ! ! 90% CL 750 kW 5 years beam 90% CL 750 kW 5 years beam ! * *- *+ *+ *+ *+ 6 ")%'#57'&8!9::;:!<:78'&;$ ")%'#78'&2!9::;:!<:82'&;$ 5 =.!%)%!* ! %&>#> 5.!%)%!* ! %&=#= *-.!%)%!* ! %&>#> *-.!%)%!* ! %&=#= ! 1 *- 4 1-.!%)%!* ! %&>#> 1-.!%)%!* ! %&=#= 2 1 !3#4 23 *+ " + 1 !5 " ! + *- 1 * ! 6 - *- ! + ! + ! 1 ! * ! 1 ! * *- *- *- *- *- *- * * 1 1 %&$ !1! !%#$%&'&(&') %&$ !1! !%#$%&'&(&') ! ! *+ *+ 10% systematic 5 yr limit: sin 2 2 θ 13 =0.0060

  13. Comparison of all Cut setups Std Cuts (Old POLfit) Std Cuts (New POLfit) K2K Style Background Signal Background Signal Background Signal 154% 155% 154% 155% 154% 155% 11424.2 489.5 11424.2 489.5 11424.2 489.5 total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 7409.0 316.2 7409.0 316.2 7409.0 316.2 truefid 6673.8 90% 319.8 101.2% 6673.8 90% 319.8 101.2% 6673.8 90% 319.8 101.2% recfid 79.5% 99.5% 79.5% 99.5% 79.5% 99.5% 5892.0 314.5 5892.0 314.5 5892.0 314.5 nhitac 48.4% 96.4% 48.4% 96.4% 48.4% 96.4% 3583.7 304.9 3583.7 304.9 3583.7 304.9 evis 22.7% 84.3% 22.7% 84.3% 22.7% 84.3% 1685.0 266.4 1685.0 266.4 1685 266.4 onering 311.8 4.21% 262.0 82.9% 311.8 4.21% 262.0 82.9% 311.8 4.21% 262.0 82.9% elike 3.31% 76.7% 3.31% 76.7% 3.31% 76.7% 245.5 242.6 245.5 242.6 245.5 242.6 nomuedcy 1.92% 67.3% 1.92% 67.3% --- --- 141.9 212.9 141.9 212.9 --- --- cosine 1.10% 63.1% 0.82% 60.6% 1.19% 67.6% 81.3 199.4 60.7 191.6 88.1 213.6 pi0mass 71.4 0.96% 194.0 61.3% 52.5 0.71% 185.9 58.8% --- --- --- --- pi0like 0.45% 47.2% 0.35% 45.2% 0.48% 51.6% 33.2 149.1 25.8 142.8 35.4 163.2 recnuE S 25.86 28.14 27.41 √ B sin 2 2 θ 13 limit for 0.0067/ 0.0062/ 0.0061/ 5 yrs 10 7 s 750kW 100kW 0.063 0.062 0.058 10% sys 30% sys • All differences are in the last 4 rows. • The new POLfit improves the ratio noticeably. S √ B

  14. Backup slides • Comparision of old polfit with nhitac<10 vs. nhitac<16 • Sensitivity slides in order for easy flipping • Comparison tables of all cut values • Variation on 2-D cut histograms • Standard cut definitions and parameters • New POLfit cut histograms

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend